I am using rust-protobuf version 2.4
I have following code
let mut msg = vec![];
let mut str = protobuf::CodedOutputStream::vec(&mut msg);
let mut rmsg = user_manager::user::user_data::new();
rmsg.set_id("1234".into());
rmsg.set_nick("test".into());
str.write_message(1, &rmsg).unwrap();
str.flush().unwrap();
println!("{:?}", msg);
let test: register_msg = protobuf::parse_from_bytes(&msg[..]).unwrap();
println!("serialized: {:?}\noriginal: {:?}", test, rmsg);
and the relevant proto description is as follows
message user_data{
string id = 1; //required
string nick = 2;
string theme = 3;
string admin_id = 4;
string lang = 5;
double credit = 6; //required
double bonus_credit = 7; //required
};
and what i get as a result is all messed up
First of all, why do I need to enter a number if im serializing the entire message? that's a really weird design.
Secondly, the first field as you may see in the proto file is the id but output from serialization shows the protobuf package serialized everything into the nick field which is the second field.
Am I doing something wrong or might this be a bug in the library?
UPDATE 1:
I have changed write_msg to write_to_bytes
this is how my code looks now.
let mut rmsg = user_manager::user::user_data::new();
rmsg.set_id("1234".into());
rmsg.set_nick("test".into());
let msg = rmsg.write_to_bytes().unwrap();
println!("{:?}", msg);
println!("{:?}", &msg[..]);
let test: register_msg = protobuf::parse_from_bytes(&msg).unwrap();
println!("serialized: {:?}\noriginal: {:?}", test, rmsg);
and still, the output is all messed up.
You can use Message::write_to_bytes to serialize a message that can be parsed with parse_from_bytes.
Also, make sure that you are deserializing the same type that you serialized.
Here's an example program that works correctly:
mod protos;
use protobuf::Message;
use protos::user_data::user_data;
fn main() {
let mut rmsg = user_data::new();
rmsg.set_id("1234".into());
rmsg.set_nick("test".into());
let msg = rmsg.write_to_bytes().unwrap();
println!("{:?}", msg);
let test: user_data = protobuf::parse_from_bytes(&msg).unwrap();
println!("serialized: {:?}\noriginal: {:?}", test, rmsg);
}
This line:
str.write_message(1, &rmsg).unwrap();
writes the message rmsg as a submessage with field id 1. So the fields end up one nesting level deeper, as if your .proto was:
message wrappermsg {
user_data msg = 1;
}
The correct method is:
rmsg.write_to(&mut str);
Related
I have a few PathBufs in my Rust application:
let mut dog_path = PathBuf::from("./animals/dog.png");
let mut cow_path = PathBuf::from("./animals/bovine/cow.jpg");
How could I change these PathBufs so that they're being referred to from the ./animals directory?
// an operation on dog_path
// same operation on cow_path
assert_eq!(PathBuf::from("./dog.png"), dog_path);
assert_eq!(PathBuf::from("./bovine/cow.jpg"), cow_path);
I think you want Path::strip_prefix:
let dog_path = PathBuf::from("./animals/dog.png");
let cow_path = PathBuf::from("./animals/bovine/cow.jpg");
let dog_path_rel = dog_path.strip_prefix("./animals").unwrap();
let cow_path_rel = cow_path.strip_prefix("./animals").unwrap();
assert_eq!(Path::new("dog.png"), dog_path_rel);
assert_eq!(Path::new("bovine/cow.jpg"), cow_path_rel);
But that won't include the leading ./. If that's important to you, you can add it manually:
let dog_path_prefixed = Path::new("./").join(dog_path_rel);
let cow_path_prefixed = Path::new("./").join(cow_path_rel);
assert_eq!(PathBuf::from("./dog.png"), dog_path_prefixed);
assert_eq!(PathBuf::from("./bovine/cow.jpg"), cow_path_prefixed);
playground
Note that strip_prefix returns a Result, meaning it could fail if the path doesn't begin with the given prefix. You may want to handle this case instead of unwraping the result (causing your program to exit with a panic), or you may want to use .expect("your message here") instead to provide a meaningful error message.
