ARM Template for to configure App Services with new VNet Integration feature? - azure

I am working on ARM Templates, I have created the template file with two or more azure app services along with app service plan and then configured with VNET Integration of each app service.
This is sample JSON code:
{
"comments": "Web-App-01",
"name": "[variables('app_name_01')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[variables('location')]",
"apiVersion": "2016-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', variables('asp_name_01'))]"
],
"tags": {
"displayName": "[variables('app_name_01')]"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('app_name_01')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', variables('asp_name_01'))]",
"siteConfig": {
"alwaysOn": true
}
},
"resources": [
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites/virtualNetworkConnections",
"name": "[concat(variables('app_name_01'), '/', variables('vnet_connection_name'),uniqueString('asdsdaxsdsd'))]",
"apiVersion": "2016-08-01",
"location": "[variables('location')]",
"properties": {
"vnetResourceId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/subnets', variables('vm_vnet_name'), variables('web_subnet_name'))]"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', variables('app_name_01'))]",
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/subnets', variables('vm_vnet_name'), variables('web_subnet_name'))]"
]
}
]
},
{
"comments": "Web-App-02",
"name": "[variables('app_name_02')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[variables('location')]",
"apiVersion": "2016-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', variables('asp_name_02'))]"
],
"tags": {
"displayName": "[variables('app_name_02')]"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('app_name_02')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', variables('asp_name_01'))]",
"siteConfig": {
"alwaysOn": true
}
},
"resources": [
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites/virtualNetworkConnections",
"name": "[concat(variables('app_name_02'), '/', variables('vnet_connection_name'),uniqueString('asdsdaxsdsd'))]",
"apiVersion": "2016-08-01",
"location": "[variables('location')]",
"properties": {
"vnetResourceId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/subnets', variables('vm_vnet_name'), variables('web_subnet_name'))]"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', variables('app_name_02'))]",
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/subnets', variables('vm_vnet_name'), variables('web_subnet_name'))]"
]
}
]
}
The above code works fine for few azure app services, but for the rest of the app services I am getting internal server error or Conflict or Bad Request during VNET Integration of Azure App Service.
Note: When I deployed the above the JSON Code, the old VNET
integration is configured instead of New VNET (Preview) feature. So, I need to configure New VNET (Preview) feature for each app service.
So, can anyone suggest me how to resolve the above issue.

I've found a working example for this on an Azure Docs GitHub post:
How do we integrate the new vnet integrartion with ARM templates?
Seems to work a different way with the new VNet integration which uses a Microsoft.Web/sites/config sub-resource named virtualNetwork instead of the Microsoft.Web/sites/virtualNetworkConnections sub-resource
As well as a few requirements that need to be set on the target subnet / vnet (described in the link). The integration piece looks something like this:
{
"apiVersion": "2018-02-01",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"name": "[parameters('appName')]",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
...
"resources": [
{
"name": "virtualNetwork",
"type": "config",
"apiVersion": "2018-02-01",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"properties": {
"subnetResourceid": "[parameters('subnetResourceId')]",
"swiftSupported": true
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', parameters('appName'))]"
]
}
]
},
Apart from this I've not found much else documented, except for a reference to it in the azure-rest-api-specs which has the "/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Web/sites/{name}/networkConfig/virtualNetwork" endpoint defined:
azure-rest-api-specs / WebApps.json
It also seems (as the spec suggests) replacing "type": "config" with "type": "networkConfig" also works.

I've talked to a Prem Engineer of Microsoft.
The Key is to replace the Automation Template
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites/virtualNetworkConnections",
"apiVersion": "2018-11-01",
"name": "[concat(parameters('sites_FelixOFA_name'), '/xxxxxxx_Functions')]",
"location": "West Europe",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', parameters('sites_FelixOFA_name'))]"
],
"properties": {
"vnetResourceId": "[concat(parameters('virtualNetworks_FelixODevPremNet_externalid'), '/subnets/Functions')]",
"isSwift": true
}
}
with
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites/networkConfig",
"name": "[concat(parameters('webAppName'),'/VirtualNetwork')]",
"apiVersion": "2016-08-01",
"properties":
{
"subnetResourceId": "[parameters('subnetResourceId')]"
}
}
Where subnetResourceId is the resource id of their subnet – it should look like /subscriptions/{sub}/resourceGroups/{rg}/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/{vnetName}/subnets/{subnetName}

