I want to link expernal 'parquet' project ( https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/master/cpp ) as part of my current project on Linux.
For this purposes I ran cmake of parquet with such parameters
cd build_parquet
cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DARROW_PARQUET=ON \
-DBoost_NO_BOOST_CMAKE=TRUE -DBoost_NO_SYSTEM_PATHS=TRUE -DBOOST_ROOT=${BOOST_BUILD_DIR}/include -DBOOST_LIBRARYDIR=${BOOST_BUILD_DIR}/lib/boost -DARROW_BOOST_USE_SHARED=OFF -DBOOST_INCLUDEDIR=${BOOST_BUILD_DIR}/include/boost ..
cmake --build . --config Release
// There are a lot of dependencies except boost, but only boost required to be installed on system, since other could be downloaded and installed by cmake script
Project successfully compiled. I got executable which could launch, generated static libs libarrow.a, libparquet.a, shared libraries libarrow.so, libparquet.so
In my main project I want to use such libraries and I use such commands in cmake to find them
find_path(PARQUET_INCLUDE_DIR NAMES arrow/api.h PATHS ${PARQUET_DIR}/src)
find_library(PARQUET_LIBRARY_RELEASE NAMES parquet.a
PATHS build_parquet/release/Release/ )
find_library(ARROW_LIBRARY_RELEASE NAMES arrow.a
PATHS build_parquet/release/Release/ )
set(PARQUET_LIBRARIES_RELEASE ${PARQUET_LIBRARY_RELEASE} ${ARROW_LIBRARY_RELEASE} )
include(FindPackageHandleStandardArgs)
find_package_handle_standard_args(Parquet DEFAULT_MSG PARQUET_INCLUDE_DIR
${PARQUET_LIBRARIES_RELEASE } )
That's work okay, libraries and includes are found.
Then I link this libraries to my project
target_link_libraries(${myExe} ${PARQUET_LIBRARIES_RELEASE} ${mySomeOtherLibraries} )
after this I got enormous amount of linker errors such that
libparquet.a(column_writer.cc.o): In function `apache::thrift::transport::TMemoryBuffer::~TMemoryBuffer()':
column_writer.cc:(.text._ZN6apache6thrift9transport13TMemoryBufferD0Ev[_ZN6apache6thrift9transport13TMemoryBufferD5Ev]+0x3): undefined reference to `vtable for apache::thrift::transport::TMemoryBuffer'
.....
so that's what I don't understand much, why lib compiled well in parquet project itself but has a lot of unresolved now, when I use it to link in my own project? Moreover I compiled project for windows and when I did the same things, but with arrow.lib and parquet.lib (instead of libparquet.a and libarrow.a ) things worked fine! I was needed only to put arrow.dll, parquet.dll to executables to run project. But in Linux I've already crashed my head
So, why it doesn't work, what I should do to finally link the project with library ?
Update
I found the problem, I had to link libraries with adding .so files (not only .a files) like this
find_library(PARQUET_LIBRARY_RELEASE NAMES parquet.so parquet.a
PATHS build_parquet/release/Release/ )
find_library(ARROW_LIBRARY_RELEASE NAMES arrow.so arrow.a
PATHS build_parquet/release/Release/ )
set(PARQUET_LIBRARIES_RELEASE ${PARQUET_LIBRARY_RELEASE} ${ARROW_LIBRARY_RELEASE} )
Project is builded. So now the question is, why I need to add .so files to linker (in Windows only static .lib are enough), is it always a case when I build project in Linux ? Is order of linkage important ( .so files first and .a files next ? )
As Uwe wrote in a comment, the https://github.com/apache/parquet-cpp repository is deprecated, and the Parquet C++ library is being developed as part of the Apache Arrow C++ codebase https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/master/cpp. Can you try building based on that, and if you have trouble can you post on the dev#arrow.apache.org mailing list?
You have succeed to build the project when link with the shared (.so) libraries instead of the static (.a) ones.
(The command find_library actually looks for one library, which name is listed in NAMES option. In your case it found .so library because its name comes before the .a one).
