How to get nested element using ServiceStack? - nested

Although I am able to access the SchemaVersion using code below, I cannot access FormatDocID nested element.
Any ideas how can I easily get FormatDocID using ServiceStack and AutoQueryFeature (or similar)?
I put only relevant parts of code here
public override void Configure(Container container)
{
JsConfig.DateHandler = DateHandler.ISO8601;
SetupValidators(container);
SetupIOC(container);
SetupPlugins(container, log);
ContentTypes.Register("application/xml"
, CLXmlSerializer.Serialize, ServiceStack.Text.XmlSerializer.DeserializeFromStream);
SetupMetaDataRedirectionPath();
SetupGlobalResponseFilters();
}
Setup plugins
private void SetupPlugins(Container container)
{
Plugins.Add(new ValidationFeature());
Plugins.Add(new SwaggerFeature());
Plugins.Add(new AutoQueryFeature
{
MaxLimit = 1000,
EnableUntypedQueries = false,
IncludeTotal = true
});
Plugins.Add(new AutoQueryDataFeature {MaxLimit = 100}
.AddDataSource(ctx => ctx.MemorySource(new List<WordDocument>
{
new WordDocument()
{
SchemaVersion = "",
Format = new Word.DocumentFormat()
{
FormatDocID = 254
}
}
}))
);
typeof(RequestLogs).AddAttributes(new RestrictAttribute {VisibilityTo = RequestAttributes.None});
typeof(AssignRoles).AddAttributes(new RestrictAttribute {VisibilityTo = RequestAttributes.None});
typeof(UnAssignRoles).AddAttributes(new RestrictAttribute {VisibilityTo = RequestAttributes.None});
typeof(Authenticate).AddAttributes(new RestrictAttribute {VisibilityTo = RequestAttributes.None});
}
Serializable classes
public abstract class Document
{
public DocumentFormat Format;
public class DocumentFormat
{
[XmlAttribute] public int Version;
public int FormatDocID;
public string DocShortName;
}
}
public class WordDocument : Document
{
[XmlAttribute] public string SchemaVersion { get; set; } = "1.0";
}
Thanks in advance for the answers.

It's not clear what you're trying to achieve or why, AutoQuery creates Auto Queryable APIs where the Response is the API Response serialized in the specified Response Content Type.
If you want to intercept the Typed Response DTO before it's returned you can create a Custom AutoQuery Implementation and introspect the response that way, e.g:
public class MyQueryServices : Service
{
public IAutoQueryData AutoQuery { get; set; }
//Override with custom implementation
public object Any(MyQuery query)
{
var q = AutoQuery.CreateQuery(query, base.Request);
var response = AutoQuery.Execute(query, q);
return response;
}
}
But the AutoQuery Memory Data Source you're using lets you provide your own collection of Typed POCOs as the Data source so you already have access to them when you create it, but the source POCOs should be a flat Type with public properties (in contrast to your class with public fields and nested types) - it's not possible to query nested object graph values.
This is an example of a POCO that doesn't use nested classes, or public fields:
public abstract class Document
{
public int Version { get; set; }
public int FormatDocID { get; set; }
public string DocShortName { get; set; }
}
So the solution if you want to use AutoQuery would be to change your Data Source to use Flat POCOs with public properties otherwise you'd need to create the impl of your Service yourself.