I tried to reach same functionality by Bicep file, finally using
virtualNetworkSubnetId:
worked for me.
For example:
resource webAppName_resource 'Microsoft.Web/sites#2020-12-01' = {
name: '${webAppName}'
location: location
properties: {
serverFarmId: appServicePlanPortalName.id
virtualNetworkSubnetId: '${vnetDeploy_module.outputs.vnetid}/subnets/${vnetDeploy_module.outputs.subnetname}'
siteConfig: {
linuxFxVersion: linuxFxVersion
minTlsVersion: minTlsVersion
http20Enabled: http20Enabled
}
httpsOnly: httpsOnly
}
}
See templates in https://github.com/Azure/azure-quickstart-templates/tree/master/quickstarts/microsoft.web/app-service-regional-vnet-integration.
Result in ARM is:
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"apiVersion": "2021-01-01",
"name": "[parameters('appName')]",
"location": "[parameters('location')]",
"kind": "app",
"properties": {
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', variables('appServicePlanName'))]",
"virtualNetworkSubnetId": "[reference(resourceId('Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks', variables('vnetName'))).subnets[0].id]",
"httpsOnly": true,
"siteConfig": {
"vnetRouteAllEnabled": true,
"http20Enabled": true
}
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', variables('appServicePlanName'))]",
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks', variables('vnetName'))]"
]
}

To fix this, I simply changed the isSwift or swiftSupported option to false.

Related

AZURE ARM Templates. The parameter LinuxFxVersion has an invalid value [duplicate]

I've set-up an App Service using the following ARM template snippet:
{
"name": "[variables('webBackEnd')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[parameters('location')]",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
],
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName')))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "BackendWebApp"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('webBackEnd')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
}
},
This will deploy an App Service. However, by default, it will be setup to use the .Net Framework. Below is a view from my Azure Portal:
In order to run my ASP.Net Core-based web server, I have to manually switch the Stack Settings from ".Net" to ".Net Core". It's a trivial thing to do, but I'd much rather configure it correctly through the ARM template. I searched Microsoft's docs but was unable to find the correct property. How does one go about to do this?
here's how an example web app looks when created from the portal:
{
"apiVersion": "2018-02-01",
"name": "[parameters('name')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[parameters('location')]",
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('name')]",
"siteConfig": {
"appSettings": [],
"metadata": [
{
"name": "CURRENT_STACK",
"value": "[parameters('currentStack')]"
}
]
},
// redacted some values
}
},
and the current stack value is dotnetcore
The accepted answer didn't work for me. I began my own investigation and finished with this code, which works in my case.
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"apiVersion": "2018-11-01",
"name": "[parameters('site_name')]",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
.........................................
"resources": [
{
"name": "metadata",
"type": "config",
"apiVersion": "2018-11-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', parameters('site_name'))]"
],
"tags": {
},
"properties": {
"CURRENT_STACK": "dotnetcore"
}
}
]

