Named Pipe, Communication between 2 children - linux

I have a problem with my code. I want to make communication between 2 children process. One of them is a server, which opens a file and sends each letter to the second process. The second process is counting letters and it should make a new file and save results. I have problems with the last step because the first process gonna finish faster than the second, what causes the end of the program. I have no idea how fix it. Looking for some tips :).
Here you got result.
My code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <string.h>
//stale
#define FIFO "my_fifo"
#define SIZE 26
//zmienne globalne
int desk; //deskryptor pliku
int tab[SIZE];
//prototypy funkcji
void parentKillAll();
void server(FILE * file);
void client();
void cleanUp(FILE * file);
int checkEntryData(int argc, char *argv);
void replaceTabWithZero(int * tab);
void countLetters(int * tab, char ch);
void saveResults(int * tab, char *title);
void showTab(int * tab);
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
if (!checkEntryData(argc, argv[1]))
return 1;
replaceTabWithZero(tab);
FILE *file = fopen(argv[1], "r");
umask(0);
mkfifo(FIFO, 0666);
if (file) {
if (fork() == 0) {
server(file);
exit(0);
} else if (fork() == 0) {
client();
saveResults(tab, strcat(argv[1], "Result"));
showTab(tab);
exit(0);
} else {
cleanUp(file);
parentKillAll();
}
} else {
perror("Error");
}
return 0;
}
void parentKillAll() {
sleep(1);
kill(0, SIGKILL);
exit(0);
}
void server(FILE * file) {
char ch;
while ((ch = fgetc(file)) != EOF) {
desk = open(FIFO, O_WRONLY);
write(desk, &ch, 1);
}
}
void client() {
char ch;
while (1) {
desk = open(FIFO, O_RDONLY);
read(desk, &ch, 1);
countLetters(tab, ch);
printf("%c", ch);
}
}
void cleanUp(FILE *file) {
wait(0);
fclose(file);
close(desk);
}
int checkEntryData(int argc, char *argv) {
if (argc < 2) {
fprintf(stderr, "Nie poprawna ilosc argumentow\n");
return 0;
}
if (access(argv, F_OK)) {
fprintf(stderr, "Podany plik \'%s\' nie istnieje\n", argv);
return 0;
}
if (access(argv, R_OK)) {
fprintf(stderr, "Brak uprawnien do odczytu pliku \'%s\'\n", argv);
return 0;
}
return 1;
}
void replaceTabWithZero(int * tab) {
for (int i = 0; i < SIZE; i++)
tab[i] = 0;
}
void countLetters(int *tab, char ch) {
int chVal = ch;
if (chVal > 92)
chVal -= 32;
if (chVal > 64 && chVal < 91)
tab[chVal-65] += 1;
}
void saveResults(int *tab, char * title) {
FILE *plik = fopen(title, "w");
if (plik) {
for (int i = 0; i < SIZE; i++)
fprintf(plik, "%c - %d\n", (i+97), tab[i]);
} else {
perror("Error");
}
fclose(plik);
}
void showTab(int * tab) {
for (int i = 0; i < SIZE; i++)
printf("\n%d", tab[i]);
}

The real problem is that the client process can never finish, because it runs an infinite while(1) loop without any exit conditions.
You should rewrite it so that it exits after reading all available data:
void client() {
char ch;
// Open the fifo only once, instead of once per character
desk = open(FIFO, O_RDONLY);
// Loop until there is no more data to read
while(read(desk, &ch, 1) > 0) {
countLetters(tab, ch);
printf("%c", ch);
}
}
This is technically sufficient to make it work, but you should also look into a series of other issues:
You should have two wait(0) calls so that you wait for both processes, and you shouldn't try to kill anything.
The server process should only be opening the fifo once, not once per character.
You should be comparing fgetc output to EOF before forcing the value into a char. Since you do it after, running your program on a ISO-8859-1 terminal will cause it to confuse EOF and the letter ÿ
You are using strcat on argv[1], even though you don't know how much space that array has. You should use your own buffer of a known length.
You should check the return value of all your system calls to ensure they succeed. Checking with access and then assuming it'll be fine is not as good since calls can fail for other reasons.
Canonical Unix behavior is to exit with 0 for success, and >= 1 for error.
It's good practice to use a larger buffer (e.g. 65536 bytes instead of 1) when using read/write directly. stdio functions like fgetc already uses a larger buffer behind the scenes.
Using a named pipe obviously works, but since you spawn both processes it would be more natural to use an unnamed one.

