We are running Spark/Hadoop on a different set of nodes than Cassandra. We have 10 Cassandra nodes and multiple spark cores but Cassandra is not running on Hadoop. Performance in fetching data from Cassandra through spark(in yarn client mode) is not very good and bulk data reads from HDFS are faster(6 mins in Cassandra to 2 mins in HDFS). Changing Spark-Cassandra parameters is not helping much also.
Will deploying Hadoop on top of Cassandra solve this issue and majorly impact read performance ?
Without looking at your code, bulk reads in an analytics/Spark capacity, are always going to be faster when directly going to the file VS. reading from a database. The database offers other advantages such as schema enforcement, availability, distribution control, etc but I think the performance differences you're seeing are normal.
Related
I have millions of streaming parquet files being written . I want to support running ad hoc interactive queries for debugging and analytics purpose ( added bonus if i can run streaming queries for some real time monitoring of key metrics as well).
What is a scalable solution for supporting this.
The two ways I have observed is running spark sql interactively over millions of parquet files (not too familiar with spark ecosystem but does this mean running a spark job for every sql user submits or do i need to run some streaming job and submit queries somehow) and second being using a presto sql engine on top of parquet (not exactly sure how presto ingests new incoming parquet files).
Any recommendations or pros and cons of either approach . Any better solutions considering i have > ~10Tb data produced every day .
Let me address your use cases :
Support running ad hoc interactive queries for debugging and analytics purpose
I would recommend building a presto cluster if you care about minimizing the latency of your queries and are willing to invest in many machines with a large amount of memory.
Reason: Presto would run fully in-memory without touching disk (in most cases)
A Spark Cluster can also do the job, however, it won't be as fast as Presto. The advantage of Spark over presto is its fault tolerance capabilities and its ability to fail over to disk in case of out of memory conditions which may be important for you given that you have too much data.
Run streaming queries for some real-time monitoring of key metrics as well
As long as you have basic queries, you can build dashboards on top of Presto which could run these queries every x minutes.
Having a considerable amount of processing may be a good reason to look at Spark streaming if real-time monitoring is important.
If it isn't then you could build an ETL (using Spark) for calculating your metrics, storing the data as a new hive table and then expose for querying via Presto/SparkSQL again.
How presto ingests new incoming parquet files?
I'm now aware of your architecture, but in any case, you need to provide Presto with a Hive connection (Hive Metastore to be precise).
Hive provides Presto with few schemas attached to the directories where you ingest your data. Presto dynamically sees the new data by default. Spark is not different by the way.
Presto has nothing to do with data ingestion. It only starts its job once the data is there.
While exploring various tools like [Nifi, Gobblin etc.], I have observed that Databricks is now promoting for using Spark for data ingestion/on-boarding.
We have a spark[scala] based application running on YARN. So far we are working on a hadoop and spark cluster where we manually place required data files in HDFS first and then run our spark jobs later.
Now when we are planning to make our application available for the client we are expecting any type and number of files [mainly csv, jason, xml etc.] from any data source [ftp, sftp, any relational and nosql database] of huge size [ranging from GB to PB].
Keeping this in mind we are looking for options which could be used for data on-boarding and data sanity before pushing data into HDFS.
Options which we are looking for based on priority:
1) Spark for data ingestion and sanity: As our application is written and is running on spark cluster, we are planning to use the same for data ingestion and sanity task as well.
We are bit worried about Spark's support for many datasources/file types/etc. Also, we are not sure if we try to copy data from let's say any FTP/SFTP then will all workers will write data on HDFS in parallel? Is there any limitation while using it? Is there any Audit trail maintained by Spark while this data copy?
2) Nifi in clustered mode: How good Nifi would be for this purpose? Can it be used for any datasource and for any size of file? Will be maintain the Audit trail? Would Nifi we able to handle such large files? How large cluster would be required in case we try to copy GB - PB of data and perform certain sanity on top of that data before pushing it to HDFS?
3) Gobblin in clustered mode: Would like to hear similar answers as that for Nifi?
4) If at all there is any other good option available for this purpose with lesser infra/cost involved and better performance?
Any guidance/pointers/comparisions for above mentioned tools and technologies would be appreciated.
Best Regards,
Bhupesh
After doing certain R&D and considering the fact that using NIFI or goblin will demand for more infrastructure cost. I have started testing Spark for data on-boarding.
SO far I have tried using Spark job for importing data [present at a remote staging area/node] into my HDFS and I am able to do that by mounting that remote location with all my spark cluster worker nodes. Doing this made that location local to those workers, hence spark job ran properly and data is on-boarded to my HDFS.
Since my whole project is going to be on Spark, hence keeping data on-boarding part on spark would not cost anything extra to me. So far I am going good. Hence I would suggest to others as well, if you already have spark cluster and hadoop cluster up and running then instead of adding extra cost [where cost could be a major constraint] go for spark job for data on-boarding.
I've been reading about Apache Cassandra lately to learn how it works and how to use it for IoT projects, especially in the need of time series based database..
However, I started to notice that Apache Spark is often mentioned when people talk about Cassandra too.
The question is, as long as I can use Cassandra cluster of nodes to serve my app, to store and read data, why would I need Apache Spark? any useful use-cases are appreciated!
The answer is broad but summarizing ... Cassandra is highly scalable and there are lot of scenarios where it fits but CQL sintax has some limitations if you don't have your schema ready for some queries.