How to Set Up Application Insights from an Release Pipeline/ARM Templates

We have an Azure DevOps release pipeline, which sets up all of our Azure resources in a location. I can create everything successfully with ARM templates, but I'm struggling to link the App Service with the App Insights resource.
If I were doing it manually, I'd click a "Turn on site extension" button in the AppInsights blade of the App Service (under the heading "Enable Application Insights through site extension without redeploying your code").
I've tried adding an "Azure App Service Manage" step to my release pipeline, set to install the "Application Insights extension for Azure App Service" extension:
In addition, I've added an "Azure App Service Manage" step to my release pipeline, set to "Enable Continuous Monitoring":
But the result is still that AppInsights is connected, but the extension is not installed:
Is there any way I can do this automatically? Either via an ARM template, a PowerShell script, or something else?
Edit: In the "Extensions" blade, I can see "Application Insights extension for Azure App Service" (v2.6.5) and "ASP.NET Core Logging Extensions" (v2.2.0), but I'm still asked to "Turn on site extension" in the "Aplication Insights" blade.
In an ARM-template you can do:
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"apiVersion": "2018-02-01",
"name": "[variables('web_app_service_name')]",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', variables('plan_name'))]",
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Insights/components', variables('app_insights_name'))]"
],
"kind": "app",
"properties": {
"siteConfig": {
"appSettings": [
{
"name": "APPINSIGHTS_INSTRUMENTATIONKEY",
"value": "[reference(variables('app_insights_name'), '2015-05-01').InstrumentationKey]"
},
{
"name": "ApplicationInsightsAgent_EXTENSION_VERSION",
"value": "~2"
}
]
}
}
}
Refer to documentation at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-monitor/app/azure-web-apps#automate-monitoring
i think you would need to do something like that:
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('webSiteName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "Website"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]",
"[resourceId('microsoft.insights/components/', parameters('appInsightsName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('webSiteName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "appsettings",
"type": "config",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/Sites', parameters('webSiteName'))]",
"Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.AzureWebSites"
],
"properties": {
"APPINSIGHTS_INSTRUMENTATIONKEY": "[reference(concat('microsoft.insights/components/', parameters('appInsightsName'))).InstrumentationKey]"
}
},
{
// this bit installs application insights extension
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.AzureWebSites",
"type": "siteextensions",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/Sites', parameters('webSiteName'))]"
],
"properties": {
}
}
]
}
I've never actually tried this, but looks correct, link to the example I've found: https://github.com/tomasr/webapp-appinsights/blob/master/WebSite.json
Make sure that your app settings key is APPINSIGHTS_INSTRUMENTATIONKEY and not ApplicationInsights:InstrumentationKey. Somewhere in the MS docs it gives the impression that you can use either. In fact that's not the case, in Azure you need to use the former otherwise Application Insights won't be enabled for server side insights.
In order for the Azure Portal to show an active integration with Application Insights, you need to set three app settings.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-monitor/app/azure-web-apps?tabs=net#automate-the-creation-of-an-application-insights-resource-and-link-to-your-newly-created-app-service
{
"resources": [
{
"name": "[parameters('name')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"properties": {
"siteConfig": {
"appSettings": [
{
"name": "APPINSIGHTS_INSTRUMENTATIONKEY",
"value": "[reference('microsoft.insights/components/AppMonitoredSite', '2015-05-01').InstrumentationKey]"
},
{
"name": "APPLICATIONINSIGHTS_CONNECTION_STRING",
"value": "[reference('microsoft.insights/components/AppMonitoredSite', '2015-05-01').ConnectionString]"
},
{
"name": "ApplicationInsightsAgent_EXTENSION_VERSION",
"value": "~2"
}
]
},
"name": "[parameters('name')]",
"serverFarmId": "[concat('/subscriptions/', parameters('subscriptionId'),'/resourcegroups/', parameters('serverFarmResourceGroup'), '/providers/Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]",
"hostingEnvironment": "[parameters('hostingEnvironment')]"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]",
"microsoft.insights/components/AppMonitoredSite"
],
"apiVersion": "2016-03-01",
"location": "[parameters('location')]"
},
{
"apiVersion": "2016-09-01",
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"location": "[parameters('location')]",
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]",
"workerSizeId": "[parameters('workerSize')]",
"numberOfWorkers": "1",
"hostingEnvironment": "[parameters('hostingEnvironment')]"
},
"sku": {
"Tier": "[parameters('sku')]",
"Name": "[parameters('skuCode')]"
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-05-01",
"name": "AppMonitoredSite",
"type": "microsoft.insights/components",
"location": "West US 2",
"properties": {
"ApplicationId": "[parameters('name')]",
"Request_Source": "IbizaWebAppExtensionCreate"
}
}
],
"parameters": {
"name": {
"type": "string"
},
"hostingPlanName": {
"type": "string"
},
"hostingEnvironment": {
"type": "string"
},
"location": {
"type": "string"
},
"sku": {
"type": "string"
},
"skuCode": {
"type": "string"
},
"workerSize": {
"type": "string"
},
"serverFarmResourceGroup": {
"type": "string"
},
"subscriptionId": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2014-04-01-preview/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0"
}
See also my other answer on this: Azure Cli How to enable Application Insights for webapp

