I am new to Keras. I am having some issues with shape while using ImageDataGenerator . Below is my code:
train_batches = ImageDataGenerator().flow_from_directory(trainpath,target_size(227,227),classes=['class1','class2'])
x_train, y_train = next(train_batches)
When I print shape of x_train, it gives (32, 227, 227, 3). I am not sure where "32" is coming in the shape. Because of this, I am having issues with training the model.
Any suggestion?
There is parameter that goes inside the method flow_from directory called batch_size, You can learn more about it here
https://keras.io/preprocessing/image/
So if you want to change the shape of the trainig batches generated, you can give a value for batch_size inside flow_from_directory()
train_batches = ImageDataGenerator().flow_from_directory(trainpath,target_size(227,227),batch_size=64,classes=['class1','class2'])
The above code will generate batches of shape (64,227,227,3). Hope this helps
Related
"ValueError: Error when checking target: expected activation_81 to have shape (1,) but got array with shape (7,)"
I am performing a multiclass classification of 7 classes for speech emotion classification using a neural network, but it fails at this point
cnnhistory=model.fit(x_traincnn,
y_train,
batch_size=16,
epochs=700,
validation_data=(x_testcnn, y_test),
callbacks=[mcp_save, lr_reduce])
at the line callbacks=[mcp_save, lr_reduce]
mcp_save being
mcp_save = ModelCheckpoint('model/aug_noiseNshift_2class2_np.h5',
save_best_only=True, monitor='val_loss', mode='min')
and lr_reduce being
lr_reduce = ReduceLROnPlateau(monitor='val_loss', factor=0.9, patience=20, min_lr=0.000001)
Final layer of NN
Dense(7) for 7 classes
model.add(Dense(7))
model.add(Activation('softmax'))
opt = keras.optimizers.SGD(lr=0.0001, momentum=0.0, decay=0.0, nesterov=False)
compiled model using
model.compile(loss='sparse_categorical_crossentropy', optimizer=opt, metrics=['accuracy', fscore])
I have already transformed the dataset, with normalised values, changed the loss function to 'sparse_categorical_crossentropy' from 'categorical_crossentropy'. Nothing has worked just pushed the error from activation_9 to activation_18 to activation_45 to activation_54 to now activation_81. But the error is still there.
Any help would be highly appreciated!
I am new to neural networks.
TIA
If you have labels as numbers, that means y_train has shape (samples, 1) and you should use 'sparse_categorical_crossentropy'.
If you have labels as one-hot encodings, that means y_train has shape (samples, 7) and you should use 'categorical_crossentropy'.
After training model with ImageDataGenerator(1/255.), do I need to rescale image before predicting ?
I thought it is necessary but experiment result said NO.
I trained a Resnet50 model which has 37 class on top layer.
Model was trained with ImageDataGenerator like this.
datagen = ImageDataGenerator(rescale=1./255)
generator=datagen.flow_from_directory(
directory=os.path.join(os.getcwd(), data_folder),
target_size=(224,224),
batch_size=256,
classes=None,
class_mode='categorical')
history = model.fit_generator(generator, steps_per_epoch=generator.n / 256, epochs=10)
Accuracy achieved 98% after 10 epochs on my train dataset.
The problem is, when i tried to predict each image in TRAIN dataset, prediction was wrong ( result is 33 whatever input image was )
img_p = './data/pets/shiba_inu/shiba_inu_27.jpg'
img = cv2.imread(img_p, cv2.IMREAD_COLOR)
img = cv2.resize(img, (224,224))
img_arr = np.zeros((1,224,224,3))
img_arr[0, :, :, :] = img / 255.
pred = model.predict(img_arr)
yhat = np.argmax(pred, axis=1)
yhat is 5, but y is 33
When I replace this line
img_arr[0, :, :, :] = img / 255.
by this
img_arr[0, :, :, :] = img
yhat is exactly 33.
Someone might suggest to use predict_generator() instead of predict(), but I want to understand what I did wrong here.
I knew what's wrong here.
I'm using Imagenet pretrained model, which DO NOT rescale image by divide it to 255. I have to use resnet50.preprocess_input before train/test.
preprocess_input function can be found here.
https://github.com/keras-team/keras-applications/blob/master/keras_applications/imagenet_utils.py
You must do every preprocessing that you do on train data, on each data that you want to feed to your trained network. actually when, for example, you rescale train images and train a network, your network train to get a matrix with entries between 0 and 1 and find the proper category. so if after training phase, you feed an image without rescaling, you feed a matrix with entries between 0 and 255 to your trained network while your network did not learn how treat with such matrix.
