first post / total Python novice so be patient with my slow understanding!
I have a dataframe containing a list of transactions by order of transaction date.
I've appended an additional new field/column called ["DB/CR"], that dependant on the presence of "-" in the ["Amount"] field populates 'Debit', else 'Credit' in the absence of "-".
Noting the transactions are in date order, I've included another new field/column called [Top x]. The output of which is I want to populate and incremental independent number (starting at 1) for both debits and credits on a segregated basis.
As such, I have created a simple loop with a associated 'if' / 'elif' (prob could use else as it's binary) statement that loops through the data sent row 0 to the last row in the df and using an if statement 1) "Debit" or 2) "Credit" increments the number for each independently by "Debit" 'i' integer, and "Credit" 'ii' integer.
The code works as expected in terms of output of the 'Top x'; however, I always receive a warning "A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame".
Trying to perfect my script, without any warnings I've been trying to understand what I'm doing incorrect but not getting it in terms of my use case scenario.
Appreciate if someone can kindly shed light on / propose how the code needs to be refactored to avoid receiving this error.
Code (the df source data is an imported csv):
#top x debits/credits
i = 0
ii = 0
for ind in df.index:
if df["DB/CR"][ind] == "Debit":
i = i+1
df["Top x"][ind] = i
elif df["DB/CR"][ind] == "Credit":
ii = ii+1
df["Top x"][ind] = ii
Interpreter
df["Top x"][ind] = i
G:\Finances Backup\venv\Statementsv.03.py:173: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
df["Top x"][ind] = ii
Many thanks :)
You should use df.loc["DB/CR", ind] = "Debit"
Use iterrows() to iterate over the DF. However, updating DF while iterating is not preferable
see documentation here
Refer to the documentation here Iterrows()
You should never modify something you are iterating over. This is not
guaranteed to work in all cases. Depending on the data types, the
iterator returns a copy and not a view, and writing to it will have no
effect.
Me again asking another Kusto related question (I really wish there would be a thorough video tutorial on this somewhere).
I have a summarize statement, that produces two columns for y axis and one for x axis.
Now i want to relabel the columns for x axis to show a string, that i also got from the database and already put into a variable with let.
This basically looks like this:
let android_col = strcat("Android: ", toscalar(customEvents
| where application_Version contains secondLatestVersionAndroid));
let iOS_col = strcat("iOS: ", toscalar(customEvents
| where application_Version contains secondLatestVersionIOS));
... some Kusto magic ...
| summarize
Android = 100 - (round((countif(hasUnhandledErrorAndroid == 1 ) * 100.0 ) / countif(isAndroid == 1), 2)),
iOS = 100 - (round((countif(hasUnhandledErroriOS == 1) * 100.0 ) / countif(isIOS == 1), 2))
by Time
|render timechart with (ytitle="crashfree users in %", xtitle="date", legend=visible )
Now i want to have the summarize display not Android and iOS, but the value of android_col and iOS_col.
Is that possible?
Best regards
Maverick
Generally, it's suggested to have predefined column names, otherwise various features don't work. For example, IntelliSense won't know the names of the columns, as they would be determined at run time only. Also, if you create a function that returns a dynamic schema, you won't be able to run this function from other clusters.
However, if you do want to change column names, you definitely have a way to do it by using various plugins. For example, bag_unpack, pivot and others.
As for courses on Kusto, there are actually several excellent courses on Pluralsight (all are free):
How to start with Microsoft Azure Data Explorer
Basic KQL
Azure Data Explorer – Advanced KQL
The usage of the "toscalar" in this query looks wrong, it seems to me that you should use the "extend" operator with the same logic to create the additional columns.
I would appreciate suggestions for a more computationally efficient way to dynamically filter a Pandas DataFrame.
The size of the DataFrame, len(df.index), is around 680,000.
This code from the callback function of a Plotly Dash dashboard is triggered when points on a scatter graph are selected. These points are passed to points as a list of dictionaries containing various properties with keys 'A' to 'C'. This allows the user to select a subset of the data in the pandas.DataFrame instance df for cross-filtering analysis.
rows_boolean = pandas.Series([False] * len(df.index))
for point in points:
current_condition = ((df['A'] == point['a']) & (df['B'] == point['b'])
& (df['C'] >= point['c']) & (df['C'] < point['d']))
rows_boolean = rows_boolean | current_condition
filtered = df.loc[rows_boolean, list_of_column_names]
The body of this for loop is very slow as it is iterating over the whole data frame, it is manageable to run it once but not inside a loop.
Note that these filters are not additive, as in this example; each successive iteration of the for loop increases, rather than decreases, the size of filtered (as | rather than & operator is used).
