Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
For our project, we are setting up MarkLogic cluster on Azure.
Is there any major performance difference when it comes to Windows or Linux ?
It would be great if there are any reference links for the same
I have done installation and configuration on both, in real terms it does not matter while setting up.
So want to know from performance perspective, does it really matters?
Workload
Current size >15M XML files which needs to be loaded into MarkLogic
Weekly 18K xml files will be ingested
In general, no. There are some minor performance differences, but it depends on your specific workload. For those edge cases, my understanding is that Linux will typically edge out Windows. But focusing on application design best practices and query optimization is significantly more important than the host OS.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
We have on premise GitLab. Is it possible to stop people from uploading all kinds of files eg. resist people from pushing in .exe files.
I've already looked at gitlabs apis, couldn't find anything relevant
Yes can prohibit certain file names in the push rules, or could reduce the maximum file size to discourage people from uploading .exe files
https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/push_rules/push_rules.html
As #Iron Bishop pointed out this feature is not available in the free plan.
Alternatively, if you are so inclined, you could contribute a filter to the Gitlab code base and then use it. It should be fairly simple to add since the framework for filtering is already in place.
Comment here, if you need further help or want to explore the custom code option.
Cheers and all the best.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Hello there I am currently with a host known as Site5 and they have a limit on how many "resource points" I can use. On this site, resource points are a measurement on how much hardware resources I have used.
The way they describe it in the links here state that 1 minute of CPU time = 1 resource point, and I have a daily limit of 250 points.
Since I've never used other web hosts, do other web hosts limit these sort of things?
Yes, most (if not all) web hosts do put limitations on hardware usage in some form or other. While I have never heard of it being done that way, after reading their documentation it appears to be an decent option.
I know other hosts, such as GoDaddy typically impose a hard limit but have "dedicated" resources to the site. For example, here's their grid for Linux hosting
What I have included here is what I'm used to seeing when determining hosted resources.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Just been reading about this potentially serious Linux based bug. It would seem that Azure should be on the safe side, as being Windows based, and most likely quickly patched, as that is why we use Platform As A Service (PAAS).
For anybody wondering what this is all about Try Hunt has a good article at: Troy Hunt's Article
Any comments from anyone on this, or pointers?
Thanks.
Azure WebSites is safe with respect to ShellShock. Azure WebSites uses IIS as our web server and we do not expose any external anonymously-accessible endpoint which exposes/calls Bash.
Note that we do install Bash as part of our VM installation (it comes with Git). But we do not expose any vector for calling into this shell remote/anonymously. We will be updating Bash for caution-sake.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
i am newbie in network administrator..
One week ago, my server work perfectly. My Server can serves 600++ users at the same time and only use 40% cpu.
Today there is something wrong with my server. My server shows 100% cpu usage when it serves 100 users at the same time.
After i check, i found a process /boot/.IpTables that use high cpu.
What happen with my server? Is my server hacked or what?
This is SS my server process :
OK, looks like your system has been had. I did some googling for /boot/.Iptables, and it appears to be malware.
https://askubuntu.com/questions/407457/help-my-server-has-been-hacked-iptables-and-iptablex-in-boot
https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=46704
My personal recommendation would be to take the machine of the network immediately, clone the drive to a USB disk, and re-install (preferably w/ a new set of passwords, and all available patches applied).
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
When i try to offline a disk in a zfs raidz pool (the raidz pool is not mirrored), zfs says that the disk cannot be taken offline because it has no valid mirror.
Isn't one of the properties of raidz that it has a redundant disk (or even 2 disks in raidz2)...?
Could you give a bit more about your configuration please? What are the commands you are using? If I'm understanding your question that should work.
Note that:
You cannot take a pool offline to the point where it becomes faulted. For example, you cannot take offline two devices out of a RAID-Z configuration, nor can you take offline a top-level virtual device.
Managing Devices in ZFS Storage Pools.
ZFS Best Practices Guide.