(Excel)Calculating costs, where prices differ based on quantities - excel

I'm looking for some help as I'm not really sure of the correct terms to use on my query below, so whilst normally I would google this, I'm not really sure what to search for.
I need to work out the total cost for something, where you have a flat rate, and then an additional cost that changes depending on how much of something you have.
So an example, you get expenses paid for millage. If you drive 0-20 miles, you'll get £10. Between 30-50 miles you get 50p per mile. Between 51-100 miles you get £1 per mile and so on, added onto the base rate of the initial £10 you'd get paid as standard.
It's not the best example, but hoping it gives an idea of what I'm after.
If I was doing this by hand I'd know how to work it out, but I'm not to sure what kind of formula I need to be using - I've never had to work with complex formulas past "=sum" until now.
If anyone has any examples they can share or can point me in the right direction of what kind of things to google I'd be most grateful !
Thanks

Well, here is one way, but you don't state what the rate is between 21 and 30...
very basic, but you should be able to edit and expand as you want.
Do note that the limits (30 miles, 50 miles) and rates used in the formula all come from the sheet - so if the 30 mile limit changes to 25 miles - all you need to do is change cell A7...

I apologize for not answering sooner, but I find this question a bit difficult to address due to the complexity of formulas we can encounter. I know the one you documented is not the most complex one we might encounter, but I was not sure if that was your actual problem or if it was intended as a simple example. I have seen a variety of other things which have often thrown me for a loop.
For example, take this set of rules:
Minimum Fee is $23.50 up to $500
$501 - $2,000 = $3.05 per 100 unit increment
$2,001 - $25,000 = $14.00 per 1000 unit increment over $2,000
$25,001 - $50,000 = $10.10 per 1000 unit increment over $25,000
$50,001 - $100,000 = $7.00 per 1000 unit increment over $50,000
$100,001 - $500,000 = $5.60 per 1000 unit increment over $100,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000 = $4.75 per 1000 unit increment over $500,000
$1,000,001 - $9,999,000 = $3.65 per 1000 unit increment over $1,000,000
$10,000,001 and up = $3.65 per 1000 unit increment over $10,000,000
It does not look too different from yours except that there is an increment of something other than a single unit. In other words for the $501 to $2,000 range, $501 to $600 would all get the same additional $3.05 incremental charge. Another dollar would actually double this because it jumps to the next increment. Like your example, each range builds on the prior range. Assuming that these amounts are in colums A through F:
i Low High Fee Base Fee Per
0 1 500 23.50
1 501 2,000 $3.05 100
2 2,001 25,000 $23.50 1000
3 25,001 50,000 $10.10 1000
4 50,001 100,000 $7.00 1000
5 100,001 500,000 $5.60 1000
6 500,001 1,000,000 $4.75 1000
7 1,000,001 9,999,999 $3.65 1000
8 10,000,000 $3.65 1000
Note also that the rate declines as the amounts increase whereas yours appears to increase.
What I did with this is create a maximum value in Column H as follows:
i Max
0 =E3
1 =INT((C4-C3)/F4)*D4
2 =INT((C5-C4)/F5)*D5
3 =INT((C6-C5)/F6)*D6
4 =INT((C7-C6)/F7)*D7
5 =INT((C8-C7)/F8)*D8
6 =INT((C9-C8)/F9)*D9
7 =INT((C10-C9)/F10)*D10
8
The first one, where i is zero, is simply the base fee. The others are computed and copied. There is no maximum for the last row. I did not really think I needed this column but it made it easier to devise the formulas.
Assuming that I put an amount to evaluate in Cell I2, it will be evaluated as follows where the formula in row 3 (where i=0) is the set fee but all others are basically a copied formula:
i 4,950
0 =IF(I$2>=$B3,$H3,0)
1 =IF(I$2>=$B4,IF($H4="",INT((I$2-$C3)/$F4)*$D4,MIN($H4,INT((I$2-$C3)/$F4)*$D4)),0)
2 =IF(I$2>=$B5,IF($H5="",INT((I$2-$C4)/$F5)*$D5,MIN($H5,INT((I$2-$C4)/$F5)*$D5)),0)
3 =IF(I$2>=$B6,IF($H6="",INT((I$2-$C5)/$F6)*$D6,MIN($H6,INT((I$2-$C5)/$F6)*$D6)),0)
