Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
If a user submit different transactions, is possible to link the different transaction one to each other?
From a privacy point of view, the user is visible on the channel so, potentially may be possible to have a privacy leakage or am I wrong?
The answer is- it depends.
If the user uses the regular, standard x509 based identities then yes - it is easy to link the transactions.
However - if the user uses identity mixer, then it is impossible to link its transactions, because it signs as a random pseudonym each time.
Related
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I recently started reading the Stripe connect doc, which I've been following, but it seems like it supports only one time. I'm creating a project where sellers can create a membership plan and user's can subscribe to them. How can I achieve this, please? (I'm using nodejs by the way.)
Yes. Stripe Billing supports Connect. There are a few different ways to set this up, so it really depends on your business model.
Here's a good starting place: https://stripe.com/docs/connect/subscriptions
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
So the title says it all. We want an app that doens't depend on an email at all, only on the phone number of the user. Is this possible ?
Edit:
I need this to authenticate against Azure Functions, if it matters. Maybe Easy-Auth has this ?
Also, I don't care if the solution is hacky. I know I can make mail verification optional, and I don't mind customizing the sign up form so that I remove the email field and submit a fake address instead of the user.
Azure AD B2C does not support this currently. If you're interested in this feature, you can upvote here and receive updates on when this becomes available:
https://feedback.azure.com/forums/169401-azure-active-directory/suggestions/15334314-phone-number-sign-up
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I am planning to make a small blog website which can be accessed from our state only.Is there any way to reach this goal.Please help me out.
You cannot do that - simple as that.
You can try a few things to raise a bar, but a determined attacker will be able to overcome the restriction.
Depending on your definition of state you can try a simple firewall. It can be easy if it's a range of IP addresses. But it may be easy to overcome this as well with VPN
You can add authentication and only allow users that can pass authentication. You need to have a process to grant login details only to specific users
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
One of the main features in my website is a simple One-to-One chat.
I'm debating whether or not I shall dedicate a server (or a cluster) for the sole purpose of this chat feature. The simpler option would be combining this feature as part of the web-servers and just scale out when necessary.
It is worth mentioning I'd like in the future to enable images transfer within the chat.
So what is the better option and why?
Well yes, Whether to use another dedicated server is not depending on how much traffic your site will have to handle. If you're dealing with images It will be a good idea to store them in another server and keep the root server clean.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
this article suggests that using MongoDB for a SAAS application that you should use one DB for each client - can this be right? http://docs.mongohq.com/use-cases/marketing-platforms.html (see bottom of page)
If so are there any occasions when it would still pay to put all clients into one DB?
I asked a similar question
Is it better to use multiple databases when you are managing independent sets of things in MongoDB?
The conclusion seems to be its not really very efficient to have multiple databases. But its still a valid way of doing things.
A more important consideration is if you want to do queries across customers for whatever reason, then your job gets a lot more difficult if they are in separate databases.