I have an Azure Logic App that monitors an SFTP site for new files, and if it finds one, it sends a message to an Azure Queue for subsequent processing, then deletes the file. My application has grown in scale and a single logic app seems to only be grabbing 5-10 files a minute.
Is it possible to setup a second (third, fourth, etc.) Logic App that monitors the same SFTP site, without the two apps conflicting/colliding with each other. I also see that there is a "High Throughput" setting that seems interesting, but I'm not sure it is what I need. My ultimate goal is to process more files faster, and I am considering changing the Logic App out for a scheduled Web Job that monitors the SFTP site. Since I am live and files are pouring in, I am a little reluctant to change anything until I know it's safe.
Any insight would be appreciated.
Thanks!!
Logic app comes under server less architecture, IF we select the pricing model based on 'number of executions' then it impact on the performance since Microsoft allocates the resources for such kind of pricing model as shared one and which server is free up the processing. I would recommend to attache service plan to it and select the pricing model 'per minute'
One more point, If you want longer operations to be done then Azure logic app is not appropriate one but since you are connecting to enterprise integration then logic app is good choice. I would recommend to divide this functionality between logic app with Azure function OR Microsoft flow.
Related
We have a Azure based system which is growing in complexity, and we need to monitor chains of events and ensure they arrive where we expect them to arrive.
We have a on-prem Java application, which sends events to an IoT Hub. The IoT hub routes to service bus queues. We have functions that update a cosmos database, trigger other functions or route to additional queues. Some functions are also callable through an API Management instance.
Our functions are already connected to Application Insights, and here the Application Insights instance is named the same as the Function App (IIRC this naming was suggested through the form that created the AI resource)
The application map in Application Insights make me lean toward one AI per environment, to have a complete map of the system. Log Analytics also seems logical to use one per environment to be able to potentially correlate data if needed.
What is the correct path for Log Analytics and Application Insights, respectively?
If it is not as clear-cut as stated in my title, what factors do I need to consider when I start to use these services?
The correct number of instances is the one that works best for you, whether that exactly follows recommended practices or not.
The recommendation is to use one workspace per environment and make sure the cloud_RoleName in App Insights to distinguish parts of the system. Log Analytics has similar considerations.
Functions defaults to spinning up an App Insights instance along with the app because if you don't use App Insights you loose most of the logging ability- it's important to connect it to App Insights, but overriding the default behavior and connecting to a centralized workspace is common in larger systems.
There are certainly reasons you might want to split the workspaces, and you can union data across workspaces as needed to pull data together from both Log Analytics and App Insights instances.
Data access control or geographic locations. If you need to keep a portion of the data within certain geographic boundaries or limit access to certain people, then split that portion off.
Similar to the security concern is a billing one. If for whatever reason, billing for different portions of the application needs to be split, then you would also want to split the logging portion.
Different portions of the system rarely interact, or are maintained by different teams, and organizing the data into separate workspaces will provide more benefits over the hassle of cross-
You are going to surpass the limitations on a single resource. Very few applications actually hit these limits, but they are there.
I understand that Microservices is about independent loosely coupled services. I have read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microservices.
When it comes to Azure, I understand there are many components like Azure Service Fabric, AKS and also have the option of deploying containers within Azure VMs using Docker or any other containerization tools. However, since Microservices is about developing atmoic individually scalable services, can this also be achieved by deploying each service as an Azure Web API APP within an App Service Plan and configure Auto-Scale based on Performance metrics (though each API APP may not be individually scalable, they can still be individually manageable in terms of deployment, configuration etc)?
Can someone please suggest if this thought process is correct?
Microservices aren't a platform or technology so if you can make small independently deployable services then they are microservices. Sure - some tech helps but it depends on your situation.
If you only need a few services you probably don't need anything complex. Make sure services are well modeled, own their own data and ideally have a good monitoring and deployment pipeline setup. Design for service failure where possible.
Do you need to scale each part independently? Ideally, you should be able to but do services have very different requirements? You could have many small App service plans but that comes at cost of unused resources so split when you need to.
This question and of course the answers are going to be opinion based, but generally when thinking in terms of micros services, think not in terms as things like loads of API's and VM's etc. Instead think in terms of. When i upload an image, its needs to be resized, and the table updated to give a url for the thumb. or when XXX record is updated in database, Run XXX in order to create a report, or update Azure search. and that each service, just knows how to do a single thing only. I.E Resize an image.
Now one could say. I have a system, A repo library, and some functions library. When an image is posted, I upload, then call this, and that etc.
With Micor services. You would instead just add the image to a queue. Create an azure function that has a queue trigger. that would resize and save both the large and the thumb to storage. this would then either update the database, or in true micro service, it would add a queue to store the new info, another function would watch that queue and insert into the database.
