Functioning App on local server fails on Azure - azure

I have an Angular Web app with an API that is functioning perfectly (well, as perfectly as any app under development functions) on my local server, but when I migrate it and its associated databases to an App Service on Azure every /api call fails with 500.
So thinking that the problem was with the databases I altered the connection strings on my local development server to point to the Azure databases. I found one small problem this way, I has mispelled the username in the connection string. SO I fixed that and it runs perfectly on my local server while accessing the Azure databases, but as soon as I run it on the Azure App Service using the same connection strings every call to /api fails with Internal Server Error 500.
All regular pages are served perfectly and Angular routing works just fine. Only accessing content from the DB fails. I have been at this for a few days and have no idea what to do next. Any advice welcomed.
I am using OpenIddict for authentication so I tagged that, but I can't see anyway that is relevant. Oddly though, and there is a clue here somewhere, the authentication call to "/connect/token" works and returns a valid token, but "/api/..." URLs do not.
I am using Asp Net Core 2.1 if that is relevant.
More Information
I tried the detailed logs as suggested, but they were hardly detailed. But I did note one interesting item. In the error there was the following information:
Requested URL: https://mysite.azuurewebsites.net/api/accounts/getusers
Physical Path: D:\home\site\wwwroot\api\accounts\getusers
Now this app is using MVC so there is no such Physical Path. The Controller is decorated with:
[Route("api/accounts")]
and the Action is decorated as:
[Authorize(Roles = "Somerole")]
[HttpGet("GetUsers"), Produces("application/json")]
It seems to me the route mapping is failing. But this works beautifully on my local development computer. What could be different on the Azure App Service? Is there some special setting I need to set in the portal to allow MVC? I can't imagine why the portal should care about such matters.
Even More Information
Using Postman, if I access /api/someValidUrl with a valid Bearer token I get a 500 error. If I remove the Authorization header then I get a 401 returned.
I started off by saying I didn't think it had anything to do with OpenIddict, but maybe I was wrong. My Authorization Controller simply creates the token. All the checking for validity is done by OpenIddict.
A Huge Clue
I added an ExceptionHandler and then used Postman to make an API request and that yielded the following exception:
<h1>Error: IDX20803: Unable to obtain configuration from: '[PII is hidden by default. Set the 'ShowPII' flag in IdentityModelEventSource.cs to true to reveal it.]'.</h1>
at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.ConfigurationManager`1.GetConfigurationAsync(CancellationToken cancel)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer.JwtBearerHandler.HandleAuthenticateAsync()
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer.JwtBearerHandler.HandleAuthenticateAsync()
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.AuthenticationHandler`1.AuthenticateAsync()
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.AuthenticationService.AuthenticateAsync(HttpContext context, String scheme)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.AuthenticationMiddleware.Invoke(HttpContext context)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.StaticFiles.StaticFileMiddleware.Invoke(HttpContext context)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.ExceptionHandlerMiddleware.Invoke(HttpContext context)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.ExceptionHandlerMiddleware.Invoke(HttpContext context)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Cors.Infrastructure.CorsMiddleware.Invoke(HttpContext context)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.ExceptionHandlerMiddleware.Invoke(HttpContext context)
I found an explanation here but I don't fully understand this but it looks as though MS middleware on Azure is incorrectly trying to interpret it as an Azure AD request. The only thing I know for sure is I do not have a file called IdentityModelEventSource.cs in my project.
For reference https://mywebsite.azurewebsites.net/.well-known/openid-configuration returns:
{
"issuer": "https://mywebsite.azurewebsites.net/",
"token_endpoint": "https://mywebsite.azurewebsites.net/connect/token",
"jwks_uri": "https://mywebsite.azurewebsites.net/.well-known/jwks",
"grant_types_supported": [
"password"
],
"scopes_supported": [
"openid",
"email",
"profile",
"roles"
],
"claims_supported": [
"aud",
"exp",
"iat",
"iss",
"jti",
"sub"
],
"subject_types_supported": [
"public"
],
"token_endpoint_auth_methods_supported": [
"client_secret_basic",
"client_secret_post"
],
"claims_parameter_supported": false,
"request_parameter_supported": false,
