Related
I have highlighted specific activities (feeding,resting and sleeping) from the dataset in my plot. Now I want to connect these highlighted points in sequence over my polar coordinates.
Here's my dataset:
Activity Latitude Longitude
Feeding 21.09542 71.06014
Resting 21.09564 71.06064
Sleeping 21.09619 71.06128
Walking 21.09636 71.06242
Walking 21.09667 71.06564
Resting 21.09483 71.06619
Can you help me out in this?
# Example dataframe
set.seed(1)
mydf=data.frame(Activity=sample(c("Walking","Feeding","Resting","Sleeping"),20,T),Latitude=rnorm(20,21,0.5),Longitude=rnorm(20,71,0.5))
mydf$Order=1:nrow(mydf)
If you want to connect the points in order regardless of the activity, do the following (for clarity, I added the variable mydf$Order to label the points).
# Plot
library(ggplot2)
ggplot(data=mydf)+
geom_point(aes(x=Latitude,y=Longitude,colour=Activity))+
geom_path(aes(x=Latitude,y=Longitude))+
geom_text(aes(x=Latitude,y=Longitude,label=Order))+
coord_polar(theta="y")
If you want to connect points according to activities, consider CMichael's answer.
Ok I am starting from scratch: My original answerwas much too bulky and inflexible.
Just add the following to get Paths for each Activity without filtering.
+ geom_path(aes(colour=ACTIVITY,x=Latitude,y=Longitude))
If you want to plot only selected Activities:
+ geom_path(data=Data[Data$ACTIVITY %in% c("Sleeping","Resting"),],aes(colour=ACTIVITY,x=Latitude,y=Longitude))
The selected Activities are to be listed in the c(...) vector with each name quoted.
UPDATE: OP clarified that he wants to connect any stationary point, this achieved by running the following:
+ geom_path(data=Data[Data$ACTIVITY!="Walking",],colour="red",aes(x=Latitude,y=Longitude))
Note that the colour=ACTIVITY is removed from the aesthetics and we consider all stationary points (!="Walking") to draw the path.
Code combining the two answers:
set.seed(1)
mydf=data.frame(Activity=sample(c("Walking","Walking","Walking","Walking","Walking","Resting","Feeding","Sleeping"),20,T),Latitude=rnorm(20,21,0.5),Longitude=rnorm(20,71,0.5))
mydf$Order=1:nrow(mydf)
# Plot
library(ggplot2)
ggplot(data=mydf)+
geom_point(aes(x=Latitude,y=Longitude,colour=Activity),size=5)+
geom_path(aes(x=Latitude,y=Longitude),size=1.2)+
geom_text(aes(x=Latitude,y=Longitude,label=Order))+
geom_path(data=mydf[mydf$Activity!="Walking",],colour="red",aes(x=Latitude,y=Longitude)) +
coord_polar(theta="y")
In the TI-BASIC programming language (Specifically TI-84+), how do you create input forms, such as the ones included in the default apps on the TI-84+.
The image included here shows an example of what I'm trying to create: A menu that you can scroll through and input multiple variables freely before executing a function
Additionally, is it possible to make this menu dynamically-updating as variables are entered?
You've set a rather tall order for TI-Basic to fill. user3932000 is correct; there is no built in function to create an input form of the type you request.
However, there is nothing stopping you from creating an interactive interface yourself. Creating it from scratch will be a time consuming and, it will consume a significant amount of memory on your calculator. There is no boilerplate code you plug your variables into to get the results you want, but you might have some luck modeling it after this quadratic solver I wrote.
ClrHome
a+bi
Output(1,1," QUADRATIC
Output(2,1," AX²+BX+C
Output(3,1,"ZEROS:
Output(6,1,"A=
Output(7,1,"B=
Output(8,1,"C=
DelVar YDelVar D
" →Str1
While Y≠105
getKey→Y
If Ans
Then
Output(X,4,Str1
Output(3,7,Str1+Str1+Str1+"
End
X+(Ans=34)-(Ans=25
If Ans<6:8
If Ans>8:6
Ans→X
Output(Ans,16,"◄
D(Y≠45→D
If Y=25 or Y=34
sum({A,B,C}(X={6,7,8→D
If Y=104:⁻D→D
10not(Y)+Y(102≠Y)-13int(Y/13(2>abs(5-abs(5-abs(Y-83
If Ans≤9
D10+Ans-2Ans(D<0→D
If X=6:D→A
If X=7:D→B
If X=8:D→C
If A
Then
2ˉ¹Aˉ¹(⁻B+{1,⁻1}√(B²-4AC
Else
If B
Then
⁻C/B
Else
If C
Then
"No Zeros
Else
"All Numbers
End
End
End
Output(3,7,Ans
Output(6,3,A
Output(7,3,B
Output(8,3,C
End
ClrHome
Ans
Here's a GIF of what it does for you.
