I have recently learned tutorial about restful APIs.In that, my instructor suggested me that if we want to delete any document we should pass id in the parameter of the request. But now I am confused How do we handle this implementation on the client side.I mean how can even the programmer on the front side could be aware of that particular document ID. Does he need to go to the database each time?
Common practice for accessing a record in db is to use its unique identifier, to get or update or delete the record.
On the client side (if you mean user interface) when user wants to delete a document, he/she must see the document somewhere in the interface. Suppose a page with a table containing a list of all (for instance) books in the db. On each row, you have book title and author's name and the id of the book document in the db.
So you can use that id to call the delete rest API.
In a nutshell, when you want to delete something you must have got it from db to simply see it, so the id is at your hand.
When you want to delete a some doc from the database you need to get all documents to the front end to see what do we need to do to this data right ?
Imagine any database GUI that u have worked with..
let's say phpmyadmin when using mysqli
in that case you have php mydamin's GUI so that u can clearly see what are the tables and how things persist in the database. you need to see that in order for you to make decision
. Like that you will need to bring at least a portion of that data to the front end for user to see it and choose what portion of data the user want's to make changes or delete.
so when we have a set of data in the front end like a list, if a user select one item from that list the id or the name of that item can be send to the server side and make the task if the user wishes to do
that's why you need an Id or a identification field of that particular data..
Related
Client Vs Server Script - for validating the following?
From the database, a list of countries in world (India,America,japan,USA etc.,) are queried and stored in a list.
Now, the user enters state name as text. This needs to be validated against the list of values.
Where should this validation be written? Client or Server?
You don't need a script for this case. You can have a Custom Record for the Countries and Custom Record for the States. State Custom Record will have a field for name of the State and another field that will source the the Country record which has a field for the name of the country. Once the custom records are created then you can now create the field from the record you want let say Contact record. Create a field Country which source to the Country custom record then another field for State which source to the State custom record and put a filter on based on the Country Field.
This way, when the user selects the Country the list on the State will only be populated with the state that has the same country from the state custom record.
This is something you can do on servers side so you avoid having problems with the user.
If the users is typing some whole wrong information, where'd you like to have the errors in a logfile on the client side where the user have to contact you first or would you like to have it server side so you'll see what's going on?
What matters aswell is the extensibility of your software, you can easy continue working on your code server sided otherwise you would need to update the validation ofc.
What's importat is that the Validation is cased locally (client) so you need to define the validation server sided but it will run locally.
You will try to use the input from the user, and do a list.Contains method or another validation method.
Hope you can work with this :)
I am doing "traditional" lotus notes programming (same since R5) and need to implement linking between 2 document types (forms) residing in different databases.
Document of type (A) in database (A) can reference several documents of type (B) in database (B).
And document (B) should also display its relationships with document (A), as document (B) can be related to different documents (A).
We have Many to Many relationship.
At the moment it is implemented on one side only (one to many):
Form of Document (A) contains embedded view of special
"link" documents residing in database A. This link documents are created by lotusScript when user selects documents from database (B). When user clicks on an item in this embedded view, it opens document (B).
Client wants to be able to edit this relationship on any side, so that if he edits it in form (A), form (B) is updated.
Form (B) is supposed to have the same kind of embedded view or a list of associated documents of type (A)
What is the best way to implement it?
Client's infrastracture is Lotus Domino 8.5.2 + Lotus Notes 8.5.2, so theoretically, composite applications approach may be an option.
The reason why I ask this question is that as far as I understand there is no good way in Notes to embed a view from another database.
The requirement is that the database should be present on workspace to be displayed in some sort of dodgy list.
It would be great to be able to specify target database for embedded view by server and replicaID, but instead we have a weird list of random workspace databases.
The main problem is that Notes wasn't designed to handle relationships like that between databases (nor anything besides parent child relationships for that matter). So the solution will have to be a creative one.
