Sorry for the title...I don't know how to really express it. Anyway, I have a simple flex box page that has little content. The issue is in tablet, if I touch-move the screen, the content moves. It shows no horizontal scroll and I see no empty gaps. Since there is no extra content to show horizontally, I don't want it to move horizontally at all.
Screens follow:
The page on load fully shown
Tho content is small, I can move the div and hide it to the left and pull it back again.
What I expect is the element not to move around since there is no content to move around.
My display is outright from this except no header/footer. For convenience:
CSS:
*, *:before, *:after
{
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
html, body
{
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
left: 0 !important;
top: 0 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
padding: 0 !important;
}
body
{
background: #444444;
color: #cccccc;
font-size: 14px;
/* Helvetica/Arial-based sans serif stack */
font-family: Frutiger, "Frutiger Linotype", Univers, Calibri, "Gill Sans", "Gill Sans MT", "Myriad Pro", Myriad, "DejaVu Sans Condensed", "Liberation Sans", "Nimbus Sans L", Tahoma, Geneva, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
}
.flexbox-parent
{
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: flex-start; /* align items in Main Axis */
align-items: stretch; /* align items in Cross Axis */
align-content: stretch; /* Extra space in Cross Axis */
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, .1);
}
.flexbox-item
{
padding: 0px;
}
.flexbox-item-grow
{
flex: 1; /* same as flex: 1 1 auto; */
}
.flexbox-item.content
{
background: rgba(0, 0, 255, .1);
}
.fill-area
{
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
justify-content: flex-start; /* align items in Main Axis */
align-items: stretch; /* align items in Cross Axis */
align-content: stretch; /* Extra space in Cross Axis */
}
.fill-area-content
{
background: rgba(0, 0, 0, .3);
border: 1px solid #000000;
/* Needed for when the area gets squished too far and there is content that can't be displayed */
overflow: auto;
}
HTML:
<div class="flexbox-parent">
<div class="flexbox-item fill-area content flexbox-item-grow">
<div class="fill-area-content flexbox-item-grow">
Content
<br /><br />
Emulates height 100% with a horizontal flexbox with stretch
<br /><br />
Content continues
</div>
</div>
</div>
Related
I am facing difficulty in stretching a SVG in the X-axis, so that there is no white space visible on either side. Also, I want the point (marked in red circle in the attached picture) to touch the starting of the second div with background color of black. I have tried changing the viewbox values, but I am not able to achieve the desired result.
The below is my code.
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
html {
font-size: 62.5%
}
body {
font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Open Sans', 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;
}
.example {
width: 100%;
height: 100vh;
}
svg {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.section-two {
width: 100%;
height: 100vh;
background-color: black;
}
<div class="example">
<svg viewbox="0 0 3000 1750">
<path d="M2987.34,2.895l-2984.74,-0l0,1224.16l671.731,426.733l2313,-426.733l0,-1224.16Z" style="fill:#f8be46;"/>
</svg>
</div>
<div class="section-two">
</div>
enter image description here
For that to happen, you need to do two things:
Make sure that your viewBox is correct. It needs to match the dimensions of your <path>. It currently doesn't.
Add the following attribute to your SVG to turn off the automatic aspect-ratio-preserving scaling that SVG does.
preserveAspectRatio="none"
If we check the bounding box of your path, we get the values:
x: 2.600
y: 2.895
width: 2984.740
height: 1650.893
So that is what your viewBox needs to be set to, if you want the path to touch all four sides of the SVG's parent container.