With a little more work. This code could be used on the Graph screen instead of the home screen, giving more option in terms of layout and design.
In the TI-BASIC programming language (Specifically TI-84+), how do you create input forms, such as the ones included in the default apps on the TI-84+.
There are many ways to ask for input in your program:
Prompt: Asks for input and stores it in a variable. For example, Prompt A. Simplest way to ask for input, but not very visually appealing.
Input: Similar to the Prompt command, except that now you can include text within the input. For example, Input "What is your name?",A.
Menu(: Multiple choice input, and each choice is connected to a Lbl marker somewhere else in the script. Much like the error screen with the quit/goto choices that you've probably seen. For example, Menu("Are you a boy or a girl?","Boy",B,"Girl",G).
getKey: Checks if a certain key is pressed, and will output True (1) if that key is pressed. For example, getKey 105. See here for which numbers each key corresponds to.
The image included here shows an example of what I'm trying to create: A menu that you can scroll through and input multiple variables freely before executing a function http://imgur.com/ulthDRV
I'm afraid that's not possible in programs. You can either put in multiple inputs, or you might be interested in looking into making apps instead.
Additionally, is it possible to make this menu dynamically-updating as variables are entered?
If you're talking about the text on top of the screenshot, yes you can; just put a Disp command or something after each line of Input, so that it continuously overwrites the text above with new text after you input a variable.
I'm developing a Windows 8.1 Store App. I have a CommandBar control with a couple of AppBarButtons inside. Using the standard icons is easy, I just set the icon property to the appropriate string like so :
<AppBarButton Icon="Download" Label="Download Files"/>
I'd like to use a couple of custom icons from the very nice free collection Modern UI Icons. Ideally, I'd like to be able to set the icon property in much the same way :
<AppBarButton Icon="transit.distance.to" Label="Distance to destination"/>
This would refer to this icon : PNG / XAML
Is this possible ?
If not, what are the alternatives ?
Tim Heuer proposes using a font file, although at present the font files available here only cover a sub-set of the icons, and also this code is quite unreadable :
<FontIcon FontFamily="ms-appx:///modernuiicons.ttf#Modern-UI-Icons---Social" Margin="0,2,0,0" Glyph="" FontSize="37.333" />
Would you believe that shows a twitter icon?!
Tim Heuer also proposes using vector data, and one of the commenters explains how the vector data can be rolled into a style. I could do that, but then I would have to copy and paste the path data for each icon I want to include ?
Should I be using the PNG files, as explained in this question ? That looks pretty messy as well.
What a nightmare!
I'm not sure what the nightmare part is -- you want to use a custom icon that isn't present in the 200+ supplied defaults. You have options:
Use SymbolIcon and supply your own font. You note that you don't like that the code feels unreadable. Unicode ranges are universally used for symbol fonts and I agree that Unicode isn't human-readable, but a simple code comment would help ;-) Fonts give you the most ease and flexibility because they are also vectors.
PathIcon. You convert your image into vector geometries we can render. This would be the second best, but also requires a bit fine tuning of the vectors to get right. For people not familiar with working with geometries this can be annoying at first. Blend and Inkscape are helpful tools here.
BitmapIcon. This would allow you to use your PNG, however you now must supply multiple of them for different scales and states. This is my least favorite option as it requires most work, but for some may be the simplest. Now your problem you will hit is there is an issue with BitmapIcon for non-rectangular shapes (which looks like your icon is). This won't have the fidelity you seek due to a bug in rasterizing.
