Is there a way to hide an entire row, not just a single column, in a grid? I'm tried PXUIField.SetVisible, PXUIField.SetVisibility, PXUISetVisible, and PXUISetVisibility, but none of them seem to work. I know that using PXUIField.SetEnabled(cache, row, false) disabled the entire row, but can I make an entire row invisible?
You need to make sure the row is not returned in the query (could override the view delegate and not return specific rows) or removed from the cache. I don't think there is anything that can hide a row using the UI related calls, but I have never come across the need for this to ever try it.
The usual pattern is to use a PXFilter DataView current DAC record to filter the PXSelect DataView bound to the grid.
The filter fields are often changed on screen directly by the user but you can also set the value of the current filter DAC record programmatically in event handlers to build more complex logic.
public PXFilter<DACFilter> Filter;
public PXSelect<DAC,
Where<DACFilter.field, Equal<Current<DACFilter.fieldFilter>>>> GridDataView;
Related
Can someone advise whether #SetViewInfo can be used with click to sort columnns.
When a view is filtered using #SetViewInfo it removes the column sorting options, thus removing the functionality of the view. Even when resetting to all records the column sorting option is not available, however I have overcome this by opening a second view then opening the original view, messy but it works. I am using View Action Buttons. (Not sure how to store the value in a Check Box Action).
Filtering
#SetViewInfo([SetViewFilter]; "userinitials"; "$80"; 1)
Resetting.
#SetViewInfo([SetViewFilter];"";"$80";1);
#SetTargetFrame("frame");
#Command([OpenView]; "DummyView"); //Needed to get the click to sort back
#Command([OpenView]; "OriginalView")
Also if the view is already sorted on another column, ie not in a categorised state no records are found. I don't want to have to remove the sorting options on my views. The help implies you don't need to have the view categorised. But I cannot get it to work if I don't, ie if I use 0 on an uncategorised view nothing happens.
From Help
isCategory - Number. Boolean value. Required in a Standard Outline view; not for use in Calendar views. 1 indicates that the column in the columnName value is a category. 0 indicates that it is not.
Is the #SetViewInfo limited as I have found or am I missing something?
Any help appreciated.
Yes, #SetViewInfo has limitations. As far as I know, you cannot keep the sorting when you use SetViewFilter. I also believe you need to have the view categorized, at least in older versions of Notes this was the case, if I remember correctly.
Limitations like this is why I personally don't use #SetViewInfo very often (if at all), I try to use other ways to display filtered documents.
One way I have handled it in the past is to use a special form with a rich text field, and then I build a list of filtered documents (e.g. through a search) and render the list of documents in the rich text item.
I use this technique to do that: http://blog.texasswede.com/dynamic-tables-in-classic-notes/
We have a view delegate and we are returning custom results according to the filters specified. Once the result is available the user choose any record, say 3rd and uses it. Next time they might change the filter criteria, and the view delegate returns a different set of result.
Here it seems the grid is auto selecting the record in previous position (3).
how can i reset the selection to the first record?
<View>.Current = <FirstRecordINeed>;
<View>.Cache.ActiveRow = <FirstRecordINeed>;
I have tried setting the activeRow/current in view delegate and the filter row updated event. But doesnt work. Any help?
To get ability to affect grid's ActiveRow you should specify property SyncPositionWithGraph="true" in the px:PXGrid in aspx.
After that you can set <View>.Cache.ActiveRow in the view delegate and it will affect grid.
In the relational controls sample db (xpagesjdbc.nsf) there is an example called JDBC_RowSetDatasource. This uses a view panel and has the check box turned on in the view panel to allow the user to select a document. Then there is a button to delete the selected docs using a simple action, delete selected documents. This deletes the document but until the button with the code that has jdbcData1.acceptChanges() is pressed the changes are not committed and the row shows as to be deleted (first icon column with the isRowDeleted() call to determine the icon).