If you are following pre-processing exactly same as at the time of training then, you might look at the part of your code where you are predicting class using yhat = np.argmax(pred, axis=1) my hunch is that there might be class mismatch in accordance to indexing, to check how your classes are indexed when you use flow_from_directory use class_map = generator.class_indices this will return you a dictionary which will show you how your classes are mapped against index.
Note: The reason I state this because I've faced similar problem, using Keras flow_from_directory doesn't sort classes and hence it's quite possible that your prediction class 1 lies on the index 10 while np.argmax will return you class 1'.
I am trying to create a ResNet50 model for a regression problem, with an output value ranging from -1 to 1.
I omitted the classes argument, and in my preprocessing step I resize my images to 224,224,3.
I try to create the model with
def create_resnet(load_pretrained=False):
if load_pretrained:
weights = 'imagenet'
else:
weights = None
# Get base model
base_model = ResNet50(weights=weights)
optimizer = Adam(lr=1e-3)
base_model.compile(loss='mse', optimizer=optimizer)
return base_model
and then create the model, print the summary and use the fit_generator to train
history = model.fit_generator(batch_generator(X_train, y_train, 100, 1),
steps_per_epoch=300,
epochs=10,
validation_data=batch_generator(X_valid, y_valid, 100, 0),
validation_steps=200,
verbose=1,
shuffle = 1)
I get an error though that says
ValueError: Error when checking target: expected fc1000 to have shape (1000,) but got array with shape (1,)
Looking at the model summary, this makes sense, since the final Dense layer has an output shape of (None, 1000)
fc1000 (Dense) (None, 1000) 2049000 avg_pool[0][0]
But I can't figure out how to modify the model. I've read through the Keras documentation and looked at several examples, but pretty much everything I see is for a classification model.
How can I modify the model so it is formatted properly for regression?
Your code is throwing the error because you're using the original fully-connected top layer that was trained to classify images into one of 1000 classes. To make the network working, you need to replace this top layer with your own which should have the shape compatible with your dataset and task.
Here is a small snippet I was using to create an ImageNet pre-trained model for the regression task (face landmarks prediction) with Keras:
NUM_OF_LANDMARKS = 136
def create_model(input_shape, top='flatten'):
if top not in ('flatten', 'avg', 'max'):
raise ValueError('unexpected top layer type: %s' % top)
# connects base model with new "head"
BottleneckLayer = {
'flatten': Flatten(),
'avg': GlobalAvgPooling2D(),
'max': GlobalMaxPooling2D()
}[top]
base = InceptionResNetV2(input_shape=input_shape,
include_top=False,
weights='imagenet')
x = BottleneckLayer(base.output)
x = Dense(NUM_OF_LANDMARKS, activation='linear')(x)
model = Model(inputs=base.inputs, outputs=x)
return model
In your case, I guess you only need to replace InceptionResNetV2 with ResNet50. Essentially, you are creating a pre-trained model without top layers:
base = ResNet50(input_shape=input_shape, include_top=False)
And then attaching your custom layer on top of it:
x = Flatten()(base.output)
x = Dense(NUM_OF_LANDMARKS, activation='sigmoid')(x)
model = Model(inputs=base.inputs, outputs=x)
That's it.
You also can check this link from the Keras repository that shows how ResNet50 is constructed internally. I believe it will give you some insights about the functional API and layers replacement.
Also, I would say that both regression and classification tasks are not that different if we're talking about fine-tuning pre-trained ImageNet models. The type of task mostly depends on your loss function and the top layer's activation function. Otherwise, you still have a fully-connected layer with N outputs but they are interpreted in a different way.
Based on this post. I need some basic implementation help. Below you see my model using a Dropout layer. When using the noise_shape parameter, it happens that the last batch does not fit into the batch size creating an error (see other post).
