I have a huge symfony app and I wanted to add some feature that I could only do with a nodeJS server .
So I have a big JSON file which result from my nodeJS run, this file have to go in Symfony.
And symfony have to be able to send some pdf file to the node server (the one which will be transform in JSON by my node server).
Is anyone have some starting idea ?
thansk for help :D
No one is going to be able to provide a full answer with so few details, but generally speaking messaging and remote procedure calls are excellent for interop between parts of a large app.
You could send a message from Symfony (which includes the path of the PDF, or the contents itself), and node will provide the result. You can encode that as JSON, and send it as an answer.
RabbitMq is widely supported, allows both produce-consume or RPC-style use.
Related
Context:
I'm making a React website that draws information from the Google Sheets API and formats specific rows into a data visualization. There are columns I don't want to share because of sensitivity of information, and fortunately there are ways to share only specified columns, but that isn't why I'm asking the following:
Problem:
I want to have a Node API that handles requests from a React front-end, but whose code isn't available on the client's browser (for example, in the bundle.js file created during build).
Clarification: I have noticed that when running most Node-React application examples locally and when building them with webpack, you end up with one bundle.js file that contains Node request-handling code being delivered to the browser on page load.
Proposal:
Do I need to deploy two separate apps (one for Node, the other for React), or can I keep them together without the server code being visible to the client?
EDIT POST ANSWER:
you end up with one bundle.js file that contains Node request-handling code being delivered to the browser on page load.
This was untrue. The code I had assumed to be request-handling code was client side request-calling code.
It is already decoupled. There is nothing you need to do.
Note that the security of your node.js server code depends on your server configuration, not node.js. If you access your server via unencrypted file sharing or FTP then your node server code is still not safe.
Even when using encryption, avoid compromised protocols such as SSL or TLSv1.0 (use TLSv1.3 instead for things like FTPS)
You can add a simple authentication system. There are plenty packages out there for Node already, so no need to implement it yourself.
Specifically, this would prevent the backend from sending sensitive data to a unauthorized request.
EDIT: Just for clarification, code run on a Node.js server is not sent out publicly, it will run on your server and send its output to the frontend.
EDIT 2: Looks like I misunderstood your question.
If your code is not decoupled at the moment it will need to be. All code of a React.js project is sent to the browser. Since there is no backend to handle any kind of access logic, any such logic would have to be in the frontend (React.js), where it could easily be circumvented.
I am using Node JS as web API server, for the front end, I am using Angular 4, Android and IOS. I have successfully implemented file upload using post request. I am exposing only one port outside. I need to implement file upload with a progress bar. I have only worked with POST and GET requests in past.I am not getting how to implement it on the server and send the progress responses to the front end. Additionally is there any other method that can be used.
It would be of great help if someone could help me with this process
For file upload you can use DropzoneJS. Since you are using Angular for front end use Dropzone for Angular.
I was looking into it and heard socket.io can be used to achieve the same. i need to user sharp package on the streamed data
For the server side, I use the built in express routers using multer. Multer parses multipart form data and uses callbacks that play very nicely with express routers.
Then for the UI you need an element that can upload multipart form data. If your using HTML 5 then you should be able to use just about any library that is out there. I personally use Vaadin uploads. It's a nice drop in element that does all the work for you. It even has a nice upload bar and status built in.
I developed a small node.js app in which I can configure conditions for a custom javascript file, which can be embedded in a webpage, and which modifies the DOM of that page in the browser on load. The configuration values are stored in MongoDB. (For sake of argument: add class "A" to DOM element with ID "B" )
I have difficulties to figure out the best way to serve requests / the JavaScript file.
Option 1 and my current implementation is:
I save a configuration in the node app and a distinct JavaScript
file is created for that configuration.
The page references that file which is hosted and served by the server.
Option 2 and where I think I want and should go is:
I saves a configuration (mongodb) NO JavaScript file is created Pages
a generic JavaScript link (for instance: api.service.com/javascript.js)
Node.js / Express app processes the request, and
returns a custom JavaScript (file?) with the correct values as saved in mongodb for that configuration
Now, while I believe this is the right way to go about it, I am unsure HOW to go about it. Any ideas and advise are very welcome!
Ps: For instance I wonder how best to authenticate or identify the origin, user and requested configuration. Shall I do this like: api.service.com/javascript.js&id="userID" - is that good practice?
Why not serve up a generic Javascript file which can take a customized json object (directly from mongodb) and apply the necessary actions? You can include the json data on the page if you really need to have everything embedded, but breaking up configuration and code is the most maintainable approach.
I am trying to create a simple text editor that has Operational Transform multi tenant support and while it was reasonably easy to get the editor working and syncing across clients using shareJS, my problem is I would like to sync the shareJS doc's with a Folder structure on the Server side (this will eventually be a git repo)
I am completely new to sharejs and Operational Transforms and found the shareJS documentation a little tough to follow for more complex example.
Any suggestions on How might I approach this problem?