4 =IF(I$2>=$B7,IF($H7="",INT((I$2-$C6)/$F7)*$D7,MIN($H7,INT((I$2-$C6)/$F7)*$D7)),0)
5 =IF(I$2>=$B8,IF($H8="",INT((I$2-$C7)/$F8)*$D8,MIN($H8,INT((I$2-$C7)/$F8)*$D8)),0)
6 =IF(I$2>=$B9,IF($H9="",INT((I$2-$C8)/$F9)*$D9,MIN($H9,INT((I$2-$C8)/$F9)*$D9)),0)
7 =IF(I$2>=$B10,IF($H10="",INT((I$2-$C9)/$F10)*$D10,MIN($H10,INT((I$2-$C9)/$F10)*$D10)),0)
8 =IF(I$2>=$B11,IF($H11="",INT((I$2-$C10)/$F11)*$D11,MIN($H11,INT((I$2-$C10)/$F11)*$D11)),0)
The Fee for this is the sum of all of the rows (labeled i, 0 through 8 above). in this example, it would be 23.50 plus 45.75 plus 28.00 for a total of 97.25.
Not too bad. How about a set like this:
No fee if $1,000 or less
$1,001 - $5,000 = $80.00 + 3% of excess over $1,000.00 per 100 unit increment
$5,001 - $10,000 = $250.00 + 2% of excess over $5,000.00 per 500 unit increment
$10,001 - $25,000 = $350.00 + 1% of excess over $10,000.00 per 1000 unit increment
$25,001 and Over = $520.00 + 3/4% of excess over $25,000.00 per 1000 unit increment
In your formula, the initial flat amount never changes and once you've computed the amount for that range, other ranges build upon it. Here, there are steps. For example at $1,000 the fee is zero, but at $1,001, it jumps to $80 as if there were an $80 fee for the first 1000. Without boring you with the entire table, Here is the formula for computing the range from 5,001 to 10,000 assuming that G2 contains the amount to use and Row 5 colums A through E are the following:
Low High Rate Minimum Increment
5,001 10,000 2.00% 250 500
=($D5+$C5*INT(($G$2-($A5-1))/$E5)*$E5)*($G$2>=$A5)*OR($B5="",$G$2<=$B5)
The formula simply looks at the current row and does the computation if the amount in G2 falls within the range from Column A to Column B.
A simplification of all of the above comes when each range cumulatively builds on the prior ranges AND the rate of payment is always increasing, like the U.S. Tax Tables:
Over Not Over
0 9,525 10% of taxable income
9,525 38,700 $952.50 plus 12% of the excess over $9,525
38,700 82,500 $4,453.50 plus 22% of the excess over $38,700
82,500 157,500 $14,089.50 plus 24% of the excess over $82,500
157,500 200,000 $32,089.50 plus 32% of the excess over $157,500
200,000 500,000 $45,689.50 plus 35% of the excess over $200,000
500,000 $150,689.50 plus 37% of the excess over $500,000
Here, we can use something referred to as the "deskpad method" to shortcut the computation
Assuming that the amount to be evaluated is in G1 and these are in column A through C starting in Row 1:
Over Not Over Rate
0 9,525 10.0%
9,525 38,700 12.0%
38,700 82,500 22.0%
82,500 157,500 24.0%
157,500 200,000 32.0%
200,000 500,000 35.0%
500,000 37.0%
We compute the amount based on G1 as follows:
=ROUND(SUMPRODUCT($C$2:$C$8-$C$1:$C$7,$G$1-$A$2:$A$8,N($G$1>$A$2:$A$8)),0)
Note: this is not entered as an array formula.
How does this relate to your question. If the need is as simple as you stated (in other words, the rate is always increasing and we do not have any "steps" in the reimbursement, we can compute it similarly to the U.S. Tax computation.
I created these values in columns A through D starting in row 1:
Over Not Over
0 20 £- Flat Amount of £10.00
20 50 £0.50 £10.00 plus £.50 per mile over 20 miles
50 100 £1.00 £25.00 plus £1.00 per mile over 50 miles
100 £1.50 £75.00 plus £1.50 per mile over 100 miles
where column D is just descriptive. I put the £10.00 flat fee in Cell E1.
Assuming that G1 contains the number of miles, we would compute the reimbursement as:
=$E$1+ROUND(SUMPRODUCT($C$2:$C$5-$C$1:$C$4,$G$1-$A$2:$A$5,N($G$1>$A$2:$A$5)),2))
For example, when G1 is 52 miles, the computation is £27.00
Note: this is not entered as an array formula.
So, if this is the situation, what you would need is a place to house Columns A through C, a place to house the flat amount and a formula similar to what I provided to compute the reimbursement based on the cell housing the number of miles.
Please note that all the earlier items indicate that this formula will not be so simple if the rate is stepped or the rate declines or if the incremental unit is something other than 1 mile.
I hope that some of this makes sense. Good luck.

