I have a project writed for DEC Unix v4. I want to compile it for linux.
My project have Imakefile, I run xmkmf to generate Makefile and after that run make to compile but I get Makefile:1059: *** missing separator. Stop.
When I see this post I installed SparkyLinux and install CDE and libmotif-dev on it for Motif and CDE and again I am going to generate Makefile and run make, but my problem still
line 1059: MComplexProgramTarget(_gdsv_.o,$(LOCAL_LIBRARIES),)
That line is valid in an Imakefile, but not in a Makefile. It looks like a macro for the C preprocessor. When the preprocessor does not find a definition for a macro, it leaves it as-is.
The next question is therefore: Why is the macro MComplexProgramTarget undefined, and which file defines it usually?
To answer this, you need to know where imake reads its definition files ("strace -f xmkmf" can help you with this), and in which file does this word appear?
The most probable thing is that you have lead to some incompatibility issue with gmake, which should be the make version you are using. Install BSD make and use it to build the system. Probably this will solve your problem (or not, but I have had this kind of problems) Depending on the platform, the package is called bmake or pmake.
Related
I have installed gprbuild, xmlada, and gnatcoll. I am now attempting to install gnatcoll_postgres. Which I have downladed from here: https://github.com/AdaCore/gnatcoll-db/
Within the Postgres folder is a Makefile, which I execute like so...
[parallels#localhost postgres]$ ls
gnatcoll_postgres.gpr gnatcoll-sql-postgres-gnade.ads
gnatcoll-sql-postgres.adb gnatcoll-sql-ranges.adb
gnatcoll-sql-postgres.ads gnatcoll-sql-ranges.ads
gnatcoll-sql-postgres-builder.adb Makefile
gnatcoll-sql-postgres-builder.ads postgres_support.c
gnatcoll-sql-postgres-gnade.adb README.md
[parallels#localhost postgres]$ make Makefile
which: no gnatls in (/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin:/var/lib/snapd/snap/bin:/home/parallels/.local/bin:/home/parallels/bin)
make: Nothing to be done for `Makefile'.
[parallels#localhost postgres]$
Would anybody please be able to tell me what this means...
which: no gnatls in (/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin:/var/lib/snapd/snap/bin:/home/parallels/.local/bin:/home/parallels/bin)
make: Nothing to be done for `Makefile'.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Please see the xmlada and gnatcoll in my project below, does this look like it's installed correctly? I'm presuming this isn't correct...
Thanks,
Lloyd
It means that your GNAT installation binaries aren’t on your PATH.
The README.txt from the adacore.com site says, in part,
To start using the tools in command-line mode, you will need to add
{install_prefix}/bin
to your PATH environment variable. Alternatively, you can simply launch
{install_prefix}/bin/gps
and GPS will automatically add itself to the PATH - it will also find the
cross compiler, if you have installed everything in the default locations.
Note that GPS will add this at the end of the PATH, meaning that it will find first any other GNAT installations that you have in your PATH.
I strongly suspect that you’ve been doing the latter, so that GPS adds itself (actually, of course, its own location) to the PATH, so that when it launches the compiler it finds the correct one.
When you run make from the terminal, the compiler isn’t on the PATH, so neither are gnatls, gprconfig, gprbuild and the rest of the GNAT tools.
What you need to do is to take the first choice from the README, and add /home/parallel/opt/GNAT/2019/bin to (the front of) your default PATH. How you do that depends on your shell.
You will find xmlada, gnatcoll already installed.
i want to install cpanm WWW::Curl::Form on my Synology NAS. But that fails. Here is the output cpanm WWW::Curl::Form WWW::Curl::Easy File::Find::Rule String::CRC32 URI::Escape
--> Working on WWW::Curl::Form
Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/S/SZ/SZBALINT/WWW-Curl-4.17.tar.gz ... OK
Configuring WWW-Curl-4.17 ... OK
Building and testing WWW-Curl-4.17 ... FAIL
! Installing WWW::Curl::Form failed. See /var/services/homes/fox/.cpanm/work/1541095458.25803/build.log
the log file gives me:
make: i686-linux-gnu-ld: Command not found
But i dont know how to fix it on my Synology NAS (DSM 6.2 and appollolake architecture DS918+)
After reviewing your additional comments, I believe I have potential solution. It looks like you are trying to install some Perl modules via the default Perl shell, cpan. As part of the installation process, the make utility is being executed. This utility is heavily used for compiling and building source from C and C++ source code, along with other languages.