Contact metroicon author and see if he can put it into the font file so you can use option #1 :-)
Maybe this is what you're looking for:
<AppBarButton Label="Transit">
<AppBarButton.Icon>
<PathIcon Data="F1 M 3.912,17.38C 4.89067,17.38 5.688,18.2653 5.688,19.3586C 5.688,20.448 4.89067,21.3333 3.912,21.3333C 2.92667,21.3333 2.136,20.448 2.136,19.3586C 2.136,18.2653 2.92667,17.38 3.912,17.38 Z M 16,17.38C 16.984,17.38 17.776,18.2653 17.776,19.3586C 17.776,20.448 16.984,21.3333 16,21.3333C 15.016,21.3333 14.224,20.448 14.224,19.3586C 14.224,18.2653 15.016,17.38 16,17.38 Z M 21.3333,18.9626L 18.464,18.9626C 18.292,17.62 17.2547,16.5933 16,16.5933C 14.7453,16.5933 13.708,17.62 13.536,18.9626L 6.37467,18.9626C 6.20267,17.62 5.16667,16.5933 3.912,16.5933C 2.656,16.5933 1.62,17.62 1.448,18.9626L 0,18.9626L 0,10.2706C 0,9.396 0.636,8.69196 1.42133,8.69196L 19.5573,8.69196C 20.3387,8.69196 20.9787,9.396 20.9787,10.2706M 20.4427,10.2706L 19.1973,10.2706L 19.1973,15.8013L 20.62,15.8013M 17.776,13.432L 17.776,10.2706L 14.224,10.2706L 14.224,13.432M 13.5107,10.2706L 9.95333,10.2706L 9.95333,13.432L 13.5107,13.432M 9.24533,10.2706L 5.688,10.2706L 5.688,13.432L 9.24533,13.432M 4.97867,10.2706L 1.42133,10.2706L 1.42133,13.432L 4.97867,13.432M 14.5787,2.36932L 12.4427,0L 15.2867,0L 17.776,2.45862L 17.776,0L 19.1973,0L 19.1973,6.31732L 17.776,6.31732L 17.776,3.85864L 15.2867,6.31732L 12.4427,6.31732L 14.5787,3.948L 7.73467,3.948C 7.41733,5.31195 6.30267,6.31732 4.97867,6.31732C 3.40667,6.31732 2.136,4.90533 2.136,3.16132C 2.136,1.41064 3.40667,0 4.97867,0C 6.30267,0 7.41733,1.00531 7.73467,2.36932L 14.5787,2.36932 Z " HorizontalAlignment="Center" VerticalAlignment="Center"/>
</AppBarButton.Icon>
</AppBarButton>
Hope this helps!
I have been trying to figure out how to get two nodes to sense when they are close to each other and then snap together but can't make it work correctly. Basically, I have an AnchorPane that I am dropping new Nodes onto. The new nodes are also anchor panes with several other components on them. When I drop the Node I save anchor points along the outer edge. Then, when I drag another Node next to it, the sides will light up indicating the other node is in range.
I am attempting to make a node that is being dragged next to another node snap to that node. I cannot seem to get the coordinates to translate correctly between each other and I am just ending up with random placement and edge detection.
Here is my code where I am saving the anchor points for the nodes:
double kromaDeviceWidth = kromaDevice.getBoundsInParent().getWidth();
double kromaDeviceHeight = kromaDevice.getBoundsInParent().getHeight();
//This x,y represents the top left corner of the node
double kromaDeviceX = kromaDevice.localToParent(0.0, 0.0).getX();
double kromaDeviceY = kromaDevice.localToParent(0.0, 0.0).getY();
kromaDevice.setTopAnchorPoint(new double[]{kromaDeviceX + kromaDeviceWidth / 2, kromaDeviceY});
kromaDevice.setRightAnchorPoint(new double[]{kromaDeviceX + kromaDeviceWidth, kromaDeviceY + kromaDeviceHeight / 2});
kromaDevice.setBottomAnchorPoint(new double[]{kromaDeviceX + kromaDeviceWidth / 2, kromaDeviceY + kromaDeviceHeight});
kromaDevice.setLeftAnchorPoint(new double[]{kromaDeviceX, kromaDeviceY + kromaDeviceHeight / 2});
The code is identical for when I initially drop a new node and when I am dragging the node. Then, I compare the two node's anchor positions to tell if they are within range:
if (Math.abs(bottomAnchorX - topAnchorPointX) <= ANCHOR_DISTANCE && Math.abs(bottomAnchorY - topAnchorY) <= ANCHOR_DISTANCE) {
....show correct edge highlight
}
I simplified the above if statement as I am using arrays to store and recall the anchor points.