Things to google : "nested IF in excel"
How to do this in a one-line-formula : enter " =IF(A1<20,10,IF(A1>50,IF(A1>50,10+A1,"u"),0.5*(A1))) " in B1, your milage in A1.
To learn building this :
identify the conditions :
condition1 > 0-20 miles, you'll get £10.
condition2 > between 30-50 miles you get 50p per mile
condition3 > between 51-100 miles you get £1 per mile added onto £10
put the conditions into IF() statement
For contition1 > just type " =if(a1<20,10,0) " at B2 (and try it!) (:
Note : The syntax for IF() function is if("condition","if-true-do-this","if-false-do-this")
Thus, for condition2 > " =if(a1>20,a1*0.5,0) "
And for condition3 > " =if(a1>50,if(a1>50,10+a1),0) " correction : should be " =if(a1>50,10+a1,0) "
Combining all the conditions > "=IF(A1>20,IF(A1>50,IF(A1>50,10+A1,"error"),0.5*(A1)),10) "
Notice that I changed 0 in the "if-false-do-this" part of the equation just to make sure it show something when the milage entered is less than 0.
Hope that helps. /(^_^)

Related

Rank order data

I have the loan dataset below -
Sector
Total Units
Bad units
Bad Rate
Retail Trade
16
5
31%
Construction
500
1100
20%
Healthcare
165
55
33%
Mining
3
2
67%
Utilities
56
19
34%
Other
300
44
15%
How can I create a ranking function to sort this data based on the bad_rate while also accounting for the number of units ?
e.g This is the result when I sort in descending order based on bad_rate
Sector
Total Units
Bad units
Bad Rate
Mining
3
2
67%
Utilities
56
19
34%
Healthcare
165
55
33%
Retail Trade
16
5
31%
Construction
500
1100
20%
Other
300
44
15%
Here, Mining shows up first but I don't really care about this sector as it only has a total of 3 units. I would like construction, other and healthcare to show up on the top as they have more # of total as well as bad units
STEP 1) is easy...
Use SORT("Range","ByColNumber","Order")
Just put it in the top left cell of where you want your sorted data.
=SORT(B3:E8,4,-1):
STEP 2)
Here's the tricky part... you need to decide how to weight the outage.
Here, I found multiplying the Rate% by the Total Unit Rank:
I think this approach gives pretty good results... you just need to play with the formula!
Please let me know what formula you eventually use!
You would need to define sorting criteria, since you don't have a priority based on column, but a combination instead. I would suggest defining a function that weights both columns: Total Units and Bad Rate. Using a weight function would be a good idea, but first, we would need to normalize both columns. For example put the data in a range 0-100, so we can weight each column having similar values. Once you have the data normalized then you can use criteria like this:
w_1 * x + w_2 * y
This is the main idea. Now to put this logic in Excel. We create an additional temporary variable with the previous calculation and name it crit. We Define a user LAMBDA function SORT_BY for calculating crit as follows:
LAMBDA(a,b, wu*a + wbr*b)
and we use MAP to calculate it with the normalized data. For convenience we define another user LAMBDA function to normalize the data: NORM as follows:
LAMBDA(x, 100*(x-MIN(x))/(MAX(x) - MIN(x)))
Note: The above formula ensures a 0-100 range, but because we are going to use weights maybe it is better to use a 1-100 range, so the weight takes effect for the minimum value too. In such case it can be defined as follow:
LAMBDA(x, ( 100*(x-MIN(x)) + (MAX(x)-x) )/(MAX(x)-MIN(x)))
Here is the formula normalizing for 0-100 range:
=LET(wu, 0.6, wbr, 0.8, u, B2:B7, br, D2:D7, SORT_BY, LAMBDA(a,b, wu*a + wbr*b),
NORM, LAMBDA(x, 100*(x-MIN(x))/(MAX(x) - MIN(x))),
crit, MAP(NORM(u), NORM(br), LAMBDA(a,b, SORT_BY(a,b))),
DROP(SORT(HSTACK(A2:D7, crit),5,-1),,-1))
You can customize how to weight each column (via wu for Total Units and wbr for Bad Rates columns). Finally, we present the result removing the sorting criteria (crit) via the DROP function. If you want to show it, then remove this step.
If you put the formula in F2 this would be the output:

