Related
I have this model in pytorch that I have been using for sequence classification.
class RoBERT_Model(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, hidden_size = 100):
self.hidden_size = hidden_size
super(RoBERT_Model, self).__init__()
self.lstm = nn.LSTM(768, hidden_size, num_layers=1, bidirectional=False)
self.out = nn.Linear(hidden_size, 2)
def forward(self, grouped_pooled_outs):
# chunks_emb = pooled_out.split_with_sizes(lengt) # splits the input tensor into a list of tensors where the length of each sublist is determined by length
seq_lengths = torch.LongTensor([x for x in map(len, grouped_pooled_outs)]) # gets the length of each sublist in chunks_emb and returns it as an array
batch_emb_pad = nn.utils.rnn.pad_sequence(grouped_pooled_outs, padding_value=-91, batch_first=True) # pads each sublist in chunks_emb to the largest sublist with value -91
batch_emb = batch_emb_pad.transpose(0, 1) # (B,L,D) -> (L,B,D)
lstm_input = nn.utils.rnn.pack_padded_sequence(batch_emb, seq_lengths, batch_first=False, enforce_sorted=False) # seq_lengths.cpu().numpy()
packed_output, (h_t, h_c) = self.lstm(lstm_input, ) # (h_t, h_c))
# output, _ = nn.utils.rnn.pad_packed_sequence(packed_output, padding_value=-91)
h_t = h_t.view(-1, self.hidden_size) # (-1, 100)
return self.out(h_t) # logits
The issue that I am having is that I am not entirely convinced of what data is being passed to the final classification layer. I believe what is being done is that only the final LSTM cell in the last layer is being used for classification. That is there are hidden_size features that are passed to the feedforward layer.
I have depicted what I believe is going on in this figure here:
Is this understanding correct? Am I missing anything?
Thanks.
Your code is a basic LSTM for classification, working with a single rnn layer.
In your picture you have multiple LSTM layers, while, in reality, there is only one, H_n^0 in the picture.
Your input to LSTM is of shape (B, L, D) as correctly pointed out in the comment.
packed_output and h_c is not used at all, hence you can change this line to: _, (h_t, _) = self.lstm(lstm_input) in order no to clutter the picture further
h_t is output of last step for each batch element, in general (B, D * L, hidden_size). As this neural network is not bidirectional D=1, as you have a single layer L=1 as well, hence the output is of shape (B, 1, hidden_size).
This output is reshaped into nn.Linear compatible (this line: h_t = h_t.view(-1, self.hidden_size)) and will give you output of shape (B, hidden_size)
This input is fed to a single nn.Linear layer.
In general, the output of the last time step from RNN is used for each element in the batch, in your picture H_n^0 and simply fed to the classifier.
By the way, having self.out = nn.Linear(hidden_size, 2) in classification is probably counter-productive; most likely your are performing binary classification and self.out = nn.Linear(hidden_size, 1) with torch.nn.BCEWithLogitsLoss might be used. Single logit contains information whether the label should be 0 or 1; everything smaller than 0 is more likely to be 0 according to nn, everything above 0 is considered as a 1 label.
I am trying to reproduce a unet result on Carvana dataset using Ternausnet in PyTorch using Lightning.
I am using DiceLoss for that with sigmoid activation function. I think I am running into an issue of a vanishing gradient, because all gradients of weights are 0, and I see the output of the network with min value of order 10^8.
What could be the issue here? How can I address the vanishing gradient? Also, if I use a different criterion, I see a problem of loss going into negative values without stopping (for BCE with logits, for instance).
Here is the code for my Dice loss:
class DiceLoss(nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
def forward(self, logits, targets, eps=0, threshold=None):
# comment out if your model contains a sigmoid or
# equivalent activation layer
proba = torch.sigmoid(logits)
proba = proba.view(proba.shape[0], 1, -1)
targets = targets.view(targets.shape[0], 1, -1)
if threshold:
proba = (proba > threshold).float()
# flatten label and prediction tensors
intersection = torch.sum(proba * targets, dim=1)
summation = torch.sum(proba, dim=1) + torch.sum(targets, dim=1)
dice = (2.0 * intersection + eps) / (summation + eps)
# print(intersection, summation, dice)
return (1 - dice).mean()
I am trying to implement Bayesian CNN using Mc Dropout on Pytorch,
the main idea is that by applying dropout at test time and running over many forward passes , you get predictions from a variety of different models.