Here is an image of what I am seeing:
You can see the slight yellow highlight when I drag one node over the other when it is offset. It should detect the other node when it is in the position in the second image. My next issue is trying to get them to snap to the right coordinates.
droppedKromaDevice.setLayoutX(parentKromaDevice.getLayoutX());
droppedKromaDevice.setLayoutY(parentKromaDevice.getLayoutY() - droppedKromaDevice.getBoundsInParent().getHeight());
I tried the above with both getLayoutX() and localToParent(0,0).getX() and they produce the same result. If I place two nodes that are exactly the same size than it actually works but if the are different sizes at all than it places them offset from each other. If I subtract the height from the y it should matter the size.
Please help. I have been trying to get this to work right for 3 days now and have tried everything I can think of.
Update:
I figured out my proximity issue. The layout for the new node was not being set right. I tried doing a Platform.runLater before I saved the anchor points of the new node but that had no impact. I fixed it by setting the anchor points for all of the nodes in the pane when I click on a node to drag it. That saved the anchor points correctly.
This however did not fix my issue of nodes of different sizes not laying out in the pane correctly. Here is a screenshot of two nodes of the same size snapping together correctly and two nodes of different sizes not snapping correctly. This makes no sense as the math should be the same.
Here is the code to set the layout for the dropped node relative to the other node:
droppedKromaDevice.setLayoutX(parentKromaDevice.getLayoutX());
droppedKromaDevice.setLayoutY(parentKromaDevice.getLayoutY() - droppedKromaDevice.getBoundsInParent().getHeight());
I found the solution to my two problems.
First, when I was creating new nodes and dropping them on the panel the bounds were not being evaluated correctly so my anchor points were off. I just changed it so when I click on a node to drag it around I loop through all of the other nodes on the panel and build their anchors instead of when I first drop/create it.
Second, in order to get the snap positioning to work accurately I had to base their layout on the delta between the opposite anchor points and not on the bounds of the node. Basically, I get the current x/y of the node I am dropping and than move it using the delta between the dropped node and the node I need to snap it to. The code below is what I used. 0 represents the x coordinate and 1 represents the y coordinate in the array
droppedKromaDevice.setLayoutX(droppedKromaDevice.getLayoutX() - droppedKromaDevice.getBottomAnchorPoint()[0] + parentKromaDevice.getTopAnchorPoint()[0]);
droppedKromaDevice.setLayoutY(droppedKromaDevice.getLayoutY() - droppedKromaDevice.getBottomAnchorPoint()[1] + parentKromaDevice.getTopAnchorPoint()[1]);
Trying to get these 2 raphael elements to both change color when hovered over one or the other. Here is the code I have. Any help would be appreciated.
var loge_1 = rsr.set();
loge_1a = rsr.rect(235.457, 287.645, 32.523, 45.486),
loge_1b = rsr.rect(235.139, 277.626, 32.933, 6.701);
loge_1.push(loge_1a,loge_1b);
loge_1.attr(logeFill);
I assume you got the code from ReadySetRaphael .... no doubt they have a very good algorithm for Raphael conversion ... try some large SVG files sometime and they will give you a good result .... anyways try this ...
loge_1.mouseover(function(){
loge_1.attr({'fill':'your Desired Color'});
}
loge_1.mouseout(function(){
loge_1.attr({'fill':'original color'});
}
this should change the color of both your rects .... Hope it helps.
Well after searching I didn't find much on the subject. So I have read up on svg elements and changed my "rect" to "path". Here is the W3C svg documentation
And here is the jsfiddle with "path"
To find my rectangles paths I just opened the svg file in Adobe AI. Then made sure my documents units was set to pixels. From there I opened my info window and just copied the my anchor points of my rectangles x & y coordinates into my "path" and presto I have 2 shapes acting as one.