Related

Error when adding Where or OrderBy clauses to Azure Mobile Apps request

I'm developing an Azure Mobile App service to interface to my Xamarin application.
I've created, connected and successfully populated an SQL Database, but when I try to add some filters to my request, for example an orderby() or where() clauses, it returns me a Bad Request error.
For example, this request: https://myapp.azurewebsites.net/tables/Race?$orderby=iRound%20desc,iYear%20desc&$top=1&ZUMO-API-VERSION=2.0.0 gives me {"message":"The query specified in the URI is not valid. Could not find a property named 'IYear' on type 'MyType'."}.
My configuration method is this:
HttpConfiguration config = new HttpConfiguration();
new MobileAppConfiguration()
.AddTablesWithEntityFramework()
.ApplyTo(config);
config.MapHttpAttributeRoutes();
Database.SetInitializer(new CreateDatabaseIfNotExists<MainDataContext>());
app.UseWebApi(config);
and my DbContext is this:
public class MainDataContext : DbContext
{
private const string connectionStringName = "Name=MS_TableConnectionString";
public MainDataContext() : base(connectionStringName)
{
Database.Log = s => WriteLog(s);
}
public void WriteLog(string msg)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(msg);
}
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Conventions.Add(
new AttributeToColumnAnnotationConvention<TableColumnAttribute, string>(
"ServiceTableColumn", (property, attributes) => attributes.Single().ColumnType.ToString()));
}
public DbSet<Race> Race { get; set; }
public DbSet ...ecc...
}
Following this guide, I added a migration after creating my TableControllers. So the TableController for the example type shown above is pretty standard:
[EnableQuery(AllowedQueryOptions = AllowedQueryOptions.All)]
public class RaceController : TableController<Race>
{
protected override void Initialize(HttpControllerContext controllerContext)
{
base.Initialize(controllerContext);
MainDataContext context = new MainDataContext();
DomainManager = new EntityDomainManager<Race>(context, Request);
}
// GET tables/Race
[EnableQuery(AllowedQueryOptions = AllowedQueryOptions.All)]
public IQueryable<Race> GetAllRace()
{
return Query();
}
// GET tables/Race/48D68C86-6EA6-4C25-AA33-223FC9A27959
public SingleResult<Race> GetRace(string id)
{
return Lookup(id);
}
// PATCH tables/Race/48D68C86-6EA6-4C25-AA33-223FC9A27959
public Task<Race> PatchRace(string id, Delta<Race> patch)
{
return UpdateAsync(id, patch);
}
// POST tables/Race
public async Task<IHttpActionResult> PostRace(Race item)
{
Race current = await InsertAsync(item);
return CreatedAtRoute("Tables", new { id = current.Id }, current);
}
// DELETE tables/Race/48D68C86-6EA6-4C25-AA33-223FC9A27959
public Task DeleteRace(string id)
{
return DeleteAsync(id);
}
}
As you can see, I already tried to add the EnableQuery attribute to my TableController, as seen on Google. I also tried to add these filters to the HttpConfiguration object, without any success:
config.Filters.Add(new EnableQueryAttribute
{
PageSize = 10,
AllowedArithmeticOperators = AllowedArithmeticOperators.All,
AllowedFunctions = AllowedFunctions.All,
AllowedLogicalOperators = AllowedLogicalOperators.All,
AllowedQueryOptions = AllowedQueryOptions.All
});
config.AddODataQueryFilter(new EnableQueryAttribute
{
PageSize = 10,
AllowedArithmeticOperators = AllowedArithmeticOperators.All,
AllowedFunctions = AllowedFunctions.All,
AllowedLogicalOperators = AllowedLogicalOperators.All,
AllowedQueryOptions = AllowedQueryOptions.All
});
I don't know what to investigate more, as things seems to be changing too fast for a newbie like me who's first got into Azure.
EDIT
I forgot to say that asking for the complete table, so for example https://myapp.azurewebsites.net/tables/Race?ZUMO-API-VERSION=2.0.0, returns correctly the entire dataset. The problem occurs only when adding some clauses to the request.
EDIT 2
My model is like this:
public class Race : EntityData
{
public int iRaceId { get; set; }
public int iYear { get; set; }
public int iRound { get; set; }
ecc..
}
and the database table that was automatically created is this, including all the properties inherited from EntityData:
Database table schema
Digging into the source code, Azure Mobile Apps sets up camelCase encoding of all requests and responses. It then puts them back after transmission accordign to rules - so iRaceId becomes IRaceId on the server.
The easiest solution to this is to bypass the auto-naming and use a JsonProperty attribute on each property within your server-side DTO and client-side DTO so that they match and will get encoding/decoded according to your rules.
So:
public class Race : EntityData
{
[JsonProperty("id")]
public string Id { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("raceId")]
public int iRaceId { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("year")]
public int iYear { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("round")]
public int iRound { get; set; }
etc..
}