If you want a general solution you could look at relative-path crate. It looks like it provide the functionality you want.
use std::path::PathBuf;
use relative_path::RelativePath;
fn main() {
let dog_path = PathBuf::from("./animals/dog.png");
let cow_path = PathBuf::from("./animals/bovine/cow.jpg");
let dog_path = RelativePath::from_path(&dog_path).unwrap();
let cow_path = RelativePath::from_path(&cow_path).unwrap();
let animals_dir = RelativePath::new("./animals");
let dog_path = animals_dir.relative(&dog_path).to_path(".");
let cow_path = animals_dir.relative(&cow_path).to_path(".");
assert_eq!(PathBuf::from("./dog.png"), dog_path);
assert_eq!(PathBuf::from("./bovine/cow.jpg"), cow_path);
}
This is a quick draft, but it shows how to do in a generic way what you are trying to accomplish. I think it could be further optimized, but I literally found this crate 10 minutes ago.
I am familiar with Gstreamer but new to Rust,
TLDR; I want to be able to initialize PadProbeId to a default value before using it.
The details:
I have a Bin (containing audio + video encoders and hlssink).
I have been able to add this bin to the pipeline and it works fine.
The issue I have is the audio for the stream is optional and I want to do add_probe() only when audio is available. Below is a simplified version fo what I tried to implement
let mut audio_probe_id: PadProbeId;
let mut tee_audio_pad: Pad;
if media_info.audio_available {
// get encoded audio from the tee
tee_audio_pad = audio_tee.request_pad_simple("src_%u").unwrap();
audio_probe_id = tee_audio_pad.add_probe(gst::PadProbeType::BLOCK_DOWNSTREAM, |_pad, _info| {
gst::PadProbeReturn::Ok
}).unwrap();
// link the audio_tee.src to enc_bin ghost pad
let audio_sink_pad = enc_bin.static_pad("audio").unwrap();
tee_audio_pad.link(&audio_sink_pad).unwrap();
}
enc_bin.call_async(move |bin| {
bin.sync_state_with_parent().unwrap();
if media_info.audio_available {
tee_audio_pad.remove_probe(audio_probe_id);
}
}
However because of Rust compilers restriction to using uninitialized variables, it does not let me use audio_probe_id without initializing.
I tried to initialize it like this; let mut audio_probe_id: PadProbeId = PadProbeId(NonZeroU64(u64::MAX));. However compiler complains that it is a private field.
error[E0423]: cannot initialize a tuple struct which contains private fields
Thanks a lot for your help!
The rust way to have empty variables like this is to use Option, but in your case it would simpler to have a single conditional:
if media_info.audio_available {
// get encoded audio from the tee
let tee_audio_pad = audio_tee.request_pad_simple("src_%u").unwrap();
let audio_probe_id = tee_audio_pad.add_probe(gst::PadProbeType::BLOCK_DOWNSTREAM, |_pad, _info| {
gst::PadProbeReturn::Ok
}).unwrap();
// link the audio_tee.src to enc_bin ghost pad
let audio_sink_pad = enc_bin.static_pad("audio").unwrap();
tee_audio_pad.link(&audio_sink_pad).unwrap();
enc_bin.call_async(move |bin| {
bin.sync_state_with_parent().unwrap();
tee_audio_pad.remove_probe(audio_probe_id);
}
} else {
enc_bin.call_async(move |bin| {
bin.sync_state_with_parent().unwrap();
});
}
I'm new to rust, and I'm trying to code a program that opens a websocket for 10 seconds, receive the data from it and then stops. The piece of code is the following.
let now = Instant::now();
while let n=now.elapsed().as_secs() < 10 {
let msg = socket.read_message().expect("Error reading message");
let msg = match msg {
tungstenite::Message::Text(s) => { s }
_ => { panic!() }
};
let parsed: serde_json::Value = serde_json::from_str(&msg).expect("Can't parse to JSON");
let price_str=parsed["p"].as_str().unwrap();
let price: f32 = price_str.parse().unwrap();
write!(f,"1 \t").expect("unable to write");
write!(f, "\t\t {} \n", price).expect("unable to write");
println!("{}",n);
}
n becomes false after 10 seconds, but the loop never ends. What I'm doing wrong?
