Is there a way by using a DAX measure to create the column which contain text values instead of the numeric sum/count that it will automatically give?
In the example below the first name will appear as a value (in the first table) instead of their name as in the second.
Data table:
+----+------------+------------+---------------+-------+-------+
| id | first_name | last_name | currency | Sales | Stock |
+----+------------+------------+---------------+-------+-------+
| 1 | Giovanna | Christon | Peso | 10 | 12 |
| 2 | Roderich | MacMorland | Peso | 8 | 10 |
| 3 | Bond | Arkcoll | Yuan Renminbi | 4 | 6 |
| 1 | Giovanna | Christon | Peso | 11 | 13 |
| 2 | Roderich | MacMorland | Peso | 9 | 11 |
| 3 | Bond | Arkcoll | Yuan Renminbi | 5 | 7 |
| 1 | Giovanna | Christon | Peso | 15 | 17 |
| 2 | Roderich | MacMorland | Peso | 10 | 12 |
| 3 | Bond | Arkcoll | Yuan Renminbi | 6 | 8 |
| 1 | Giovanna | Christon | Peso | 17 | 19 |
| 2 | Roderich | MacMorland | Peso | 11 | 13 |
| 3 | Bond | Arkcoll | Yuan Renminbi | 7 | 9 |
+----+------------+------------+---------------+-------+-------+
No DAX needed. You should put the first_name field on Rows and not on Values. Select Tabular View for the Report Layout. Like this:
After some search I found 4 ways.
measure 1 (will return blank if values differ):
=IF(COUNTROWS(VALUES(Table1[first_name])) > 1, BLANK(), VALUES(Table1[first_name]))
measure 2 (will return blank if values differ):
=CALCULATE(
VALUES(Table1[first_name]),
FILTER(Table1,
COUNTROWS(VALUES(Table1[first_name]))=1))
measure 3 (will show every single text value), thanks # Rory:
=CONCATENATEX(Table1,[first_name]," ")
For very large dataset this concatenate seems to work better:
=CALCULATE(CONCATENATEX(VALUES(Table1[first_name]),Table1[first_name]," "))
Results:
Related
Excel
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H |
---|-----------------|----------|--------|--------|-----------|-------------|---------|----------|---
1 | Loan | 50.000 | Year | Start | Interests | Repayment | Annuity | End |
2 | Interests p.a. | 2% | 1 | 50.000 | -1.250 | -1.750 | -3.000 | 48.250 |
3 | Annuity p.a. | 3.000 | 2 | 48.250 | -1.206 | -1.794 | -3.000 | 46.456 |
4 | Maturity | ?? | 3 | 46.456 | -1.161 | -1.839 | -3.000 | 44.618 |
5 | | | 4 | 44.618 | -1.115 | -1.885 | -3.000 | 42.733 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
21 | | | 20 | 8.094 | -202 | -2.798 | -3.000 | 5.297 |
22 | | | 21 | 5.297 | -132 | -2.868 | -3.000 | 2.429 |
23 | | | 22 | 2.429 | -61 | -2.939 | -3.000 | 0 |
The above loan of 50.000 has an interest rate of 2% and an annuity of 3.000.
In the table from C1:H23 the annual development of the remaining loan is displayed.
Based on this helper table I know that the maturity of the loan is 22 years by using the following formula in Cell B4:
B4 = COUNTA(C1:C22)
However, my question is if there is an Excel-Formula that can calculate the maturity in one cell so I do not need the helper table in C1:H23?
Excel-File
| A | B | C | D | E | F |
---|--------------|-------------------|--------|-----------------|------------|------------|-
1 | Sales | Product | | Product | Sales | |
2 | 20 | Product_A | | Product_D | 100 | Product_D |
3 | 10 | Product_A | | Product_D | 90 | |
4 | 50 | Product_A | | Product_D | 50 | |
5 | 80 | Product_B | | Product_D | 50 | |
6 | 40 | Product_C | | | | |
7 | 30 | Product_C | | | | |
8 | 100 | Product_D | | | | |
9 | 90 | Product_D | | | | |
10 | 50 | Product_D | | | | |
11 | 50 | Product_D | | | | |
12 | | | | | | |
In Column B I have list of different products with their corresponding sales in Column A.
Products can appear mutliple times in the list.
Sales numbers can be equal for multiple products.
I want to use the value in Cell F2 as Filter-Criteria to create a descending list of the products in Column D and Column E sorted by the sales in Column A.
Therefore, I tried to add the FILTER function to the formula from this question:
=INDEX(SORT(FILTER(A2:B11,A2:A11=F2,""),2,-1),SEQUENCE(COUNT(A2:A11)),{2,1})
However, with this formula I get error #VALUE.