inherited class AutoMapper.AutoMapperMappingException

I am new at automapper and it is a very good stuff easy to use, but now I have a problem with it. Trying to convert my derived class to base and it gives me
AutoMapper.AutoMapperMappingException
Missing type map configuration or unsupported mapping.
Mapping types: ClientEventDb -> EventId
Database.ClientEventDb -> EventId
Destination path: ClientEvent
Source value:
Event:Login
Automapper wants to convert ClientEventDb to EventId? I don't understand why. EventId is an enum...
Please help me I have run out of ideas.
Here is the code which I run:
ClientEventDb[] edbl;
using (var context = new DbEntities())
{
edbl=context.Events.Take(1000).ToArray();
}
Mapper.CreateMap<ClientEventDb, ClientEvent>();
Console.WriteLine("hello");
return edbl.Select(edb => Mapper.Map<ClientEvent>(edb)).ToArray();
Here are my classes
[Table("events", Schema = "public")]
public class ClientEventDb : ClientEvent
{
public ClientEventDb(string userName, EventId happening, object userObject = null)
: base(userName, happening, userObject)
{
}
public ClientEventDb()
{
}
}
[ProtoContract]
[Table("events", Schema = "public")]
public class ClientEvent : ClientEventBase
{
[ProtoMember(1)]
[Column("username")]
public string UserName { get; private set; }
[ProtoMember(2)]
[Column("time")]
public DateTime DateTime { get; private set; }
[ProtoMember(3)]
[Key]
[Column("id")]
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]
public string Id { get; private set; }
[ProtoMember(4)]
[Column("data")]
public byte[] UserObject { get; set; }
public ClientEvent(string userName,EventId happening, object userObject=null) : base(happening)
{
UserName = userName;
DateTime = DateTime.Now;
//UserObject = null;
if (userObject!=null) throw new NotImplementedException();
}
public ClientEvent()
{
}
protected ClientEvent Clone()
{
return (ClientEvent)MemberwiseClone();
}
}
[ProtoContract]
[ProtoInclude(10, typeof(ClientEvent))]
public class ClientEventBase
{
[Column("eventid")]
[ProtoMember(1)]
public int EventIdValue { get; set; } //must be public because of entity framework
[NotMapped]
public EventId EventId
{
get { return (EventId) EventIdValue; }
set { EventIdValue = (int) value; }
}
public ClientEventBase(EventId eventId)
{
EventId = eventId;
}
public ClientEventBase()
{
}
public override string ToString()
{
return String.Format("Event:{0}",EventId);
}
}
public enum EventId
{
Login = 1,
Logout,
ExitApplication,
}
UPDATE
bugfix: ClientEvent [Key] attribute moved to id property
Solution was this (thx to stuartd):
ClientEventDb[] edbl;
using (var context = new DbEntities())
{
edbl=context.Events.ToArray();
}
Mapper.CreateMap<ClientEventDb, ClientEvent>().ConstructUsing((ClientEventDb src) => new ClientEvent());
return edbl.Select(Mapper.Map<ClientEvent>).ToArray();
AutoMapper is confused as its made to map between similar properties in different classes, you are using it incorrectly - you just need to go from the derived class to the base which does not require AutoMapper. You could use this to do what you need....
ClientEventDb[] edbl;
using (var context = new DbEntities())
{
edbl=context.Events.Take(1000).ToArray();
}
return edbl.Cast<ClientEvent>().ToList();
I'd be looking at why you even feel you need a derived ClientEventDb though - understand we dont have the whole picture here but it seems to do nothing in addition to what the base class already does.
The issue is that ClientEvent has two constructors but you have not told AutoMapper which to use.
If you want it to use your constructor with parameters, change your mapping code to this and it will work:
Mapper.CreateMap<ClientEventDb, ClientEvent>()
.ConstructUsing(src => new ClientEvent(src.UserName, src.EventId));
Or to make AutoMapper use the default constructor:
Mapper.CreateMap<ClientEventDb, ClientEvent>()
.ConstructUsing((ClientEventDb src) => new ClientEvent());