Related

My semaphore module is not working properly(Dining philosopher)

I'm implementing a semaphore methods to understand synchronization and thread things.
By using my semaphore, I tried to solve the Dining Philosophers problem.
My plan was making deadlock situation first.
But I found that just only one philosopher eat repeatedly.
And I checked that my semaphore is working quite good by using other synchronization problems. I think there is some problem with grammar.
please let me know what is the problem.
Here is my code.
dinig.c (including main function)
#include "sem.h"
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
static tsem_t *chopstick[5];
static tsem_t *updating;
static int update_status (int i, int eating)
{
static int status[5] = { 0, };
static int duplicated;
int idx;
int sum;
tsem_wait (updating);
status[i] = eating;
/* Check invalid state. */
duplicated = 0;
sum = 0;
for (idx = 0; idx < 5; idx++)
{
sum += status[idx];
if (status[idx] && status[(idx + 1) % 5])
duplicated++;
}
/* Avoid printing empty table. */
if (sum == 0)
{
tsem_signal (updating);
return 0;
}
for (idx = 0; idx < 5; idx++)
fprintf (stdout, "%3s ", status[idx] ? "EAT" : "...");
/* Stop on invalid state. */
if (sum > 2 || duplicated > 0)
{
fprintf (stdout, "invalid %d (duplicated:%d)!\n", sum, duplicated);
exit (1);
}
else
fprintf (stdout, "\n");
tsem_signal (updating);
return 0;
}
void *thread_func (void *arg)
{
int i = (int) (long) arg;
int k = (i + 1) % 5;
do
{
tsem_wait (chopstick[i]);
tsem_wait (chopstick[k]);
update_status (i, 1);
update_status (i, 0);
tsem_signal (chopstick[i]);
tsem_signal (chopstick[k]);
}
while (1);
return NULL;
}
int main (int argc,
char **argv)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
chopstick[i] = tsem_new (1);
updating = tsem_new (1);
for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
{
pthread_t tid;
pthread_create (&tid, NULL, thread_func, (void *) (long) i);
}
/* endless thinking and eating... */
while (1)
usleep (10000000);
return 0;
}
sem.c(including semaphore methods)
#include "sem.h"
.
sem.h(Header for sem.c)
#ifndef __SEM_H__
#define __SEM_H__
#include <pthread.h>
typedef struct test_semaphore tsem_t;
tsem_t *tsem_new (int value);
void tsem_free (tsem_t *sem);
void tsem_wait (tsem_t *sem);
int tsem_try_wait (tsem_t *sem);
void tsem_signal (tsem_t *sem);
#endif /* __SEM_H__ */
compile command
gcc sem.c dining.c -pthread -o dining
One problem is that in tsem_wait() you have the following code sequence outside of a lock:
while(sem->count <= 0)
continue;
There's no guarantee that the program will actually re-read sem->count - the compiler is free to produce machine code that does something like the following:
int temp = sem->count;
while(temp <= 0)
continue;
In fact, this will likely happen in an optimized build.
Try changing your busy wait loop to something like this so the count is checked while holding the lock:
void tsem_wait (tsem_t *sem)
{
pthread_mutex_lock(&(sem->mutexLock));
while (sem->count <= 0) {
pthread_mutex_unlock(&(sem->mutexLock));
usleep(1);
pthread_mutex_lock(&(sem->mutexLock));
}
// sem->mutexLock is still held here...
sem->count--;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&(sem->mutexLock));
}
Strictly speaking, you should do something similar for tsem_try_wait() (which you're not using yet).
Note that you might want to consider using a pthread_cond_t to make waiting on the counter changing more efficient.
Finally, your code to 'get' the chopsticks in thread_func() has the classic Dining Philosopher deadlock problem in the situation where each philosopher simultaneously acquires the 'left' chopstick (chopstick[i]) and ends up waiting forever to get the 'right' chopstick (chopstick[k]) since all the chopsticks are in some philosopher's left hand.

