I am running the NUnit tests (project in .Net Framework 4.5), as part of azure devops build pipeline.
- task: VSTest#2
inputs:
testAssemblyVer2: 'tests/**/*.Tests.dll'
pathtoCustomTestAdapters: '$(Build.SourcesDirectory)/packages'
codeCoverageEnabled: true
displayName: 'NUnit Testing'
- task: PublishCodeCoverageResults#1
inputs:
codeCoverageTool: JaCoCo
summaryFileLocation: '$(Common.TestResultsDirectory)/**/*.xml'
displayName: 'Publish Code Coverage'
// summaryFileLocation: '$(Common.TestResultsDirectory)/**/*.coverage'
But I am not able to see the coverage report, all I see the download link for coverage results...
How can I convert the .coverage report to JaCoCo format? OR generate the report directly in JaCoCo format?
I have seen some solution for .Net Core (link), but none for .Net framework
Update:
As per the release to Azure Devops for Sprint 150
When publishing code coverage reports, you no longer need to specify HTML files.
Therefore, the script in my illustration no longer needs to use the report generator tool directly to create the html report, and when publishing the coverage results, the directory containing those html reports doesn't need to be specified.
Edit:
The trick I've found for getting the coverage results from a .Net Framework project to show up on the Code Coverage tab is in the same line of thought to your linked article.
Don't run tests with the VS Test Task in Azure
Install the Report Generator and Coverlet tools directly
Use dotnet-vstest command for running tests through Coverlet
Publish reports generated with Report Generator and Cobertura format coverage results
Don't use the VS Test Task
Running this task will allow you to collect coverage with a simple checkbox, but you then surrender your opportunity to provide the content for the Code Coverage Tab
Install tools directly
Use a Powershell task (or similar) to install the Coverlet and Report Generator tools directly. This allows you to use them on projects that are not .Net Core.
"install tools:"
&dotnet tool install dotnet-reportgenerator-globaltool --tool-path . --version 4.0.12
&dotnet tool install coverlet.console --tool-path . --version 1.4.1
Use dotnet vstest through coverlet
It's my understanding that dotnet test doesn't play nice with .Net Framework projects/assemblies. However, we can still use the dotnet command, which we know will be on the agent machine, but we need to use it as a mechanism to get to the vstest.console.exe.
The Coverlet tool, as mentioned in the article you linked, will output coverage results in Cobertura format if you tell it to do so.
&$coverlet $unitTestFile.FullName --target "dotnet" --targetargs "vstest $($unitTestFile.FullName) --logger:trx" --format "cobertura"
Publish results
Complete script sample
note: this script is pretty rough, so use it as a thought exercise for your individual situation.
"install tools:"
&dotnet tool install dotnet-reportgenerator-globaltool --tool-path . --version 4.0.12
&dotnet tool install coverlet.console --tool-path . --version 1.4.1
"`nmake reports dir:"
mkdir .\reports
"`nrun tests:"
$unitTestFile = gci -Recurse | ?{ $_.FullName -like "*bin\*UnitTestProject2.dll" }
Write-Host "`$unitTestFile value: $unitTestFile"
$coverlet = "$pwd\coverlet.exe"
"calling $coverlet for $($unitTestFile.FullName)"
&$coverlet $unitTestFile.FullName --target "dotnet" --targetargs "vstest $($unitTestFile.FullName) --logger:trx" --format "cobertura"
"`ngenerate report(s)"
gci -Recurse |
?{ $_.Name -eq "coverage.cobertura.xml" } |
%{ &"$pwd\reportgenerator.exe" "-reports:$($_.FullName)" "-targetdir:reports" "-reporttypes:HTMLInline;HTMLChart" }
If you're struggling to figure out the escaping of quotes and such with the Coverlet command, YOU ARE NOT ALONE. I used the echoargs commandlet from PSCX more times than I care to admit so I could see what was actually getting provided to the .exe calls I was making.
The Results!!
...because that's really what matters
Original Answer:
Because of the way the linked article you mentioned is installing and using the report generator global tool I would think you can still follow those guidelines for creating the HTML inline and chart report types.
I'm not sure what is meant or how it works when the article says,
The point is the reporttypes: Use HTMLInLine for enabling the output on the Azure DevOps page. Azure DevOps Coverage page show index.html on the web.
I'm understanding that you can use the tool to create the HTML report from the .xml coverage results, and then publish the coverage results and report together with the Publish Code Coverage task.
So it seems all you need is to have an .xml format of the .coverage tool.
I didn't get it working in straight powershell, but you could follow the instructions from the Report Generator documentation to write a C# utility to access the Coverage.Analysis library.
For anyone looking for code coverage in Azure Devops (using classic editor, without Yaml), in current .NET (core) 5, with xUnit tests:
In your xUnit test project, add following (it generally comes by default in .NET 5, xUnit template now):
<PackageReference Include="coverlet.collector" Version="3.0.3" />
Keep checking for new version.