I’ve found an application of the Mc Dropout and I really did not get how they applied this method and how exactly they did choose the correct prediction from the list of predictions
here is the code
def mcdropout_test(model):
model.train()
test_loss = 0
correct = 0
T = 100
for data, target in test_loader:
if args.cuda:
data, target = data.cuda(), target.cuda()
data, target = Variable(data, volatile=True), Variable(target)
output_list = []
for i in xrange(T):
output_list.append(torch.unsqueeze(model(data), 0))
output_mean = torch.cat(output_list, 0).mean(0)
test_loss += F.nll_loss(F.log_softmax(output_mean), target, size_average=False).data[0] # sum up batch loss
pred = output_mean.data.max(1, keepdim=True)[1] # get the index of the max log-probability
correct += pred.eq(target.data.view_as(pred)).cpu().sum()
test_loss /= len(test_loader.dataset)
print('\nMC Dropout Test set: Average loss: {:.4f}, Accuracy: {}/{} ({:.2f}%)\n'.format(
test_loss, correct, len(test_loader.dataset),
100. * correct / len(test_loader.dataset)))
train()
mcdropout_test()
I have replaced
data, target = Variable(data, volatile=True), Variable(target)
by adding
with torch.no_grad(): at the beginning
And this is how I have defined my CNN
class Net(nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super(Net, self).__init__()
self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(3, 192, 5, padding=2)
self.pool = nn.MaxPool2d(2, 2)
self.conv2 = nn.Conv2d(192, 192, 5, padding=2)
self.fc1 = nn.Linear(192 * 8 * 8, 1024)
self.fc2 = nn.Linear(1024, 256)
self.fc3 = nn.Linear(256, 10)
self.dropout = nn.Dropout(p=0.3)
nn.init.xavier_uniform_(self.conv1.weight)
nn.init.constant_(self.conv1.bias, 0.0)
nn.init.xavier_uniform_(self.conv2.weight)
nn.init.constant_(self.conv2.bias, 0.0)
nn.init.xavier_uniform_(self.fc1.weight)
nn.init.constant_(self.fc1.bias, 0.0)
nn.init.xavier_uniform_(self.fc2.weight)
nn.init.constant_(self.fc2.bias, 0.0)
nn.init.xavier_uniform_(self.fc3.weight)
nn.init.constant_(self.fc3.bias, 0.0)
def forward(self, x):
x = self.pool(F.relu(self.dropout(self.conv1(x)))) # recommended to add the relu
x = self.pool(F.relu(self.dropout(self.conv2(x)))) # recommended to add the relu
x = x.view(-1, 192 * 8 * 8)
x = F.relu(self.fc1(x))
x = F.relu(self.fc2(self.dropout(x)))
x = self.fc3(self.dropout(x)) # no activation function needed for the last layer
return x
Can anyone help me to get the right implementation of the Monte Carlo Dropout method on CNN?
Implementing MC Dropout in Pytorch is easy. All that is needed to be done is to set the dropout layers of your model to train mode. This allows for different dropout masks to be used during the different various forward passes. Below is an implementation of MC Dropout in Pytorch illustrating how multiple predictions from the various forward passes are stacked together and used for computing different uncertainty metrics.