How should my program behave to handle errors?

I have written a program (with code from SO) that does printenv | sort | less and now I should implement error-handling. How can that be done? The program should fail gracefully, for example when passed the wrong arguments.
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
struct command
{
const char **argv;
};
/* Helper function that spawns processes */
int spawn_proc (int in, int out, struct command *cmd) {
pid_t pid;
if ((pid = fork ()) == 0) {
if (in != 0) {
dup2 (in, 0);
close (in);
}
if (out != 1) {
dup2 (out, 1);
close (out);
}
return execvp (cmd->argv [0], (char * const *)cmd->argv);
}
return pid;
}
/* Helper function that forks pipes */
int fork_pipes (int n, struct command *cmd) {
int i;
int in, fd [2];
for (i = 0; i < n - 1; ++i) {
pipe (fd);
spawn_proc (in, fd [1], cmd + i);
close (fd [1]);
in = fd [0];
}
dup2 (in, 0);
return execvp (cmd [i].argv [0], (char * const *)cmd [i].argv);
}
int main (int argc, char ** argv) {
int i;
if (argc == 1) { /* There were no arguments */
const char *printenv[] = { "printenv", 0};
const char *sort[] = { "sort", 0 };
const char *less[] = { "less", 0 };
struct command cmd [] = { {printenv}, {sort}, {less} };
return fork_pipes (3, cmd);
}
if (argc > 1) { /* I'd like an argument */
if (strncmp(argv[1], "cd", 2) && strncmp(argv[1], "exit", 2)) {
char *tmp;
int len = 1;
for( i=1; i<argc; i++)
{
len += strlen(argv[i]) + 2;
}
tmp = (char*) malloc(len);
tmp[0] = '\0';
int pos = 0;
for( i=1; i<argc; i++)
{
pos += sprintf(tmp+pos, "%s%s", (i==1?"":"|"), argv[i]);
}
const char *printenv[] = { "printenv", 0};
const char *grep[] = { "grep", "-E", tmp, NULL};
const char *sort[] = { "sort", 0 };
const char *less[] = { "less", 0 };
struct command cmd [] = { {printenv}, {grep}, {sort}, {less} };
return fork_pipes (4, cmd);
free(tmp);
} else if (! strncmp(argv[1], "cd", 2)) { /* change directory */
printf("change directory to %s\n" , argv[2]);
chdir(argv[2]);
} else if (! strncmp(argv[1], "exit", 2)) { /* change directory */
printf("exit\n");
exit(0);
}
}
exit(0);
}
It's going to be frankly a bit painful to go through your program and fix all those missing-error-handling bugs after the fact. Much better would have been to write correct code from the start! Moreover, you have more bugs than just missing error handling. I didn't scan all of your code, but at first glance I already saw one use of an uninitialized local variable (in in fork_pipes is used before it is set). Any decent compiler with warnings enabled would have caught that.
As a direct answer to your question, you'll just have to go through and spot every system call or library function call that is capable of returning errors, see if you are checking for them, and add checks if they are not already there. fork, malloc, dup2 — everything.

