I wanted to see if there is a parameter provided. But i don't know why this code wont work. What am i doing wrong?
if ![ -z "$1" ]
then
echo "$1"
fi
Let's ask shellcheck:
In file line 1:
if ![ -z "$1" ]
^-- SC1035: You need a space here.
In other words:
if ! [ -z "$1" ]
then
echo "$1"
fi
If, as per your comment, it still doesn't work and you happen to be doing this from a function, the function's parameters will mask the script's parameters, and we have to pass them explicitly:
In file line 8:
call_it
^-- SC2119: Use call_it "$#" if function's $1 should mean script's $1.
You could check the number of given parameters. $# represents the number of parameters - or the length of the array containing the parameters - passed to a script or a function. If it is zero then no parameters have been passed. Here is a good read about positional parameters in general.
$ cat script
#!/usr/bin/env bash
if (( $# == 0 )); then
echo "No parameters provided"
else
echo "Number of parameters is $#"
fi
Result:
$ ./script
No parameters provided
$ ./script first
Number of parameters is 1
$ ./script first second
Number of parameters is 2
If you would like to check the parameters passed to the script with a function then you would have to provide the script parameters to the function:
$ cat script
#!/usr/bin/env bash
_checkParameters()
{
if (( $1 == 0 )); then
echo "No parameters provided"
else
echo "Number of parameters is $1"
fi
}
_checkParameters $#
This will return the same results as in the first example.
Also related: What are the special dollar sign shell variables?
Having bash script as follows
#! /bin/bash
usage()
{
echo -e "need help!"
}
while getopts ":a:b:h" OPTION
do
case $OPTION in
a)
printf "a option with value %s\n" $OPTARG
;;
b)
printf "b option with value %s\n" $OPTARG
;;
h)
usage
;;
?)
echo -e "No option selected"
;;
esac
done
exit 0
Above script run fine with different option but i wanted to extend it to not allow to pass multiple option at same time like as following argument
$ ./test.bash -a 1 -b 2
a option with value 1
b option with value 2
should be not valid means some way it give me error like wrong syntax i achieved it by as follows but it seems to long it is as follow
#! /bin/bash
usage()
{
echo -e "need help!"
}
let "a_count=0"
let "b_count=0"
MY_ARG=""
while getopts ":a:b:h" OPTION
do
case $OPTION in
a)
let a_count=1
MY_ARG=$OPTARG
;;
b)
let b_count=1
MY_ARG=$OPTARG
;;
h)
usage
;;
?)
echo -e "No option selected"
;;
esac
done
[[ $a_count -eq 1 ]] && [[ $b_count -eq 1 ]] && echo "wrong command sytax" && exit 0
[[ $a_count -eq 1 ]] && printf "a option with value %s\n" $MY_ARG
[[ $b_count -eq 1 ]] && printf "b option with value %s\n" $MY_ARG
exit 0
run like
$ ./test.bash -a 1 -b 2
wrong command sytax
But i want to finish validation in while..loop of getopts. Also this validation not works for following command
./test.bash -a -b
a option with value -b
any one have batter idea how to use getopts for this type validation?
you've almost got it. The : after the a and after the b say that they take an argument, so your example with -a -b is actually valid, saying "There is option a with value -b".
If you really just want "-a or -b and then an argument", you probably don't need getopts at all, but should do:
[ "$1" == "-a" ] && printf "a option with value %s\n" $2
[ "$1" == "-b" ] && printf "b option with value %s\n" $2
any one have batter idea how to use getopts for this type validation?
well, actually, you're explicitly telling geptopts that -a and -b are not boolean parameters, but parameters that take an extra argument. The argument parser cannot tell whether the argument following -a is a parameter or its own argument, and thus they consider [-a ] [-b ] as syntax.
The best way, would actually be to have a different boolean parameter that matches the use case when you do not want an argument for -a and -b.