How do I need to modify the formula to make it work?
Simply add COUNTIF() inside the SEQUENCE():
=INDEX(SORT(FILTER(A2:B11,B2:B11=F2,""),2,-1),SEQUENCE(COUNTIF(B2:B11,F2)),{2,1})
Current view on OP side:
Due to unknown reason only Column D gets filled.
Excel-Table:
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
-----|----------------|-----------------|------------------|--------|---------|---------|---------|-----
1 | month&year | date | customer | | 2020-01 | 2020-03 | 2020-04 |
-----|----------------|-----------------|------------------|--------|---------|---------|---------|-----
2 | 2020-01 | 2020-01-10 | Customer A | | 3 | 2 | 4 |
3 | 2020-01 | 2020-01-14 | Customer A | | | | |
4 | 2020-01 | 2020-01-17 | Customer B | | | | |
5 | 2020-01 | 2020-01-19 | Customer B | | | | |
6 | 2020-01 | 2020-01-23 | Customer C | | | | |
7 | 2020-01 | 2020-01-23 | Customer B | | | | |
-----|----------------|-----------------|---------------- -|--------|---------|---------|---------|-----
8 | 2020-03 | 2020-03-18 | Customer E | | | | |
9 | 2020-03 | 2020-03-19 | Customer A | | | | |
-----|----------------|-----------------|------------------|--------|---------|---------|---------|-----
10 | 2020-04 | 2020-04-04 | Customer B | | | | |
11 | 2020-04 | 2020-04-07 | Customer C | | | | |
12 | 2020-04 | 2020-04-07 | Customer A | | | | |
13 | 2020-04 | 2020-04-07 | Customer E | | | | |
14 | 2020-04 | 2020-04-08 | Customer A | | | | |
15 | 2020-04 | 2020-04-12 | Customer A | | | | |
16 | 2020-04 | 2020-04-15 | Customer B | | | | |
17 | |
In my Excel file I want to calculate the unique count of cutomers per month as you can see in Cell E2:G2.
I already inserted Column A as a helper column which extracts only the month and the year from the date in Column B.
Therefore, the date-formatting is the same as in the timline in Cell E1:G2.
I guess the formula to get the unique count per month is somehow related to =COUNTIFS($A:$A,E$1) but I have no clue how to modify this formula to get the expected values.
Do you have any idea?
Here's one approach which would work for Office 365 and if you have access to UNIQUE:
=COUNTA(UNIQUE(IF($A$2:$A$16=G$1,$C$2:$C$16,""),,FALSE))-1
For older versions, following will work with CTRL+SHIFT+ENTER (array entry)
=SUM(--(FREQUENCY(IFERROR(MATCH($A$2:$A$16&$C$2:$C$16,E$1&$C$2:$C$16,0),"a"),MATCH($A$2:$A$16&$C$2:$C$16,E$1&$C$2:$C$16,0))>0))
You can do it without any helping column.
=SUM(--(UNIQUE(FILTER($C$2:$C$16,TEXT($B$2:$B$16,"yyyy-mm")=E$1))<>""))
For older version of excel use below formula with your helper column.
=SUMPRODUCT(--($A$2:$A$16=D$1)*(1/COUNTIFS($A$2:$A$16,$A$2:$A$16,$C$2:$C$16,$C$2:$C$16)))
I want to compose sales table for purchased and sold items to see total profit. It's easy to do when items are purchased and sold individually or as a lot. But how to handle situation when one buys collection of items and sells them one by one. For example, I buy a collection (C) of a hammer and a screwdriver and sell tools separately. If I would enter data into simple table as in the image, I would get wrong profit result.
When there are only two items, I could divide their purchase price randomly, but when there are many items and not all of them are yet sold, I can't easily see if this collection already made profit or not.
I expect correct output of profit. In this case collection cost was 10 and selling price of all collection items was 13. Thus it should show profit of 3, not loss of -7. I was thinking of adding 2 new column, like IsCollection, CollectionID. Then derive a formula, which would use either simple subtraction or would check price of a whole collection and subtract it from the sum of items that belong to that collection. Deriving such formula is another question... But maybe there is an easier way of accomplishing the same
I added a column COLLECTION to identify item who belong to a collection.
Then I used SUMIF to sum sell price for items which belong at the same collection.
Then I used IF in Profit column to use summed sell price or single sell price.
You need to define in some formula a range of cell (see below).
Problem: you can't add profit values to obtain Total profit.
I used opencalc (but it should be almost the same in Excel).
Content of
SUM_COLL (row2):
=SUMIF($A$1:$A$22;"="&A2;$D$1:$D$22)
SUM_COLL (row3):
=SUMIF($A$1:$A$22;"="&A3;$D$1:$D$22)
and so on.