Does ServiceStack support generics in end-to-end typed requests

I was playin' around with ServiceStack and was wondering if it supported this scenario. I'm using generics in my request types so that many DTOs that inherit from a common interface will support the same basic methods [ like... GetById(int Id) ].
Using a request type specific to a single kind of DTO works, but breaks the generics nice-ness...
var fetchedPerson = client.Get<PersonDto>(new PersonDtoGetById() { Id = person.Id });
Assert.That(person.Id, Is.EqualTo(fetchedPerson.Id)); //PASS
Mapping a route to the generic also works:
Routes.Add<DtoGetById<PersonDto>>("/persons/{Id}", ApplyTo.Get);
...
var fetchedPerson2 = client.Get<PersonDto>(string.Format("/persons/{0}", person.Id));
Assert.That(person.Id, Is.EqualTo(fetchedPerson2.Id)); //PASS
But using the end-to-end generic request type fails:
var fetchedPerson3 = client.Get<PersonDto>(new DtoGetById<PersonDto>() { Id = person.Id });
Assert.That(person.Id, Is.EqualTo(fetchedPerson3.Id)); //FAIL
I wonder if I'm just missing something, or if i'm trying to abstract just ooone layer too far... :)
Below is a complete, failing program using NUnit, default ServiceStack stuff:
namespace ssgenerics
{
using NUnit.Framework;
using ServiceStack.ServiceClient.Web;
using ServiceStack.ServiceHost;
using ServiceStack.ServiceInterface;
using ServiceStack.WebHost.Endpoints;
[TestFixture]
class Program
{
public static PersonDto GetNewTestPersonDto()
{
return new PersonDto()
{
Id = 123,
Name = "Joe Blow",
Occupation = "Software Developer"
};
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{}
[Test]
public void TestPutGet()
{
var listeningOn = "http://*:1337/";
var appHost = new AppHost();
appHost.Init();
appHost.Start(listeningOn);
try
{
var BaseUri = "http://localhost:1337/";
var client = new JsvServiceClient(BaseUri);
var person = GetNewTestPersonDto();
client.Put(person);
var fetchedPerson = client.Get<PersonDto>(new PersonDtoGetById() { Id = person.Id });
Assert.That(person.Id, Is.EqualTo(fetchedPerson.Id));
var fetchedPerson2 = client.Get<PersonDto>(string.Format("/persons/{0}", person.Id));
Assert.That(person.Id, Is.EqualTo(fetchedPerson2.Id));
Assert.That(person.Name, Is.EqualTo(fetchedPerson2.Name));
Assert.That(person.Occupation, Is.EqualTo(fetchedPerson2.Occupation));
var fetchedPerson3 = client.Get<PersonDto>(new DtoGetById<PersonDto>() { Id = person.Id });
Assert.That(person.Id, Is.EqualTo(fetchedPerson3.Id));
Assert.That(person.Name, Is.EqualTo(fetchedPerson3.Name));
Assert.That(person.Occupation, Is.EqualTo(fetchedPerson3.Occupation));
}
finally
{
appHost.Stop();
}
}
}
public interface IDto : IReturnVoid
{
int Id { get; set; }
}
public class PersonDto : IDto
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Occupation { get; set; }
}
public class DtoGetById<T> : IReturn<T> where T : IDto { public int Id { get; set; } }
public class PersonDtoGetById : IReturn<PersonDto> { public int Id { get; set; } }
public abstract class DtoService<T> : Service where T : IDto
{
public abstract T Get(DtoGetById<T> Id);
public abstract void Put(T putter);
}
public class PersonService : DtoService<PersonDto>
{
public override PersonDto Get(DtoGetById<PersonDto> Id)
{
//--would retrieve from data persistence layer
return Program.GetNewTestPersonDto();
}
public PersonDto Get(PersonDtoGetById Id)
{
return Program.GetNewTestPersonDto();
}
public override void Put(PersonDto putter)
{
//--would persist to data persistence layer
}
}
public class AppHost : AppHostHttpListenerBase
{
public AppHost()
: base("Test HttpListener",
typeof(PersonService).Assembly
) { }
public override void Configure(Funq.Container container)
{
Routes.Add<DtoGetById<PersonDto>>("/persons/{Id}", ApplyTo.Get);
}
}
}
No, It's a fundamental concept in ServiceStack that each Service requires its own unique Request DTO, see this answer for more examples on this.
You could do:
[Route("/persons/{Id}", "GET")]
public class Persons : DtoGetById<Person> { ... }
But I strongly advise against using inheritance in DTOs. Property declaration is like a DSL for a service contract and its not something that should be hidden.
For more details see this answer on the purpose of DTO's in Services.