Azure ARM SSL Binding using App service certificate

I have a site with custom hostnames configured with hostnameBindings in the ARM template. This deploys fine.
I have also the SSL certificate created and verified from Azure, with the corresponding thumbprint.
In the Azure site I am also able to bind the certificate to the app service.
But when I use the ARM template to assign the SSL from the template in the hostnameBindings it gives an error that the certificate was not found...
I don't understand what goes wrong...
My guesses:
the certificate is in a different resource group so it cannot be
found, but in the template settings I cannot set the group.
in the Azure website before I can use the SSL I have to import, so maybe I am missing this step in the ARM template?
using wrong thumbprint?
In the hostnameBindings I am defining only the thumbprint and the sslState
Any idea which step I am missing?
thank you
UPDATE
My parameter json file:
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentParameters.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.5.0.8",
"parameters": {
"baseResourceName": {
"value": "base-name"
},
"environments": {
"value": [
"preview"
]
},
"hostNames": {
"value": [
{
"name": "myhostname.example.com",
"sslState": "SniEnabled",
"thumbprint": "9897LKJL88KHKJH8888KLJLJLJLKJLJLKL4545"
},
{
"name": "myhostname2.example.com"
}
]
},
"ipSecurityRestrictions": {
"value": []
}
}
}
My template json file:
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.5.0.8",
"parameters": {
"hostName": {
"defaultValue": [],
"type": "array",
"metadata": {
"description": "The custom hostnames of sites"
}
}
},
"variables": {
"standardPlanMaxAdditionalSlots": 4,
"appName": "[concat(parameters('baseResourceName'), '-private')]",
"appServicePlanName": "[concat(parameters('baseResourceName'), '-appServicePlan')]",
"appInsightName": "[concat(parameters('baseResourceName'), '-appInsight')]",
"ipSecurityRestrictions": "[parameters('ipSecurityRestrictions')]"
},
"resources": [
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"comments": "AppPlan for app.",
"sku": {
"name": "[if(lessOrEquals(length(parameters('environments')), variables('standardPlanMaxAdditionalSlots')), 'S1', 'P1')]"
},
"tags": {
"displayName": "AppServicePlan-Private"
},
"name": "[variables('appServicePlanName')]",
"kind": "app",
"apiVersion": "2016-09-01",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"properties": {},
"dependsOn": []
},
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"comments": "This is the private web app.",
"kind": "app",
"apiVersion": "2016-03-01",
"name": "[variables('appName')]",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"displayName": "WebApp"
},
"properties": {
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', variables('appServicePlanName'))]",
"siteConfig": {
"appSettings": [],
"phpVersion": "",
"ipSecurityRestrictions": "[variables('ipSecurityRestrictions')]",
"http20Enabled": true,
"minTlsVersion": "1.2"
}
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', variables('appServicePlanName'))]",
"[resourceId('microsoft.insights/components/', variables('appInsightName'))]"
]
},
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites/hostnameBindings",
"name": "[concat(variables('appName'), '/', parameters('hostName')[copyIndex()].Name)]",
"apiVersion": "2016-03-01",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"properties": "[parameters('hostName')[copyIndex()]]",
"condition": "[greater(length(parameters('hostName')), 0)]",
"copy": {
"name": "hostnameCopy",
"count": "[length(parameters('hostName'))]",
"mode": "Serial"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/sites/',variables('appName'))]"
]
}
]
}
completely unrelated, did you test your condition greater(..., 0) with zero length array? pretty sure it will blow up.
on the subject. i think you can maybe make it work if you link your certificate resource to the app service plan. so this is an operation that is performed on the certificate resource. this is totally possible if you use keyvault to store the certificate
{
"apiVersion": "2016-03-01",
"name": "[variables('certificateName')]",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/certificates",
"dependsOn": [
"[parameters('appServicePlan')]"
],
"properties": {
"keyVaultId": "kvResourceId",
"keyVaultSecretName": "secretName",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('appServicePlan'))]"
}
}