I am working on a similar situation but with a repeat control. I can delete the row with #jdbcDelete but that is immediate. Looking at the data it shows the row is gone from the data even before acceptChanges() is called.
Since I can't use the simple action to delete selected documents (no view panel) what is the Java equivalent to delete the row in a similar manner? I have tried deleteRow() on both the variable for the data set and for the row but get an error in both cases.
Howard, the simple action just memorizes the primary keys of the records as to be deleted. If you want to simulate that you need to take a similar approach (using a ViewScope variable or bean) to keep track of your "deleted" records and a method that executes the actual deletion.
Smells like a case for a bean
I have a list box where I am trying to get the datafrom the people view in names.nsf.
The first column of the people view is computed and shows Last Name , First Name.
The code below works fine for my list box values but it does not take into consideration the value in the Filter By Column Value. Basiclly the code below acts like the Filter By Column value property does not exist. I know the Filter by Column value property is working because I replaced a repeat control on the page with a computed field and the repeat control is displaying the value excepected but the list box is displaying values from the first document in the view.
Thoughts I had to fix this are:
Use getAllDocumentsByKey to just search the people view but when I do that I lose the column values and I would need to recompute the value, something that I would like to avoid if possible incase the column formula changes.
Use FTSearch but what I really need to do is search that first column only and I am not aware of search operator that searchs a column only. Is there such a thing?
Another thought would be to somehow use the values of a repeat control, as the values for my list box, but I am guessing that this is not possible. I sort of thinking something with a scope varibale but I have not worked that out yet.
A repeat control works. How can I get my code to loop through the doeuments the same way a repeat control does?
And as a side question, is there anyway to tie a pager to a datasource as oppsed to a repeat control.
BTW What I currently do is to build a list box using a few computed fields and a repeat control but what I really want to do is to use a regular xpages list box control.
Here is the code:
var doc:NotesDocument = view1.getFirstDocument();
while (doc != null && count<10)
{
var tmpDoc:NotesDocument = view1.getNextDocument(doc)
ret.push(doc.getColumnValues()[1]);
doc.recycle();
count++;
doc = tmpDoc;
}
Try to use getAllEntriesByKey. This will give You access to column values (through ColumnValue property of view entry).
I'm having this categorized view displayed in a view panel where the category column itself is not shown. Instead I'm displaying a combobox above the viewPanel where users can select from all the categories available (see screenshot below). The combo is bound to a scopeVariable and is refreshing the viewPanel onChange. The viewPanel has a computed categoryFilter reading from the same scopeVar. That all works nicely.
Now I also have implemented an additional wildcard (*) value in the selection list which (if selected) programmatically sets the cat filter to NULL. This way I'm forcing the viewPanel to show all entries. Again, this works fine, but with the drawback that now the view is showing empty rows where the category entries would be shown normally (in the screenshot you see empty rows above each entry, with 2 entries for the category "edcom GmbH" obviously belonging to the same category; those aren't separated by an empty row):
One way to at least hide those empty rows would be through means of css coding. But I would prefer those rows not being rendered at all.
Can this be done at all using a viewPanel, and how? Or do I have to use other controls like a repeat or a dataTable maybe?
Thanks in advance,
Lothar
One "hack" (an ugly one I admit) would be to change your categorization column from Firma to Firma:"--All--" or Firma:"*" and then instead of setting the category filter to NULL you set it to "--All--" (or "*").
The double category hits the indexer, but should do what you need.
Obviously there's no easy way. So meanwhile I'll stick to this css-style solution:
In the view panel und All Properties - data I set var = "entry". Then, under All Properties - styling I set a programatic value for the rowClasses property:
if(entry.isCategory()){
return "rowStyleHidden";
}
return "";
The style class "rowStyleHidden" hides those rows using
display: none;
Don't know yet how this turns out performance-wise, I'll have to observe this once I implement it in a copy of the real database.
You can also switch to a none categorized view, by having the viewname calculated based on the value in combobox.