"request_uri_parameter_supported": false
}
Perhaps with this information someone can point me in the right direction.
New Startup.cs
I took Pinpoint's advice and changed from JWT. The new Startup follows:
using AspNet.Security.OpenIdConnect.Primitives;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Builder;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration;
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
using SIAngular.DBContexts;
using SIAngular.Models;
using SIAngular.Services;
using OpenIddict.Abstractions;
using Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Hosting;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity;
using System;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
namespace SIAngular
{
public class Startup
{
private readonly IHostingEnvironment env;
public Startup(IHostingEnvironment env, IConfiguration configuration)
{
Configuration = configuration;
this.env = env;
SIDBConnectionString = Configuration.GetConnectionString("SIDB");
}
public static string SIDBConnectionString;
public IConfiguration Configuration { get; }
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
SymmetricSecurityKey _ssk = new SymmetricSecurityKey(Convert.FromBase64String(Configuration["Jwt:Key"]));
services.AddDbContext<ApplicationDbContext>(options =>
{
options.UseSqlServer(Configuration.GetConnectionString("SqlConnection"));
options.UseOpenIddict();
});
services.AddCors();
// Register the Identity services.
services.AddIdentityCore<ApplicationUser>(config =>
{
config.SignIn.RequireConfirmedEmail = true;
config.Password.RequireDigit = true;
config.Password.RequiredLength = 8;
config.Password.RequireLowercase = true; config.Password.RequireNonAlphanumeric = true;
config.User.RequireUniqueEmail = true;
})
.AddRoles<IdentityRole>()
.AddEntityFrameworkStores<ApplicationDbContext>()
.AddDefaultTokenProviders()
.AddRoleValidator<RoleValidator<IdentityRole>>()
.AddRoleManager<RoleManager<IdentityRole>>()
.AddSignInManager<SignInManager<ApplicationUser>>();
// Configure Identity to use the same JWT claims as OpenIddict instead
// of the legacy WS-Federation claims it uses by default (ClaimTypes),
// which saves you from doing the mapping in your authorization controller.
services.Configure<IdentityOptions>(options =>
{
options.ClaimsIdentity.UserNameClaimType = OpenIdConnectConstants.Claims.Name;
options.ClaimsIdentity.UserIdClaimType = OpenIdConnectConstants.Claims.Subject;
options.ClaimsIdentity.RoleClaimType = OpenIdConnectConstants.Claims.Role;
});
services.AddOpenIddict()
// Register the OpenIddict core services.
.AddCore(options =>
{
// Configure OpenIddict to use the Entity Framework Core stores and models.
options.UseEntityFrameworkCore()
.UseDbContext<ApplicationDbContext>();
})
// Register the OpenIddict server services.
.AddServer(options =>
{
// Register the ASP.NET Core MVC services used by OpenIddict.
// Note: if you don't call this method, you won't be able to
// bind OpenIdConnectRequest or OpenIdConnectResponse parameters.
options.UseMvc();
// Enable the token endpoint.
options.EnableTokenEndpoint("/connect/token");
options.AcceptAnonymousClients();
options.DisableScopeValidation();
// Note: the Mvc.Client sample only uses the code flow and the password flow, but you
// can enable the other flows if you need to support implicit or client credentials.
options.AllowPasswordFlow();
// Mark the "email", "profile" and "roles" scopes as supported scopes.
options.RegisterScopes(OpenIdConnectConstants.Scopes.Email,
OpenIdConnectConstants.Scopes.Profile,
OpenIddictConstants.Scopes.Roles);
// During development, you can disable the HTTPS requirement.
if (env.IsDevelopment())
options.DisableHttpsRequirement();
options.AddSigningKey(_ssk);
})
.AddValidation();
services.AddSingleton<IConfiguration>(Configuration);
services.AddScoped<IPasswordHasher<ApplicationUser>, SqlPasswordHasher>();
services.AddMvc();
services.AddTransient<IEmailSender, AuthMessageSender>();
services.AddTransient<ISmsSender, AuthMessageSender>();
}
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IHostingEnvironment env, ILoggerFactory loggerFactory)
{
app.UseCors(builder =>
builder.AllowAnyOrigin()
.AllowAnyHeader()
.AllowAnyMethod()
);
if (env.IsDevelopment())
{
app.UseDeveloperExceptionPage();
//app.UseWebpackDevMiddleware(new Microsoft.AspNetCore.SpaServices.Webpack.WebpackDevMiddlewareOptions { HotModuleReplacement = true });
}
else
{
app.UseExceptionHandler("/Home/Error");
}
app.UseStaticFiles();
app.UseAuthentication();
app.UseMvc(routes =>
{
routes.MapRoute(
name: "default",
template: "{controller=Home}/{action=Index}/{id?}");
});
app.MapWhen(x => !x.Request.Path.Value.StartsWith("/api"), builder =>
{
builder.UseMvc(routes =>
{
routes.MapSpaFallbackRoute(
name: "spa-fallback",
defaults: new { controller = "Home", action = "Index" });
});
});
}
}
}
Now the problem is an exception:
InvalidOperationException: No authenticationScheme was specified, and there was no DefaultChallengeScheme found.