The make utility is trying to call some executable i686-linux-gnu-ld which is a linker, see ld. A linker is a utility used in C programming for linking (combining) multiple compiled object files into a single executable binary. make is calling this utility as some sort of build process. Instead of calling i686-linux-gnu-ld it should probably just be calling ld. The only thing I am not sure about is why it is using the full name of the utility instead of ld.
I can think of two solutions. The first would be to update the make file to use the correct name for the linker. I'm not sure how you would do this when it is being installed via cpan since it is downloading a package and executing the make file before you have a chance to modify it. The other option is to create a symbolic link from the incorrect name and path of ld that the make file is using to the correct path /opt/bin/ld. This will result in ld being called when i686-linux-gnu-ld is called. Also, I forgot to mention it earlier but the which command will tell you where an executable / command is located on your shell's path.
The Stack Overflow post, How to symlink a file in Liunx?, gives a good explanation of how to create a symlink. You need to create a symlink to point to the correct name and path of the linker. To do so run the following command:
ln -s /opt/bin/ld /usr/bin/i686-linux-gnu-ld
Depending on the permissions of these directories you may need to run this command under a account with elevated permissions or via sudo. I apologize for this post being rather long and verbose. I just wanted to explain my solution in detail. I hope this helps. Please let me know if this doesn't resolve the problem.
edit: fixed typo in the command.
I am using the automatic Coq 8.5 makefile generator. This makefile prefixes all modules by "Top." .
Now let's say you run a lot of files by make and then want to change/debug some file in the IDE.
Then the annoying fact is that Coq complains it cannot find the compiled other files, because in the IDE it assumes the names without the "Top" prefix.
I tried to tweak the makefile to get rid of this prefix. But I always ended in some error message of the make.
Can someone show me either how to remove "Top" prefix in make or tell the IDE to use the "Top" prefix.
You can start CoqIDE with the following arguments coqide -R . Top.
This will get rid of the following error Error: The file ..../Logic.vo contains library Top.Logic and not library Logic.
This is annoying indeed. In order to avoid that kind of annoyance, always start your _CoqProject with a line listing options:
-Q . MyProject
To note: the options you can put on the first line of your _CoqProject are the ones listed when calling coqtop -help.
I have a check for a header file in configure.ac in the source root
AC_CHECK_HEADER(log4c.h,
[],
[AC_MSG_ERROR([Couldn't find or include log4c.h])])
and I'd like to give different feedback on different platform to reflect different most straight forward ways of providing the header:
on Debian it should error with the message Couldn't find or include log4c.h. Install log4c using 'sudo apt-get install liblog4c-dev'
on OpenSUSE it should error with ... Install log4c using 'sudo yum install log4c-devel' (didn't research the package name, but you catch my drift)
on other systems (where I'm too lazy to research the package name) it should error with ... Install log4c by fetching ftp://.../log4c.tar.gz and installing with './configure && make && make install' in the source root
I
checked the AM_CONDITIONAL macro, but I don't get how to use it in configure.ac rather than in Makefile.am (as described in autoconf/automake: conditional compilation based on presence of library?)
found the tip to run esyscmd in stackoverflow.com/questions/4627900/m4-executing-a-shell-command, but adding esyscmd (/bin/echo abc) to configure.ac doesn't print anything when I run autoreconf --install --verbose --force.
Both answers describing the usage of conditional macros without the shell commands for the mentioned OS and links to predefined macros (like AC_CHECK_HEADER_DEBIAN, AC_CHECK_HEADER_SUSE, etc.) are appreciated.
The following configure.ac doesn't work:
AC_INIT([cndrvcups-common], [2.90], [krichter722#aol.de])
AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4])
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign -Wall subdir-objects])
AC_PROG_CC
AM_PROG_AR
AM_PROG_CC_C_O
AC_MSG_NOTICE([Hello, world.])
AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT
AC_CHECK_HEADER(check.h,
[],
[
AS_IF (test "$(lsb_release -cs)" = "vivid", [echo aaaaaa], [echo bbbbbb])
])
LT_INIT # needs to be after AM_PROGS_AR
AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h])
AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile])
AC_OUTPUT
because ./configure fails with
checking check.h usability... no
checking check.h presence... no
checking for check.h... no
./configure: line 4433: syntax error near unexpected token `;'
./configure: line 4433: ` if ; then :'
There's also ./configure: line 4427: #include: command not found which happens no matter whether AC_CHECK_HEADER is specified.
Your configure.ac is almost ok. The only problem is space between AS_IF and the parenthesis. No whitespace is allowed between a macro name and the opening parenthesis in m4 scripts. This is correct syntax:
AC_CHECK_HEADER(check.h,
[],
[
AS_IF(test "$(lsb_release -cs)" = "vivid", [echo aaaaaa], [echo bbbbbb])
])
If you are looking for a way to detect different distros look for example at configure.ac of cgmanager.
