i am using Strapi for a prototype and i am meeting the following issue. I have created a new content type "Checklist" and i added in it a relation property 1 to many with the User model provided by the users-permissions plugin.
Then i wanted to add some custom logic on the lifecycle call back, in beforeSave and in beforeUpdate from which i would like to access the user assigned to the Checklist.
The code looks like that:
{
var self = module.exports = {
// Before saving a value.
// Fired before an `insert` or `update` query.
generateLabel : (model) => {
var label = "";
var day = _moment(model.date,_moment.ISO_8601).year();
var month = _moment(model.date,_moment.ISO_8601).day();
var year = _moment(model.date,_moment.ISO_8601).month();
console.log(model);
if (model.user) {
label = `${model.user}-${year}-${month}-${day}`;
}else{
label = `unassigned-${year}-${month}-${day}`;
}
return label;
I call the method generateLabel from the callback. It works, but my model.user always returned undefined. It is a 1-n property. I can access model.date property (one of the field i have created) without any issue, so i guess the pbs is related to something i have to do to populate the user relation, but i am not sure on how to proceed.
When i log the model object, the console display what i guess is a complete mongoose object but i am not sure where to go from there as if i try to access the property that i see in the console, i will always reach an undefined.
Thanks in advance for your time, i use the following
strapi: 3.0.0-alpha.13.0.1
nodejs: v9.10.1
mongodb: 3.6.3
macos high sierra
Also running into the similar / same issue, I think this has to do with the user permissions plugin, and having to use that to access the User model. Or I thought about trying to find the User that’s associated with the id of the newly created record. I’m trying to use AfterCreate. Anyone that could shed some light on this would be great!
It's because relational attributes are not send in create fonction (See your checklist service add function).
Relations are handled in an other function updateRelations.
The thing you can do is to send values in Checklit.create()
Related
I recently started using Node.js + Express.js (generated with pug) + pg-promise for handling db.
My first target is to obtain data from Postgres (already set up) and display it pretty using render and pug. Let's say it is user list from Users table.
On this restful tutorial I have learned how to get data and return it as JSON - it worked.
Based on Mozilla's tutorial I seperated my code:
routes/users.js: where for '/' I call user_controller.user_list method (using router.get)
controllers/userController.js I have exported user_list where I would like to ask model for data and call render if I have results
queries.js which is kinda my model? But I'm not sure. It has API: connection to db with promises and one function for every query I am going to use in Controllers. I believe I should have like one Model file per table (or any logical entity) but where to store pgp connections?
This file is based on first tutorial I mentioned
// queries.js (connectionString is set properly to my postgres)
var pgp = require('pg-promise')(options);
var db = pgp(connectionString);
function getUsers(req, res, next) {
db.any('SELECT (user_id, username) FROM public.users ORDER BY user_id ASC LIMIT 1000')
.then(function (data) {
res.json({ data: data });
})
.catch(function (err) {
return next(err);
});
}
module.exports = {
getUsers: getUsers
};
Here starts my problem as most tutorials uses mongoose which is very model-db-schema-friendly and what I have is simple 'SELECT ...' string I pass to pg-promise's any() function.
Therefore I have no model class like User.
In userControllers.js I don't know how to call getUsers() to handle its data. Returning JS object from getUsers() would be nice.
Also: where should I call render? In controller or only in
db.any(...).then(function (data) { <--here--> })
Before, I also tried to embed whole Postgres handling into Controller but from db.any() I got this array for handling:
[{ row: '(1,John)' },{ row: '(2,Amy)' },{ row: '(50,Peter)' } ]
Didn't know how go from there as I probably lost my API functionality as well ;-)
I am browsing through multiple tutorials how to handle MVC but usually they handle MongoDB and
satisfy readers with res.send() not render().
I am not sure that I understand what your question is exactly about, but since I do not have enough reputation to comment, I'll do my best to help you with your interrogations. :)
First, regarding the queries.js file, it is IMO not exactly a model, but rather a DAO (Data Access Object) file. DAO comes between you Model (which is actually you database) and your Controller layers. There usually is a DAO file per object (User, Pet, whatever you want) in your data model.
When the data model is rather complex, it can be useful to use an Object Relational Mapping (ORM) such as Mongoose to map your database and execute complexe processes on your objects. In such a case, you might need a specific file per object so as to describe your model and store your queries. But since you don't need an ORM, you DAO can directly interact with your database. That is why you do not have a User.js file.
Regarding the way the db object should be used, I think you should refer directly to pg-promise documentation on the matter.
IMPORTANT: For any given connection, you should only create a single
Database object in a separate module, to be shared in your application
(see the code example below). If instead you keep creating the
Database object dynamically, your application will suffer from loss in
performance, and will be getting a warning in a development
environment (when NODE_ENV = development)
As a matter of fact, a db object in pg-promise sort of represents the database itself and is actually designed for the simultaneous use of several databases, which does not seem to be your case for the moment.
