This started happening recently. The CPU usage is <5% when idle, but as soon as I start typing goes to 100%. I tried many of the proposed speed ups I found on other questions but none worked. My question is: what is the best way to know what is taking up so many CPU resources? Is there a way to know which plugin is using those resources? Is there a log one can look into?
Couldn't find a solution to this. Reinstalling Android Studio without using the previous configuration solved the problem.
Related
Is there any way to work in collaboration in Android Studio or IntelliJ?
Yes, I know about Git, but that requires pushing and pulling which is time consuming if you want to edit very small things (a single line).
Something real time would be great.
I took a look at Floobits, just not sure if we're willing to pay for something I have no idea about.
I could see that some editors like Visual Studio Code and Atom have some real-time editing solutions, but that makes running the code a bit harder.
Can someone tell me any way to achieve this?
After this huge mess from one AndroidStudio update, am cleaning everything and starting from scratch.
I'd like to ask if anyone knows if I should go with specific versions of Java.
But first my headache, although I just cleaned my computer of AndroidStudio.
I have Win 10 64 bit
HAD AndroidStudio 1.51 (it said it was JRE:1.7.0_79-b15 amd64)
After the update I had a "Unsupported major.minor version 52.0" error
Following some posts I upgraded the Java on my machine.
First "1.8.0_74" but AndroidStudio couldn't find the JDK directory, so I installed "1.8.0_73" and AndroidStudio found the JDK directory. But then I started getting rendering errors but with Rendering Problems Exception raised during
rendering: com.android.ide.common.rendering.api.LayoutlibCallback.getXmlFileParser(Ljava/lang/String;)Lorg/xmlpull/v1/XmlPullParser;
Anyway, that's it. This has become such a tragedy that I would rather start from scratch, but if anyone could point me as to the proper (steps) of which way I should go, I would really appreciate it.
Thanks ahead,
Sergio
I met this issue when I updated the api android 23 N (preview). In xml editor, change the Api to render into Api 23 android 6.0 and Autimatically Pick best.This would solve the problem.
refer: link
Yes.. i also faced same problem,I have resolved with changing the version to api 23.generally it will take best/latest version ,in my case its set to N preview.
So I'm pretty sure this question will get closed, but I just want to see if anyone else is experiencing this issue. I'm trying to migrate over to Android Studio, as it just came out of beta and Google announced that they essentially won't be supporting ADT for Eclipse from now on. So far, I'm noticing that the application as a whole is extremely slow and bordering on unresponsive. With every click, I have to deal with extreme latency, which is really making this tool hard to use. After doing a quick check, I've noticed that this one application is using nearly 1GB of memory and I haven't even begun to migrate my project to it! Is anyone else experiencing something like this and does anyone have an idea of what I can do to speed this up? If this doesn't improve then I'll be forced to stop migrating and continue using the Eclipse ADT until something has been done. I'm running Windows 7x64
Did you notice if the IDE is stuck doing something by looking at bottom right status?
Make sure you are using bundled Gradle, also Do you have have many dependencies? You might want to check if its getting stuck because it is constantly looking for those dependencies.
After upgrading to R# v6 I am unpleasantly surprised to see that the memory usage for the same application is using almost three (3) times what it did with v5.x, and is painfully slow. Not sure I would upgrade again if I had known this before hand.
Is this a known issue? Has anyone noticing the same jump been able to successfully tweak this?
Cheers,
Berryl
We're receiving mixed reports on memory and performance consumption in v6. In some cases, users call the new version a massive improvement over previous versions, other times they report increased memory consumption and lags in certain scenarios. This is pretty much the same story with every new version.
There are several known issues related to processing classic ASP files and in general processing source file on solution load. Both have been addressed lately and will be fixed in ReSharper 6.1 that is coming out later this Fall.
I suggest that you do the following:
Try to clean ReSharper caches by deleting YourSolutionName.suo and *_ReSharper.YourSolutionName* folder - this helps sometimes.
Downgrade to ReSharper 5.1.3 for the time being. This version is available via ReSharper archive.
As soon as ReSharper 6.1 comes out, install it to see if it's any better.
If it's no better, profile ReSharper and send the profile to us for investigation.
An alternative would be to profile 6.0 right away as there's a chance that your issue is something we've not yet investigated during 6.1 development.
i am new in using the Visual Leak Detector, after creating the settings as per the documentations for Visual C++ 6, and running the program in the debug mode
the error
"The application has failed to start because vld_x86.dll was not found.Re-installing the application may fix this problem"
i have reinstalled and included the path for the dll in the VC6 settings.
thanks in advance for the help.
After searching for the answer myself for quite a long time, two things finally corrected the problem for me. First, if you haven't already restarted Visual Studio after including these new files and libraries, then you should do so. Second, when I went to look into my computer to see what was added to my path in environment variables, it had add the win64. and I run win32. Hope that was descriptive enough and helps.
the include is correct and needed as far as i know.
i was having the same problem and could solve it by copying all files in vld's "bin" directory into the same folder as the executable i wanted to check for leaks.
not a very elegant way but working, i hope it works for you aswell!