Returning a value based on multiple criteria and ranges of numbers

I am looking for a way to do some type of lookup/match to come up
with bonuses. It is based on what they sold, for how much, and based on how much they sold last year, and the amount increased.
Example Line 2: So say they sold $900 worth of pens to Joe (New Amount is w/in 1-999). Last
year Joe only bought $23 worth of pens (Previous Amount is w/in 1-24) they get a $25 bonus (Bonus). Also..
There also has to be a minimum increase amount (Min increase column). So say if Joe bought
$999 worth of pens last year and $1000 worth of pens this year, the
salesperson shouldn't get a bonus because it was only a buck increase. It has to be at least $50 increase in this case. That's what the Min Increase column is.
Group Min Increase Previous Amount New Amount Bonus
Min Max Min Max
Pens 50 1 24 1000 999999 45
Pens 50 1 24 1 999 25
Pens 50 25 100 1000 999999 45
Pens 5 25 100 1 999 25
Paper 10 1 24 1000 999999 50
Paper 10 1 24 1 999 25
Paper 10 25 100 1000 999999 50
Paper 5 25 100 1 999 25
I started looking at Indexmatching but it's not enough. Then I thought of summing, but it's really not adding anything together.
=SUMIFS(B3:B10, G1:G10, "Pens", D3:D10, "50")
Also, =INDEX(range2,MATCH(TRUE,COUNTIF(range1,range2)>0,0)) won't work because that's only two ranges.
It also has to be something they can update constantly.
The actual data looks something like this
Sale Prev. Group
900 23 Pens
So you'd need to find the difference, see if it's within the minimum increase for the group and the amounts (900-23 > 50). Then return a value. 23 is between 1 and 24 and 900 is between 1 and 999 so $25 bonus.
Does anyone have any suggestions? I'm looking into index matching, but I can't find out how to do it with ranges.
Thanks
The formula is based on aggregate which performs array like operations. As such keep full column references inside of the aggregate function as short as you can and avoid full column references. Based on the layout of information in the picture above, place the following formula in L3 and copy down as required.
=IFERROR(INDEX(G:G,AGGREGATE(15,6,ROW($A$3:$A$10)/(($A$3:$A$10=$K3)*($C$3:$C$10<=$J3)*($D$3:$D$10>=$J3)*($E$3:$E$10<=$I3)*($F$3:$F$10>=$I3)*((I3-J3)>=$B$3:$B$10)),1)),"No Bonus")
Caveat: If for some reason, the sales situation matches multiple rows in your table, then it will return the bonus corresponding to the lowest row number that met all the criteria.

Excel Formula, To Calcuate a maximum Weight based off a desired minimum profit (GP%)

So I am working on a spreadsheet for a Butchery I manage and have run into a problem.
First off back story: We do $20 packs for certain bulk products that have a min/max weight range.
The Goal is to be able to put in this spreadsheet the desired minimum GP% and from that get a maximum weight based off that minimum profit margin.
For example a Beef Steak that Costs $17.50 p/kilo Would be minimum of 680g (at a GP% of 30.30%) and a maximum weight of 790g (at a GP% of 20.50%)
I have been 'googling' all day, and banging my head on my desk (as well as experimenting with different formula's) I am starting to think I may have to resort to programming a macro to perform this but I would prefer to be able to achieve in a formula on the cell that way I can copy-paste easily down the spreadsheet.
If anyone has a solution or can put me on the right track would be Awesome.
I think the formula you are looking for is :
your selling price (=20$) / your mark up on cost
where your mark up is :
your cost per kilo / (1- your margin)
So for 20% expected GP it gives :
= 20 / (17.5 / (1-0.2))
= 20 / 21.875
= 0.914... kilos
Balance is then :
Revenue = 20$
Cost = 0.914 * 17.5 = 16
Margin = 4
Margin % = 20

