I am using apollo-server-express for graphql back-end. I am going to process only mutations there, but I want to redirect query and subscription on hasura by means of schema stitching with introspection. Queries through apollo-server to hasura are working fine and returning the expected data.
But subscriptions are not working and I am getting this error: " Expected Iterable, but did not find one for field subscription_root.users".
And besides, server hasura is receiving events:
But apollo-server resents the answer from hasura. It is not the first day I suffer with this and I can not understand what the problem is.
In the editor hasura subscriptions work.
Link to full code
If you need any additional info, I will gladly provide it to you.
import {
introspectSchema,
makeExecutableSchema,
makeRemoteExecutableSchema,
mergeSchemas,
transformSchema,
FilterRootFields
} from 'graphql-tools';
import { HttpLink } from 'apollo-link-http';
import nodeFetch from 'node-fetch';
import { resolvers } from './resolvers';
import { hasRoleResolver } from './directives';
import { typeDefs } from './types';
import { WebSocketLink } from 'apollo-link-ws';
import { split } from 'apollo-link';
import { getMainDefinition } from 'apollo-utilities';
import { SubscriptionClient } from 'subscriptions-transport-ws';
import * as ws from 'ws';
import { OperationTypeNode } from 'graphql';
interface IDefinitionsParams {
operation?: OperationTypeNode,
kind: 'OperationDefinition' | 'FragmentDefinition'
}
const wsurl = 'ws://graphql-engine:8080/v1alpha1/graphql';
const getWsClient = function (wsurl: string) {
const client = new SubscriptionClient(wsurl, {
reconnect: true,
lazy: true
}, ws);
return client;
};
const wsLink = new WebSocketLink(getWsClient(wsurl));
const createRemoteSchema = async () => {
const httpLink = new HttpLink({
uri: 'http://graphql-engine:8080/v1alpha1/graphql',
fetch: (nodeFetch as any)
});
const link = split(
({ query }) => {
const { kind, operation }: IDefinitionsParams = getMainDefinition(query);
console.log('kind = ', kind, 'operation = ', operation);
return kind === 'OperationDefinition' && operation === 'subscription';
},
wsLink,
httpLink,
);
const remoteSchema = await introspectSchema(link);
const remoteExecutableSchema = makeRemoteExecutableSchema({
link,
schema: remoteSchema
});
const renamedSchema = transformSchema(
remoteExecutableSchema,
[
new FilterRootFields((operation, fieldName) => {
return (operation === 'Mutation') ? false : true; // && fieldName === 'password'
})
]
);
return renamedSchema;
};
export const createNewSchema = async () => {
const hasuraExecutableSchema = await createRemoteSchema();
const apolloSchema = makeExecutableSchema({
typeDefs,
resolvers,
directiveResolvers: {
hasRole: hasRoleResolver
}
});
return mergeSchemas({
schemas: [
hasuraExecutableSchema,
apolloSchema
]
});
};
Fixed by installing graphql-tools 4th version. It tutns out the editor did not even notice that I do not have this dependency and simply took the version of node_modules, which was installed by some other package. Problem was with version 3.x. Pull request is where the bug was fixed.
I had the same problem, different cause and solution.
My subscription was working well, until I introduced the 'resolve' key in
my subscription resolver:
Here is the 'Subscription' part of My resolver:
Subscription: {
mySubName: {
resolve: (payload) => {
console.log('In mySubName resolver, payload:',payload)
return payload;
},
subscribe:() => pubSub.asyncIterator(['requestsIncomplete']),
// )
},
The console.log proved the resolve() function was being called with a well structured payload (shaped the same as my Schema definiton - specifically the an object with a key named after the graphQL Subscriber, pointing to an array (array is an iterable):
In mySubName resolver, payload: { mySubName:
[ { id: 41,
...,
},
{...},
{...}
...
...
]
Even though I was returning that same unadulterated object, it caused the error expected Iterable, but did not find one for field "Subscription.mySubName"
When I commented out that resolve function all together, the subscription worked, which is further evidence that my payload was well structured, with the right key pointing to an iterable.
I must be mis-using the resolve field. From https://www.apollographql.com/docs/graphql-subscriptions/subscriptions-to-schema/
When using subscribe field, it's also possible to manipulate the event
payload before running it through the GraphQL execution engine.
Add resolve method near your subscribe and change the payload as you wish
so I am not sure how to properly use that function, specifically don't know what shape object to return from it, but using it as above breaks the subscription in the same manner you describe in your question.