Though, it won't help you with your issue trying to have parameters with argument or boolean, but for the argument syntax checking you can try docopt which has a nicer way to create command line interface. You focus on doing the --help documentation, it parses it to build your parameter/argument parser. e.g.:
eval "$(docopts -V - -h - : "$#" <<EOF
Usage: myscript [(-a <foo> | -b <bar> | -abool | -bbool)]
-a <foo> The A option.
-b <bar> The B option.
-abool The A bool
-bbool The B bool
--help Show help options.
--version Print program version.
----
myscript 0.0.0
Copyright (C)20.. Your Name
License...
)"
if $a ; then
echo "a option! with $a"
fi
if $b ; then
echo "b option! with $b"
fi
if $abool ; then
echo "abool option!"
fi
if $bbool ; then
echo "bbool option!"
fi
This is not quite perfect because it will always process the first switch, but it does place an exit inside the while loop which is in keeping with your design requirement. It may give you an idea how to finish it.
#!/bin/bash
usage()
{
echo -e "need help!"
}
while getopts "a:b:h" OPTION
do
case $OPTION in
a)
aflag=1
aval=$OPTARG
if [ ! -z "$bflag" ]
then
printf "ERROR: cant use both -a and -b\n"
exit 1
fi
;;
b)
bflag=1
bval=$OPTARG
if [ ! -z "$aflag" ]
then
printf "ERROR: cant use both -a and -b\n"
exit 1
fi
;;
h) usage ;;
?) printf "ERROR" ; exit 1 ;;
esac
done
if [ ! -z "$aflag" ]
then
printf "a option with value %s $aval\n"
elif [ ! -z "$bflag" ]
then
printf "b option with value %s $bval\n"
fi
exit 0
If you still want to use the getopts I would use bash built-in variable for the arguments count $# to detect wrong number of arguments passed:
#! /bin/bash
usage()
{
echo -e "need help!"
}
# Check if number of arguments is greater than 2 as "-a1" (one arg) and "-a 2" are correct.
# You might want to check for other wrong inputs.
if [ $# > 2 ]
then
echo "Some warning t o the user or"
usage
exit 1
fi
while getopts ":a:b:h" OPTION
do
case $OPTION in
a)
printf "a option with value %s\n" $OPTARG
;;
b)
printf "b option with value %s\n" $OPTARG
;;
h)
usage
;;
?)
echo -e "No option selected"
;;
esac
done
exit 0
I am trying to process command line arguments using getopts in bash. One of the requirements is for the processing of an arbitrary number of option arguments (without the use of quotes).
1st example (only grabs the 1st argument)
madcap:~/projects$ ./getoptz.sh -s a b c
-s was triggered
Argument: a
2nd example (I want it to behave like this but without needing to quote the argument"
madcap:~/projects$ ./getoptz.sh -s "a b c"
-s was triggered
Argument: a b c
Is there a way to do this?
Here's the code I have now:
#!/bin/bash
while getopts ":s:" opt; do
case $opt in
s) echo "-s was triggered" >&2
args="$OPTARG"
echo "Argument: $args"
;;
\?) echo "Invalid option: -$OPTARG" >&2
;;
:) echo "Option -$OPTARG requires an argument." >&2
exit 1
;;
esac
done
I think what you want is to get a list of values from a single option. For that, you can repeat the option as many times as needed, and add it's argument to an array.
#!/bin/bash
while getopts "m:" opt; do
case $opt in
m) multi+=("$OPTARG");;
#...
esac
done
shift $((OPTIND -1))
echo "The first value of the array 'multi' is '$multi'"
echo "The whole list of values is '${multi[#]}'"
echo "Or:"
for val in "${multi[#]}"; do
echo " - $val"
done
The output would be:
$ /tmp/t
The first value of the array 'multi' is ''
The whole list of values is ''
Or:
$ /tmp/t -m "one arg with spaces"
The first value of the array 'multi' is 'one arg with spaces'
The whole list of values is 'one arg with spaces'
Or:
- one arg with spaces
$ /tmp/t -m one -m "second argument" -m three
The first value of the array 'multi' is 'one'
The whole list of values is 'one second argument three'
Or:
- one
- second argument
- three
This's my way to do this with a user-defined-function: getopts-extra.