Profit (row2):
=IF(A2<>"";E2-C2;D2-C2)
Profit (row3):
=IF(A3<>"";E3-C3;D3-C3)
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+
| COLLECTION | Item name | Purch Price | Sell Price | SUM_COLL | Profit |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+
| | A | 1 | 1.5 | 0 | 0.5 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+
| | B | 2 | 2.1 | 0 | 0.1 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+
| C | C1 | 10 | 7 | 27 | 17 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+
| C | C2 | 10 | 6 | 27 | 17 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+
| D | D1 | 7 | 15 | 23 | 16 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+
| | E | 8 | 12 | 0 | 4 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+
| C | C3 | 10 | 14 | 27 | 17 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+
| D | D2 | 7 | 8 | 23 | 16 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+
| | | | | 0 | 0 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+
| | | | | 0 | 0 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+
| | | | | 0 | 0 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+
| | | | | 0 | 0 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+
Update:
I added two more column to make Profit summable:
COUNT_COLL (row2):
=COUNTIF($A$1:$A$22;"="&A2)
COUNT_COLL (row3):
=COUNTIF($A$1:$A$22;"="&A3)
Profit_SUMMABLE (row2)
=IF(A2<>"";(E2-C2)/G2;D2-C2)
Profit_SUMMABLE (row3)
=IF(A3<>"";(E3-C3)/G3;D3-C3)
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+------------+-----------------+
| COLLECTION | Item name | Purch Price | Sell Price | SUM_COLL | Profit | COUNT_COLL | Profit_SUMMABLE |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+------------+-----------------+
| | A | 1 | 1.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+------------+-----------------+
| | B | 2 | 2.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+------------+-----------------+
| C | C1 | 10 | 7 | 27 | 17 | 3 | 5.6666666667 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+------------+-----------------+
| C | C2 | 10 | 6 | 27 | 17 | 3 | 5.6666666667 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+------------+-----------------+
| D | D1 | 7 | 15 | 23 | 16 | 2 | 8 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+------------+-----------------+
| | E | 8 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+------------+-----------------+
| C | C3 | 10 | 14 | 27 | 17 | 3 | 5.6666666667 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+------------+-----------------+
| D | D2 | 7 | 8 | 23 | 16 | 2 | 8 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+------------+-----------------+
| | | | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+------------+-----------------+
| | | | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+------------+-----------------+
| | | | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+------------+-----------------+
...
...
| TOTAL | | | | | 87.6 | | 37.6 |
+------------+-----------+-------------+------------+----------+--------+------------+-----------------+
I'm trying to find a solution without macros in excel for following problem:
There is a table containing ratings of a student for different time periods.
So the rating of the student with ID=1 was 1 from January to April and 3 from Mai to June.
Two other students had a constant ranking (6 and 9) from January to June
| A | B | C |D |
---| ----|------------|------------|-------|
1 | ID | START | END |RANKING|
2 | 1 | 01.01.2014 | 30.04.2014 | 1 |
3 | 1 | 01.05.2014 | 30.06.2014 | 3 |
4 | 2 | 01.01.2014 | 30.06.2014 | 6 |
5 | 3 | 01.01.2014 | 30.06.2014 | 9 |
Next table contains IDs (y axis) and Months (x axis)
| F | G | H | I | J | K | L |
---| ----|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
1 | ID | 201401 | 201402 | 201403 | 201404 | 201405 | 201406 |
2 | 1 | | | | | | |
3 | 2 | | | | | | |
4 | 3 | | | | | | |
And I wish to feel this second table like this:
| ID | 201401 | 201402 | 201403 | 201404 | 201405 | 201406 |
| ----|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| 2 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| 3 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
I tried to use Index and Match, but without any good results because I haven't found a posibility to use IF (if (
Could anybody help?
You can get what you're looking for with SUMPRODUCT
Given the layout you provided, this formula should work when put in G2 and filled down and over
=SUMPRODUCT(--($A:$A=$F2),--($B:$B<=G$1),--($C:$C>G$1),$D:$D)
That looks in column A for an ID matching F2, then for every one it finds of those:
It checks the date in column B against the date in G1
It checks the date in column C against the date in G1
If all criteria match, it returns the value in Column D
This assumes you only have one entry for each period, otherwise it will sum them.
Also, you can use SUMIFS, it's a little less easy to read but I think it's slightly more efficient than SUMPRODUCT (I'm not positive, just anecdotal evidence from usage)
=SUMIFS($D:$D,$A:$A,"="&$F3,$B:$B,"<="&G$1,$C:$C,">"&G$1)
It does the exact same thing, just with different syntax.