You can use the DB queue from anything. You can use the Blob queue from anything. Your main API, does not care how images are handled. You can change your functions one day to maybe save to dropbox, instead of azure blob. All really easy, with no re-build of the API, because the API does not care.
A good example I use it for is email and SMS. My systems dont know how to send an email, or an SMS. They only know how to add to a queue. My microservices. SendEmail and SendSMS do know how to do it, and I can change how and who i send that content with, really easy. I can tomorrow change from Twilio to send grid, without ever telling the API that i've done it.
On a more complex thing. I have approval, at the moment that approval sends an email or SMS to either user or admin, and that can change over time. So I have an SMS server, Email Service and and approvalService. when approval happens, it just adds a config to the queue, The rest is done by a logic app, that knows to send an email to XXX and an SMS to XXX and then update database. My api, is just a post, that creates a queue.
Basically what I am saying here is to get started, maybe porting an existing app. Start with the workflow stuff, like send an email, resize an image, create a report, create a PDF, email 50 subscribers etc. and take all that code out and put into there own micro service that just knows how to do one thing. Then when you grow with confidence, create a workflow from all of these services with Logic Apps, let azure take care of the rest, thats what they want to do.
I thought one of the advantages of Azure was that I could turn services on and off depending on when I want them to be available.
However I cant see how to pause my App Service Plan.
Is it possible?
I want to use the S1 tier so that I can play with what it offers. However I want to be able to pause the cost accumulation when I am not using it.
I see from the app service pricing help that an app will still be billed for even though it is in the stopped state.
Yet the link also clearly states that I only pay for what I use. So how does that work?
If you put your hosting plan onto the free tier, you will stop being charged for it. However if you have things like deployment slots and certificates these will be deleted.
The ability to turn services on and off, is more to do with being able to scale services, so if you need 50 servers for an hour you can easily do that.
What you can do to make your solution temporary is to create a deployment script, using Powershell or Resource manager Templates then you can deploy your solution for exactly as long as you need it and then delete it again when you don't. In this sense you can turn your services on and off at a whim.
Azure provides building blocks for you to create the solution you need, it is up to you to figure out how to best use those building blocks to create the solution you seek.
Edited to answer extended question.
If you want to use the S1 pricing plan, and not have it charge when you are not using it, the only way of achieving that is by using automation. Fortunately, this is reasonably trivial to achieve.
If you look at this template it is pretty much all configured to deploy a website from Github to Azure on demand. If you edit that to configure it to your needs you can have a new Azure website online with 2 minutes of running the script.
Then you would have another script that deleted it once you had finished.
Doing it this way you would loose no functionality, and probably learn quite a bit about what is possible with Azure along the way.
App Service Plan
An app service plan is the hardware that a web app runs on. In the free and shared tier your web apps share an instance with other web apps. In the other tiers you have a dedicated virtual machine. It is this virtual machine that you pay for. In that case it is irrelevant whether or not you have web apps running on your app service or not, you still have a virtual machine running and you will be charged for that.
To change the App Service Plan via PowerShell, you can run the following command
Set-AzureRmAppServicePlan -ResourceGroupName $rg -Name $AppServicePlan -Tier Free
I was able to accomplish this using the dashboard by selecting the App Service Plan, clicking Scale up (App Service Plan), and then from there if you click Dev/Test you can select the Free tier.
As others have mentioned, you need to script this. Fortunately, I created a repository with one-click deployment to your Azure resources.
https://github.com/jraps20/jrap-AzureVerticalScaling
The steps are intended to be as simple and generic as possible:
Execute the one-click deployment from the repo readme
Select the subscription, resource group etc.
Deploy resource to Azure
Set up your schedule to scale up and scale down as-needed
The scripting relies on runbooks and variables to maintain the previous state of each App Service Plan and App Services within those plans. Some App Services cannot be scaled due to specific settings being used (AlwaysOn, Use32BitWOrkerProcess, ClientCertEnabled, etc.). In those cases, the previous values are stored as variables prior to down scaling and then the original values are reapplied when the services are scaled up.
For more clarity, I have written a blog post that goes into detail. The post is pertaining to Sitecore, but applies to any App Service setup- Drastically Reduce Azure PaaS Hosting Costs in Non-Prod Environments With Scheduled Vertical Scaling. It also includes a brief video tutorial to show its use case.
Myself and others have been using this repository/approach for well over a year and it works great. I mostly use it for POC's to reduce costs when I'm not actively working on something. However, its main intention was for targeting non-prod environments to save costs during non-work hours.
Azure App Service Plan is just an logical concept of a set of features and capacity that you can share across multiple apps. I don`t think you can "pause" a plan, instead you can pause your service. and depends on billing model of each service, you might or might not get charged.
Pausing = Delete or lower tier.
Scripting is the key.
