Using the ss-id ServiceStack session cookie, I am tracking a user's session and revoking that session when the user has created too many sessions with the same account.
I have a CustomCredentialsAuthProvider that implements this interface:
public interface IUserSessionSource
{
IAuthSession GetUserSession(string userAuthId);
}
Whenever one of my APIs calls GetUserSession in my Auth API, I use the following code to try and get the value of the ss-id cookie:
public IAuthSession GetUserSession(string userAuthId)
{
IRequest req = HostContext.TryGetCurrentRequest();
IAuthSession session = req.GetSession();
}
This works when I run my APIs localhost. As soon as I deploy my APIs in Docker containers HostContext.TryGetCurrentRequest() always returns null.
I am running .NETCore in Linux (CentOS distro) Docker containers.
Any guesses to why HostContext.TryGetCurrentRequest fails "inside" a Docker container?
Is there a more reliable alternate way to get the ss-id cookie value included in the HTTP request to my Auth API?
HostContext.TryGetCurrentRequest() is only available in Hosts which allow accessing the HttpContext at runtime which by default is only classic ASP.NET Framework Apps.
Ideally you should avoid using singleton access to the Request Context and pass it in from base.Request in your Services instead, but for .NET Core App's you can register HttpContextAccessor in your Startup ConfigureServices() but it incurs a perf hit:
services.AddSingleton<IHttpContextAccessor, HttpContextAccessor>();
Related
I am building an ASP NET Core web application that will perform a delete operation for a user on a remote datastore. Currently, I have a frontend web app that communicates with Azure Functions to delete a user. I have a concern with security. How can I make sure the user is the logged-in user? Currently, in my ASP Net Core Web App, I have the user authenticate with AAD using Microsoft as an Identity Provider. From a client-side, the user is verified and taken care of. However, my app calls the Azure Functions endpoints. Is there an extra level of security that I could add. I only want to give my web app (registered in Azure) the ability to call the endpoints.
There are two main ways to authenticate your users. One is to use the App Services authentication options: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/configure-authentication-provider-aad. This is by far the easier method.
If you need more control over things than what is available in the service, then you can implement validation within the Function itself as Thiago mentioned. Ben Morris did a fairly detailed post on how to implement your own OAUTH provider inside your Function App with C#: https://www.ben-morris.com/custom-token-authentication-in-azure-functions-using-bindings/ If you can take care of the validation in the Function's DI container, validation inside a specific function is fairly clean as seen in the post:
public class ExampleHttpFunction
{
private readonly IAccessTokenProvider _tokenProvider;
public ExampleHttpFunction(IAccessTokenProvider tokenProvider)
{
_tokenProvider = tokenProvider;
}
[FunctionName("ExampleHttpFunction")]
public IActionResult Run(
[HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Anonymous, "get", Route = "example")] HttpRequest req, ILogger log)
{
var result = _tokenProvider.ValidateToken(req);
if (result.Status == AccessTokenStatus.Valid)
{
log.LogInformation($"Request received for {result.Principal.Identity.Name}.");
return new OkResult();
}
else
{
return new UnauthorizedResult();
}
}
}
I will buy anyone a beer who can solve my problem!
As a piece of work I need to update our Identity Server to use an implicit login flow, it was currently using Bearer Token access only. As a part of our architecture we are using Multi-tenancy.
For security reaosns we need to check the tenant header to verify that the user is not impersonating another tenant. To do this from a client perspective we use a custom IProfileService. This gets triggered in the middleware of Identity Server, meaning all is good!
However if I was a user and I wanted to use some form of functionality on Identity Server itself and not an actual client of it, then IProfileService will not be triggered. An example of this would be to revoke access to clients, or even log out.
The GetProfileDataAsync Method on IProfileService is Invoked when the client request additional claims for the user.
germansak on Github Issue here had a similar issue and it was never quite answered (https://github.com/IdentityServer/IdentityServer4/issues/1643)
Leading to my question, how has anyone been able to verify a Tenant on Identity Server itself when they are not going through a Client, but instead Identity Server. If I can't trigger IProfileService I feel as if I'm beat!
Both logout and grants functionality is not part of the identity server 4 core package and they are simply implemented as ASP.NET Core razor views outside of the oauth2 flows.
There are few ways to validate headers therefore, I guess the easiest in my opinion would be to add another middleware.
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app)
{
app.UseMiddleware<TenantHeaderValidationMiddleware>();
...Your other config
}
public class TenantHeaderValidationMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate _next;
public RequestCultureMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
{
_next = next;
}
public async Task InvokeAsync(HttpContext context)
{
string tenantId = Request.Headers["YourTenantIdHeader"];
//do the checking
...Validation logic
//pass request further if correct
await _next(context);
}
}
in an existing Silverlight application,I'm substituting WCF Services with ServiceStack's ones... I've successfully managed to port all the service and tested them..I've got one last point to look at...the authentication
Currently in I use an Asp.NET authentication based on a CustomMembershipProvider that checks with some criteria if a user can access to the application.