I was already using graphql-tools 4.0.0, I upgraded to 4.0.8 but it made no difference.
Related
I am trying to use apollo/graphql subscription in my nextjs project, my graphql server is placed in external nextjs service,I can work with queries and mutation without any problem but when I use an implementation of useSubscription I get the following error:
"Error: Observable cancelled prematurely
at Concast.removeObserver (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/#apollo/client/utilities/observables/Concast.js:118:33)
at eval (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/#apollo/client/utilities/observables/Concast.js:21:47)
at cleanupSubscription (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/zen-observable-ts/module.js:92:7)
at Subscription.unsubscribe (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/zen-observable-ts/module.js:207:7)
at cleanupSubscription (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/zen-observable-ts/module.js:97:21)
at Subscription.unsubscribe (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/zen-observable-ts/module.js:207:7)
at eval (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/#apollo/client/react/hooks/useSubscription.js:106:26)
at safelyCallDestroy (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:22763:5)
at commitHookEffectListUnmount (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:22927:11)
at invokePassiveEffectUnmountInDEV (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:24998:13)
at invokeEffectsInDev (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:27137:11)
at commitDoubleInvokeEffectsInDEV (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:27110:7)
at flushPassiveEffectsImpl (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:26860:5)
at flushPassiveEffects (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:26796:14)
at eval (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:26592:9)
at workLoop (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/scheduler/cjs/scheduler.development.js:266:34)
at flushWork (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/scheduler/cjs/scheduler.development.js:239:14)
at MessagePort.performWorkUntilDeadline (webpack-internal:///../../node_modules/scheduler/cjs/scheduler.development.js:533:21)"
I know that the subscriptions server is working right because I can to listening from apollo studio and I have created a spa with create-react-app and it works fine
I have used:
Server:
"apollo-server-express": "^3.6.7"
"graphql-ws": "^5.7.0"
Client
"next": "^12.1.5"
"#apollo/client": "^3.5.10"
"graphql-ws": "^5.7.0"
Hook implementation
const room = useSubscription(
gql`
subscription onRoomAdded($roomAddedId: ID!) {
roomAdded(id: $roomAddedId) {
id
name
}
}
`
);
Client implementation
import { ApolloClient, HttpLink, InMemoryCache, split } from '#apollo/client';
import { GraphQLWsLink } from '#apollo/client/link/subscriptions';
import { getMainDefinition } from '#apollo/client/utilities';
import { createClient } from 'graphql-ws';
import fetch from 'isomorphic-fetch';
const HOST = 'http://localhost:3001/graphql';
const HOST_WS = 'ws://localhost:3001/graphql';
const isServer = typeof window === 'undefined';
if (isServer) {
global.fetch = fetch;
}
const httpLink = new HttpLink({
uri: HOST,
});
const link = isServer
? httpLink
: split(
({ query }) => {
const definition = getMainDefinition(query);
return (
definition.kind === 'OperationDefinition' &&
definition.operation === 'subscription'
);
},
new GraphQLWsLink(
createClient({
url: HOST_WS,
})
),
httpLink
);
const client = new ApolloClient({
ssrMode: isServer,
link,
cache: new InMemoryCache(),
});
export default client;
any idea about the problem? I think the problem could be that NextJS only works with subscriptions-transport-ws but in the official apollo documentation indicates that the new official way is to use graphql-ws the other library is unmaintained already
UPDATE!
I have checked that the subscriptions are working right in production build, I'm investigating how to implement in development process. any suggestions are welcome.
If it is working in production, but in not in dev, you may have the same issue I had with my React SPA: StrictMode and double rendering as described in this github issue.
