I imagine that I have a row with two kinds of alphanumeric values, one that has 0, and another that has a digit above 0.
If I want to find the rightmost cell that has a value above 0 such as 1, what would the formula be?
Currently I am using the formula =IFERROR(LOOKUP(2,1/(A2:O2<>""),A2:O2),"NS")
but it returns MB0 instead of HB1.
I'd suggest trying like below if number part is always rightmost part of the string.
=IFERROR(LOOKUP(2,1/RIGHT(A2:O2),A2:O2),"NS")
Related
How can I find in the first character and then the numeric value in this string 100App100?
The formula I've used so far is below which is finding the the first numeric value. I want to return the value 100, after the App, as I want to use the formula for work for all other cells as well, example when string is FOUR200, then it would be 200. Is this possible?
=VALUE(RIGHT(B2, LEN(B2)-MIN(SEARCH({0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9},B2&"0123456789"))+1))
1] As per your described, you can using Lookup+Right function
In C1, copied down :
=LOOKUP(9^9,0+RIGHT(B1,ROW($1:$250)))
2] Or, should you want to extract 1st group of numeric value after 1st group of text value
then in C1, copied down :
=LOOKUP(9^9,0+MID(MID(B1,AGGREGATE(15,6,FIND(CHAR(ROW($1:$26)+{64,96}),B1),1),99),MIN(FIND({0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9},MID(B1,AGGREGATE(15,6,FIND(CHAR(ROW($1:$26)+{64,96}),B1),1),99)&1/17)),ROW($1:$250)))
I have a spreadsheet that I track my hours. Each cell initially is populated with a formula, i.e. =IF(WORKDAY(B24-1,1,holidays2019)=B24,OFFSET(C24,-1,2),0)
and then as the month progresses I enter my actual time.
In the following excerpt all values through 5/10/2019 are entered.
The formula =SUMIF(C5:C19,NOT(ISFORMULA(C5:C19))) shows zero. I do not understand why this does not work.
I appreciate any help! Column B in my spreadsheet corresponds to the dates shown below and Column C to the time entries.
Expected Result: 48.9
=SUMPRODUCT(J6:J20,--NOT(ISFORMULA(J6:J20)))
The key to this solution is the -- in front of the NOT(). A boolean that is processed by a math operator gets converted to 1 or 0. --, +0, -0, *1, /1 would have all worked to do the conversion. So now you wind up with an array of values you may want to sum being multiplied by an array of 1 and 0 to indicate the ones you want. The 1 are manual entry and the 0 are your formulas entries.
Now SUMPRODUCT performs array like calculations. As a result avoid using full column/row references inside it or you will wind up with a lot of excess calculations. Adjust the ranges in the answer to suit your needs.
Here's the MSDN definition of the Criteria in =SUMIF
criteria Required. The criteria in the form of a number, expression,
a cell reference, text, or a function that defines which cells will be
added. For example, criteria can be expressed as 32, ">32", B5, "32",
"apples", or TODAY().
Important: Any text criteria or any criteria that includes logical or
mathematical symbols must be enclosed in double quotation marks (").
If the criteria is numeric, double quotation marks are not required.
So, the reason, why your SUMIF returns 0 is, because none of the cells match the criteria, as they return a number and meanwhile they expect FALSE
Another issue here being, that the ISFORMULA will return TRUE, even when a range contains a single formula while all the rest has none. So basically you need to drag the formula down for each cell individually and sum them up only when a value is TRUE
Starting from cell D1:
=ISFORMULA(B1)
And then you can simply sum them up with the formula you provided.
=SUMIF(D1:D16,TRUE,C1:C16)
Obviously, you can hide the column D to make it more aesthetically pleasing.
Your formula fails because the criteria you're matching against, is TRUE/FALSE. Obviously the values in C5:C19 don't contain any booleans, so the sum is 0.
To solve this, you can add the correct criteria in cell D5 and below: =ISFORMULA(C5)
Then use =SUMIF(D5:D19,FALSE,C5:C19) to sum the values in column C.
I'm trying to write a SUM(IF(zero, add 8), A1:G1) kind of excel function.
What it should do:
If the cell contains a number, add that number to the sum.
If the cell contains a number = 0, add 8 to the sum.
if the cell is empty, add nothing to the sum
I have tried using SUMIF, but it only "adds the numbers if they meet a criteria", and I rather need "add this when the criteria is met"
You could just make a longer formula:
=SUM(A1:G1)+COUNTIF(A1:G1, 0)*8
The first sum will only do your numbers ignore blanks and 0's, the second part counts the number of 0's and multiplies it by 8.
You can do this with the following formula:
=SUMIF(A1:G1,">0")+8*COUNTIFS(A1:G1,0,A1:G1,"<>")
should be self-explaining :)
Method 1
If you can spare another column, just use an IF statement to replace all 0's by 8's and blanks by 0's (not really necessary) in a new column
=IF(A1=0,8,A1) and take a SUM of this column.