Actually, both shared and static parquet libraries contain the same set of symbols, and both sets are insufficient for link. The difference is that the shared library contains information, where to find remaining symbols (in the thrift library in your case), but the static library doesn't.
For correctly link with the static libraries, you need to list dependent libraries manually.
On Windows .lib file may mean either a static library, or a import file for the shared (.dll) one. It seems that you link with the dynamic one (it has no lib prefix), which succeed like on Linux.
Related
I have run into a rather strange problem with Google Tests.
In my project, I am using externalProject_add in order to download google tests and add them into my project. In my function, I believe I am asking for the project to be built, and then installed into a specific directory:
ExternalProject_Add(gTest_download
URL ${GTEST_url}
URL_HASH ${GTEST_hash}
UPDATE_COMMAND ""
BUILD_COMMAND cmake --build . --target install
CMAKE_CACHE_ARGS
-DCMAKE_C_COMPILER:PATH=${Compiler_C}
-DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER:PATH=${Compiler_CXX}
-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=ON
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=<BINARY_DIR>/installation
)
I can then tell the program where all the source files are living with this:
ExternalProject_Get_Property(gTest_download BINARY_DIR)
set(gTest_LIBRARY_DIR ${BINARY_DIR}/installation/lib CACHE INTERNAL "Google Test Binary Dir")
set(gTest_INCLUDE_DIR ${BINARY_DIR}/installation/include CACHE INTERNAL "Google Test Include Dir")
However, when I try to run a cmake test with protobufs I get the run time error:
./Protobuf_test: error while loading shared libraries: libgmock.so.1.11.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Which is super odd, because I know I specifically told the program where to find the libraries in the same externalProject_add file:
set(gTest_LIBRARIES
${gTest_LIBRARY_DIR}/${prefix}gmock${suffix}
${gTest_LIBRARY_DIR}/${prefix}gmock_main${suffix}
${gTest_LIBRARY_DIR}/${prefix}gtest${suffix}
${gTest_LIBRARY_DIR}/${prefix}gtest_main${suffix}
CACHE INTERNAL "Google Test Libraries"
)
Where ${prefix} is "lib" and ${suffix} is ".lib". And I make sure to link them in my CMakeLists.txt file properly by doing target_link_libraries(Protobuf_test ${gTest_LIBRARIES} ${protobuf_LIBRARIES}) ex:
CUSTOM_PROTOBUF_GENERATE_CPP(PROTO_SRCS PROTO_HDS ${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR} hello.proto)
include_directories(
${protoBuf_INCLUDE_DIR}
${gTest_INCLUDE_DIR}
${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}
)
add_executable(Protobuf_test protobuf_test.cc ${PROTO_SRCS} ${PROTO_HDS})
add_dependencies(Protobuf_test
gTest_download
protoBuf_download
)
target_link_libraries(Protobuf_test
${gTest_LIBRARIES}
${protoBuf_LIBRARIES}
)
add_test(NAME testing_protobuf COMMAND Protobuf_test)
So I went into the installation folder which is located in d/linuxBuild/lib/src/gTest_download-build/installation/lib and confirmed it exists there. I then ran ldd libgmock.so and got the following output:
libgtest.so.1.11.0 => not found
Which I thought was odd as well. gtest is in the same directory! How is that possible? So I ran ldd on gmock_main:
libgmock.so.1.11.0 => not found
libgtest.so.1.11.0 => not found
So now I have two libraries that are in the same directory however they cannot be found. Confused, I decide to go to where the libraries should have originally installed to and copied over from. So two folders up: d/linuxBuild/lib/src/gTest_download-build. I then go into that folders lib folder and verify the libraries are there. I then run the same ldd command on gmock:
libgtest.so.1.11.0 => /mnt/d/linuxBuild/lib/src/gTest_download-build/lib/libgtest.so.1.11.0 (0x00007fb651729000)
I'm confused by this and again, run it on gmock_main:
libgmock.so.1.11.0 => /mnt/d/linuxBuild/lib/src/gTest_download-build/lib/libgmock.so.1.11.0 (0x00007f58b0db3000)
libgtest.so.1.11.0 => /mnt/d/linuxBuild/lib/src/gTest_download-build/lib/libgtest.so.1.11.0 (0x00007f58b0c9c000)
I am sorry for the lengthy question, but I need to know what happened here? Why is it when I install the libraries the links break from each other and they don't know their locations compared to the ones in the original installation path? Did their symbolic links break? Did I do something incorrectly in the CMake build? I'm scratching my head on this problem since I have never encountered this before. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Forget about externalProject_add and use FetchContent / FetchContent_MakeAvailable, especially when dealing with CMake-ready projects:
See https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/module/FetchContent.html for details
include(FetchContent)
FetchContent_Declare(
googletest
GIT_REPOSITORY https://github.com/google/googletest.git
GIT_TAG release-1.11.0
)
FetchContent_MakeAvailable(googletest)