So far I have found 2 ways to make it work:
remove StrictMode
subscribe with vanilla JS instead ofuseSubscription
const ON_USER_ADDED = gql`
subscription OnUserAdded {
userAdded {
name
id
}
}
`;
const subscribe = () => {
client.subscribe({
query: ON_USER_ADDED,
}).subscribe({
next(data) {
console.log('data', data);
},
complete(){
console.log('complete');
},
error(err) {
console.log('error', err);
}
})
};
I'm trying to run next build when using getStaticProps and getStaticPaths method in one of my routes, but it fails every time. Firstly, it just couldn't connect to my API (which is obvious, they're created using Next.js' API routes which are not available when not running a Next.js app). I thought that maybe running a development server in the background would help. It did, but generated another problems, like these:
Error: Cannot find module for page: /reader/[id]
Error: Cannot find module for page: /
> Build error occurred
Error: Export encountered errors on following paths:
/
/reader/1
Dunno why. Here's the code of /reader/[id]:
const Reader = ({ reader }) => {
const router = useRouter();
return (
<Layout>
<pre>{JSON.stringify(reader, null, 2)}</pre>
</Layout>
);
};
export async function getStaticPaths() {
const response = await fetch("http://localhost:3000/api/readers");
const result: IReader[] = await response.json();
const paths = result.map((result) => ({
params: { id: result.id.toString() },
}));
return {
paths,
fallback: false,
};
}
export async function getStaticProps({ params }) {
const res = await fetch("http://localhost:3000/api/readers/" + params.id);
const result = await res.json();
return { props: { reader: result } };
}
export default Reader;
Nothing special. Code I literally rewritten from the docs and adapted for my site.
And here's the /api/readers/[id] handler.
export default async function handler(
req: NextApiRequest,
res: NextApiResponse
) {
const knex = getKnex();
const { id } = req.query;
switch (req.method) {
case "GET":
try {
const reader = await knex
.select("*")
.from("readers")
.where("id", id)
.first();
res.status(200).json(reader);
} catch {
res.status(500).end();
}
break;
}
}
Nothing special either. So why is it crashing every time I try to build my app? Thanks for any help in advance.
You should not fetch an internal API route from getStaticProps — instead, you can write the fetch code present in API route directly in getStaticProps.
https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/data-fetching#write-server-side-code-directly
I've got a mutation resolver that I call directly from the server like this:
import {graphql} from "graphql";
import {CRON_JOB_TO_FIND_USERS_WHO_HAVE_GONE_OFFLINE_MUTATION} from "../../query-library";
import AllResolvers from "../../resolvers";
import AllSchema from "../../schema";
import {makeExecutableSchema} from "graphql-tools";
const typeDefs = [AllSchema];
const resolvers = [AllResolvers];
const schema = makeExecutableSchema({
typeDefs,
resolvers
});
const {data, errors} = await graphql(
schema,
CRON_JOB_TO_FIND_USERS_WHO_HAVE_GONE_OFFLINE_MUTATION,
{},
{caller: 'synced-cron'},
{timeStarted: new Date().toISOString().slice(0, 19).replace('T', ' ')}
)
The mutation resolver is called and runs correctly. I don't need it to return anything, but GraphQL throws a warning if it doesn't, so I'd like it to return an object, any object.
So I'm trying it like this:
SCHEMA
cronJobToFindUsersWhoHaveGoneOffline(timeStarted: String): myUserData
QUERY
// note -- no gql. This string is passed directly to function graphql()
// where it gets gql applied to it.
const CRON_JOB_TO_FIND_USERS_WHO_HAVE_GONE_OFFLINE_MUTATION = `
mutation ($timeStarted: String){
cronJobToFindUsersWhoHaveGoneOffline(timeStarted: $timeStarted){
id,
},
}
`;
RESOLVER
cronJobToFindUsersWhoHaveGoneOffline(parent, args, context) {
return Promise.resolve()
.then(() => {
// there is code here that finds users who went offline if any
return usersWhoWentOffline;
})
.then((usersWhoWentOffline) => {
// HERE'S WHERE I HAVE TO RETURN SOMETHING FROM THE RESOLVER
let myUserDataPrototype = {
__typename: 'myUserData',
id: 'not_a_real_id'
}
const dataToReturn = Object.create(myUserDataPrototype);
dataToReturn.__typename = 'myUserData';
dataToReturn.id = 'not_a_real_id';
return dataToReturn; <==GRAPHQL IS NOT HAPPY HERE
})
.catch((err) => {
console.log(err);
});
},
}
GraphQL throws this warning:
data [Object: null prototype] {
cronJobToFindUsersWhoHaveGoneOffline: [Object: null prototype] { id: 'not_a_real_id' }
}
errors undefined
I have tried all kinds of different ways to fix this, but I haven't figured out the correct syntax yet.
What is a good way to handle this?
That doesn't appear to be a warning. That looks like you're writing the result to the console somewhere.
(Using typescript for better readability. Vanilla js is always welcome)
Nodejs App, using these imports:
import { FieldPath, DocumentReference } from '#google-cloud/firestore';
and this function
async getByIds(ids: DocumentReference[]) {
const collection = this.db.client.collection('authors');
const query = await collection.where(FieldPath.documentId(), 'in', ids).get();
return query.docs.map(d => ({ id: d.id, ...d.data() }));
}
returns this very specific error:
The corresponding value for FieldPath.documentId() must be a string or a DocumentReference.