Related

Get Token request returned http error: 400 and server response

I have a asp.net core 3.1 web api which adds messages to Azure Queue. In this case I am using an account to login into the VS2019 and debug the code in my local development environment. The same account is also added to the access policy for the storage account with the role : Storage Queue Data Contributor
Here I am trying to remove the dependency of using connectionstring and queue name to connect to the Azure Queue service from the asp.net core web api. All works fine in the case where I am providing connectionstring and queue name. But when I am trying to go with the route of Managed Service Identity in context to my local development environment it is throwing error.
Here goes the code for the asp.net core web api:
TestAPIController.cs:
[HttpPost]
public async Task Post([FromBody]WeatherForecast data)
{
var message = JsonSerializer.Serialize(data);
await _queueClient.SendMessageAsync(message, null, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(-1));
}
Startup.cs:
public class Startup
{
public Startup(IConfiguration configuration)
{
Configuration = configuration;
}
public IConfiguration Configuration { get; }
// This method gets called by the runtime. Use this method to add services to the container.
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddControllers();
//services.AddHostedService<WeatherDataService>();
services.AddAzureClients(builder =>
{
builder.AddClient<QueueClient, QueueClientOptions>((options, _, _) =>
{
options.MessageEncoding = QueueMessageEncoding.Base64;
var credential = new DefaultAzureCredential();
var queueUri = new Uri("<AzureQueueURL>");
return new QueueClient(queueUri, credential, options);
});
});
services.AddSwaggerGen(c =>
{
c.SwaggerDoc("v1", new OpenApiInfo{Title = "queue_storage", Version = "v1"});
});
}
// This method gets called by the runtime. Use this method to configure the HTTP request pipeline.
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IWebHostEnvironment env)
{
if (env.IsDevelopment())
{
app.UseDeveloperExceptionPage();
app.UseSwagger();
app.UseSwaggerUI(c => c.SwaggerEndpoint("/swagger/v1/swagger.json", "queue_storage v1"));
}
app.UseHttpsRedirection();
app.UseRouting();
app.UseAuthorization();
app.UseEndpoints(endpoints =>
{
endpoints.MapControllers();
});
}
}
On executing the above code I found the below error:
Azure.Identity.AuthenticationFailedException: Azure CLI authentication failed due to an unknown error. ERROR: The command failed with an unexpected error. Here is the traceback:
ERROR: Get Token request returned http error: 400 and server response: {"error":"invalid_grant","error_description":"AADSTS700082: The refresh token has expired due to inactivity.áThe token was issued on 2021-04-23T15:29:05.0816332Z and was inactive for 90.00:00:00.\r\nTrace ID: cbd16614-192a-409b-82a8-348597e81900\r\nCorrelation ID: 85b72955-22a3-4b1c-b05c-d7054ce6a6c6\r\nTimestamp: 2022-05-08 11:22:40Z","error_codes":[700082],"timestamp":"2022-05-08 11:22:40Z","trace_id":"cbd16614-192a-409b-82a8-348597e81900","correlation_id":"85b72955-22a3-4b1c-b05c-d7054ce6a6c6","error_uri":"https://login.microsoftonline.com/error?code=700082"}
I referred to the this article :https://www.rahulpnath.com/blog/getting-started-with-azure-queue-storage/ for my POC.
Can anyone provide their guidance to fix this issue