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
html {
font-size: 62.5%
}
body {
font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Open Sans', 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;
}
.example {
width: 100%;
height: 100vh;
}
svg {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.section-two {
width: 100%;
height: 100vh;
background-color: black;
}
<div class="example">
<svg viewbox="2.6 2.9 2984.7 1650.9" preserveAspectRatio="none">
<path d="M2987.34,2.895l-2984.74,-0l0,1224.16l671.731,426.733l2313,-426.733l0,-1224.16Z" style="fill:#f8be46;"/>
</svg>
</div>
<div class="section-two">
</div>
The following code works well on Chrome, but on Edge the Sticky element is out of place
.main {
display: flex;
max-width: 1200px;
width: 100%;
flex-flow: row nowrap;
margin: auto;
text-align: center;
font-size: 30px;
}
.sticky {
width: 300px;
max-height: 715px;
position: sticky;
top: 10px;
padding: 15px;
margin: 20px 30px 0 0;
box-shadow: 0px 5px 25px 0px rgba(41,128,185,0.15);
background: yellow;
}
.content {
height: 1600px;
flex: 1 1;
background: red;
}
<body dir="rtl">
<main class="main">
<div class="content">Scrollable content here</div>
<div class="sticky">Sticky content here</div>
</main>
</body>
Result in Edge:
I noticed that if I remove the box-shadow from the sticky component or the dir=rtl from the body. It all works as expected.
It appears to be a bug in Edge, and after one resize the window in e.g. jsFiddle, it corrects itself.
What Edge also does, with dir="trl" set on the body, it render the scrollbar on the left side of the viewport, which e.g. neither Chrome nor Firefox does.
A workaround could be to instead of swap position with dir=rtl on the body, use Flexbox's own order property, and then set the direction on the inner elements to control the flow.
Fiddle demo
Stack snippet
.main {
display: flex;
max-width: 1200px;
/*width: 100%; default /*
/*flex-flow: row nowrap; default */
margin: auto;
text-align: center;
font-size: 30px;
}
.sticky {
width: 300px;
max-height: 715px;
position: sticky;
top: 10px;
padding: 15px;
margin: 20px 30px 0 0;
box-shadow: 0px 5px 25px 0px rgba(41,128,185,0.15);
background: yellow;
}
.content {
height: 1600px;
flex: 1 1;
background: red;
order: 1; /* added, move last */
}
<body>
<main class="main">
<div class="content">Scrollable content here</div>
<div class="sticky">Sticky content here</div>
</main>
</body>
Updated based on a comment.
After some more testing and research, trying to move the box-shadow, which obviously cause this issue, to an inner element such a pseudo, still offset the .sticky element.
So two simple solutions, so dir="rtl" can be kept on the body, is to either, using a pseudo, use an image to create the shadow, or, as in below sample, use the filter property.
Here I used a CSS trick to apply it only on Edge, but it can fully replace the box-shadow, and which way to go is more about how old browsers one need to support.
Fiddle demo 2
Stack snippet 2
.main {
display: flex;
max-width: 1200px;
width: 100%;
flex-flow: row nowrap;
margin: auto;
text-align: center;
font-size: 30px;
}
.sticky {
width: 300px;
max-height: 715px;
position: sticky;
top: 10px;
padding: 15px;
margin: 20px 30px 0 0;
box-shadow: 0px 5px 25px 0px rgba(41,128,185,0.15);
background: yellow;
}
/* CSS to target Edge only */
#supports (-ms-ime-align: auto) {
.sticky {
box-shadow: none;
filter: drop-shadow( -5px -5px 15px rgba(41,128,185,0.15) );
}
}
.content {
height: 1600px;
flex: 1 1;
background: red;
}
<body dir="rtl">
<main class="main">
<div class="content">Scrollable content here</div>
<div class="sticky">Sticky content here</div>
</main>
</body>
I am trying to mimic the WinJS grouped list view using flexbox. I am getting close (I think) except that the columns overlap when resizing.
http://jsfiddle.net/w8ts4Lnx/5/
I want the items to stay inside the group and let the group grow horizontally.
body {
height: 100%;
display: flex;
flex-flow: column wrap;
}
h1 {
padding: 1em;
}
#content {
padding: 10px;
background-color: #eee;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row nowrap;
flex-grow: 1;
}
#content > .group {
margin: 10px;
padding: 10px;
border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;
background-color: #ddd;
display: flex;
flex-flow: column wrap;
max-height: 600px;
}
#content > .group .item {
margin: 10px;
padding: 10px;
background-color: #aaa;
width: 200px;
}
Any ideas what I'm missing?
If you don't want your content to overflow the container you must specify flex-shrink: 0;
flex-shrink source
This 'number' component sets flex-shrink longhand and specifies the flex shrink factor, which determines how much the flex item will shrink relative to the rest of the flex items in the flex container when negative free space is distributed. When omitted, it is set to 1. The flex shrink factor is multiplied by the flex basis when distributing negative space.