Message queue/shared memory method

I have a bit of a problem in using IPC (inter-process communication) program below.
Please let me explain:
I want to pass Linux commands such as "ls" or "wc file.txt"
from a parent to a child to execute using the message queue, and
then have the child returning the command outputs back to
the parent process using shared memory method.
But this is what I got: The parent process always got the output 1 step behind;
in the following fashion:
Step1) ls file.txt
(Nothing showed up.)
Step2) wc file.txt
(Output of earlier command "ls file.txt" showed up here instead.)
Step 3) cat file.txt
(Output of earlier command "wc file.txt" showed up instead.)
Any help is appreciated.
To compile: gcc -o program ./program.c
To run: -./program -v
Code:
#define BUFSZ 512
#define ERRBUFSZ 512
#define TIMEOUT_TIMEDIO 20
#define SHM_SIZE 5120
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <setjmp.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/ipc.h>
#include <sys/shm.h>
static sigjmp_buf jmpbuf;
int timed_io(char* buf, int len, FILE* rfp, int sec);
static void sigalrm_handler(int signo);
void do_cmd(char *buf, int len, int linenum, char *errbuf);
int parse_cmd(char *buf, char **vbuf, char *errbuf);
int process_cmd_ipc(char *argv, int linenum, char *errbuf);
struct my_msgbuf {
long mtype;
char mtext[256];
};
static void sigalrm_handler(int signo)
{
siglongjmp(jmpbuf, 1);
}
int timed_io(char* buf, int len, FILE* rfp, int sec)
{
struct sigaction nsigaction[1];
struct sigaction osigaction[1];
int prev_alrm;
int st = 0;
if(sigsetjmp(jmpbuf, 1) == 0)
{
nsigaction->sa_handler = sigalrm_handler;
sigemptyset(&nsigaction->sa_mask);
nsigaction->sa_flags = SA_RESTART;
prev_alrm = alarm(0);
sigaction(SIGALRM, nsigaction, osigaction);
alarm(sec);
if (fgets(buf, len, rfp) == NULL)
st = -1; // EOF
buf[strlen(buf) - 1] = 0;
}
else { st = -2; } // Time-out
alarm(0); // Reset old alarm and handler
sigaction(SIGALRM, osigaction, 0);
return st;
}
int process_cmd_ipc(char *argv, int linenum, char* errbuf)
{
struct my_msgbuf buf;
int msqid, msqid_parent, st, shmid, str_len;
key_t key, key_shm;
char* shared_buf;
FILE *fd;
// create key for shared memory segment
if ((key_shm = ftok("shm_key.txt", 'R')) == -1) {
perror("ftok");
exit(1);
}
// Connect to shared memory segment
if ((shmid = shmget(key_shm, SHM_SIZE, 0644 | IPC_CREAT)) == -1)
{
perror("shmget");
exit(1);
}
// Attach to shared memory segment
shared_buf = shmat(shmid, (void *) 0, 0);
if (shared_buf == (char *) (-1)) {
perror("shmat");
exit(1);
}
// End of shared memory section` //
// Begin: message queue section
pid_t cpid=fork();
if (cpid<0) {
fprintf(stderr,"ERR: \"fork\" error! (Line=%d)\n", linenum);
exit (-1);
} else if (cpid==0) // child process
{ // Begin: message queue
if ((key = ftok("mysh.c", 'B')) == -1) {
perror("ftok");
exit(1);
}
if ((msqid = msgget(key, 0644)) == -1) {
perror("msgget from child");
exit(1);
}
memset(buf.mtext, 0, sizeof(buf.mtext)); // Clear buffer
if(msgrcv(msqid, (struct msgbuf*) &buf, sizeof(buf), 0,0) == -1)
{
perror("msgrcv");
exit(1);
}
// End: message queue
// begin: shared memory segment
memset(shared_buf, 0, SHM_SIZE); // zeroize shared_buf
fd = popen(buf.mtext, "r");
str_len = 0;
while(fgets(shared_buf + str_len, SHM_SIZE, fd) != NULL)
{ str_len = strlen(shared_buf); }
pclose(fd);
// end: shared memory segment
}
else { // parent
// Begin - message queue
if ((key = ftok("mysh.c", 'B')) == -1) {
perror("ftok");
exit(1);
}
if ((msqid_parent = msgget(key, 0644 | IPC_CREAT)) == -1) {
perror("msgget from parent");
exit(1);
}
buf.mtype = 1;
strncpy(buf.mtext, argv, strlen(argv));
if(msgsnd(msqid_parent, (struct my_msgbuf*) &buf, strlen(buf.mtext), 0) == -1)
perror("msgsnd");
// End - message queue
// Begin - shared memory
// usleep(10000);
printf("%s", shared_buf);
// End - shared memory
} // if-else fork
}
int parse_cmd(char *buf, char **vbuf, char *errbuf)
{
int i=0;
char *delim=" ,\t\n";
char *tok;
tok=strtok(buf,delim);
while (tok) {
vbuf[i]=(char *)malloc(BUFSZ*sizeof(char));
strcpy(vbuf[i],tok);
tok=strtok(NULL,delim);
i++;
}
vbuf[i]=0;
return i;
}
void do_cmd(char *buf, int len, int linenum, char *errbuf) {
int i=0; int numargs;
char *vbuf[128];
char* copy = (char *) malloc(strlen(buf) + 1);
int maxargs=sizeof(vbuf)/sizeof(char *);
strcpy(copy, buf);
numargs = parse_cmd(copy,vbuf,errbuf);
process_cmd_ipc(buf,linenum, errbuf);
for (i=0;i<numargs; i++) { free(vbuf[i]); }
free(copy);
copy = NULL;
return;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int i; int st; int linenum=0;
char *buf=(char *)malloc(BUFSZ*sizeof(char));
char *errbuf=(char *)malloc(ERRBUFSZ*sizeof(char));
char *mysh = "";
FILE *rfp=stdin;
if (isatty(fileno(rfp))) {
mysh = "mysh (Ctrl-C to exit)>";
fprintf(stderr,"%s",mysh);
}
while(1)
{
st = timed_io(buf, BUFSZ, stdin, TIMEOUT_TIMEDIO);
if (st != 0)
{
fprintf(stderr, "ERR: No input %s (Status=%d)\n", errbuf, st);
return -1;
}
else
{
linenum++;
if (*buf)
{ do_cmd(buf, BUFSZ, linenum,errbuf); }
if (mysh)
fprintf(stderr,"%s",mysh);
}
}
}