Calculating Total based on Different Discount Rates

I’m trying to calculate the total contract value on a list of projects with different monthly rates and terms (#months). Basically you get a nice discount if the term is longer than 24 months however the discount is capped at $1,000 (you can’t discount more than $1,000)
0-24 months:Full Price
25-48 months:50% of the full price (capped at $1,000)
49 onwards:25% of the full price (capped at $1,000)
Attached is my spreadsheet and the calculated total works well for some monthly rates but the formula doesn’t work well for lower monthly amounts. I have two columns, Calculated Total and Desired Total (what the total should be). Any idea how I can fix the Calculated Total Formula to get the desired total? Thank you
Amount Term Calculated Total Desired Total
1500 68 $74,000 $80,000
1000 48 $36,000 $48,000
4000 36 $120,000 $120,000
3000 30 $81,000 $81,000
2000 27 $51,000 $51,000
4000 120 $216,000 $216,000
NumMonths Base Discount
0 0 1.00
24 24 0.50
48 36 0.25
Formula:
=A2*VLOOKUP(B2,$F$2:$H$4,2)+A2*(B2-VLOOKUP(B2,$F$2:$F$4,1))*IF((A2*VLOOKUP(B2,$F$2:$H$4,3))<1000,1000/A2,VLOOKUP(B2,$F$2:$H$4,3))
In order to get to a solution I changed the setup of your sheet slightly (beginning, end, discount and max. discount):
In order to get to your solution, you just have to multiply the different tiers with the terms for each tier. I used IF functions to do this:
IF(B2>$G$2,$G$2,B2)*IF(A2*(1-$H$2)<$F$7,$F$7,A2*(1-$H$2))+IF(B2>$G$3,$G$3-$G$2,IF(B2-$G$2<0,0,B2-$G$2))*IF(A2*(1-$H$3)<$F$7,$F$7,A2*(1-$H$3))+IF(B2-$G$3>0,B2-$G$3,0)*IF(A2*(1-$H$4)<$F$7,$F$7,A2*(1-$H$4))

Using the Excel's Rank() function to calculate allocations based on ranking and constraints

I have the following table set up
Limit Allocation Yield Ranking
$600 [to calc] 0.07% 7
$600 0.09% 6
$600 0.20% 1
$400 0.20% 1
$400 0.13% 4
$200 0.19% 3
$200 0.12% 5
Additionally, I have a constraint which I could only allocate a total of $2000 across the 7 rows here, by the rankings of their yield (so a higher yield would get everything allocated up to the limit column if there is any left overs from the $2000 total).
I was wondering how I could set up the equations so that it could perform the allocation automatically. Thanks!
I'm going to assume this table starts in A1...
In E1, put the amount you have to allocate
In B2 (and then copied to B3...B8) use the following formula
=MIN(A2,$E$1-SUMIF($D$2:$D$8,">"&D2,$B$2:$B$8))
This will work out how much has been taken by higher ranked, and take the rest, upto whatever is the lesser amount of their limit, and what is left in the pot.
There is one fault with this equation that you will need to figure out how to handle:
If there are equal ranks at the end of the distribution, then both will get the final amount. (e.g. try this with $2,001, and you will see that the 2 rows that have then rank 1 will both claim the final dollar)
Answer to solve the ties for rank causing problem. In the rank column D, add to the rank =rank(c2,$c$2:$c$8,0) + (.0000001 * row(a2)), or whatever row you are in. Then format the rank column to only show integers. Doing this makes the very small decimal addition to the rank the tie breaker so the first row with the rank's matching integer will take the allocation. Since you are adding it to the rank, it doesn't effect any totals. By changing the column format display to integer, the viewer will not be aware of the tiebreaker.

Resources