Head to Azure devops, create pipeline using classic editor. Do the restore, build steps. (Or you can choose dotnet core template as below):
In the test command of dotnet core task, add argument - --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage". Remember "XPlat Code Coverage" is friendly name and case sensitive. Your test command would look like:
Check this checkbox if you want to publish your test results: Publish test results and code coverage, but it won't publish code coverage. The functionality is not yet working (at least not in non-windows).
Next add - Publish code coverage results task. Choose "Code coverage tool" as "Cobertura" and in "Summary file" field, add $(Agent.TempDirectory)/**/coverage.cobertura.xml. Looks like this:
Save and Queue (in any agent, I use Ubuntu) and see the result once pipeline run completes:
Coverage report tab:
HTML Coverage reports and coverage cobertura xml are published as artifacts:
You can use Publish Code Coverage Results task in azure devops pipeline to see code coverage result in Jacoco format.
for further information about setup and configuration , please check the blog in MSDN
https://learn.microsoft.com/hi-in/azure/devops/pipelines/tasks/test/publish-code-coverage-results?view=tfs-2015#q--a
Hope it helps.
Related
I needed a small help. Whenever I run the pipeline, the data being displayed in testtab is incorrect and it displays the data which I ran on my local desktop rather than the job ran on Agent.
You can run tests in test tabs using different options. You can use any to solve your problem:
Automatically inferred test result: for some popular test runners' pipeline automatically infer the test output.
This is done with the help of describing the error logs generated during build operation.
Publish Test result task: Publishes test result to azure pipeline you choose the runner for tests execution available in
any formats.
Test execution tasks: Built -in test execution tasks such as visual studio test that automatically publish tests results to the pipeline
Azure Devops also provide other way to surface the test information You can use this.
Test analytics provide rich insights into test result over a period of time, identify problematic area in your test.
The dashboard provide track of your work's progress add widgets that surface test related information.
Requirement quality
Test result trend
Deployment status
Reference: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/pipelines/test/review-continuous-test-results-after-build?view=azure-devops
I am trying to run the unit test cases and calculate code coverage whenever CI build is run .
You can view the build definition in the picture below .
I am getting the error : 'No test sources found matching the given filter ***bin\Release\UTproject.dll'
When I check the logs of task 'Build Solution' I found that there's no trace of unit test cases being built . Though other projects are getting build .
Can anyone please guide me on what change should I make in the repository or the build to make sure that Unit test project gets built along with other projects ?
Perhaps building the unit test project would resolve the above stated issue in running unit tests along the with Ci build . Let me know if there's anything else that I am missing .
Thanks in Advance !
When I check the logs of task 'Build Solution' I found that there's no trace of unit test cases being built .
According to your description, you need to find out the reason why the unit test project are not built.
So, first, we need make sure we have submit the Unit test project in the repo and the Visual Studio build task build the solution .sln file, not only the project .csproj files:
Second, if the Unit test project is built and we still get the same error, then we need to check filter in the option Test files in the Visual Studio Test task.
As the log showing, you set the filter like:
**\*bin\release\xxxxUT.dll
So, you need make sure you have set the configuration=release when you build the solution in Visual Studio build task:
Or you could change the filter to:
**\*UI*.dll
!**\obj\**
And the Search folder should be the folder where the test dll generated, the default value is $(System.DefaultWorkingDirectory)
Hope this helps.
Currently I am trying to using Azure Test Plans to manage all test cases, but I just found how to build / generate manual test cases. I also make some research about Pipeline and I just write some "hello world" test scripts and using Pipeline to automatically test the code. My question is: How could I combine TestPlans with Pipeline to make the test in pipeline recordable? Thank you so much!
this is how the pipeline looks like
this is how the test code be checked
My question is: How could I combine TestPlans with Pipeline to make
the test in pipeline recordable?
I'm a bit confused about what the recordable mean in your question. To combine TestPlan with Pipeline, you should configure the Test Plan Settings. For example, set a build pipeline(build and generates the test binaries) and a release pipeline with test-related task in your Test Plan Settings.
The normal logic is:
A test plan containing your automated tests, which you have associated with automated test methods using Visual Studio 2017, or Visual Studio 2015 or earlier.
A Team Build pipeline that generates builds containing the test binaries.
The app to test. You can deploy the app as part of the build and release workflow and also use it for on-demand testing.
For more details please check Run automated tests from test plans.
I have a Visual Studio solution housing an Azure Cloud Service with the following projects:
CloudService
CloudServiceRole
Tests
Where the Tests project is a standard MSTest project that contains unit tests for the business logic in the CloudServiceRole project.
The code is stored in Visual Studio Online and I have hooked up the automated CI build deployment that Azure offers. When I check in code, my staging deployment of the cloud service is automatically updated. However, the Tests project is never even built during the CI builds! This, of course, means that no unit tests run during the build as the "run unit tests" part of the build process finds no assemblies with tests.