import sys
import numpy as np
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
def enable_dropout(model):
""" Function to enable the dropout layers during test-time """
for m in model.modules():
if m.__class__.__name__.startswith('Dropout'):
m.train()
def get_monte_carlo_predictions(data_loader,
forward_passes,
model,
n_classes,
n_samples):
""" Function to get the monte-carlo samples and uncertainty estimates
through multiple forward passes
Parameters
----------
data_loader : object
data loader object from the data loader module
forward_passes : int
number of monte-carlo samples/forward passes
model : object
keras model
n_classes : int
number of classes in the dataset
n_samples : int
number of samples in the test set
"""
dropout_predictions = np.empty((0, n_samples, n_classes))
softmax = nn.Softmax(dim=1)
for i in range(forward_passes):
predictions = np.empty((0, n_classes))
model.eval()
enable_dropout(model)
for i, (image, label) in enumerate(data_loader):
image = image.to(torch.device('cuda'))
with torch.no_grad():
output = model(image)
output = softmax(output) # shape (n_samples, n_classes)
predictions = np.vstack((predictions, output.cpu().numpy()))
dropout_predictions = np.vstack((dropout_predictions,
predictions[np.newaxis, :, :]))
# dropout predictions - shape (forward_passes, n_samples, n_classes)
# Calculating mean across multiple MCD forward passes
mean = np.mean(dropout_predictions, axis=0) # shape (n_samples, n_classes)
# Calculating variance across multiple MCD forward passes
variance = np.var(dropout_predictions, axis=0) # shape (n_samples, n_classes)
epsilon = sys.float_info.min
# Calculating entropy across multiple MCD forward passes
entropy = -np.sum(mean*np.log(mean + epsilon), axis=-1) # shape (n_samples,)
# Calculating mutual information across multiple MCD forward passes
mutual_info = entropy - np.mean(np.sum(-dropout_predictions*np.log(dropout_predictions + epsilon),
axis=-1), axis=0) # shape (n_samples,)
Moving on to the implementation which is posted in the question above, multiple predictions from T different forward passes are obtained by first setting the model to train mode (model.train()). Note that this is not desirable because unwanted stochasticity will be introduced in the predictions if there are layers other than dropout such as batch-norm in the model. Hence the best way is to just set the dropout layers to train mode as shown in the snippet above.
I followed this great answer for sequence autoencoder,
LSTM autoencoder always returns the average of the input sequence.
but I met some problem when I try to change the code:
question one:
Your explanation is so professional, but the problem is a little bit different from mine, I attached some code I changed from your example. My input features are 2 dimensional, and my output is same with the input.
for example:
input_x = torch.Tensor([[0.0,0.0], [0.1,0.1], [0.2,0.2], [0.3,0.3], [0.4,0.4]])
output_y = torch.Tensor([[0.0,0.0], [0.1,0.1], [0.2,0.2], [0.3,0.3], [0.4,0.4]])
the input_x and output_y are same, 5-timesteps, 2-dimensional feature.
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.optim as optim
class LSTM(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, input_dim, latent_dim, num_layers):
super(LSTM, self).__init__()
self.input_dim = input_dim
self.latent_dim = latent_dim
self.num_layers = num_layers
self.encoder = nn.LSTM(self.input_dim, self.latent_dim, self.num_layers)
# I changed here, to 40 dimesion, I think there is some problem
# self.decoder = nn.LSTM(self.latent_dim, self.input_dim, self.num_layers)
self.decoder = nn.LSTM(40, self.input_dim, self.num_layers)
def forward(self, input):
# Encode
_, (last_hidden, _) = self.encoder(input)
# It is way more general that way
encoded = last_hidden.repeat(input.shape)
# Decode
y, _ = self.decoder(encoded)
return torch.squeeze(y)
model = LSTM(input_dim=2, latent_dim=20, num_layers=1)
loss_function = nn.MSELoss()
optimizer = optim.Adam(model.parameters())
y = torch.Tensor([[0.0,0.0], [0.1,0.1], [0.2,0.2], [0.3,0.3], [0.4,0.4]])
x = y.view(len(y), -1, 2) # I changed here
while True:
y_pred = model(x)
optimizer.zero_grad()
loss = loss_function(y_pred, y)
loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
print(y_pred)
The above code can learn very well, can you help review the code and give some instructions.
When I input 2 examples as the input to the model, the model cannot work:
for example, change the code:
y = torch.Tensor([[0.0,0.0], [0.1,0.1], [0.2,0.2], [0.3,0.3], [0.4,0.4]])
to:
y = torch.Tensor([[[0.0,0.0],[0.5,0.5]], [[0.1,0.1], [0.6,0.6]], [[0.2,0.2],[0.7,0.7]], [[0.3,0.3],[0.8,0.8]], [[0.4,0.4],[0.9,0.9]]])
When I compute the loss function, it complain some errors? can anyone help have a look
question two:
my training samples are with different length:
for example:
x1 = [[0.0,0.0], [0.1,0.1], [0.2,0.2], [0.3,0.3], [0.4,0.4]] #with 5 timesteps
x2 = [[0.5,0.5], [0.6,0.6], [0.7,0.7]] #with only 3 timesteps
How can I input these two training sample into the model at the same time for a batch training.