A couple of (off-the wall, potentially awful) ideas come to mind. One is to store the references in the documents themselves, and update them whenever the document is saved. That could all be done in LotusScript, and would require searching through the other database's documents to update their references.
Upside is that the performance when reading the documents would be excellent. There'd be no issues while reading Database A if Database B was unavailable. It keeps data local to each database. The downsides include the likelihood of save conflicts and the danger that references could get out of sync if documents aren't "saved" but instead are updated via agents, etc.
Another thought is to use agents to manage the links on a scheduled basis. If you don't need real-time up-to-date references, you could run an agent that scans Database B and updates the references in Database A. With this method you could choose either to update the Database A documents themselves - or - as it sounds like you've already done, create a set of link documents that show up in an embedded view. The latter eliminates the save conflict problem.
One more idea is to hide any references when you open a document in Database A, but provide a button to "show" or "update" references. When you click that button, it fires off LotusScript to search Database B and build a list on the fly. This would probably work quickly with less than 10,000 documents. That function could update the link documents you store on the same database which feed the embedded view.
Hope this helps!
What is the best way to implement it?
As you mention creating a composite application may allow you to do this, but would be restricted to windows rather then design level in the form.
eg.
[Window A] --- trigger ---> [Window B]
If you are not familiar with this system I did a tutorial which explains the basics.
http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/compappwiki.nsf/dx/ibm-my-first-wire
Although the tutorial calls back to the same database, it is easy enough to point to a different one.
Personally I'd do it through XPages. I personally find it much easier to implement then through classic style notes design/comp apps. It will also allow you to display design elements within the same screen area.
As you've already heard, Lotus Notes has no referential integrity constraints built-in, you have to do it yourself.
I wouldn't be relying on document links as they're geared around UNID's which can change if you cut and paste the same document, thus losing the link. Try this,
1/ Create an "ID" field on each document. You can populate it by using #Unique in a computed field to generate an ID, and save that to the documents in both databases. You can create an agent to do this in lotusScript (LS), or formula. (Consider using the evaluate statement if doing in LS)
2/ Create a lookup view in each database that lists the documents by the new ID (don't forget to set the "sort order" of the ID column.
3/ Using an action button that can be configured for both databases, you can create a LS function that will open the the opposing databases view and return the ID field. (NotesUIWorkspace.pickliststrings would be the simplest way to pick the documents, otherwise you could build a dialogbox. Store the list of results in a field called "linkedID" as multi-value list.
4/ There may be more info that you want to store like document title or author, so you'll need to then get a handle to those documents using getdocumentbykey and then interrogating the fields you'll need to display information on screen.
5/ You can then also add a new field on the target documents you're referring to, call it "referrerID", which is a list of documents that reference the current document. This will maintain the two-way relationship.
The field that stores links must be a multi-valued field, otherwise it gets quite cumbersome to loop through list of linked document ID's and manage them.
This approach uses a static key so you can copy databases around without losing the relationships between documents the user has invested time in producing. You can (and probably will) lose those relationships if you rely on document universal ID's (described well in the #documentUniqueID documentation), if you cut and paste the document, or copy the database somewhere else they become new documents despite copying the same fields, and will be assigned a new universal ID, any document links for the old document will be invalid.
If the information you're displaying from the other database changes, you'll need to be able to refresh that data regularly, so consider writing a scheduled agent that can do the look up and refresh the relevant fields.
If the user intends to un-link or change the relationships between documents, then you'll need to add functions that loop through the key fields and keep the lists consistent with what the user is doing. So, like I said, Lotus Notes' flat data structure requires you manage all integrity constraints yourself.
If you want to get a little fancy you can use embedded views as they do support references from another database on the same server. Some tips about handling it in LotusScript here. And use an additional view that categorises your data by the referring ID. Embedded views are ok, as long as the view they're based on is not too big, otherwise it may affect the performance of the form that it is embedded into.
I'm new to the Zend Framework and I have a problem to create an edit form with the Zend_Form.