function getopts-extra () {
declare i=1
# if the next argument is not an option, then append it to array OPTARG
while [[ ${OPTIND} -le $# && ${!OPTIND:0:1} != '-' ]]; do
OPTARG[i]=${!OPTIND}
let i++ OPTIND++
done
}
# Use it within the context of `getopts`:
while getopts s: opt; do
case $opt in
s) getopts-extra "$#"
args=( "${OPTARG[#]}" )
esac
done
The full example of getoptz.sh:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
function getopts-extra () {
declare i=1
# if the next argument is not an option, then append it to array OPTARG
while [[ ${OPTIND} -le $# && ${!OPTIND:0:1} != '-' ]]; do
OPTARG[i]=${!OPTIND}
let i++ OPTIND++
done
}
function main () {
declare args
declare OPTIND OPTARG opt
while getopts :s: opt; do
case $opt in
s) getopts-extra "$#"
args=( "${OPTARG[#]}" )
;;
\?) echo "Invalid option: -$OPTARG" >&2
;;
:) echo "Option -$OPTARG requires an argument." >&2
exit 1
;;
esac
done
declare i
for i in "${!args[#]}"; do
echo "args[$i]: ${args[i]}"
done
}
main "$#"
exit
Test:
bash getoptz.sh -s a b c
Output:
args[0]: a
args[1]: b
args[2]: c
This function is a part of the bash lib called xsh-lib/core, available at the syntax xsh /util/getopts/extra.
You can parse the command-line arguments yourself, but the getopts command cannot be configured to recognize multiple arguments to a single option. fedorqui's recommendation is a good alternative.
Here is one way of parsing the option yourself:
while [[ "$*" ]]; do
if [[ $1 = "-s" ]]; then
# -s takes three arguments
args="$2 $3 $4"
echo "-s got $args"
shift 4
fi
done
Instead of using getops I found this better. Create a file tmp.sh and copy the following code..
usage() {
echo "Usage:
./tmp.sh --cloud_provider gcp --source_path abc --destination_path def --refresh_frequency 100 --authenticate true --credential_path a.json
"
}
while [ "$#" -gt 0 ]; do
case $1 in
-a | --authenticate)
shift
[[ $1 == -* ]] && continue
export authenticate=$1
;;
-cp | --credential_path)
shift
[[ $1 == -* ]] && continue
export credential_path=$1
;;
-c | --cloud_provider)
shift
[[ $1 == -* ]] && continue
export cloud_provider=$1
;;
-s | --source_path)
shift
[[ $1 == -* ]] && continue
export source_path=$1
;;
-d | --destination_path)
shift
[[ $1 == -* ]] && continue
export destination_path=$1
;;
-r | --refresh_frequency)
shift
[[ $1 == -* ]] && continue
export refresh_frequency=$1
;;
--)
shift
break
;;
esac
shift
done
This question already has answers here:
Concatenate all arguments and wrap them with double quotes
(6 answers)
Closed 5 years ago.
I would like to concatenate all the arguments passed to my bash script except the flag.
So for example, If the script takes inputs as follows:
./myBashScript.sh -flag1 exampleString1 exampleString2
I want the result to be "exampleString1_exampleString2"
I can do this for a predefined number of inputs (i.e. 2), but how can i do it for an arbitrary number of inputs?
function concatenate_args
{
string=""
for a in "$#" # Loop over arguments
do
if [[ "${a:0:1}" != "-" ]] # Ignore flags (first character is -)
then
if [[ "$string" != "" ]]
then
string+="_" # Delimeter
fi
string+="$a"
fi
done
echo "$string"
}
# Usage:
args="$(concatenate_args "$#")"
This is an ugly but simple solution:
echo $* | sed -e "s/ /_/g;s/[^_]*_//"
You can also use formatted strings to concatenate args.