Preventing ClaimsTransformation from running on every HTTP request

I have a web application targeting .NET 5.0 and I am trying to implement Windows Authentication along with some policies for authorization. We have a database table from another application that holds info on user roles, so I am using that to set permissions for my users.
I created a ClaimsTransformer class:
ClaimsTransformer.cs
public class ClaimsTransformer : IClaimsTransformation
{
// snip constructor which pulls in my DbContext from DI
public async Task<ClaimsPrincipal> TransformAsync(ClaimsPrincipal principal)
{
var id = ((ClaimsIdentity) principal.Identity);
var ci = new ClaimsIdentity(id.Claims, id.AuthenticationType, id.NameClaimType, id.RoleClaimType);
// snip call to DbContext to get user's role from database
if (roleId == 1 || roleId == 7)
{
ci.AddClaim(new Claim("user-role", "admin"));
}
return new ClaimsPrincipal(ci);
}
}
I have my authentication/authorization setup like this:
Startup.cs
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddAuthentication(IISDefaults.AuthenticationScheme);
services.AddTransient<IClaimsTransformation, ClaimsTransformer>();
services.AddAuthorization(options =>
{
options.AddPolicy("Admin", policy =>
policy.RequireClaim("user-role", "admin"));
});
// snip rest of method
}
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IWebHostEnvironment env)
{
// snip unrelated code
app.UseAuthentication();
app.UseAuthorization();
}
My first use of this is to hide a menu in my _Layout.cshtml:
#if ((await AuthorizationService.AuthorizeAsync(User, "admin").Succeeded)
{
// Admin nav link
}
The issue is, since AuthorizeAsync is running on every HTTP request, my ClaimsTransformer also runs each time, hitting the database to check the user's roles on every request. I'd like to avoid this, but I'm not sure of the best way to do so.
Basically, I'd like the system to check the roles only once, when the user is first authenticated. I read that this is what is supposed to happen when using Windows Authentication with IIS, but I am seeing the roles query running on every request when deployed to my IIS server also.
I could easily add a check in my ClaimsTransformer to see if the "user-role" claim exists, and only hit the DB if it is not present, but is there a better way? Should I be overriding something like UserClaimsPrincipalFactory instead of using a ClaimsTransformer?

How to enable Windows Authentication with in-process IIS hosting under IdentityServer4?