In each of my Services method I've something as
public bool DoSomething(int idUser, string prefix)
{
if (!HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.IsAuthenticated) throw new SecurityExeption();
//some computation
return res;
}
And it works fine...
Now I was tring to implement the same thing on ServiceStack,I've created my AuthProvider as follow
public class myAuthProvider : CredentialsAuthProvider
{
public override bool TryAuthenticate(IServiceBase authService, string userName, string password)
{
if (userName == "test" && password == "test")
return true;
return false;
//return base.TryAuthenticate(authService, userName, password);
}
public override void OnAuthenticated(IServiceBase authService, IAuthSession session, IOAuthTokens tokens, Dictionary<string, string> authInfo)
{
authService.SaveSession(session, SessionExpiry);
}
}
And tested it on a sample project (I promise I'll remove test/test before deploying it!)
I've tried to check if HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.IsAuthenticated is valid after I've authenticated via SS Service but I got a false... am I doing something wrong or ServiceStack won't build authentication on asp.net? am I hinering from the wrong AuthProvider? I wish to have all the asp.net feauter persisted as sliding period/session timeout via web.config and so on
Thanks
Possible Duplicate but may be different because you're on Silverlight.
Use ASP.NET Membership in ServiceStack
Based on Documentation:
"ServiceStack's Authentication, Caching and Session providers are completely new, clean, dependency-free testable APIs that doesn't rely on and is devoid of ASP.NET's existing membership, caching or session provider models."
https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/wiki/Authentication-and-authorization
If you're using a the service stack JsonServiceClient, there is nothing that will automatically fill in any authentication information in your request. Additionally, once you make your service run on ServiceStack, you're opting out of any MS built-in authentication schemes. See Mythz answer on how you can run an ASP.NET site side by side with a shared session and whether that can apply to your situation.
I have a hunch that in your custom Auth Provider, the username and password being passed in to TryAuthenticate is either NULL or empty.
I have an ASP.NET Web API service that runs on a web server with Windows Authentication enabled.
I have a client site built on MVC4 that runs in a different site on the same web server that uses the HttpClient to pull data from the service. This client site runs with identity impersonation enabled and also uses windows authentication.
The web server is Windows Server 2008 R2 with IIS 7.5.
The challenge I am having is getting the HttpClient to pass the current windows user as part of its authentication process. I have configured the HttpClient in this manner:
var clientHandler = new HttpClientHandler();
clientHandler.UseDefaultCredentials = true;
clientHandler.PreAuthenticate = true;
clientHandler.ClientCertificateOptions = ClientCertificateOption.Automatic;
var httpClient = new HttpClient(clientHandler);
My understanding is that running the site with identity impersonation enabled and then building the client in this manner should result in the client authenticating to the service using the impersonated identity of the currently logged in user.
This is not happening. In fact, the client doesn't seem to be authenticating at all.
The service is configured to use windows authentication and this seems to work perfectly. I can go to http://server/api/shippers in my web browser and be prompted for windows authentication, once entered I receive the data requested.
In the IIS logs I see the API requests being received with no authentication and receiving a 401 challenge response.
Documentation on this one seems to be sparse.
I need some insight into what could be wrong or another way to use windows authentication with this application.
Thank You,
Craig
I have investigated the source code of HttpClientHandler (the latest version I was able to get my hands on) and this is what can be found in SendAsync method:
// BeginGetResponse/BeginGetRequestStream have a lot of setup work to do before becoming async
// (proxy, dns, connection pooling, etc). Run these on a separate thread.
// Do not provide a cancellation token; if this helper task could be canceled before starting then
// nobody would complete the tcs.
Task.Factory.StartNew(startRequest, state);
Now if you check within your code the value of SecurityContext.IsWindowsIdentityFlowSuppressed() you will most probably get true. In result the StartRequest method is executed in new thread with the credentials of the asp.net process (not the credentials of the impersonated user).
There are two possible ways out of this. If you have access to yours server aspnet_config.config, you should set following settings (setting those in web.config seems to have no effect):
<legacyImpersonationPolicy enabled="false"/>
<alwaysFlowImpersonationPolicy enabled="true"/>
If you can't change the aspnet_config.config you will have to create your own HttpClientHandler to support this scenario.
UPDATE REGARDING THE USAGE OF FQDN
The issue you have hit here is a feature in Windows that is designed to protect against "reflection attacks". To work around this you need to whitelist the domain you are trying to access on the machine that is trying to access the server. Follow below steps:
Go to Start --> Run --> regedit
Locate HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\MSV1_0 registry key.
Right-click on it, choose New and then Multi-String Value.
Type BackConnectionHostNames (ENTER).
Right-click just created value and choose Modify.
Put the host name(s) for the site(s) that are on the local computer in the value box and click OK (each host name/FQDN needs to be on it's own line, no wildcards, the name must be exact match).