Design Diagram
Use scripts to create (also consider shared resources)
Delete using scripts
Use scripts to recreate.
eg: If we use resource group properly per environment then
Export-AzureRmResourceGroup will create a template for us (everything in the resource group will be pulled out as script). So we can delete it and recreate it anytime.
To pause a VM and stop billing you need to shut is down and deallocate it. Just shutting down still has the capacity reserved as if its running.
Storage can't be shutdown - it can be moved to lower cost tiers.
We currently have a window service which send some notification emails to users after doing some processing on database(SQL database). Runs once in day.
We want to move this on azure cloud. One alternate is to put it on Azure VM as is. but I am finding some other best possible solution for that.
I study about recurring and on demand Web jobs but I am not sure is this is best solution.
Also is there any possibility to update configuration of service code in App.config without re-deploy the code of service on cloud. I means we can manage configuration from Azure portal.
Thanks in advance.
Update 11/4/2016
Since this was written, there are 2 additional features available in Azure that are both excellent choices depending on what functionality you need:
Azure Functions (which was based on the WebJobs described below): Serverless code that can be trigger/invoked in various ways, and has scaling support.
Azure Service Fabric: Microservice platform, with support for actor model, stateful and stateless services.
You've got 3 basic options:
Windows service running on VM
WebJob
Cloud service
There's a lot of information out there on the tradeoffs between these choices, but here's a brief summary.
VM - Advantages: you can move your service basically as it is without having to change much or any of your code. They also have the easiest connectivity with other resources in Azure (blob storage, virtual networks, etc). The disadvantage is you're giving up all the of PaaS advantages and are still stuck managing your own VM infrastructure
WebJob - Advantages: Multiple invocation options (queues, blobs, manually, queue receive loops, continuous while-loop style, etc), scheduled (would cover your case). Easy to deploy (can go with website, as a console app, automatically through Kudu), has some built in logging in Azure portal - and yes, to answer your question, you can alter the configuration in the portal itself for connection strings and app settings.
Disadvantages - you'll need to update code, you don't have access to underlying resources (if you need that), and more of something to keep in mind than a disadvantage - it uses the same resources as the webapp it's deployed with.
Web Jobs are the newest of the options, but at the same time appear to have active development going on to increase the functionality and usefulness.
Cloud Service - like a managed VM, has some deployment options, access to underlying VM if needed. Would require some code changes from your existing service.
There's nothing you've mentioned in your use case that makes me think a Web Job shouldn't be first thing you try.
(Edit: Troy Hunt has a great and relatively recent blog post illustrating most of the points I've mentioned about Web Jobs above: http://www.troyhunt.com/2015/01/azure-webjobs-are-awesome-and-you.html)
I'm trying to figure out a solution for recurring data aggregation of several thousand remote XML and JSON data files, by using Azure queues and WebJobs to fetch the data.
Basically, an input endpoint URL of some sort would be called (with a data URL as parameter) on an Azure website/app. It should trigger a WebJobs background job (or can it continuously running and checking the queue periodically for new work), fetch the data URL and then callback an external endpoint URL on completion.
Now the main concern is the volume and its performance/scaling/pricing overhead. There will be around 10,000 URLs to be fetched every 10-60 minutes (most URLs will be fetched once every 60 minutes). With regards to this scenario of recurring high-volume background jobs, I have a couple of questions:
Is Azure WebJobs (or Workers?) the right option for background processing at this volume, and be able to scale accordingly?
For this sort of volume, which Azure website tier will be most suitable (comparison at http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/app-service/)? Or would only a Cloud or VM(s) work at this scale?
Any suggestions or tips are appreciated.
Yes, Azure WebJobs is an ideal solution to this. Azure WebJobs will scale with your Web App (formerly Websites). So, if you increase your web app instances, you will also increase your web job instances. There are ways to prevent this but that's the default behavior. You could also setup autoscale to automatically scale your web app based on CPU or other performance rules you specify.
It is also possible to scale your web job independently of your web front end (WFE) by deploying the web job to a web app separate from the web app where your WFE is deployed. This has the benefit of not taking up machine resources (CPU, RAM) that your WFE is using while giving you flexibility to scale your web job instances to the appropriate level. Not saying this is what you should do. You will have to do some load testing to determine if this strategy is right (or necessary) for your situation.
You should consider at least the Basic tier for your web app. That would allow you to scale out to 3 instances if you needed to and also removes the CPU and Network I/O limits that the Free and Shared plans have.
As for the queue, I would definitely suggest using the WebJobs SDK and let the JobHost (from the SDK) invoke your web job function for you instead of polling the queue. This is a really slick solution and frees you from having to write the infrastructure code to retrieve messages from the queue, manage message visibility, delete the message, etc. For a working example of this and a quick start on building your web job like this, take a look at the sample code the Azure WebJobs SDK Queues template punches out for you.