# ...
target_link_libraries(Protobuf_test
PRIVATE
gmock_main
${protoBuf_LIBRARIES}
)
This way, you are linking against the gmock_main target, which will set up your libraries, includes, and any indirect dependencies correctly like any cmake project added via add_subdirectory() or find_package().
I'm new to the world of cmake and linking to libaries. Now for a project I need to include a third party library in the current application. However I'm having problems linking to the library.
Here is what I have:
The library is build in the location D:/qwt-6.1.2, which contains:
the folder /src with the header and source files
the folder /lib which contains (qwt.dll, qwt.ext, qwt.lib, qwtd.dll, qwtd.ext, qwtd.ilk, qwtd.lib and qwtd.pdb.
I have tried to add the following to the cmake file:
add_executable(Demo main.cpp mainwindow.cpp mainwindow.h )
include_directories(D:/qwt-6.1.2/src)
link_directories(D:/qwt-6.1.2/lib)
target_link_libraries(Demo qwt)
The including goes fine since the intellisense of visual studio can the includes that I do, however when I build I get the error:
Error 1 error LNK1104: cannot open file 'qwt.lib'
Does anybody have an idea what I'm doing wrong? I don't care at the moment if it is statically or dynamically linked.
For one of my Qt Embedded projects I'm using a external Qt lib called SMTPEmail. This lib needs to be compiled before being included into a project, something that I managed to do successfully both for Qt 4.8 ARM and for Desktop.
The problem I'm getting is that when I include the headers into my project and include the library in the .pro, the linker gives me
(path_to_libs)/libSMTPEmail.so: undefined reference to `QSslSocket::connectToHostEncrypted(QString const&, unsigned short, QFlags<QIODevice::OpenModeFlag>)'
(path_to_libs)/libSMTPEmail.so: undefined reference to `QSslSocket::QSslSocket(QObject*)'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [re8k_interface-tgt] Error 1
but only for compiling for ARM. IOW compiling the lib for both ARM and Desktop goes OK, compiling the project for Desktop using the lib goes OK but compiling it for ARM using the lib goes wrong.
Following this forum thread I suspected this could be due to missing the link to the library file of openssl (the project points to different lib folders when compiling for different environments). So I searched for all "openssl" related files inside the compiler for ARM (arm-arago-linux-gnueabi) and included in the same folder where the .so is located; same error. I then suspected the lib itself had other dependencies which were not in the path_to_libs, so I did a readelf -d libSMTPEmail.so and later in the .so.1 and readelf did return some lib dependencies that were not inside the same folder of the library. I then copied all such dependencies to the folder and got no success either.
So what could be happening? All dependencies known by me were put in place and I still get the error only for the situation where the lib is included by another project compiled for ARM.
You need to point your QMake where your libs and header file is in your .pro file;
So find where your library is assume /usr/local/include then ;
INCLUDEPATH += /usr/local/include
Add which libs you will use;
LIBS += -lSMTPEmail
You can check my answer here;
Two things stand out for me in your question:
1.
undefined reference to
This error message means that there was an error in the linking step of compilation. This occurs when you include a header to a function/class/variable but don't have the definition included in your own sources, or you do not link in a static library that does.
Searching for dependencies in libraries that are already compiled (.dll or .so) is too late, the compiler is looking for a static link, not a dynamic link.