Update
I noticed one more problem in your configure.ac.
AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT macro expands to a set of default includes and can't be used here. It is not needed also. It will be used by default in your AC_CHECK_HEADER macro, as you omit last parameter.
This is the cause of line 4427: #include: command not found error you mention.
Update to your comment
First of all, running a system command itself, like lsb_release is not portable. You should first check, for example with AC_CHECK_PROG, for its presence.
Regarding the syntax I would first get the output of the command using backticks: result=`lsb_release -cs` and later test resulting output: test "x$result" = "xvivid". x is needed to avoid problems with empty value in some shells.
At last, I have doubts whether configure script is a proper place for all this distro specific messages. You may consider placing it in the README file.
Avoid those system specific messages.
Print one message which allows people to figure out what package to install on their respective system, but avoid naming the system specific package names and system specific installation tools.
You will never be able to add messages for all systems, so it is better to go the part of the way which you know and let your users go the rest of the way because they know their systems better than you can.
The proper way would be to write a software package outside but called from your configure which, given a header filename, foo.pc filename, library name, etc. figures out how to install that on the respective system. Then let system specific maintainers fix that package, and call it from configure if it is installed, and issue a generic error message otherwise.
A portable shell script local to your software package might do the same job to some extent. You still have to maintain all the system specific parts for all possible systems, though.
Hmm... now that I am thinking about that, the idea appears not that bad. I might add such a script to some of the projects I maintain and see how it turns out in practical use.
I would still try to keep most of that logic outside configure, though.
I am trying to build NetCDF4 from source on MacOSX. When I run ./configure I get the error:
checking for library containing H5Fflush... no
configure: error: Can't find or link to the hdf5 library. Use --disable-netcdf-4, or see config.log for errors.
I installed hdf5 before, and set the environment variables as:
LDFLAGS=-L/opt/local/lib
CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/local/include
In /opt/local/lib I have these files:
libhdf5.8.dylib
libhdf5.a
libhdf5.dylib
libhdf5.settings
libhdf5_cpp.8.dylib
libhdf5_cpp.a
libhdf5_cpp.dylib
libhdf5_hl.8.dylib
libhdf5_hl.a
libhdf5_hl.dylib
libhdf5_hl_cpp.8.dylib
libhdf5_hl_cpp.a
libhdf5_hl_cpp.dylib
And in /opt/local/include I have:
hdf5.h hdf5_hl.h
Why doesn't the configure script find the hdf5 library? I am happy to provide more information if needed!
EDIT:
My ultimate goal is to install netcdf4 for use as a Fortran module. I have tried installing everything through MacPorts, and it seemed to work, but when I tried to use it, the compiler told me that there was no netcdf.mod file, and sure enough there wasn't one to be found anywhere.
It turns out that just typing:
sudo port install netcdf-fortran
only installs the library files, but doesn't create a .mod file, which I guess is needed. So I found out that other people had the same problem, and the advice given was to install it with gcc44, which did create a .mod file, but then my compiler told me that the .mod file was built with a different version of gfortran and it couldn't be used, so that's why I am trying to build it from scratch, but if someone has a faster option, I would be more than happy to try it!
Ok, I finally figured it out.
I reinstalled netcdf-fortran with macports, then the .mod file suddenly appeared, I then had the problem, however, that when running gfortran, it would tell me that netcdf.mod was compiled with a different version of fortran than the one I am using. (Macports uses 4.8), so got gcc48 from macports and am using gfortran-mp-4.8 to compile now and it works.
Still don't know how to build all these things from scratch, but it works now at least!!!
Typically, I see this when there is a downstream dependency that cannot be fulfilled. The test program created by configure is finding libhdf5, but compilation is still failing because it cannot find something like libz or libszip, depending on how your libhdf5 was compiled.
If you check your config.log file and look for the error, it will probably tell you something along the lines of 'unresolved symbol'. This will give a clue as to which library is missing. If it is linking against the statically-built libhdf5, you may need to add the appropriate library usingLDFLAGS.
If you post the relevant portion of your config.log file, we may be able to help sort out what exactly is going wrong.
Sometimes it doesn't work in the configure parameters like
./configure --enable-shared --enable-fortran --enable-netcdf-4
CPPFLAGS=-I$home/apps2/include LDFALGS=-L$home/apps2/lib --prefix=$home/apps2
or doesn't work when export CPPFLAGS=-I$home/apps2/include in the open SHELL.
Maybe you can set the env vars CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS in the .bashrc file (prior to the first two ways).