Multithread Directory and File Search

I am new to semaphores and the concepts of mutual exclusion. I am supposed to recursively text search in files through directories using multithreading. The number of threads is to be given by the user.
The issue with this code is it goes through one directory and then waits. I cannot figure out what is wrong.I am getting a segmentation fault error. Cannot figure out why is this happening.
#include <iostream>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <dirent.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fstream>
#include <limits.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <semaphore.h>
using namespace std;
#include <stdio.h>
int iDirectories=0;
pthread_mutex_t mutex=PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
sem_t semaphore1;
char searchStringThread[PATH_MAX];
int directories=0;
class directoryQueue
{
private:
struct Node
{
char directoryPath[PATH_MAX];
Node *next;
};
Node *front;
Node *rear;
Node *nodeCount;
public:
directoryQueue(void)
{
front=NULL;
rear=NULL;
nodeCount=0;
}
void Enqueue(char array[PATH_MAX])
{
Node *newNode;
newNode=new Node;
strcpy(newNode->directoryPath,array);
newNode->next=NULL;
if(isEmpty())
{
front=newNode;
rear=newNode;
}
else
{
rear->next=newNode;
rear=newNode;
}
nodeCount++;
}
char * Dequeue(void)
{
Node *temp;
if (isEmpty())
cout << "Error ! Empty Queue "<<endl;
else
{
char *deque;
deque=new char[PATH_MAX];
strcpy(deque,front->directoryPath);
temp = front->next;
front = temp;
nodeCount--;
return deque;
}
}
bool isEmpty(void)
{
if(nodeCount)
return false;
else
return true;
}
void makeNull(void)
{
while(!isEmpty())
{
Dequeue();
}
}
~directoryQueue(void)
{
makeNull();
}
};
directoryQueue saveDirectory;
void *threadHandler(void *)
{
int thpath_length;
char thPath[PATH_MAX];
char saveITDirectory[PATH_MAX];
char itDirectory[PATH_MAX];
int threadCount;
struct dirent *iWalker;
DIR *iDirectory;
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
threadCount=iDirectories++;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
sem_wait(&semaphore1);
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
strcpy(itDirectory,saveDirectory.Dequeue());
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
iDirectory=opendir(itDirectory);
if(iDirectory==NULL)
{
cout<<"Error"<<endl;
cout<<itDirectory<<" Cannot be Opened"<<endl;
exit(10000);
}
while((iWalker=readdir(iDirectory)) !=NULL)
{
if(iWalker->d_type==DT_REG)
{
strcpy(saveITDirectory,iWalker->d_name);
cout<<itDirectory<<"/"<<endl;
if (strcmp (saveITDirectory, "..") == 0 ||
strcmp (saveITDirectory, ".") == 0)
{
continue;
}
else
{
thpath_length = snprintf(thPath,PATH_MAX,"%s/%s",itDirectory,saveITDirectory);
cout<<thPath<<endl;
if (thpath_length >= PATH_MAX)
{
cout<<"Path is too long"<<endl;
exit (1000);
}
ifstream openFile;
openFile.open(thPath);
char line[1500];
int currentLine = 0;
if (openFile.is_open()) {
while (openFile.good()) {
currentLine++;
openFile.getline(line, 1500);
if (strstr(line, searchStringThread) != NULL){
cout<<thPath<<": "<<currentLine<<": "<<line<<endl;
cout<<"This was performed by Thread no. "<<threadCount<<endl;
cout<<"ID :"<<pthread_self();
}
}
}
openFile.close();
}
}
if (closedir (iDirectory))
{
cout<<"Unable to close "<<itDirectory<<endl;
exit (1000);
}
}
}
void walkThroughDirectory(char directory_name[PATH_MAX],char searchString[PATH_MAX])
{