2.
compiling the lib for both ARM and Desktop goes OK, compiling the
project for Desktop using the lib goes OK but compiling it for ARM
using the lib goes wrong.
This suggests that you are using conditional compilation in your .pro file that does a "both" compilation, a "desktop only" compilation and a "ARM only" compilation. If this is correct, you need to examine your compilation instructions for your "ARM only" compilation.
The error message itself refers to you using two functions from the QSslStock class. These are part of the QtNetwork module so you should have the following in your .pro file in order for the necessary links to be formed.
Qt += network
I guess this would be a generic question on including libraries with existing makefiles within cmake; but here's my context -
I'm trying to include scintilla in another CMake project, and I have the following problem:
On Linux, scintilla has a makefile in (say) the ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/scintilla/gtk directory; if you run make in that directory (as usual), you get a ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/scintilla/bin/scintilla.a file - which (I guess) is the static library.
Now, if I'd try to use cmake's ADD_LIBRARY, I'd have to manually specify the sources of scintilla within cmake - and I'd rather not mess with that, given I already have a makefile. So, I'd rather call the usual scintilla make - and then instruct CMAKE to somehow refer to the resulting scintilla.a. (I guess that this then would not ensure cross-platform compatibility - but note that currently cross-platform is not an issue for me; I'd just like to build scintilla as part of this project that already uses cmake, only within Linux)
So, I've tried a bit with this:
ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND(
OUTPUT scintilla.a
COMMAND ${CMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM}
WORKING_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/scintilla/gtk
COMMENT "Original scintilla makefile target" )
... but then, add_custom_command adds a "target with no output"; so I'm trying several approach to build upon that, all of which fail (errors given as comment):
ADD_CUSTOM_TARGET(scintilla STATIC DEPENDS scintilla.a) # Target "scintilla" of type UTILITY may not be linked into another target.
ADD_LIBRARY(scintilla STATIC DEPENDS scintilla.a) # Cannot find source file "DEPENDS".
ADD_LIBRARY(scintilla STATIC) # You have called ADD_LIBRARY for library scintilla without any source files.
ADD_DEPENDENCIES(scintilla scintilla.a)
I'm obviously quote a noob with cmake - so, is it possible at all to have cmake run a pre-existing makefile, and "capture" its output library file, such that other components of the cmake project can link against it?
Many thanks for any answers,
Cheers!
EDIT: possible duplicate: CMake: how do i depend on output from a custom target? - Stack Overflow - however, here the breakage seems to be due to the need to specifically have a library that the rest of the cmake project would recognize...
Another related: cmake - adding a custom command with the file name as a target - Stack Overflow; however, it specifically builds an executable from source files (which I wanted to avoid)..
You could also use imported targets and a custom target like this:
# set the output destination
set(SCINTILLA_LIBRARY ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/scintilla/gtk/scintilla.a)
# create a custom target called build_scintilla that is part of ALL
# and will run each time you type make
add_custom_target(build_scintilla ALL
COMMAND ${CMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM}
WORKING_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/scintilla/gtk
COMMENT "Original scintilla makefile target")
# now create an imported static target
add_library(scintilla STATIC IMPORTED)
# Import target "scintilla" for configuration ""
set_property(TARGET scintilla APPEND PROPERTY IMPORTED_CONFIGURATIONS NOCONFIG)
set_target_properties(scintilla PROPERTIES
IMPORTED_LOCATION_NOCONFIG "${SCINTILLA_LIBRARY}")
# now you can use scintilla as if it were a regular cmake built target in your project
add_dependencies(scintilla build_scintilla)
add_executable(foo foo.c)
target_link_libraries(foo scintilla)
# note, this will only work on linux/unix platforms, also it does building
# in the source tree which is also sort of bad style and keeps out of source
# builds from working.
OK, I think I have it somewhat; basically, in the CMakeLists.txt that build scintilla, I used this only:
ADD_CUSTOM_TARGET(
scintilla.a ALL
COMMAND ${CMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM}
WORKING_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/scintilla/gtk
COMMENT "Original scintilla makefile target" )
... and then, the slightly more complicated part, was to find the correct cmake file elsewhere in the project, where the ${PROJECT_NAME} was defined - so as to add a dependency:
ADD_DEPENDENCIES(${PROJECT_NAME} scintilla.a)
... and finally, the library needs to be linked.