Finally, when it comes to the render function, I believe it should be in the controller, as your DAO is not supposed to know how the data it has gathered is going to be used.
Modularity is always a time-saving choice on the long-term.
Furthermore, note that you might later need a Business Layer between your DAO and your controller, in order to preprocess and postprocess data you are going to persist or to display. In such a case, if you need for instance to ask for data from your database, you will need to render data after it is processed by the Business layer. If the render is made in the DAO layer, it will not be possible.
In the link I provided earlier to pg-promise's db object connection, you will also find documentation on the any() method. You might already have looked it up.
It specifically states that it returns
A promise object that represents the query result:
When no rows are returned, it resolves with an empty array.
When 1 or more rows are returned, it resolves with the array of rows.
so your returned data is a JS Array. If you want to make it a JS object, just use
JSON.stringify(yourArray) to process your data before rendering it in your controller.
But I wonder if Pug is not able to use your data directly.
Also, if you cannot get any data out of your DAO, maybe you should check that your data object is not empty, as such a case is tolerated by the any() method. If you expect your query to always return something, you might want to consider using the many() or the one() methods.
I hope this helps you.
Using Raven client and server #30155. I'm basically doing the following in a controller:
public ActionResult Update(string id, EditModel model)
{
var store = provider.StartTransaction(false);
var document = store.Load<T>(id);
model.UpdateEntity(document) // overwrite document property values with those of edit model.
document.Update(store); // tell document to update itself if it passes some conflict checking
}
Then in document.Update, I try do this:
var old = store.Load<T>(this.Id);
if (old.Date != this.Date)
{
// Resolve conflicts that occur by moving document period
}
store.Update(this);
Now, I run into the problem that old gets loaded out of memory instead of the database and already contains the updated values. Thus, it never goes into the conflict check.
I tried working around the problem by changing the Controller.Update method into:
public ActionResult Update(string id, EditModel model)
{
var store = provider.StartTransaction(false);
var document = store.Load<T>(id);
store.Dispose();
model.UpdateEntity(document) // overwrite document property values with those of edit model.
store = provider.StartTransaction(false);
document.Update(store); // tell document to update itself if it passes some conflict checking
}
This results in me getting a Raven.Client.Exceptions.NonUniqueObjectException with the text: Attempted to associate a different object with id
Now, the questions:
Why would Raven care if I try and associate a new object with the id as long as the new object carries the proper e-tag and type?
Is it possible to load a document in its database state (overriding default behavior to fetch document from memory if it exists there)?
What is a good solution to getting the document.Update() to work (preferably without having to pass the old object along)?
Why would Raven care if I try and associate a new object with the id as long as the new object carries the proper e-tag and type?
RavenDB leans on being able to serve the documents from memory (which is faster). By checking for persisting objects for the same id, hard to debug errors are prevented.
EDIT: See comment of Rayen below. If you enable concurrency checking / provide etag in the Store, you can bypass the error.
Is it possible to load a document in its database state (overriding default behavior to fetch document from memory if it exists there)?
Apparantly not.
What is a good solution to getting the document.Update() to work (preferably without having to pass the old object along)?
I went with refactoring the document.Update method to also have an optional parameter to receive the old date period, since #1 and #2 don't seem possible.
RavenDB supports optimistic concurrency out of the box. The only thing you need to do is to call it.
session.Advanced.UseOptimisticConcurrency = true;
See:
http://ravendb.net/docs/article-page/3.5/Csharp/client-api/session/configuration/how-to-enable-optimistic-concurrency
I'm using Sequelize.js for ORM and have a few associations (which actually doesn't matter now). My models get get and set methods from those associations. Like this (from docs):
var User = sequelize.define('User', {/* ... */})
var Project = sequelize.define('Project', {/* ... */})
// One-way associations
Project.hasOne(User)
/*
...
Furthermore, Project.prototype will gain the methods getUser and setUser
according to the first parameter passed to define.
*/
So now, I have Project.getUser(), which returns a Promise. But if I call this twice on the very same object, I get SQL query executed twice.
My question is - am I missing something out, or this is an expected behavior? I actually don't want to make additional queries each time I call the same method on this object.
If this is expected - should I use custom getters with member variables which I manually populate and return if present? Or there is something more clever? :)
Update
As from DeBuGGeR's answer - I understand I can use includes when making a query in order to eager load everything, but I simply don't need it, and I can't do it all the time. It's waste of resources and a big overhead if I load my entire DB at the beginning, just to understand (by some criteria) that I won't need it. I want to make additional queries depending on situation. But I also can't afford to destroy all models (DAO objects) that I have and create new ones, with all the info inside them. I should be able to update parts of them, which are missing (from relations).