Original model:
def LSTM_model(X_train,Y_train,dropout,hidden_units,MaskWert,batchsize):
model = Sequential()
model.add(Masking(mask_value=MaskWert, input_shape=(X_train.shape[1],X_train.shape[2]) ))
model.add(Dropout(dropout, noise_shape=(batchsize, 1, X_train.shape[2]) ))
model.add(Dense(hidden_units, activation='sigmoid', kernel_constraint=max_norm(max_value=4.) ))
model.add(LSTM(hidden_units, return_sequences=True, dropout=dropout, recurrent_dropout=dropout))
Now Alexandre Passos suggested to get the runtime batchsize with tf.shape. I tried to implement the runtime batchsize idea it into Keras in different ways but never working.
import Keras.backend as K
def backend_shape(x):
return K.shape(x)
def LSTM_model(X_train,Y_train,dropout,hidden_units,MaskWert,batchsize):
batchsize=backend_shape(X_train)
model = Sequential()
...
model.add(Dropout(dropout, noise_shape=(batchsize[0], 1, X_train.shape[2]) ))
...
But that did just give me the input tensor shape but not the runtime input tensor shape.
I also tried to use a Lambda Layer
def output_of_lambda(input_shape):
return (input_shape)
def LSTM_model_2(X_train,Y_train,dropout,hidden_units,MaskWert,batchsize):
model = Sequential()
model.add(Lambda(output_of_lambda, outputshape=output_of_lambda))
...
model.add(Dropout(dropout, noise_shape=(outputshape[0], 1, X_train.shape[2]) ))
And different variants. But as you already guessed, that did not work at all.
Is the model definition actually the correct place?
Could you give me a tip or better just tell me how to obtain the running batch size of a Keras model? Thanks so much.
The current implementation does adjust the according to the runtime batch size. From the Dropout layer implementation code:
symbolic_shape = K.shape(inputs)
noise_shape = [symbolic_shape[axis] if shape is None else shape
for axis, shape in enumerate(self.noise_shape)]
So if you give noise_shape=(None, 1, features) the shape will be (runtime_batchsize, 1, features) following the code above.
I want to use an LSTM neural Network with keras to forecast groups of time series and I am having troubles in making the model match what I want. The dimensions of my data are:
input tensor: (data length, number of series to train, time steps to look back)
output tensor: (data length, number of series to forecast, time steps to look ahead)
Note: I want to keep the dimensions exactly like that, no
transposition.
A dummy data code that reproduces the problem is:
import numpy as np
from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense, TimeDistributed, LSTM
epoch_number = 100
batch_size = 20
input_dim = 4
output_dim = 3
look_back = 24
look_ahead = 24
n = 100
trainX = np.random.rand(n, input_dim, look_back)
trainY = np.random.rand(n, output_dim, look_ahead)
print('test X:', trainX.shape)
print('test Y:', trainY.shape)
model = Sequential()
# Add the first LSTM layer (The intermediate layers need to pass the sequences to the next layer)
model.add(LSTM(10, batch_input_shape=(None, input_dim, look_back), return_sequences=True))
# add the first LSTM layer (the dimensions are only needed in the first layer)
model.add(LSTM(10, return_sequences=True))
# the TimeDistributed object allows a 3D output
model.add(TimeDistributed(Dense(look_ahead)))
model.compile(loss='mean_squared_error', optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy'])
model.fit(trainX, trainY, nb_epoch=epoch_number, batch_size=batch_size, verbose=1)
This trows:
Exception: Error when checking model target: expected
timedistributed_1 to have shape (None, 4, 24) but got array with shape
(100, 3, 24)
The problem seems to be when defining the TimeDistributed layer.
How do I define the TimeDistributed layer so that it compiles and trains?
The error message is a bit misleading in your case. Your output node of the network is called timedistributed_1 because that's the last node in your sequential model. What the error message is trying to tell you is that the output of this node does not match the target your model is fitting to, i.e. your labels trainY.
Your trainY has a shape of (n, output_dim, look_ahead), so (100, 3, 24) but the network is producing an output shape of (batch_size, input_dim, look_ahead). The problem in this case is that output_dim != input_dim. If your time dimension changes you may need padding or a network node that removes said timestep.
I think the problem is that you expect output_dim (!= input_dim) at the output of TimeDistributed, while it's not possible. This dimension is what it considers as the time dimension: it is preserved.
The input should be at least 3D, and the dimension of index one will
be considered to be the temporal dimension.
The purpose of TimeDistributed is to apply the same layer to each time step. You can only end up with the same number of time steps as you started with.
If you really need to bring down this dimension from 4 to 3, I think you will need to either add another layer at the end, or use something different from TimeDistributed.
PS: one hint towards finding this issue was that output_dim is never used when creating the model, it only appears in the validation data. While it's only a code smell (there might not be anything wrong with this observation), it's something worth checking.