DIR * directory;
struct dirent * walker;
char d_name[PATH_MAX];
int path_length;
char path[PATH_MAX];
directory=opendir(directory_name);
if(directory==NULL)
{
cout<<"Error"<<endl;
cout<<directory_name<<" Cannot be Opened"<<endl;
exit(10000);
}
while((walker=readdir(directory)) !=NULL)
{
strcpy(d_name,walker->d_name);
cout<<directory_name<<"/"<<endl;
if (strcmp (d_name, "..") == 0 ||
strcmp (d_name, ".") == 0)
{
continue;
}
else
{
path_length = snprintf(path,PATH_MAX,"%s/%s",directory_name,d_name);
cout<<path<<endl;
if (path_length >= PATH_MAX)
{
cout<<"Path is too long"<<endl;
exit (1000);
}
if(walker->d_type==DT_DIR)
{
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
saveDirectory.Enqueue(path);
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
sem_post(&semaphore1);
directories++;
walkThroughDirectory (path,searchString);
}
else if(walker->d_type==DT_REG)
{
ifstream openFile;
openFile.open(path);
char line[1500];
int currentLine = 0;
if (openFile.is_open()) {
while (openFile.good()) {
currentLine++;
openFile.getline(line, 1500);
if (strstr(line, searchString) != NULL)
cout<<path<<": "<<currentLine<<": "<<line<<endl;
}
}
openFile.close();
}
}
}
if (closedir (directory))
{
cout<<"Unable to close "<<directory_name<<endl;
exit (1000);
}
}
int main(int argc,char *argv[])
{
char * name;
cout<<"Total Directories "<< directories<<endl;
name=get_current_dir_name();
cout<<"Current Directory is: "<<name<<endl;
sem_init(&semaphore1,0,0);
strcpy(searchStringThread,argv[1]);
int number_of_threads=atoi(argv[3]);
pthread_t threads[number_of_threads];
walkThroughDirectory(argv[2],argv[1]);
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
saveDirectory.Enqueue(argv[2]);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
sem_post(&semaphore1);
for(int i=0;i<number_of_threads;i++)
{
pthread_create(&threads[i],NULL,threadHandler,NULL);
}
for(int j=0;j<number_of_threads;j++)
{
pthread_join(threads[j],NULL);
}
while(saveDirectory.isEmpty())
{
cout<<"Queue is Empty"<<endl;
cout<<"Exiting"<<endl;
exit(10000);
}
free(name);
cout<<"Total Directories "<< directories<<endl;
return 0;
}
There's a simple bug where you lock a mutex twice instead of unlocking it when you're done:
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
saveDirectory.Enqueue(path);
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
should be:
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
saveDirectory.Enqueue(path);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
Note: this isn't to say that there aren't other problems - just that this is probably your immediate problem.
The biggest problem is that it looks like you put directories on the saveDirectory queue (so another thread can pull it off to work on it), then go ahead an process that directory recursively in the thread that just put it on the queue. I think you'll need to give some more thought on how the work will be divided among the threads.
A couple of more minor comments:
you might want to consider using std::string if that's permitted. It should make some of your string handling simpler (you leak memory from the data returned from directoryQueue::Dequeue(), for example)
if the primary reason for the existence of the directoryQueue class is to hold work items for multiple threads, then maybe it should manage it's own mutex so callers don't need to deal with that complexity