# assuming flag is first arg and optional
flag=$1
[[ $1 = ${1#-} ]] && unset $flag || shift
concat=$(printf '%s_' ${#})
echo ${concat%_} # to remove the trailing _
nJoy!
Here's a piece of code that I'm actually proud of (it is very shell-style I think)
#!/bin/sh
firsttime=yes
for i in "$#"
do
test "$firsttime" && set -- && unset firsttime
test "${i%%-*}" && set -- "$#" "$i"
done
IFS=_ ; echo "$*"
I've interpreted your question so as to remove all arguments beginning with -
If you only want to remove the beginning sequence of arguments beginnnig with -:
#!/bin/sh
while ! test "${1%%-*}"
do
shift
done
IFS=_ ; echo "$*"
If you simply want to remove the first argument:
#!/bin/sh
shift
IFS=_ ; printf %s\\n "$*"
flag="$1"
shift
oldIFS="$IFS"
IFS="_"
the_rest="$*"
IFS="$oldIFS"
In this context, "$*" is exactly what you're looking for, it seems. It is seldom the correct choice, but here's a case where it really is the correct choice.
Alternatively, simply loop and concatenate:
flag="$1"
shift
the_rest=""
pad=""
for arg in "$#"
do
the_rest="${the_rest}${pad}${arg}"
pad="_"
done
The $pad variable ensures that you don't end up with a stray underscore at the start of $the_rest.
#!/bin/bash
paramCat () {
for s in "$#"
do
case $s in
-*)
;;
*)
echo -n _${s}
;;
esac
done
}
catted="$(paramCat "$#")"
echo ${catted/_/}
I am trying to write a script in bash that check the validity of a user input.
I want to match the input (say variable x) to a list of valid values.
what I have come up with at the moment is:
for item in $list
do
if [ "$x" == "$item" ]; then
echo "In the list"
exit
fi
done
My question is if there is a simpler way to do this,
something like a list.contains(x) for most programming languages.
Say list is:
list="11 22 33"
my code will echo the message only for those values since list is treated as an array and not a string,
all the string manipulations will validate 1 while I would want it to fail.
[[ $list =~ (^|[[:space:]])$x($|[[:space:]]) ]] && echo 'yes' || echo 'no'
or create a function:
contains() {
[[ $1 =~ (^|[[:space:]])$2($|[[:space:]]) ]] && exit(0) || exit(1)
}
to use it:
contains aList anItem
echo $? # 0： match, 1: failed
how about
echo $list | grep -w -q $x
you could either check the output or $? of above line to make the decision.
grep -w checks on whole word patterns. Adding -q prevents echoing the list.
Matvey is right, but you should quote $x and consider any kind of "spaces" (e.g. new line) with
[[ $list =~ (^|[[:space:]])"$x"($|[[:space:]]) ]] && echo 'yes' || echo 'no'
so, i.e.
# list_include_item "10 11 12" "2"
function list_include_item {
local list="$1"
local item="$2"
if [[ $list =~ (^|[[:space:]])"$item"($|[[:space:]]) ]] ; then
# yes, list include item
result=0
else
result=1
fi
return $result
}
end then
`list_include_item "10 11 12" "12"` && echo "yes" || echo "no"
or
if `list_include_item "10 11 12" "1"` ; then
echo "yes"
else
echo "no"
fi
Note that you must use "" in case of variables:
`list_include_item "$my_list" "$my_item"` && echo "yes" || echo "no"
IMHO easiest solution is to prepend and append the original string with a space and check against a regex with [[ ]]
haystack='foo bar'
needle='bar'
if [[ " $haystack " =~ .*\ $needle\ .* ]]; then
...
fi
this will not be false positive on values with values containing the needle as a substring, e.g. with a haystack foo barbaz.