Save everything and restart the machine
You can read full KB article regarding the issue here.
I was also having this same problem. Thanks to the research done by #tpeczek, I developed the following solution: instead of using the HttpClient (which creates threads and sends requests async,) I used the WebClient class which issues requests on the same thread. Doing so enables me to pass on the user's identity to WebAPI from another ASP.NET application.
The obvious downside is that this will not work async.
var wi = (WindowsIdentity)HttpContext.User.Identity;
var wic = wi.Impersonate();
try
{
var data = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(new
{
Property1 = 1,
Property2 = "blah"
});
using (var client = new WebClient { UseDefaultCredentials = true })
{
client.Headers.Add(HttpRequestHeader.ContentType, "application/json; charset=utf-8");
client.UploadData("http://url/api/controller", "POST", Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(data));
}
}
catch (Exception exc)
{
// handle exception
}
finally
{
wic.Undo();
}
Note: Requires NuGet package: Newtonsoft.Json, which is the same JSON serializer WebAPI uses.
The reason why this is not working is because you need double hop authentication.
The first hop is the web server, getting impersonation with Windows authentication to work there is no problem. But when using HttpClient or WebClient to authenticate you to another server, the web server needs to run on an account that has permission to do the necessary delegation.
See the following for more details:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2008/06/13/understanding-kerberos-double-hop.aspx
Fix using the "setspn" command:
http://www.phishthis.com/2009/10/24/how-to-configure-ad-sql-and-iis-for-two-hop-kerberos-authentication-2/
(You will need sufficient access rights to perform these operations.)
Just consider what would happen if any server was allowed to forward your credentials as it pleases... To avoid this security issue, the domain controller needs to know which accounts are allowed to perform the delegation.
To impersonate the original (authenticated) user, use the following configuration in the Web.config file:
<authentication mode="Windows" />
<identity impersonate="true" />
With this configuration, ASP.NET always impersonates the authenticated user, and all resource access is performed using the authenticated user's security context.
I have succesfully created a REST web service with Jersey and secured it via java security annotations.
It looks something like this
GET /users/ // gives me all users
GET /users/{id} // gives the user identified by {id}
POST /users/ // creates user
PUT /users/{id} // updates user identified by {id}
DELETE /users/{id} // delete user
I also have setup a realm with two roles: user and admin
I secured all methods so that only admins can access them.
Now i want to give free the PUT /users/{id} and GET /users/{id} methods, so that users can access their own and only their own resources.
Example:
// user anna is logged in and uses the following methods
GET /users/anna // returns 200 OK
GET /users/pete // returns 401 UNAUTHORIZED
Since i could not find a way to configure this through annotations, I am thinking of passing the HTTP request to the corresponding method to check if the user is allowed to access the resource.
It would look something like this for the GET /users/{id} method:
#GET
#Path("/users/{id}")
#RolesAllowed({"admin","user"})
#Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public Response getUser(
#PathParam("id") String id,
#Context HttpServletRequest req
) {
HttpSession session = request.getSession(false);
if (session != null && session.getValue("userID").equals(id))
return getObject(User.class, id);
return Response.status(Status.UNAUTHORIZED).build();
}
I don't like this aproach because i think i would have to add the userID manualy to the session.
Do you know a more elegant way to solve this?
If not how do you add the userid to the session while using form authentication?
EDIT
Thank you Will and Pavel :) Here is my final solution:
#Context
private SecurityContext security;
// ...
#GET
#Path("/users/{id}")
#RolesAllowed({"admin","user"})
#Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public Response getUser(#PathParam("id") String id){
if (security.isUserInRole("user"))
if (security.getUserPrincipal().getName().equals(id))
return getObject(User.class, id);
else
return Response.status(Status.UNAUTHORIZED).build();
else
return getObject(User.class, id);
}
In the HttpServletRequest, you can call getRemoteUser() or getUserPrincipal() to get the identity of the logged in user. You would then continue like you are doing in specifically allowing or denying them access to the particular resource.
Blessed Geek is referring more specifically to the aspect of REST regarding stateless transactions and the use of HTTP authentication. While this is an important point in the larger scope of a REST architecture, it's less relevant to your specific question since you don't specify the type of authentication mechanism you're using against your Java EE app, especially since authentication is a container issue in Java EE, not an application issue.
If you're using basic authentication, then you are using HTTP headers to manage authentication and authorization. If you're using form based authentication, then the container is managing this for you via the servlet session, making the service stateful (since sessions are a stateful artifact).
But this has no bearing on your specific question.
One of the most important aspects of deploying REST is understanding the role of http headers and cookies.
For REST to be practical, you need to deploy an authentication framework.
Read
GWT and Google Docs API.
GWT-Platform login + session management
Read up on Google Federated Login, OAuth and OpenID.
Some of my explanations may be outdated, if they were posted before OAuth 2.0.