Im not sure what winJS behavior you're trying to mimic since i've never used winJS, however I think this is closer to the proper behavior you're looking to achieve: http://jsfiddle.net/w8ts4Lnx/11/
The columns overlap because the contents doesn't fit. The Items don't fit in the group, so they flow-over.
To solve this you have to specify an overflow-strategy for the group-div, with "overflow" like this (the last one):
#content > .group {
margin: 10px;
padding: 10px;
border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;
background-color: #ddd;
display: flex;
flex-flow: column wrap;
max-height: 600px;
overflow: hidden;
}
The default is visible which make them fall outside. Read more here: http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/pr_pos_overflow.asp
There are other options than hidden. You can set vertical/horizontal scroll, or both. Just choose whatever gets you closer to that desired "WinJS grouped list view". Try:
overflow-x: scroll;
overflow-y: auto;
or
overflow-y: auto;
overflow-x: scroll;
Happy coding!
I faced a similar issue and in my case the fix was removing the height setting on the container styling. This allowed the container size to grow with the changing browser heights.
"let the group grow horizontally"- You have to use the flex-direction as "row" on the .group, and you have to wrap the groups inside the #content, then it won't overlap anymore..
http://jsfiddle.net/gafcvq9b/2/
#content {
padding: 10px;
background-color: #eee;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
flex-grow: 1;
}
#content > .group {
margin: 10px;
padding: 10px;
border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;
background-color: #ddd;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
max-height: 600px;
}
I think it would be best not to set width since you want flexbox to dynamically determine it. so I removed it and then I added flex grow to increase the first group.
http://jsfiddle.net/mspriyakk/vv3tfrtv/3/
#content > .group:nth-of-type(1) {
flex-grow: 2;
}
#content > .group .item {
margin: 10px;
padding: 10px;
background-color: #aaa;
}
This is the correct answer that's fixes overlapping columns:
.flex-container {
display: flex;
flex-flow: column;
}
.flex-item {
flex: 1 0 auto;
}
It might be a little late, but I made a codepen, where I was working with this problem, maybe it will help to the people reading this question.
html
<body>
<div class="test-container">
<div class="item item1">
item1
</div>
<div class="item item2">
item2
</div>
<div class="item item3">
item3
</div>
</div>
</body>
css (scss)
.test-container {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
height: 100%;
width: 50%;
background-color: red;
padding-left: 2rem;
.item {
opacity: 0.6;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
flex-basis: 100px;
margin-left: -2rem;
}
.item1 {
background-color: cyan;
z-index: 10;
}
.item2 {
background-color: blue;
color: red;
z-index: 20;
}
.item3 {
background-color: black;
z-index: 30;
color: white;
}
}
https://codepen.io/Garma/pen/ZZmNWg?editors=1100
Cheers
I have an OUTER div with two inner divs:
one of them is VERTICAL SIDEBAR whose content is fairly short
second one is div with MAIN PAGE whose content varies
They are both set to float: left, so they are next to each other.
I already learned that when setting height or min-height in percentage, all the parents need to have their height specified also.
I would like them both to be stretched to the end of the page. Havent managed to do that, problems begin when MAIN PAGE div is longer than monitor height( so there needs to be scrollbar), then I usually end with that nasty scrollbar inside MAIN PAGE div or I end with the SIDEBAR div being too short.
ok you should set the Outer divs css like so
.outer{
position:absolute;
top:0;
bottom:0;
left:0;
right:0;
overflow:auto;
}
This will set the outer div to completely fill the window, with a side bar to scroll the length of the rest of the page. You would only have one main side scrollbar.
Now if you want the sidebar to just fill the page. set its css like so:
.sideBar{
position:absolute //can be relative if necesary.
top:0;
bottom:0;
overflow:none;
}
Now this sets the sidebar to the exact height of the outer div. so it will span the entire page and the overflow is set to none to ensure no scrollbar.
Now the outer div's and sidebar div's height should be dictated by the main div, and you should only have one clean scroll bar.