(The concept is shamelessly stolen form JQuery's hasClass()-Method)
You can use (* wildcards) outside a case statement, too, if you use double brackets:
string='My string';
if [[ $string == *My* ]]
then
echo "It's there!";
fi
If it isn't too long; you can just string them between equality along a logical OR comparison like so.
if [ $ITEM == "item1" -o $ITEM == "item2" -o $ITEM == "item3" ]; then
echo In the list
fi
I had this exact problem and while the above is ugly it is more obvious what is going on than the other generalized solutions.
If your list of values is to be hard-coded in the script, it's fairly simple to test using case. Here's a short example, which you can adapt to your requirements:
for item in $list
do
case "$x" in
item1|item2)
echo "In the list"
;;
not_an_item)
echo "Error" >&2
exit 1
;;
esac
done
If the list is an array variable at runtime, one of the other answers is probably a better fit.
There's a cleaner way to check if string is in the list:
if [[ $my_str = #(str1|str2|str3) ]]; then
echo "string found"
fi
Consider exploiting the keys of associative arrays. I would presume this outperforms both regex/pattern matching and looping, although I haven't profiled it.
declare -A list=( [one]=1 [two]=two [three]='any non-empty value' )
for value in one two three four
do
echo -n "$value is "
# a missing key expands to the null string,
# and we've set each interesting key to a non-empty value
[[ -z "${list[$value]}" ]] && echo -n '*not* '
echo "a member of ( ${!list[*]} )"
done
Output:
one is a member of ( one two three )
two is a member of ( one two three )
three is a member of ( one two three )
four is *not* a member of ( one two three )
If the list is fixed in the script, I like the following the best:
validate() {
grep -F -q -x "$1" <<EOF
item 1
item 2
item 3
EOF
}
Then use validate "$x" to test if $x is allowed.
If you want a one-liner, and don't care about whitespace in item names, you can use this (notice -w instead of -x):
validate() { echo "11 22 33" | grep -F -q -w "$1"; }
Notes:
This is POSIX sh compliant.
validate does not accept substrings (remove the -x option to grep if you want that).
validate interprets its argument as a fixed string, not a regular
expression (remove the -F option to grep if you want that).
Sample code to exercise the function:
for x in "item 1" "item2" "item 3" "3" "*"; do
echo -n "'$x' is "
validate "$x" && echo "valid" || echo "invalid"
done
I find it's easier to use the form echo $LIST | xargs -n1 echo | grep $VALUE as illustrated below:
LIST="ITEM1 ITEM2"
VALUE="ITEM1"
if [ -n "`echo $LIST | xargs -n1 echo | grep -e \"^$VALUE`$\" ]; then
...
fi
This works for a space-separated list, but you could adapt it to any other delimiter (like :) by doing the following:
LIST="ITEM1:ITEM2"
VALUE="ITEM1"
if [ -n "`echo $LIST | sed 's|:|\\n|g' | grep -e \"^$VALUE`$\"`" ]; then
...
fi
Note that the " are required for the test to work.
Thought I'd add my solution to the list.
# Checks if element "$1" is in array "$2"
# #NOTE:
# Be sure that array is passed in the form:
# "${ARR[#]}"
elementIn () {
# shopt -s nocasematch # Can be useful to disable case-matching
local e
for e in "${#:2}"; do [[ "$e" == "$1" ]] && return 0; done
return 1
}
# Usage:
list=(11 22 33)
item=22
if elementIn "$item" "${list[#]}"; then
echo TRUE;
else
echo FALSE
fi
# TRUE
item=44
elementIn $item "${list[#]}" && echo TRUE || echo FALSE
# FALSE
The shell built-in compgen can help here. It can take a list with the -W flag and return any of the potential matches it finds.