The debugger confirms that ids is in fact a DocumentReference array.
Maybe the #google-cloud/firestore package isn't aligned to the firebase one?
EDIT:
as noted by Doug in it's comment, I forgot to put the code for this.db.client. Here you are:
export class DatabaseProvider {
private _db: Firestore;
get client(): Firestore {
return this._db;
}
constructor() {
this._db = new Firestore({
projectId: ...,
keyFilename: ...
});
}
}
And used as
const db = new DatabaseProvider();
It seems like what you're trying to do is a batch get, which is available via a different method: getAll(). I think you want this:
async getByIds(ids: DocumentReference[]) {
return this.db.client.getAll(...ids);
}
I'm creating an Apollo Client like this:
var { ApolloClient } = require("apollo-boost");
var { InMemoryCache } = require('apollo-cache-inmemory');
var { createHttpLink } = require('apollo-link-http');
var { setContext } = require('apollo-link-context');
exports.createClient = (shop, accessToken) => {
const httpLink = createHttpLink({
uri: `https://${shop}/admin/api/2019-07/graphql.json`,
});
const authLink = setContext((_, { headers }) => {
return {
headers: {
"X-Shopify-Access-Token": accessToken,
"User-Agent": `shopify-app-node 1.0.0 | Shopify App CLI`,
}
}
});
return new ApolloClient({
cache: new InMemoryCache(),
link: authLink.concat(httpLink),
});
};
to hit the Shopify GraphQL API and then running a query like that:
return client.query({
query: gql` {
productVariants(first: 250) {
edges {
node {
price
product {
id
}
}
cursor
}
pageInfo {
hasNextPage
}
}
}
`})
but the returned object only contain data and no extensions which is a problem to figure out the real cost of the query.
Any idea why?
Many thanks for your help
There's a bit of a hacky way to do it that we wrote up before:
You'll need to create a custom apollo link (Apollo’s equivalent of middleware) to intercept the response data as it’s returned from the server, but before it’s inserted into the cache and the components re-rendered.
Here's an example were we pull metrics data from the extensions in our API:
import { ApolloClient, InMemoryCache, HttpLink, ApolloLink } from 'apollo-boost'
const link = new HttpLink({
uri: 'https://serve.onegraph.com/dynamic?show_metrics=true&app_id=<app_id>',
})
const metricsWatchers = {}
let id = 0
export function addMetricsWatcher(f) {
const watcherId = (id++).toString(36)
metricsWatchers[watcherId] = f
return () => {
delete metricsWatchers[watcherId]
}
}
function runWatchers(requestMetrics) {
for (const watcherId of Object.keys(metricsWatchers)) {
try {
metricsWatchers[watcherId](requestMetrics)
} catch (e) {
console.error('error running metrics watcher', e)
}
}
}
// We intercept the response, extract our extensions, mutatively store them,
// then forward the response to the next link
const trackMetrics = new ApolloLink((operation, forward) => {
return forward(operation).map(response => {
runWatchers(
response
? response.extensions
? response.extensions.metrics
: null
: null
)
return response
})
})
function create(initialState) {
return new ApolloClient({
link: trackMetrics.concat(link),
cache: new InMemoryCache().restore(initialState || {}),
})
}
const apolloClient = create(initialState);
Then to use the result in our React components:
import { addMetricsWatcher } from '../integration/apolloClient'
const Page = () => {
const [requestMetrics, updateRequestMetrics] = useState(null)
useEffect(() => {
return addMetricsWatcher(requestMetrics =>
updateRequestMetrics(requestMetrics)
)
})
// Metrics from extensions are available now
return null;
}
Then use a bit of mutable state to track each request and its result, and the use that state to render the metrics inside the app.
Depending on how you're looking to use the extensions data, this may or may not work for you. The implementation is non-deterministic, and can have some slight race conditions between the data that’s rendered and the data that you've extracted from the extensions.
In our case, we store performance metrics data in the extensions - very useful, but ancillary - so we felt the tradeoff was acceptable.
There's also an open issue on the Apollo client repo tracking this feature request
I dont have any idea of ApolloClient but i tried to run your query in shopify graphql app. It return results with extensions. Please find screenshot below. Also You can put questions in ApolloClient github.