Print fifo content and exit

I need to print the content of a fifo (named pipe) to standard output.
I could use the command:
cat fifo
The problem is that cat doesn't return. It stays running, waiting for more content coming from the fifo. But I know there wont be any more content coming for a while so I just want to print what's available.
Is there a command that just print the available content and exit??
EDIT:
In one end of the fifo there is a process writing every now and then the output of different commands. That process is permanently running so there wont be an EOF.
When you can't send an EOF, you could use a 'non-blocking cat'. I've included a (tested) C version i found here (credit goes to the original author over there of course). The magic is in fcntl(STDIN_FILENO, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK).
The first argument to this non-blocking cat is the number of seconds you want to wait before exiting again.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
void read_loop(int fFile, double wWait)
{
if (fFile < 0) return;
double max_time = wWait, total_time = 0;
struct timespec cycle_time = { 0, 50 * 1000 * 1000 };
double add_time = (double) cycle_time.tv_sec + (double) cycle_time.tv_nsec / 1000000000.;
char next_line[1024];
FILE *input_file = fdopen(fFile, "r");
while (total_time < max_time)
{
while (fgets(next_line, 1024, input_file))
{
write(STDOUT_FILENO, next_line, strlen(next_line));
total_time = 0;
}
nanosleep(&cycle_time, NULL);
total_time += add_time;
}
fclose(input_file);
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
if (argc < 2)
{
fprintf(stderr, "%s [max time] (files...)\n", argv[0]);
return 1;
}
int max_wait = strtoul(argv[1],0, 10);
if (argc == 2)
{
fprintf(stderr, "%s: using standard input\n", argv[0]);
fcntl(STDIN_FILENO, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
read_loop(STDIN_FILENO, max_wait);
return 0;
}
int current = 2;
while (current < argc)
{
fprintf(stderr, "%s: switch to file '%s'\n", argv[0], argv[current]);
int next_file = open(argv[current++], O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
read_loop(next_file, max_wait);
close(next_file);
}
return 0;
}
You should close the other end of the FIFO. That should send an EOF to the cat process.

Categories

Resources