# My list can contain spaces so I want to set the internal
# file separator to newline to preserve the original strings.
IFS=$'\n'
# Create a list of acceptable strings.
accept=( 'foo' 'bar' 'foo bar' )
# The string we will check
word='foo'
# compgen will return a list of possible matches of the
# variable 'word' with the best match being first.
compgen -W "${accept[*]}" "$word"
# Returns:
# foo
# foo bar
We can write a function to test if a string equals the best match of acceptable strings. This allows you to return a 0 or 1 for a pass or fail respectively.
function validate {
local IFS=$'\n'
local accept=( 'foo' 'bar' 'foo bar' )
if [ "$1" == "$(compgen -W "${accept[*]}" "$1" | head -1)" ] ; then
return 0
else
return 1
fi
}
Now you can write very clean tests to validate if a string is acceptable.
validate "blah" || echo unacceptable
if validate "foo" ; then
echo acceptable
else
echo unacceptable
fi
Prior answers don't use tr which I found to be useful with grep. Assuming that the items in the list are space delimited, to check for an exact match:
echo $mylist | tr ' ' '\n' | grep -F -x -q "$myitem"
This will return exit code 0 if the item is in the list, or exit code 1 if it isn't.
It's best to use it as a function:
_contains () { # Check if space-separated list $1 contains line $2
echo "$1" | tr ' ' '\n' | grep -F -x -q "$2"
}
mylist="aa bb cc"
# Positive check
if _contains "${mylist}" "${myitem}"; then
echo "in list"
fi
# Negative check
if ! _contains "${mylist}" "${myitem}"; then
echo "not in list"
fi
Late to the show? Following very easy variant was not clearly mentioned yet. I use case for checking simple lists, which is a general Bourne Shell idiom not relying on anything external nor extended:
haystack='a b c'
needle='b'
case " $haystack " in (*" $needle "*) :;; (*) false;; esac
Please note the use of the separator (here: SPC) to correcyly delimit the pattern: At the beginning and end of " $haystack " and likewise in the test of " $needle ".
This statement returns true ($?=0) in case $needle is in $haystack, false otherwise.
Also you can test for more than one $needle very easily. When there are several similar cases like
if (haystack.contains(needle1)) { run1() } elif (haystack.contains(needle2)) { run2() } else { run3() }
you can wrap this into the case, too:
case " $haystack " in (*" $needle1 "*) run1;; (*" $needle2 "*) run2;; (*) run3;; esac
and so on
This also works for all lists with values which do not include the separator itself, like comma:
haystack=' a , b , c '
needle=' b '
case ",$haystack," in (*",$needle,"*) :;; (*) false;; esac
Note that if values can contain anything including the separator sequence (except NUL, as shells do not suport NUL in variables as you cannot pass arguments containing NUL to commands) then you need to use arrays. Arrays are ksh/bashisms and not supported by "ordinary" POSIX/Bourne shells. (You can work around this limitation using $# in POSIX-Shells, but this is something completely different than what was aked here.)
Can the (*) false part be left away?
No, as this is the critical return value. By default case returns true.
Yes if you do not need the return value and put your processing at the location of the :
Why the :;;
We could also write true;;, but I am used to use : instead of true because it is shorter and faster to type
Also I consider not writing anything bad practice, as it is not obvious to everybody that the default return value of case is true.
Also "leaving out" the command usually indicates "something was forgotten here". So putting a redundant ":" there clearly indicates "it is intended to do nothing else than return true here".
In bash you can also use ksh/bashisms like ;& (fallthroug) or ;;& (test other patterns) to express if (haystack.contains(needle1)) { run1(); }; if (haystack.contains(needle2)) { run2(); }
Hence usually case is much more maintainable than other regex constructs. Also it does not use regex, it only use shell patterns, which might even be faster.