If you want to make use of your data without restrictions and doing analytical workloads with your cassandra data or join with other tables Spark is the most appropriate complement. Spark has a tight integration with Cassandra.
I recommend you to check this slides: http://www.slideshare.net/patrickmcfadin/apache-cassandra-and-spark-you-got-the-the-lighter-lets-start-the-fire?qid=48e2528c-a03c-49b4-879e-45599b2aff34&v=&b=&from_search=5
Cassandra is for storing data where as Spark is for performing some computation on top of it. Analogy with Hadoop: Cassandra is like HDFS where as Spark is like Map Reduce.
Especially with computations, when using DataStax Cassandra connector, data locality can be exploited. If you need to do some computation which modifies a row (but doesn't really depend on anything else), then that operation is optimized to run locally on each machine in cluster without any data movement in network.
Same goes with a lot of other Spark workload, the actions(some function which modifies the data) are done locally and only result is sent to client. As far as I know, when you want to do analytics on top of data stored in Cassandra, Spark is well supported and popular choice. If you don't need to do any operations on the data, still you can use Spark for other purposes like I mentioned below.
Spark streaming can be used to ingest or export data from Cassandra ( I used it a lot personally). The same data import/export can be achieved with small hand-written JDBC agents but Spark streaming code I wrote for ingesting 10GB data from Cassandra contains less than 20 lines of code with multi machine-multi threading built-in and an admin UI where I can see the job progress.
With Spark+Zeppelin, we can visualize Cassandra data using Spark, we can build beautiful UIs with little Spark code where users can even enter input and see the result as graph/table etc.
Note: Actually, visualization can be better with Kibana/ElasticSearch or Solr/Banana when used with Cassandra but they are very hard to setup and indexing has it's own issues to deal with.
There are a lot of other use cases, but personally I used Spark as a Swiss army knife for multiple tasks.
Apache cassandra is have feature like fast read and write so you can use it with the apache spark streaming to write your data directly into cassandra without legacy.
For use case you can consider any video application to upload video with the help of streaming and directly store it into cassandra blob.
i am trying to load around 2 million records to cassandra through spark. Spark has 4 executors and cassandra has 4 nodes in the cluster. But it takes around 20 mins to save all the data to cassandra. Can anyone please help me to make this thing bit more faster.
Ok so I can see several issues with your configuration
Running Cassandra in VM for performance benchmark
Spark NOT co-located (so no data locality ...)
In general, installing Cassandra inside a virtual machine is not recommended for performance benchmark, this is an anti-pattern. So your slow insertion rate is normal, do not complain, you can't ask for better perf while using VM ...
I am looking for directions:
I have a cassandra database with latitude & longitude data. I need to search for data within a radius or a box coordinates around a point. I am using golang(gocql) client to query Cassandra.
I need some understanding regarding Spark and Cassandra as this seams like the way to go.
Is the following assumptions correct; I have 2 Cassandra nodes(the data in a replica of 2).
Should I then install an extra node and install Spark on this and then connect it to the other two existing Cassandra nodes containing the data(With the Spark Connector from DataStax).
And do the two existing Cassandra nodes need to have Spark workers installed on them to work with Spark Master node?
When the Spark setup is in place, do you query(Scala) the existing data and then save the data onto the Spark node and then query this with the gaoling(gocql) client?
Any directions is welcome
Thanks in advance
Geospatial Searching is a pretty deep topic. If it's just doing searches that you're after (not batch/analytics), I can tell you that you probably don't want to use Spark. Spark isn't very good at 'searching' for data - even when it's geospatial. The main reason is that Spark doesn't index data for efficient searches and you'd have to create a job/context (unless using job server) every time you'd want to do a search. That takes forever when you're thinking in terms of user facing application time.
Solr, Elastic Search, and DataStax Enterprise Search (Disclaimer I work for DataStax) are all capable of box and radius searches on Cassandra data and do so in near real time.
To answer your original question though, if the bulk of your analytics in general come from Cassandra data, it may be good idea to run Spark on the same nodes as Cassandra for data locality. The nice thing is that Spark scales quite nicely, so if you find Spark taking too many resources from Cassandra, you can simply scale out (both Cassandra and Spark).
Should I then install an extra node and install Spark on this and then
connect it to the other two existing Cassandra nodes containing the
data(With the Spark Connector from DataStax).
Spark is a cluster compute engine so it needs a cluster of nodes to work well. You'll need to install it on all nodes if you want it to be as efficient as possible.
And do the two existing Cassandra nodes need to have Spark workers
installed on them to work with Spark Master node?
I don't think they 'have' to have them, but it's a good idea for locality. There's a really good video on academy.datastax.com that shows how the spark cassandra connector reads data from Cassandra to Spark. I think it will clear a lot of things up for you: https://academy.datastax.com/demos/how-spark-cassandra-connector-reads-data
When the Spark setup is in place, do you query(Scala) the existing
data and then save the data onto the Spark node and then query this
with the gaoling(gocql) client?
The Spark-Cassandra connector can communicate to both Cassandra and Spark. There are methods, saveToCassandra(), for example, that will write data back to Cassandra your jobs are processed. Then you can use your client as you normally would.
There are some really good free Spark + Cassandra tutorials at academy.datastax.com. This is also a good place to start: http://rustyrazorblade.com/2015/01/introduction-to-spark-cassandra/