My problem is that I need to store the entry ID during editing, I've seen some examples that are using a hidden form field, but a hidden field can be manipulated by a user.
So: how can I set a form field which gets populated by $form->populate($data); and is available after submiting the request but is not editabel/visible to the user in any way?
Thanks for any help!
I'm not sure if there's really a point in trying to hide the value.
Consider the following:
To display the correct editor form, you need the ID of the object that is to be edited.
Before allowing the user to edit a certain ID, you would check if the user can edit it or not.
Thus, if you put the ID in the form, it shouldn't really matter:
When you POST the edit form, you should again check that the user can still edit the ID.
If the user changes the hidden ID, it doesn't really matter. They could still go and edit the other ID by finding it on the site. (This is assuming your check didn't tell you the user does not have access)
what kind of data you wanna hide?
data should be in post or get.if you dont put your data in your form,then you will have to use GET which is less secure than POST.
If you have some data and you dont want the user to see those data,then you should not put those data in a form.you can store and retrieve hidden data using forms submitted values.lets suppose your hidden field is users password.you dont need to send password back to the client when client is editing the form.you can manipulate password in your controller according to the user`s submitted first name and last name.
If you still insist, you may wanna try encrypting data using ZF and echo ing your value and setting encrypted data into a hidden form element.
Zend_Form generates an HTML form element with the form elements you specify. So its element capabilities are narrowed to a simple HTML form.
The hidden form element is used to pass those data that the user is not supposed to enter by hand. But as you yourself said it, there is no guaranty it could not be tampered. so no security is provided by using a hidden form value.
Most of times you'd better use server side values (like stored in sessions) to reference to values that are to be protected from user.
I suggest you keep the ID in a session value, and then you could use the session key in the hidden form field. this way the user can not change the target ID. However you are not able to use the $form->populate($values) on this in one step. you would have to set the target value with other steps:
fetch data from the session
set the form element value with the fetched data
I am new to Drupal and trying to get hand on it.
I am not able to find how to have the following functionality on my site. If anyone can help me out, it would be great for me.
I need to have a form that will take 2 fields one of which is supposed to be the login id(how to retrive login id?). I need to store this and display in tabular form also on a new page. Lastly I want to provide an edit form for this functionality using the same form but its use will be like whenever a person adds value in this form, it checks in Table1, if entry is not present it adds in table, else it updates the table.
Apart from this I need to store all the updations in a seperate table or something like that, so that I am able to see the history of all the changes
Eg:
ADD Form:
Fields:
- LoginID
- Phone number
Show Table Page(Tabular with the stored information)
Edit Form(same as above form):
Fields:
- LoginID
- Phone number
Now If I add my phone number to this it will get stored. Later when I try to modify my number it should update in initial table but also store the history of old and new entry in a separate table so that I can perform varies options on it.
I also dont know how to add/enable form fields in drupal. :(
Thanks
I'm not entirely sure what you're asking, but I think the Computed Field module might be helpful. The module allows you to define custom hooks that run when a node is saved.
If you're not creating nodes and are using something like the Webform module, you should be able to write a module to process the data.
I have a database of clients. Before entering a new client, I want to make sure that that client is not already in the database. So I want to put a search form at the top of my page to search by client number, and client name. Further down the page, I'll have another form to enter and submit the client's information. Would this be the best way to go about something like this? How would you approach this? i'm using drupal 6.
It is better that when the user is inserting a new customer name, an autocomplete shows the names matching the characters inserted by the user; if the user wrote "Mic", and in the database there is a customer with the name "Michael Greenpeace", the autocomplete will show "Michael Greenpeace", and the user will understand there is already a record for that customer.
Even without the autocomplete (which would help the user to understand if the data for the customer has been already inserted in the database, and continue with the next customer), a user that inserted the name of an existing customer should see the existing data; this would help the user to avoid rewriting data that are already updated (customer information need to be updated, sometimes, and not only inserted).