If you use getUser() it will make the query call, it dosent give you access to the user. You can manually save it to project.user or project.users depending on the association.
But you can try Eager Loading
Project.find({
include: [
{ model: User, as: 'user' } // here you HAVE to specify the same alias as you did in your association
]
}).success(function(project){
project.user // contains the user
});
Also e.g of getUser(). Dont expect it to automatically cache user and dont override this cleverly as it will create side effects. getUser is expected to get from database and it should!
Project.getUser().then(function(user){
// user is available and is a sequelize object
project.user = user; // save project.user and use it till u want to
})
The first part of things is clear - every call to get[Association] (for example Project.getUser()) WILL result in database query.
Sequelize does not maintain any kind of state nor cache for the results. You can get user in the Promisified result of the call, but if you want it again - you will have to make another query.
What #DeBuGGeR said - about using accessors is also not true - accessors are present only immediately after a query, and are not preserved.
As sometimes this is not ok, you have to implement some kind of caching system by yourself. Here comes the tricky part:
IF you want to use the same get method Project.getUser(), you won't be able to do it, as Sequelize overrides your instanceMethods. For example, if you have the association mentioned above, this won't work:
instanceMethods: {
getUser: function() {
// check if you have it, otherwise make a query
}
}
There are few possible ways to fix it - either change Sequelize core a little (to first check if the method exists), or use some kind of wrapper to those functions.
More details about this can be found here: https://github.com/sequelize/sequelize/issues/3707
Thanks to mickhansen for the cooperation on how to understand what to do :)
Here's my problem:
I have a system with two hosts: machine M1 and machine M2 each running a node.js process on the same codebase.
On M1 I have a mongoose.Model instance (user) which I need to pass (using a REST api call) to M2. I have to have the complete instance of user on M2, ie. all data, virtuals, plugins, save() should work as expected.
One solution is to only send user's ObjectId, then on M2 to perform a query to mongodb to fetch the full object. I don't want to do this!
Another solution would be to serialize it using user.toJSON() or user.toObject() then send it down the wire. On M2, all I do is new User(userObject).
The problem is that when calling .save() on this it will interpret it as a new object and attempt an insert() instead of an .update().
To fix this I can set .isNew = false on the object, however, when updating, the delta (difference between stored model and updated values) now contains all the data and mongo complains it will not update a document's _id
Is there an elegant way to solve this using a native method or plugin ?! Am I doing it wrong?!
It may be wrong, but you may try using upsert() on the created user object instead of saving it.
If you plan to use it usually, you may end up defining a new static method in your schema, like:
Schema.statics.createOrUpdate = function(object, callback) {
statics.upsert(this, object, callback);
};
This way you can pass your user data to M2, and on M2, you can update it easily.
This is a late call but I faced same problem before finding out Model.hydrate method.
http://mongoosejs.com/docs/api.html#model_Model.hydrate
Shortcut for creating a new Document from existing raw data, pre-saved
in the DB. The document returned has no paths marked as modified
initially.
So on M2 User.hydarate(userObject) can be used instead of new User(userObject) and no need to set isNew to false.
I have a repeat where the value loops through documents in the current database, these documents contain a database and view name. The repeat then opens the database and view and retrieves data from within them:
var dbOther:NotesDatabase = session.getDatabase(null, doc.getItemValueString("Database"));
if(dbOther != null){
var lookupView:NotesView = dbOther.getView(doc.getItemValueString("ViewName"));
var viewNav:NotesViewNavigator = lookupView.createViewNavFromCategory(key);
}
This works fine on all browsers but if I view the xpage in the Notes Client I get the following error: Exception occurred calling method NotesDatabase.getView(string) null
I have tested that the dbOther variable is set by writing the Server and FilePath properties to a log. I checked that it could see the views by generating a loop using getViews and getAliases, again all view aliases were written to the log without an issue.
I have manually entered the view name in case the value was not being selected from the document correctly but received the same error.
Is there a way I can connect to a view in another database in XPiNC? I have found an XSnippet which allows you to dynamically add view data sources to your page, I think this may get around my problem but wanted to find out if there was an alternative solution before I re-write everything!
Try some of these other ways of getting a handle on a database:
This one uses "" instead of the null parameter to indicate current server:
var dbOther:NotesDatabase = session.getDatabase("", doc.getItemValueString("Database"))
This one uses database.getServer() instead of the null parameter:
var dbOther:NotesDatabase = session.getDatabase(database.getServer(), doc.getItemValueString("Database"))
This one uses sessionAsSigner to get access to the database (instead of using the credentials of the current user):
var dbOther:NotesDatabase = sessionAsSigner.getDatabase(database.getServer(), doc.getItemValueString("Database"))
Are you using a Lotus Notes 8.5.3 client?