Thanks for your help.
while let n binds the result of the expression now.elapsed().as_secs() < 10 to n. This binding can never fail, thus your loop never exits.
The compiler emits a lint to prevent such mistakes:
warning: irrefutable `while let` pattern
--> src/lib.rs:24:11
|
24 | while let n = now.elapsed().as_secs() < 10 {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(irrefutable_let_patterns)]` on by default
= note: this pattern will always match, so the loop will never exit
= help: consider instead using a `loop { ... }` with a `let` inside it
To fix your snippet, you'll need to remove the let n part. Or in a more unusual and rather unidiomatic manner, you can pattern match on the value returned by now.elapsed().as_secs() < 10 through:
while let true = now.elapsed().as_secs() < 10 {
// do your thing
}
If you want access to the loop control variable, you can still bind it to a variable through:
let now = std::time::Instant::now();
while let n # true = now.elapsed().as_secs() < 10 {
println!("loop_control={}", n)
}
As #Jmb mentions in a comment, there is another issue that's not a compiler error: The loop body may block indefinitely, thus rendering the timeout ineffective.
I'm following the example from the rusqlite git hub https://github.com/rusqlite/rusqlite/blob/master/src/vtab/array.rs#L206. I have the exact same code but I get the compile error
the trait bound `std::vec::Vec<rusqlite::types::Value>: rusqlite::ToSql` is not satisfied
A snippet of the code is below. ids is a Vec of String
let intValues:Vec<i64> = ids.into_iter().map(|s| s.parse::<i64>().expect("Id Parse error.")).collect();
let values:Vec<rusqlite::types::Value> = intValues.into_iter().map(rusqlite::types::Value::from).collect();
let ptr = std::rc::Rc::new(values);
let mut statement = db_connection
.prepare("select * from item where id in rarray(?);")
.expect("Failed to prepare second query.");
let results = statement
// This is the error line
.query_map(&[&ptr], |row| {
Ok(database::ItemData {
id: row.get(0)?,
name: row.get(1)?,
time_to_prepare: row.get(2)?
})
});
I had to add "array" to the feature in the toml file.
I would like to parse a web page, insert anchors at certain positions and render the modified DOM out again in order to generate docsets for Dash. Is this possible?
From the examples included in html5ever, I can see how to read an HTML file and do a poor man's HTML output, but I don't understand how I can modify the RcDom object I retrieved.
I would like to see a snippet inserting an anchor element (<a name="foo"></a>) to an RcDom.
Note: this is a question regarding Rust and html5ever specifically ... I know how to do it in other languages or simpler HTML parsers.
Here is some code that parses a document, adds an achor to the link and prints the new document:
extern crate html5ever;
use html5ever::{ParseOpts, parse_document};
use html5ever::tree_builder::TreeBuilderOpts;
use html5ever::rcdom::RcDom;
use html5ever::rcdom::NodeEnum::Element;
use html5ever::serialize::{SerializeOpts, serialize};
use html5ever::tendril::TendrilSink;
fn main() {
let opts = ParseOpts {
tree_builder: TreeBuilderOpts {
drop_doctype: true,
..Default::default()
},
..Default::default()
};
let data = "<!DOCTYPE html><html><body></body></html>".to_string();
let dom = parse_document(RcDom::default(), opts)
.from_utf8()
.read_from(&mut data.as_bytes())
.unwrap();
let document = dom.document.borrow();
let html = document.children[0].borrow();
let body = html.children[1].borrow(); // Implicit head element at children[0].
{
let mut a = body.children[0].borrow_mut();
if let Element(_, _, ref mut attributes) = a.node {
attributes[0].value.push_tendril(&From::from("#anchor"));
}
}
let mut bytes = vec![];
serialize(&mut bytes, &dom.document, SerializeOpts::default()).unwrap();
let result = String::from_utf8(bytes).unwrap();
println!("{}", result);
}
This prints the following:
<html><head></head><body></body></html>
As you can see, we can navigate through the child nodes via the children attribute.
And we can change an attribute present in the vector of attributes of an Element.