My goal is to change this so the tests project is built and all the unit tests executed.
Looking at the MSBuild arguments that the CI deployment process uses, it appears that only the CloudService:Publish target is executed. The CloudService project has no dependency on the Tests project so MSBuild never even builds the latter.
What I have tried
I cannot manually add a CloudService->Tests dependency because when I add dependencies on projects that are not Cloud Service Role projects, I get an error during build (The item "C:\a\src\MyProject\Tests\Tests.csproj" in item list "ProjectReferenceWithConfiguration" does not define a value for metadata "Name".) and I cannot add a CloudServiceRole->Tests dependency because that would make a circular dependency.
Instructing MSBuild to build the full solution by manually adding a /t:Build parameter resulted in yet another error: C:\a\bin\ServiceDefinition.csdef: Need to specify the physical directory for the virtual path 'Web/' of role Web.
Adding the Tests project as a separate build target, alongside the solution, results in the tests getting built! However, at the same time, it disables the Continuous Deployment functionality: More than one solution found. Continuous Deployment skipped.
Trying to make a fake Cloud Service Role project that references the Tests project but has zero instances configured results in a build error: WAT100: The following roles 'Tests.FakeRole' have an instance count of 0. Instance count of 0 is not supported in deployments to Microsoft Azure. Attempting to disable this validation results in a build error due to a defect in the Azure SDK.
You need to run a Build and a Publish separately. I ran into the same problem on my VSO (now VSTS) project and this fixed it. This happens because your cloud service doesn't depend on your unit test project.
1) Visual Studio Build (or MSBuild) action with arguments /t:Build (clean here)
2) Visual Studio Build (or MSBuild) action with arguments /t:Publish (do not clean here)
Note: I had to run these actions separately (not /Build;Publish) otherwise I got an error about the cloud service entry point.
Pieced this together from this question and from here and here.
One workaround that appears to bring results is to add a pre-MSBuild script to the build definition and explicitly build the Tests project in that script.
:: This is used as a pre-build script in Continuous Deployment builds because on their own, they do not build the Tests project.
"c:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v4.0.30319\MSBuild.exe" %~dp0\..\..\Tests\Tests.csproj /t:Build /p:Configuration=Debug;Platform=AnyCPU;OutDir="%~dp0\..\..\..\..\bin\\"
It appears to do the job, although I am not sure what side-effects I should be aware of. My main concern is that the binaries from this build go into the same directory as the binaries from the Cloud Service build - is there perhaps some possibility of conflict here?
I understand that gitlab has support to Jenkins CI, but what I need is a lot less than that.
I have a Rails application and get the coverage from the tests using simplecov. It generates HTML output in a directory by running a rake task. I would like to see the current coverage through gitlab. Is there a simple way to integrate this report with gitlab?
I fear there is still no easy way to integrate code coverage reports but Gitlab now supports (since Version 8.0 integrated) build jobs for your code. Unfortunately you have to implement your solution by writing a custom .gitlab-ci.yml to run your coverage tests. For viewing the reports, you can specify the generated "artifacts" or publish them on gitlab pages.
For more information, see here: https://about.gitlab.com/gitlab-ci/
Additionally you can parse a text output to display a short code coverage report:
(Enable builds and output test coverage)
Go to "Project Settings" -> Builds
Add to "Test coverage parsing" a regular expression (examples below, simplecov included)
See Publish Code Coverage Report with GitLab Pages
The short answer: Unfortunately there is no easy way to do this.
The longer answer:
GitLab not yet has a Jenkins support.
What you basically need is a service like GitLab CI or Jenkins CI, which starts simplecov and posts the output back to GitLab. Unfortunately GitLab does not offer such a functionality yet.
But I know other organizations which do have a Jenkins service for GitLab which automatically comment git pushes with the Jenkins result.
You now (June 2020, GitLab 13.1) have code coverage history, in addition of Test coverage parsing.
Graph code coverage changes over time for a project
All too often, a project has a code coverage target but development teams might not have much visibility into which direction that target value is trending over time.
There needs to be an easier way to track changes in code coverage over time without that extra hassle.
The Code Coverage graph now provides better visibility into how code coverage is trending over time.
It displays a simple graph of the coverage value(s) calculated in pipelines.
See Documentation and Issue
With GitLab 13.6 (November 2020), you also have (not for free though)
Display code coverage data for selected projects
In 13.4, we released the first iteration of Code Coverage data for Groups that enables you to compare the coverage of multiple projects and download the data in a single file from a single screen. However, to analyze the data, you had to open the file to check it manually, and probably imported it into a spreadsheet for further analysis.
In GitLab 13.6, you can now select specific projects in a group to see their latest coverage values directly in GitLab itself without needing to download a file or waste development time accessing code coverage data. We welcome feedback on the functionality and possible iterations for this feature in our feedback issue.
See Documentation and Issue.