Note also that I am aware of the existence of the method df['C'].between(point['c'], point['d']) as an alternative to the last two comparison operators, however, I only want this comparison to be inclusive at the lower end.
Solutions I have considered
Searching the many frustratingly similar posts on SO reveals a few ideas which get some of the way:
Using pandas.DataFrame.query() will require building a (potentially very large) query string as follows:
query = ' | '.join([f'((A == {point["a"]}) & (B == {point["b"]})
& (C >= {point["c"]}) & (C < {point["d"]}))' for point in points])
filtered = df.query(query)
My main concern here is that I don’t know how efficient the query method becomes when the query passed has several dozen (or even several hundred) conditions strung together. This solution also currently does not allow the selection of columns using list_of_column_names.
Another possible solution could come from implementing something like this.
To reiterate, speed is key here, so I'm not just after something that works, but something that works a darn sight faster than my boolean implementation above:
There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it. (PEP 20)
I posted question previously as "using “.between” for string values not working in python" and I was not clear enough, but I could not edit, so I am reposting with clarity here.
I have a Data Frame. In [0,61] I have string. In [0,69] I have a string. I want to slice all the data in cells [0,62:68] between these two and merge them, and paste the result into [1,61]. Subsequently, [0,62:68] will be blank, but that is not important.
However, I have several hundred documents, and I want to write a script that executes on all of them. The strings in [0,61] and [0,69] are always present in all the documents, but along different locations in that column. So I tried using:
For_Paste = df[0][df[0].between('DESCRIPTION OF WORK / STATEMENT OF WORK', 'ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS / SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION', inclusive = False)]
But the output I get is: Series([], Name: 0, dtype: object)
I was expecting a list or array with the desired data that I could merge and paste. Thanks.
enter image description here
If you want to select the rows between two indices (say idx_start and idx_end), excluding these two rows) on column col of the dataframe df, you will want to use
df.loc[idx_start + 1 : idx_end, col]
To find the first index matching a string s, use
idx = df.index[df[col] == s][0]
So for your case, to return a Series of the rows between these two indices, try the following:
start_string = 'DESCRIPTION OF WORK / STATEMENT OF WORK'
end_string = 'ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS / SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION'
idx_start = df.index[df[0] == start_string][0]
idx_end = df.index[df[0] == end_string][0]
For_Paste = df.loc[idx_start + 1 : idx_end, 0]
I have data in a csv file as follows:
60,27702,1938470,13935,18513,8
60,32424,1933740,16103,15082,11
60,20080,1946092,9335,14970,2
60,28236,1937936,13799,16871,6
60,22717,1943455,10809,16726,4
120,37702,2938470,23935,28513,8
120,42424,2933740,26103,25082,11
120,30080,2946092,2335,24970,2
120,38236,2937936,23799,26871,6
120,32717,2943455,20809,26726,4
180,47702,3938470,33935,8513,8
180,52424,3933740,36103,5082,11
180,40080,3946092,3335,4970,2
180,48236,3937936,33799,6871,6
180,42717,3943455,30809,6726,4
I then used the following code to insert column heading:
df = pd.read_csv("contikiMAC_new_out.csv", names=['Energest','CPU','LPM','Transmit','Listen','ID'])
I used df.groupby(['ID']) to see the data in group according to column 'ID'.
The problem is the data in column 'LPM' gets reset after some time so I would like to add the previous value with the new value whenever the new value in LPM column is smaller for specific 'ID' .
I tried doing :
for x in df.groupby(['ID']):
for i in df.ID:
if (df.loc[i, 'LPM'] < df.loc[i - 1, 'LPM']):
df.loc[i, 'LPM'] = df.loc[i, 'LPM'] + df.loc[i - 1, 'LPM']
But actually not getting the fruitful result I desire because it mixes with the 'LPM' value of different 'ID' and the process takes a long time. Can anyone please help me in suggesting a way to write the data group wise in a csv file based on 'ID' after performing the sum operation ?
The data structure I like to see is as follows:
60,27702,1938470,13935,18513,8
120,37702,2938470,23935,28513,8
180,47702,3938470,33935,37026,8
60,32424,1933740,16103,15082,11
120,42424,2933740,26103,25082,11
180,52424,3933740,36103,30164,11
60,20080,1946092,9335,14970,2
120,30080,2946092,2335,24970,2
180,40080,3946092,3335,29940,2
60,28236,1937936,13799,16871,6
120,38236,2937936,23799,26871,6
180,48236,3937936,33799,33742,6
60,22717,1943455,10809,16726,4
120,32717,2943455,20809,26726,4
180,42717,3943455,30809,33452,4
If I understood your problem correctly, DataFrame.shift is what you're looking for.
Something like:
df['LPM_prev'] = df.groupby(['ID'])['LPM'].shift(1)
And then you can work with that column