Azure - Set WebSocket On from ARM json template

I'm trying to turn WebSockets On for an Azure WebApp from an Azure ARM json template that deploys my whole infrastructure.
Here is an extract with regards to the Azure Web App. It doesn't work, i.e the WebSockets are still Off. I unsuccessfully tried different spelling: webSocketsEnabled or WebSockets.
"resources":[
{
"name": "[variables('MyApp')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "Brazil South",
"apiVersion": "2016-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', variables('MyAppPlanBrazil'))]"
],
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', variables('MyAppPlanBrazil')))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "MyAppAppBrazil"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('MyAppPlanBrazil')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', variables('MyAppPlanBrazil'))]",
"siteConfig": {
"AlwaysOn": true,
"webSocketsEnabled": true,
"connectionStrings": [
{
...
},
{
...
},
]
}
}
]
UPDATE
As suggested in answer below I updated the apiVersion to "2016-08-01" but this still doesn't work.
Also note that while my schema is the one described here, apiVersion is squiggled in VS and it says the authorized value is "2015-08-01" only.
UPDATE2
I tried the solutions below. They work for their authors but not for me. I guess the problem is elsewhere. My infrastructure is already deployed and I try to update it with webSocketsEnabled. Whereas in the solution below I imagine the authors directly create the web app with webSocketsEnabled.
Also, I coupled webSocketsEnabled with alwaysOn whereas the pricing tier of my webapp doesn't allow "AlwaysOn" (as it says in the portal I need to upgrade to use that feature) so I'll try without alwaysOn.
UPDATE3
At the end, the above template worked when I removed AlwaysOn.
Thank you to those who tried to help me.
Set your api version to this: "2016-08-01"
Use
"webSocketsEnabled": true
This is from the Microsoft.Web/sites template reference:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/templates/microsoft.web/sites
The api version you are using (2015-08-01) from:
https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-schemas/blob/master/schemas/2015-08-01/Microsoft.Web.json
Doesn't have web sockets in it, but the later one:
https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-schemas/blob/master/schemas/2016-08-01/Microsoft.Web.json
Does have webSocketsEnabled.
Please have a try to use the following code. It works correctly on my side.
Updated: add whole test arm template and you could have a try to use the following code with your service plan name and resource group name
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"serverFarmName": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "YourPlan"
},
"serverFarmResourceGroup": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "ResourceGroupName"
}},
"variables": {
"ARMtemplateTestName": "[concat('ARMtemplateTest', uniqueString(resourceGroup().id))]"},
"resources": [
{
"name": "[variables('ARMtemplateTestName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "southcentralus",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"dependsOn": [ ],
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceId(parameters('serverFarmResourceGroup'), 'Microsoft.Web/serverFarms', parameters('serverFarmName')))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "ARMtemplateTest"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('ARMtemplateTestName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId(parameters('serverFarmResourceGroup'), 'Microsoft.Web/serverFarms', parameters('serverFarmName'))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"name": "web",
"type": "config",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', variables('ARMtemplateTestName'))]"
],
"tags": {
"displayName": "enableWebSocket"
},
"properties": {
"webSocketsEnabled": true,
"alwaysOn": true
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "connectionstrings",
"type": "config",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/Sites', variables('ARMtemplateTestName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"ConnString1": {
"value": "My custom connection string",
"type": "custom"
},
"ConnString2": {
"value": "My SQL connection string",
"type": "SQLAzure"
}
}
},
{
"name": "appsettings",
"type": "config",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', variables('ARMtemplateTestName'))]"
],
"tags": {
"displayName": "Appsetting"
},
"properties": {
"key1": "value1",
"key2": "value2"
}
}
]
}],
"outputs": {}
}
Test Result:
All the above solution should work.
My initial snippet worked as well ... as soon as I removed alwaysOn.
Indeed, I was using a free tiers App Service Plan for which alwaysOn is not available. While there was no errors or anything else indicating something wrong, I could not set webSocketEnabled and alwaysOn at the same time in that case.

Deploy a node.js site using Azure Resource Manager

I'm struggling with a ARM deployment script for my node.js application. If I point to a repo with an MVC application it all works fine, but not using an node.js app.
Are there any specific settings for node.js sites?
Here is the resource part of my script:
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('nodeName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('nodeName'))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "Website"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('nodeName'))]"
],
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "web",
"type": "sourcecontrols",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/Sites', concat(parameters('nodeName')))]"
],
"properties": {
"repoUrl": "https://github.com/microServiceBus/microservicebus.node.git",
"branch": "master",
"IsManualIntegration": true
}
}
],
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('nodeName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('nodeName'))]",
"siteConfig": {
"appSettings": [
{
"Name": "hubUri",
"Value": "[parameters('hubUri')]"
},
{
"Name": "nodeName",
"Value": "[parameters('nodeName')]"
},
{
"Name": "organizationaId",
"Value": "[parameters('organizationaId')]"
}
]
}
}
}
The issue was that the name of the repo had a dot in it (microservicebus.node.git). I believe the bug is fixed or is going to be fixed soon.

Resources