My ASP.Net Core MVC app accesses a .Net Core API through IdentityServer. It works fine on IIS server running in-process with Entity Framework based identity store. Now I am trying to enable Windows Authentication and getting stuck here.
What I tried is following the identityserver doc section "Windows Authentication" - I added the code below to the ConfigureServices of my IdentityServer's Startup.cs
// configures IIS in-proc settings
services.Configure<IISServerOptions>(iis =>
{
iis.AuthenticationDisplayName = "Windows";
iis.AutomaticAuthentication = false;
});
I also enabled the Windows Authentication in IIS for my API app
The part of the doc that I am confused about is "You trigger Windows authentication by calling ChallengeAsync on the Windows scheme". It doesn't mention where you do that. I am assuming it is in identityserver and I put the code in the Login method of the AccountController of the identityserver as bellow.
/// <summary>
/// Entry point into the login workflow
/// </summary>
[HttpGet]
public async Task<IActionResult> Login(string returnUrl)
{
// trigger Windows authentication by calling ChallengeAsync
await ChallengeWindowsAsync(returnUrl);
// build a model so we know what to show on the login page
var vm = await BuildLoginViewModelAsync(returnUrl);
if (vm.IsExternalLoginOnly)
{
// we only have one option for logging in and it's an external provider
return RedirectToAction("Challenge", "External", new { scheme = vm.ExternalLoginScheme, returnUrl });
}
return View(vm);
}
private async Task<IActionResult> ChallengeWindowsAsync(string returnUrl)
{
// see if windows auth has already been requested and succeeded
var result = await HttpContext.AuthenticateAsync("Windows");
if (result?.Principal is WindowsPrincipal wp)
{
// we will issue the external cookie and then redirect the
// user back to the external callback, in essence, treating windows
// auth the same as any other external authentication mechanism
var props = new AuthenticationProperties()
{
RedirectUri = Url.Action("Callback"),
Items =
{
{ "returnUrl", returnUrl },
{ "scheme", "Windows" },
}
};
var id = new ClaimsIdentity("Windows");
// the sid is a good sub value
id.AddClaim(new Claim(JwtClaimTypes.Subject, wp.FindFirst(ClaimTypes.PrimarySid).Value));
// the account name is the closest we have to a display name
id.AddClaim(new Claim(JwtClaimTypes.Name, wp.Identity.Name));
// add the groups as claims -- be careful if the number of groups is too large
var wi = wp.Identity as WindowsIdentity;
// translate group SIDs to display names
var groups = wi.Groups.Translate(typeof(NTAccount));
var roles = groups.Select(x => new Claim(JwtClaimTypes.Role, x.Value));
id.AddClaims(roles);
await HttpContext.SignInAsync(
IdentityServerConstants.ExternalCookieAuthenticationScheme,
new ClaimsPrincipal(id),
props);
return Redirect(props.RedirectUri);
}
else
{
// trigger windows auth
// since windows auth don't support the redirect uri,
// this URL is re-triggered when we call challenge
return Challenge("Windows");
}
}
What I expect to happen, if everything goes well, is that the authentication happens automatically (without a login box?) because the "Challenge" call will require the client side (the browser) to send in Windows identity info and a token will be issued based on that.
It doesn't seem to work that way now - I am getting an Unauthorized error from API when starting the MVC app:
Am I doing that in the wrong place? Or am I missing something else?

Azure SignalR Hub Authorization from .AddAzureADB2CBearer

I've been looking for an answer on Internet for days with regards to [Authorize] over the SignalR Hub class. I'm using Azure B2C to authenticate users. Everything works great when the class is not decorated with [Authorize], however I require the user to be authorized, so that I can access the Claims. All my Controllers are authenticating correctly.
[Authorize]
public class SignalRHub : Hub
{
My SignalR Service is running on Azure and started on the server as follows:
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddAuthentication(AzureADB2CDefaults.BearerAuthenticationScheme)
.AddAzureADB2CBearer(options => Configuration.Bind("AzureAdB2C", options));
.....
services.AddSignalR().AddAzureSignalR(ConnectionString)
}
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IWebHostEnvironment env)
{
app.UseEndpoints(endpoint =>
{
.....
endpoint.MapHub<AzureSignalRSevice.SignalRHub>("/rhub");
});
}
The Debugger is indicating when the client tries to connect:
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Hosting.Diagnostics: Information: Request starting HTTP/1.1 POST https://localhost:44301/rhub/negotiate?negotiateVersion=1 0
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer.JwtBearerHandler: Information: AzureADB2CJwtBearer was not authenticated. Failure message: No SecurityTokenValidator available for token: {Token}
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization.DefaultAuthorizationService: Information: Authorization failed.
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer.JwtBearerHandler: Information: AuthenticationScheme: AzureADB2CJwtBearer was challenged.
The client code is as follows:
var connection = new HubConnectionBuilder().WithUrl("https://localhost:44301/rhub", options =>
{
options.AccessTokenProvider = () => Task.FromResult(token);
}).Build();
All the articles I have read say that the token is passed as a parameter, however in my instance it is being sent in the Authorization header correctly.
I have tried to configure the JwtBearerOptions and pass the token to context.Token, however I get the same Authentication failure.
services.Configure<JwtBearerOptions>(AzureADB2CDefaults.JwtBearerAuthenticationScheme, options =>
{
}
OnChallenge is hit when it fails with invalid_token in the context.
All the Packages are the most recent and up to date running on Core 3.1.2
I've been though many articles, this was the best so far
https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/10582
It doesn't use B2C Authetication though.
I have it working !
The solution is to include the Authentication Scheme
[Authorize(AuthenticationSchemes = AzureADB2CDefaults.BearerAuthenticationScheme + ", " + AzureADB2CDefaults.JwtBearerAuthenticationScheme)]
public class SignalRHub : Hub
{
}