Recurrent N-dimensional autoencoder
First of all, LSTMs work on 1D samples, yours are 2D as it's usually used for words encoded with a single vector.
No worries though, one can flatten this 2D sample to 1D, example for your case would be:
import torch
var = torch.randn(10, 32, 100, 100)
var.reshape((10, 32, -1)) # shape: [10, 32, 100 * 100]
Please notice it's really not general, what if you were to have 3D input? Snippet belows generalizes this notion to any dimension of your samples, provided the preceding dimensions are batch_size and seq_len:
import torch
input_size = 2
var = torch.randn(10, 32, 100, 100, 35)
var.reshape(var.shape[:-input_size] + (-1,)) # shape: [10, 32, 100 * 100 * 35]
Finally, you can employ it inside neural network as follows. Look at forward method especially and constructor arguments:
import torch
class LSTM(nn.Module):
# input_dim has to be size after flattening
# For 20x20 single input it would be 400
def __init__(
self,
input_dimensionality: int,
input_dim: int,
latent_dim: int,
num_layers: int,
):
super(LSTM, self).__init__()
self.input_dimensionality: int = input_dimensionality
self.input_dim: int = input_dim # It is 1d, remember
self.latent_dim: int = latent_dim
self.num_layers: int = num_layers
self.encoder = torch.nn.LSTM(self.input_dim, self.latent_dim, self.num_layers)
# You can have any latent dim you want, just output has to be exact same size as input
# In this case, only encoder and decoder, it has to be input_dim though
self.decoder = torch.nn.LSTM(self.latent_dim, self.input_dim, self.num_layers)
def forward(self, input):
# Save original size first:
original_shape = input.shape
# Flatten 2d (or 3d or however many you specified in constructor)
input = input.reshape(input.shape[: -self.input_dimensionality] + (-1,))
# Rest goes as in my previous answer
_, (last_hidden, _) = self.encoder(input)
encoded = last_hidden.repeat(input.shape)
y, _ = self.decoder(encoded)
# You have to reshape output to what the original was
reshaped_y = y.reshape(original_shape)
return torch.squeeze(reshaped_y)
Remember you have to reshape your output in this case. It should work for any dimensions.
Batching
When it comes to batching and different length of sequences it is a little more complicated.
You have to pad each sequence in batch before pushing it through network. Usually, values with which you pad are zeros, you may configure it inside LSTM though.
You may check this link for an example. You will have to use functions like torch.nn.pack_padded_sequence and others to make it work, you may check this answer.
Oh, since PyTorch 1.1 you don't have to sort your sequences by length in order to pack them. But when it comes to this topic, grab some tutorials, should make things clearer.
Lastly: Please, separate your questions. If you perform the autoencoding with single example, move on to batching and if you have issues there, please post a new question on StackOverflow, thanks.
My code is as below:
class Mymodel(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, input_size, hidden_size, output_size, num_layers, batch_size):
super(Discriminator, self).__init__()
self.input_size = input_size
self.hidden_size = hidden_size
self.output_size = output_size
self.num_layers = num_layers
self.batch_size = batch_size
self.lstm = nn.LSTM(input_size, hidden_size)
self.proj = nn.Linear(hidden_size, output_size)
self.hidden = self.init_hidden()
def init_hidden(self):
return (Variable(torch.zeros(self.num_layers, self.batch_size, self.hidden_size)),
Variable(torch.zeros(self.num_layers, self.batch_size, self.hidden_size)))
def forward(self, x):
lstm_out, self.hidden = self.lstm(x, self.hidden)
output = self.proj(lstm_out)
result = F.sigmoid(output)
return result
I want to use LSTM to classify a sentence to good (1) or bad (0). Using this code, I get the result which is time_step * batch_size * 1 but not 0 or 1. How to edit the code in order to get the classification result?