Reusable function:
: Needle "list" Seperator_opt
NeedleListSep()
{
if [ 3 -gt $# ];
then NeedleListSep "$1" "$2" " ";
else case "$3$2$3" in (*"$3$1$3"*) return 0;; esac; return 1;
fi;
}
In bash you can simplify this to
: Needle "list" Seperator_opt
NeedleListSep()
{
local s="${3-" "}";
case "$s$2$s" in (*"$s$1$s"*) return 0;; esac; return 1;
}
Use like this
Test() {
NeedleListSep "$1" "a b c" && echo found $1 || echo no $1;
NeedleListSep "$1" "a,b,c" ',' && echo found $1 || echo no $1;
NeedleListSep "$1" "a # b # c" ' # ' && echo found $1 || echo no $1;
NeedleListSep "$1" "abc" '' && echo found $1 || echo no $1;
}
Test a
Test z
As shown above, this also works for degerated cases where the separator is the empty string (so each character of the list is a needle). Example:
Test
returns
no
no
no
found
As the empty string is cleary part of abc in case your separator is the empty string, right?
Note that this function is Public Domain as there is absolutely nothing to it which can be genuinely copyrighted.
An alternative solution inspired by the accepted response, but that uses an inverted logic:
MODE="${1}"
echo "<${MODE}>"
[[ "${MODE}" =~ ^(preview|live|both)$ ]] && echo "OK" || echo "Uh?"
Here, the input ($MODE) must be one of the options in the regular expression ('preview', 'live', or 'both'), contrary to matching the whole options list to the user input. Of course, you do not expect the regular expression to change.
Examples
$ in_list super test me out
NO
$ in_list "super dude" test me out
NO
$ in_list "super dude" test me "super dude"
YES
# How to use in another script
if [ $(in_list $1 OPTION1 OPTION2) == "NO" ]
then
echo "UNKNOWN type for param 1: Should be OPTION1 or OPTION2"
exit;
fi
in_list
function show_help()
{
IT=$(CAT <<EOF
usage: SEARCH_FOR {ITEM1} {ITEM2} {ITEM3} ...
e.g.
a b c d -> NO
a b a d -> YES
"test me" how "test me" -> YES
)
echo "$IT"
exit
}
if [ "$1" == "help" ]
then
show_help
fi
if [ "$#" -eq 0 ]; then
show_help
fi
SEARCH_FOR=$1
shift;
for ITEM in "$#"
do
if [ "$SEARCH_FOR" == "$ITEM" ]
then
echo "YES"
exit;
fi
done
echo "NO"
Assuming TARGET variable can be only 'binomial' or 'regression', then following would do:
# Check for modeling types known to this script
if [ $( echo "${TARGET}" | egrep -c "^(binomial|regression)$" ) -eq 0 ]; then
echo "This scoring program can only handle 'binomial' and 'regression' methods now." >&2
usage
fi
You could add more strings into the list by separating them with a | (pipe) character.
Advantage of using egrep, is that you could easily add case insensitivity (-i), or check more complex scenarios with a regular expression.
This is almost your original proposal but almost a 1-liner. Not that complicated as other valid answers, and not so depending on bash versions (can work with old bashes).
OK=0 ; MP_FLAVOURS="vanilla lemon hazelnut straciatella"
for FLAV in $MP_FLAVOURS ; do [ $FLAV == $FLAVOR ] && { OK=1 ; break; } ; done
[ $OK -eq 0 ] && { echo "$FLAVOR not a valid value ($MP_FLAVOURS)" ; exit 1 ; }
I guess my proposal can still be improved, both in length and style.
Simple oneliner...
if [[ " 11 22 33 " == *" ${x} "* ]]; then echo "${x} is in the list"; fi;
Add before fi: else echo "${x} is NOT in the list";
The script below implements contains function for a list.
function contains {
local target=$1
shift
printf '%s\n' "$#" | grep -x -q "$target"
out=$?
(( out = 1 - out ))
return $out
}
If you convert a string based on white space into a list and use it, it seems to be solved as follows.
list="11 22 33"
IFS=" " read -ra parsed_list <<< "$list"
# parsed_list would be ("11" "22" "33")
contains "11" "${parsed_list[#]}"
echo $? # 1
contains "22" "${parsed_list[#]}"
echo $? # 1
contains "1" "${parsed_list[#]}"
echo $? # 0
contains "11 22" "${parsed_list[#]}"
echo $? # 0