Method 2
Just SUM over your original data, count the number of zeros in your data and multiply this number by 8.
=SUM(A1:A10)+8*COUNTIF(A1:A10,"=0")
Note: The data is in A1:A10 in this case.
I have two tables, table1 and table2. I execute VLOOKUP function in order to fill in 3 columns from table2 into table1.
For some reason, the formula doesn't work for the first row, and doesn't find the exact match from table2 even though it exists.
I made sure that both columns (for comparison) have the same format (General) and there is no extra spacing. Same conditions also apply for the rest of the records, and it works there properly.
table1 - you can see the missing matches for the first row.
table2 - you can see the match does exist, but it is not reflected in table1.
Is there any other reason why VLOOKUP can't find a match for a specific record?
Try directly evaluating equality for the two cells that you believe are equal, for instance if A2 is the value you are looking up and Sheet2!A100 is the value you think should match try this in a cell:
=(A2=Sheet2!A100)
If that returns false then you know that there is some formatting issue or error in your vlookup.
Also try Formulas / Evaluate Formula ribbon command to step through your vlookup in case that highlights something wrong.
Okay - Here's a doozy of a use-case. VLOOKUP and INDEX-MATCH were returning #N/A for values that were "apparently" equal. Cleaned my data with =TRIM(CLEAN(SUBSTITUTE(A1,CHAR(160)," "))) and that didn't work.
Then, I compared two cells that looked like they had matching values and they evaluated to FALSE (A1=B1 resulted in FALSE).
Then, as a last resort, I code checked each ASCII value for each character in the two cells and I found that the "-" in one cell was different from the "-" in the other cell. The first cell has the ASCII value 63 and the second cell had the ASCII value 45 for what looked like was the same "-". Turns out that 63 is a "short dash" and 45 is your standard dash or minus symbol.
The way to evaluate the ASCII codes for each character in a string is to combine the CODE function with the MID or RIGHT functions after testing the cells for length using the LEN function.
Examples:
LEN(A1) should equal LEN(B1)
For the first character in each cell:
CODE(A1) Code defaults to the first character on the left
CODE(MID(A1,2,1) yields the ASCII for the second character
CODE(MID(A1,3,1) yields the ASCII for the second character
and so on
If you have a lot of characters you can post an integer sequence next to your CODE-MID function and point the position argument to the related integer and just copy down or across
Or
You can look for the weird non-numeric character and just test that one for both cells.
Have observed scenarios like this where direct comparison fails (e.g. formula =A1=B1 resulted in FALSE) and yet length =LEN(A1)=LEN(B1) and letter by letter ASCI comparison (=CODE(A1,1,1), =CODE(A1,2,1), =CODE(A1,3,1), etc.) shows no difference.
What worked was to adjust the format of the lookup value inside the VLOOKUP.
e.g.
=VLOOKUP(A1, ARRAY, COL_NUM, FALSE) -> =VLOOKUP(TEXT(A1, "000"), ARRAY, COL_NUM, FALSE)
Here's an issue I encountered: my VLOOKUP formula returns the correct value (1) if I type in the value-to-look-up (1.016) directly in the formula, shown in cell F54.
However, if I referenced a value in column A as the value-to-look-up, the formula returned #N/A, as shown in cell F55.
(I was actually trying to VLOOKUP the current row's A value plus 0.015, i.e. VLOOKUP(A54+0.015, $A$3:$B$203, 2, FALSE))
Yet if I use the ROUND function, then the VLOOKUP formula works, as shown in F56.
I recently encountered the same issue and resolved it by changing the vlookup formula to =VLOOKUP([value to lookup], [lookup table], [column to return in the lookup table], False). Setting the last input argument to "false" forces Excel vlookup function to perform an exact match.
I am using current forumla in excel but it returns NA. May I know any problem on it
LOOKUP(5,{10,7;9,14;8,14;7,14;6,28;5,28;4,28;3,42;2,42;1,42})
On microsoft's support page on this, it states:
If lookup_value is smaller than the smallest value in the first row or column (depending on the array dimensions), LOOKUP returns the #N/A error value.
And most importantly:
Important The values in array must be placed in ascending order. For example, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2 or A-Z or FALSE, TRUE. If you do not do so, LOOKUP may not give the correct value. Uppercase and lowercase text are equivalent.
Your first row is: (10,7), and 5 is smaller than 10, so it returns #N/A
If you put your values in ascending order, it should work.
My question would be "why are you using LOOKUP?" - If you expect an exact match then LOOKUP isn't the best function, VLOOKUP would be better, i.e.
=VLOOKUP(5,{10,7;9,14;8,14;7,14;6,28;5,28;4,28;3,42;2,42;1,42},2,0)
That will return 28 and if you change the lookup value to any of the listed values in the lookup range it will still work
If the lookup value is changed to a value that isn't in the list, e.g. 5.5 or 11 you will get #N/A error