Different authentication schema (Windows, Bearer) for each route

I need to add single-sign-on using Windows Authentication to my intranet Angular web application (hosted on IIS) which uses a JWT Bearer token for authentication. The controllers are secured using the [Authorize] attribute and JWT Bearer token authentication is working. All of the controllers are exposed under the api/ route.
The idea is to publish a new SsoController under the sso/ route, which should be secured with Windows Authentication and that exposes a WindowsLogin action that returns a valid bearer token for the application.
Back when I was using ASP.net Web Forms it was quite easy, you only had to enable Windows Authentication in the web.config/system.webServer section, disable it application-wide in the system.web section and then enable it again under a <location path="sso"> tag. This way ASP.net generated the NTLM/Negotiate challenges only for requests under the sso route.
I got it almost working - the SsoController gets the Windows user name and creates the JWT token just fine, but the pipeline is still generating the WWW-Authenticate: NTLM and WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate headers for all HTTP 401 responses, not just for the ones under the sso route.
How can I tell the pipeline that I want only Anonymous or Bearer auth for all of the api/ requests?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Program.cs
public static IWebHostBuilder CreateWebHostBuilder(string[] args) =>
WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder(args)
.UseStartup<Startup>()
.UseIISIntegration();
Startup.cs
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
// Set up data directory
services.AddDbContext<AuthContext>(options =>
options.UseSqlServer(Configuration.GetConnectionString("AuthContext")));
services.AddAuthentication(IISDefaults.AuthenticationScheme);
services.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddJwtBearer(options =>
{
options.TokenValidationParameters = new TokenValidationParameters
{
ValidateIssuer = true,
ValidateAudience = true,
ValidateLifetime = true,
ValidateIssuerSigningKey = true,
ValidIssuer = "AngularWebApp.Web",
ValidAudience = "AngularWebApp.Web.Client",
IssuerSigningKey = _signingKey,
ClockSkew = TimeSpan.Zero //the default for this setting is 5 minutes
};
options.Events = new JwtBearerEvents
{
OnAuthenticationFailed = context =>
{
if (context.Exception.GetType() == typeof(SecurityTokenExpiredException))
{
context.Response.Headers.Add("Token-Expired", "true");
}
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
};
});
services.AddMvc().SetCompatibilityVersion(CompatibilityVersion.Version_2_1);
// In production, the Angular files will be served from this directory
services.AddSpaStaticFiles(configuration =>
{
configuration.RootPath = "ClientApp/dist";
});
}
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IHostingEnvironment env)
{
if (env.IsDevelopment())
{
app.UseDeveloperExceptionPage();
}
else
{
app.UseExceptionHandler("/Error");
app.UseHsts();
}
app.UseHttpsRedirection();
app.UseStaticFiles();
app.UseSpaStaticFiles();
app.UseAuthentication();
app.UseWhen(context => context.Request.Path.StartsWithSegments("/sso"),
builder => builder.UseMiddleware<WindowsAuthMiddleware>());
app.UseMvc(routes =>
{
routes.MapRoute(
name: "default",
template: "{controller}/{action=Index}/{id?}");
});
app.UseSpa(spa =>
{
// To learn more about options for serving an Angular SPA from ASP.NET Core,
// see https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=864501
spa.Options.SourcePath = "ClientApp";
if (env.IsDevelopment())
{
spa.UseAngularCliServer(npmScript: "start");
}
});
}
WindowsAuthMiddleware.cs
public class WindowsAuthMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate next;
public WindowsAuthMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
{
this.next = next;
}
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext context)
{
if (!context.User.Identity.IsAuthenticated)
{
await context.ChallengeAsync(IISDefaults.AuthenticationScheme);
return;
}
await next(context);
}
}
web.config
<system.webServer>
<aspNetCore processPath="%LAUNCHER_PATH%" arguments="%LAUNCHER_ARGS%" stdoutLogEnabled="false" stdoutLogFile=".\logs\stdout" forwardWindowsAuthToken="true"/>
<security>
<authentication>
<anonymousAuthentication enabled="true" />
<windowsAuthentication enabled="true" />
</authentication>
</security>
</system.webServer>
So, I spent the last few days investigating this problem and I got a working - if a bit hacky - solution.