ServiceStack QueryBase class for Paging + Sorting, but Validation not fired

I've created a QueryBase class in order to support Paging and Sorting when needed.
public class QueryBase
{
public string Sort { get; set; }
public int PageNumber { get; set; }
public int PageSize { get; set; }
}
If a class supports these features, it'll simply extend it like this:
public class Cars: QueryBase, IReturn<CarsResponse>
{
}
public class CarsResponse : IHasResponseStatus
{
public List<Car> Cars { get; set; }
public ResponseStatus ResponseStatus { get; set; }
}
Then in order to fill QueryBase from querystring I've created a RequestFilterAttribute that can be used when needed:
public class QueryRequestFilterAttribute : Attribute, IHasRequestFilter
{
#region IHasRequestFilter Members
public IHasRequestFilter Copy()
{
return this;
}
public int Priority
{
get { return -100; }
}
public void RequestFilter(IHttpRequest req, IHttpResponse res, object requestDto)
{
var request = requestDto as QueryBase;
if (request == null) { return; }
request.PageNumber = req.QueryString["pageNumber"].IsEmpty() ? 1 : int.Parse(req.QueryString["pageNumber"]);
request.PageSize = req.QueryString["pageSize"].IsEmpty() ? 15 : int.Parse(req.QueryString["pageSize"]);
request.Sort = req.QueryString["sort"].IsNullOrEmpty() ? "id" : req.QueryString["sort"];
}
#endregion
}
Everything is working properly, but my goal now is to enable Validation in order to define some basic rules like maxpagesize or minpagenumber.
A very basic implementation is:
public class QueryBaseValidator : AbstractValidator<QueryBase>
{
public QueryBaseValidator()
{
RuleFor(query => query.PageSize).LessThanOrEqualTo(100).GreaterThan(0);
}
}
In this way validator filter is not able to find the validator above in its cache, because it searches for Cars instead of QueryBase (line 11 ValidationFilter.cs):
ValidatorCache.GetValidator(req, requestDto.GetType());
What is the best solution for this problem in order to avoid writing same validation logic in each subclass?
I found a solution but I don't know if it's the best one: using a validator for each class implementing QueryBase.
QueryBaseValidator modified as follows:
public class QueryBaseValidator<T> : AbstractValidator<T> where T : QueryBase
{
public QueryBaseValidator()
{
RuleFor(query => query.PageSize).LessThanOrEqualTo(100).GreaterThan(0);
}
}
Additional validator created for subclass Cars
public class CarsValidator : QueryBaseValidator<Cars>
{
}
In this way everything works and I've now a basic implementation of generic paging, sorting and very soon query with ServiceStack.

servicestack serializes to empty json string

I am having a strange issue with ServiceStack (SS). The entity I pass to the method is always serialized to empty json string by SS. So s is always "{}". I debug and see that the entity is a hydrated instance with properties with values.
Any ideas why this is the case?
public virtual void Serialize<TEntity>(TEntity entity, Stream stream)
{
// s is always {}
var s = JsonSerializer.SerializeToString(entity);
// rest is not important at this point...
s = JsvFormatter.Format(s);
using (var writer = new StreamWriter(stream))
{
writer.Write(s);
}
}
I am editing the question show exactly what the passed in (VolumeCreated) entity is.
public class VolumeEvent : IEvent<VolumeID>
{
public VolumeEvent(VolumeID identity)
{
Identity = identity;
}
#region Implementation of IEvent<out VolumeIdentity>
public VolumeID Identity { get; private set; }
#endregion
}
public class VolumeCreated : VolumeEvent
{
public DateTime PublishDate { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public VolumeCreated(VolumeID identity, string title, DateTime publishDate)
: base(identity)
{
Title = title;
PublishDate = publishDate;
}
}
ServiceStack serializes only serializes public properties.

Resources