Theory:
Recall that an LSTM outputs a vector for every input in the series. You are using sentences, which are a series of words (probably converted to indices and then embedded as vectors). This code from the LSTM PyTorch tutorial makes clear exactly what I mean (***emphasis mine):
lstm = nn.LSTM(3, 3) # Input dim is 3, output dim is 3
inputs = [autograd.Variable(torch.randn((1, 3)))
for _ in range(5)] # make a sequence of length 5
# initialize the hidden state.
hidden = (autograd.Variable(torch.randn(1, 1, 3)),
autograd.Variable(torch.randn((1, 1, 3))))
for i in inputs:
# Step through the sequence one element at a time.
# after each step, hidden contains the hidden state.
out, hidden = lstm(i.view(1, 1, -1), hidden)
# alternatively, we can do the entire sequence all at once.
# the first value returned by LSTM is all of the hidden states throughout
# the sequence. the second is just the most recent hidden state
# *** (compare the last slice of "out" with "hidden" below, they are the same)
# The reason for this is that:
# "out" will give you access to all hidden states in the sequence
# "hidden" will allow you to continue the sequence and backpropagate,
# by passing it as an argument to the lstm at a later time
# Add the extra 2nd dimension
inputs = torch.cat(inputs).view(len(inputs), 1, -1)
hidden = (autograd.Variable(torch.randn(1, 1, 3)), autograd.Variable(
torch.randn((1, 1, 3)))) # clean out hidden state
out, hidden = lstm(inputs, hidden)
print(out)
print(hidden)
One more time: compare the last slice of "out" with "hidden" below, they are the same. Why? Well...
If you're familiar with LSTM's, I'd recommend the PyTorch LSTM docs at this point. Under the output section, notice h_t is output at every t.
Now if you aren't used to LSTM-style equations, take a look at Chris Olah's LSTM blog post. Scroll down to the diagram of the unrolled network:
As you feed your sentence in word-by-word (x_i-by-x_i+1), you get an output from each timestep. You want to interpret the entire sentence to classify it. So you must wait until the LSTM has seen all the words. That is, you need to take h_t where t is the number of words in your sentence.
Code:
Here's a coding reference. I'm not going to copy-paste the entire thing, just the relevant parts. The magic happens at self.hidden2label(lstm_out[-1])
class LSTMClassifier(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, embedding_dim, hidden_dim, vocab_size, label_size, batch_size):
...
self.word_embeddings = nn.Embedding(vocab_size, embedding_dim)
self.lstm = nn.LSTM(embedding_dim, hidden_dim)
self.hidden2label = nn.Linear(hidden_dim, label_size)
self.hidden = self.init_hidden()
def init_hidden(self):
return (autograd.Variable(torch.zeros(1, self.batch_size, self.hidden_dim)),
autograd.Variable(torch.zeros(1, self.batch_size, self.hidden_dim)))
def forward(self, sentence):
embeds = self.word_embeddings(sentence)
x = embeds.view(len(sentence), self.batch_size , -1)
lstm_out, self.hidden = self.lstm(x, self.hidden)
y = self.hidden2label(lstm_out[-1])
log_probs = F.log_softmax(y)
return log_probs
The main problem you need to figure out is the in which dim place you should put your batch size when you prepare your data. As far as I know, if you didn't set it in your nn.LSTM() init function, it will automatically assume that the second dim is your batch size, which is quite different compared to other DNN framework. Maybe you can try:
self.lstm = nn.LSTM(input_size, hidden_size, num_layers, batch_first=True)
like this to ask your model to treat your first dim as the batch dim.
As a last layer you have to have a linear layer for however many classes you want i.e 10 if you are doing digit classification as in MNIST . For your case since you are doing a yes/no (1/0) classification you have two lablels/ classes so you linear layer has two classes. I suggest adding a linear layer as
nn.Linear ( feature_size_from_previous_layer , 2)
and then train the model using a cross-entropy loss.
criterion = nn.CrossEntropyLoss()
optimizer = optim.SGD(net.parameters(), lr=0.001, momentum=0.9)