You could do something like this:
jsFiddle
Setting display: table-cell on both div's inside the outer div with display: table-row will ensure they are always the same height, you'll have to set display: table on body for this to work, or you could just set it directly on the outer div instead of table-row. That will work just fine. This approach should work on anything better than IE7.
CSS:
html {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0px;
top:0px;
left: 0px;
right: 0px;
overflow: scroll-x;
}
body {
height: 100%;
padding: 0px;
margin: 0px;
display: table;
}
.outer {
display: table-row;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
.sidebar, .mainpage {
display: table-cell;
height: 100%;
}
.sidebar {
width: 200px;
background-color: #EFEFEF;
}
HTML
<div class="outer">
<div class="sidebar">sidebar</div>
<div class="mainpage">mainpage</div>
</div>
After seeing your site, this is the fix:
.Page {
width: 970px;
min-height: 100%;
width: 100%;
display: table;
}
.Sidebar {
width: 257px;
background: url(img/sidebar-bg.png) repeat-y;
margin-left: 23px;
background: white;
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: top;
}
.Sidebar-Nav {
padding-left: 15px;
}
.Content {
background: url(img/content-bg.png) repeat;
margin-left: 10px;
width: 680px;
float: left;
background: white;
display: table-cell;
padding: 10px;
}
EDIT: I forgot the .Page styles, I added it.
EDIT: Also, if you want to center it, then use this:
html, body {
height: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
padding: 0px;
margin: 0px;
}
body {
padding: 0px;
margin: 0px;
line-height: 21px;
background: url(img/bg-page-01.jpg) no-repeat;
background-position: 50% 0%;
}
.Page {
height: 100%;
display: table;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.Sidebar {
width: 257px;
height: 100%;
background: url(img/sidebar-bg.png) repeat-y;
background: white;
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: top;
}
.Sidebar-Nav {
padding-left: 15px;
}
.Content {
height: 100%;
background: url(img/content-bg.png) repeat;
margin-left: 10px;
width: 680px;
float: left;
background: white;
display: table-cell;
padding: 10px;
}
If your talking about height issues here, then use this:
html, body {
height: 100%;
min-height: 100% /* for firefox */
}
#main, #sidebar {
height: 100%;
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
-o-box-sizing: border-box;
-ms-box-sizing: border-box;
-khtml-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box; /* eliminates increased height due to padding & child margins */
}
#sidebar { background: blue; width: 200px; float:left; margin: 0; }
#main { background: green; width: 960px; margin: 0 0 0 200px; }
edit: fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/jTwqe/
I'm not really sure what your issue is, but is an alternate solution.
.outer { display: table; }
.sidebar, .main { display: table-cell; padding: 10px; }
.sidebar { background: green; }
.main { background: blue; }
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/Q5CmR/
Could someone explain me what's going on with this small piece of HTML ?
http://jsbin.com/akome5
On most of current browsers (FF4, Chrome10, IE9, IE8, Opera 11), the layout of the element looks like this :
Meh?! I don't understand why ?!
Why aren't the height and width as big as the visible box (orange+red spaces) ?
Adding a "display:inline-block;" to the element doesn't seems to really fix it.
How can I fix it ?
Thx!!
Setting a width and height on an A tag
Try adding the following styles.
a.button {
display: block;
float: left;
overflow: auto;
}
a.button span {
display: block;
float: left;
}
I'd propose a different approach involving no spans
html:
<a class="button2" href="#">Text Text Text</a>
css:
/* Button 2 */
.button2 {
background-color:red;
border:solid 10px orange;
border-top:0;
border-bottom:0;
display:inline-block;
color:#fff;
font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
font-size:11px;
font-weight:bold;
line-height:30px;
text-decoration:none;
padding:0 3px;
}
old (top) new (bottom)
http://jsfiddle.net/pxfunc/vr7gJ/
For information I manage to do it without float:left, here is the whole CSS :
a.button{
display: inline-block; /* <- added */
text-decoration: none;
}
a.button span{
display: inline-block;
font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
font-size: 11px;
font-weight: bold;
height: 30px;
line-height: 30px; /* <- added */
text-decoration: none;
}
a.button .left, a.button .right{
background-color: orange;
width: 10px;
}
a.button .text{
background-color: red;
color: white;
}
The line-height instruction was the key.