It turns out that the main problem is that IIS will handle the Windows Authentication negotiation for all 401 responses sent by the application. It's something that's done at a lower level as soon as you enable Windows Authentication in IIS (or in the system.webServer section), and I haven't been able to find a way to bypass this behaviour. I actually did a test with a classic Web Form app and it works the same - the reason I never noticed this is that classic Forms Authentication rarely generates 401 responses, rather it uses redirects (30x) to take the user to the login page.
This gave me an idea: I could add another middleware to the pipeline that rewrites 401 responses generated by the authorization infrastructure to another, rarely used HTTP code, and detect that in my client Angular app to make it behave as a 401 (by refreshing an access token, or denying router navigation, etc). I used HTTP error 418 "I'm a teapot" since it's an existing but unused code. Here is the code:
ReplaceHttp401StatusCodeMiddleware.cs
public class ReplaceHttp401StatusCodeMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate next;
public ReplaceHttp401StatusCodeMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
{
this.next = next;
}
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext context)
{
await next(context);
if (context.Response.StatusCode == 401)
{
// Replace all 401 responses, except the ones under the /sso paths
// which will let IIS trigger the Windows Authentication mechanisms
if (!context.Request.Path.StartsWithSegments("/sso"))
{
context.Response.StatusCode = 418;
context.Response.Headers["X-Original-HTTP-Status-Code"] = "401";
}
}
}
}
Startup.cs
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IHostingEnvironment env, ILoggerFactory loggerFactory)
{
...
// Enable the SSO login using Windows Authentication
app.UseWhen(
context => context.Request.Path.StartsWithSegments("/sso"),
builder => builder.UseMiddleware<WindowsAuthMiddleware>());
app.UseMiddleware<ReplaceHttp401StatusCodeMiddleware>();
...
}
The middleware also injects the original status code in the response for further reference.
I also applied to my code the suggestion from Mickaël Derriey to use Authorization policies because it makes the controllers cleaner, but it's not necessary for the solution to work.
Welcome to StackOverflow! That's an interesting quesiton you have here.
First, let me state that I didn't test any of the content in this answer.
Using authorization policies to drive sources of authentication
I like the idea behind the WindowsAuthMiddleware you created, and how it's conditionally inserted in the pipeline if the URL starts with /sso.
MVC integrated with the authorization system and provides the same capabilities with authorization policies. The result is the same, and prevents you from having to write low-level code.
You can define authorization policies in the ConfigureServices method. In your case, if I'm not mistaken, there are two policies:
all requests to /sso should be authenticated with Windows authenticated; and
all other requests should be authenticated with JWTs
services.AddAuthorization(options =>
{
options.AddPolicy("Windows", new AuthorizationPolicyBuilder()
.AddAuthenticationSchemes(IISDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.RequireAuthenticatedUser()
.Build());
options.AddPolicy("JWT", new AuthorizationPolicyBuilder()
.AddAuthenticationSchemes(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.RequireAuthenticatedUser()
.Build());
});
You can then reference those policies by name in the [Authorize] attributes used to decorate your controllers and/or actions.
[Authorize("Windows")]
public class SsoController : Controller
{
// Actions
}
[Authorize("JWT")]
public class ApiController : Controller
{
// Actions
}
Doing so means that the Windows authentication handler will not run against /api requests, hence the responses should not contain the WWW-Authenticate: NTLM and WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate headers.
Removing automatic authentication of all requests
When you pass an authentication scheme as an argument of AddAuthentication, this means the authentication middleware will try to authenticate every request against that scheme.
This is useful when you have one authentication scheme, but in this case, you could think about removing it, as even for requests to /sso, the JWT handler will analyze the request for a token.
Two calls to AddAuthentication
You should only have one call to AddAuthentication:
the first one sets the IIS authentication scheme as a default so the handler should run on every request;
the second call overwrites that setting and set the JWT scheme as the default one
Let me know how you go!

Resources