What I have tried to do is to implement a client on the server side that could get the entire doc text on update but (and this is the lack of experience I'm sure) the only way I can think to accomplice is to use the client api to cycle through all documents and write each to a file. But to me this sounds horribly inefficient. Can anyone point me to any resources that might help or offer some advice as to how I could approach this?
This is a bit late thought but you can still call getSnapshop method on the server side and dump that into a file on your file system. If it is not run locally you can create a tiny router with express on your local machine that listen for post request and you post the dumped file into the post request body on your sharejs server and then on your machine dump the post request body to a file, that should work.
Beware of security considerations if you use a auth system on your server.
I am admittedly a complete noob in all things server, Linux, and websockets. I finally managed to set up a VM running Apache, Tomcat, and Railo that I could connect to and serve up CFM pages, all the while learning UNIX command line navigation, server theory, etc, etc...
Here's my problem -- there is only one Railo websocket extension and it is super rinky-dink (I had to modify the CFC just to get the service to start) but I can't get a websocket connection up (I keep getting "unexpected code 200" in Google Chrome). There is minimal documentation, which is not helpful at all.
Basically, I am trying to do some prototyping for a future project that will use websockets. I like Railo for its speed, security, and excellent ability for very database heavy operations. I am interested in Node, but don't know how to get the same security and DB functionality out of Javascript as I can with CFML.
So I have a couple questions: what are my best options for WebSocket servers? Should I be trying to use Apache and/or Tomcat? People keep saying it's totally not worthwhile to have something like Node.js running the websockets portion and something else doing the heavy lifting behind it -- why is this? I'm more than happy writing WS handlers in whatever language if I can just get a nudge in the right direction, some excellent tutorials (I can't seem to find much in this department), or good feedback on how to, from the ground up, set up my Linux box to handle websockets -- and preferably how to handle both websockets and a robust language like Railo.
The Railo extension works fine for me.
What about submitting some test code so that we can debug it? Of course the websockets projects is very young and in full deployment. So feel free to fork and submit patches or suggestions.
You have plenty of options:
Railo Google Group
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/railo
Github Extension Repository
submit a but in the Railo Jira bugtracker
The main problem of node.js is that it's mono-thread : you won't be able to do background tasks using it and local IO will block your server.
A solution I use is Go. It's very fast, has very good concurrency features and has integrated websocket and json libraries (sample : http://gary.beagledreams.com/page/go-websocket-chat.html). An efficient web application server is made in a few dozens lines of Go. You'll find that there is still much less documentation on internet than for java or even node.js through.
There are a few implementations of websockets in java but as I'm in the process of switching everything I had in java to Go I hadn't tested them. I know I use Google gson for the json encoding in java and it's very good.
The "unexpected code 200" is caused by Railo's web socket server sending an outdated response. They changed the web socket spec and Chrome uses the newer spec.
The problem seems to be caused by chrome & co implementing the new spec, "draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-17". It requires the server to respond with "HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols" rather than 200 OK.
The solution here would be to either update the Railo web socket extension yourself or use some other solution:
Here is a complete demo of a web socket chat server written in PHP.
http://www.flynsarmy.com/2012/02/php-websocket-chat-application-2-0/
I have used this myself to implement a real-time HTML chat served from an Arch Linux machine that I had lying around. Configuration consisted of simply setting up Apache and PHP then changing the IP address in index.html and in server.php to the external ip address of the server machine.
This flynsarmy demo includes a recent version of PHPWebSocket which is an open source web socket server written entirely in PHP and contained in a single file. The demo hooks into three callbacks: connect, message recieved, and disconnect.
The important thing to note, for me, was that the web socket protocol supports text only, not binary so while extending it for my own chat app I had to implement my own commands to help control the server. Commands in my case looked like this:
!kickusers: username, another_username, a_third_username
My server code would check the first character of all messages for a '!' and if present would treat it as a command. Then I slice up the string to get the command "kickusers" and a list of users to kick. Then I call the appropriate kick function and pass it the array of usernames.
Since my scenario was a chat client this meant that the user could literally type this command into chat and the server would accept and respond to it.
The way all this is deployed on my server is like so:
I have Apache serve the index.html page when the user goes to that location on my server in their browser. The only purpose Apache plays here is to give index.html to the client who requested it.
The index.html page contains html to display the chat and javascript to send and recieve chat to/from the server. Basically, index.html is simply a chat client written in HTML and Javascript and it runs in the browser.
I run server.php via ssh on the server to start up the WEB SOCKET server (totally separate from Apache) which just sits there and handles chat stuff like echoing text to the other connected clients etc.
Though the Arch wiki on installing Apache and PHP is specific to Arch in the way that you install the Apache and PHP packages the sections on configuring Apache and PHP apply to all. I'll save you the google query and give you the link here if you like: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/LAMP
As for prototyping, the reason I gave the link to Flynsarmy's chat demo is because his comments are helpful, he wrote a blog about it, and it comes as a very simple yet complete example of how to do something with web sockets in php.