Note that in the commands heretofore, the scintilla.a is merely a name/label/identifier/string (so it could be anything else, like scintilla--a or something); but for linking - the full path to the actual `scintilla.a file is needed (which in this project ends up in a variable ${SCINTILLA_LIBRARY}). In this project, the linking basically occurs through a form of a
list(APPEND PROJ_LIBRARIES ${SCINTILLA_LIBRARY} )
... and I don't really know how cmake handles the actual linking afterwards (but it seems to work)
For consistency, I tried to use ${SCINTILLA_LIBRARY} instead of scintilla.a as identifier in the ADD_CUSTOM_TARGET, but got error: "Target names may not contain a slash. Use ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND to generate files". So probably this could be solved smarter/more correct with ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND - however, I read that it "defines a new command that can be executed during the build process. The outputs named should be listed as source files in the target for which they are to be generated."... And by now I'm totally confused so as to what is a file, what is a label, and what is a target - so I think I'll leave at this (and not fix it if it ain't broken :) )
Well, it'd still be nice to know a more correct way to do this eventually,
Cheers!
Suppose I have an SConstruct file that looks like this:
env = Environment()
env.Program("a", ["a.c", "util.c"])
env.Program("b", ["b.c", "util.c"])
This build works properly with no SCons warning messages. However, if I modify this to specify different libraries for each Program build (the actual libraries are not relevant):
env.Program("a", ["a.c", "util.c"], LIBS="m")
env.Program("b", ["b.c", "util.c"], LIBS="c")
then I get the warning:
scons: warning: Two different environments were specified for target util.o,
but they appear to have the same action: $CC -o $TARGET -c $CFLAGS $CCFLAGS $_CCCOMCOM $SOURCES
This appears to be caused by the Program builder automatically creating a new environment for building the sources, even though it is just the LIBS variable that is different (and so only the link step needs to have a different environment). I can work around this by doing something like:
util = env.Object("util.c")
env.Program("a", ["a.c"] + util, LIBS="m")
env.Program("b", ["b.c"] + util, LIBS="c")
This uses a single Object builder for building util.c, then using the precompiled object file in each Program build, thus avoiding the warning. However, this should not really be necessary. Is there a more elegant way to work around this problem? Or is this actually a bug in SCons that should be fixed?
Context: I have nearly 2000 C source files compiled into about 20 libraries and 120 executables with lots of shared sources. I created the SConstruct file from the previous proprietary build system using a conversion script I wrote. There are about 450 "Two different environments" warning messages produced by SCons for a full build using my current SConstruct.
I found a workaround that doesn't involve creating extra variables to hold the object file nodes:
env.Program("a", ["a.c", env.Object("util.c")], LIBS="m")
env.Program("b", ["b.c", env.Object("util.c")], LIBS="c")
This isolates the build of util.c within a single environment. Although it is specified twice, once for each Program, SCons doesn't warn about this because it's the same source built with the same env object. Of course SCons only compiles the source once in this case.
You may use the Split function and a custom helper to simplify the build process for large projects:
def create_objs(SRCS, path=""):
return [env.Object(path+src+".cpp") for src in SRCS]
prg1 = Split("file_1 file_2 file_N")
prg2 = Split("file_2 file_5 file_8")
env.Program("a", create_objs(prg1), LIBS="x")
env.Program("b", create_objs(prg2), LIBS="y")
The object files are created only once, and they can be used in multiple builds. Hope this helps...
One issue I found in my code was that I was not using the target object path correctly. Or in otherwords I had a variant dir directive, but instead of using BUILDPATH i ended up using my original source code path. This way Scons was finding the object generated in target BUILDPATH and source path.
Creating a static library out of the first set of files and linking the library to the next set of files (which have some files in common with the first set) to create a target works as well.
env.StaticLibrary ("a", ["a.c","util.c"], LIBS = "m")
env.Program ("b", ["b.c","util.c"], LIBS = ["c","a"])