My favorite editor, geany, has an option "Disk check timeout", after this timeout it checks if someone else has overwritten the file that I'm editing. This is a simple tool to detect if two people work on the same file (we don't use a version control system). Is there an option or a plugin for kdevelop that does the same thing?
Edit: as Zhigalin said KDevelop does the check automatically but only for local files, I need it for files opened using sftp.
In KDevelop this check is always active, you will get a popup as soon as you focus on that file in the editor.
Edit: if you are speaking of remote files than the reply is no, there is no such functionality.
So you have 4 options:
File a proposal here (which probably won't get implemented soon because of few active developers)
Patches are always welcome
[suggested] Start using a version control system like Git, there are even tools to automatically deploy on server when you make commit on a specific branch.
Use AutoFS(FUSE) to mount your server as a local folder.
Related
I've searched in haxelib for a library to use for remotely editing a file on a server using ssh connection with haxe, or listing files in directory..
Has any one done this with haxe?
I want to build a desktop app to create a yaml editor that will change settings files of several servers using a frontend like haxe-ui.
Ok, there are probably a lot of ways you could do it, but I would suggest separating your concerns:
desktop app to create a yaml editor
Ok, that's a fine use case for Haxe / a programming language. Build an editor, check.
change settings files (located on) several servers
Ok, so you have options here. Either
Make the remote files appear as local files via some network file system, or
Copy the files locally, edit them , and copy them back, or
Roll your own network-enabled service that runs on each server, receives commands, and modifies the files.
Random aside: Given that these are settings files, you probably also want to restart some service after changes are made.
I'd say option 2 is the easiest. There are even many ways to do that:
Use scp to both bring the settings files to a local location, edit them locally, and then push them back. And if you setup SSH keys, you won't have to bother with passwords.
Netcat is another tool for pushing bytes (aka files) over the network. It's simpler than scp, but with no security measures.
Or, get creative / crazy, and say, "my settings files will all be stored in a git repo. The 'sync' process will be a push / pull setup."
There are simply lots of ways to get this done.
I'am a linux users and web developer.
Actually I'm using KDE as desktop environment and Kate as IDE.
I'm working for a company and we're using remote sandbox for development.
This is my actual workflow:
Connect to remote sandbox via sftp using Dolphin (file Manager)
Open the file that I want edit and save it
Show the changes in the browser
When I've finish I must copy the file that I've edited from remote to my git local folder and commit changes.
In the past I've used SublimeText with "upload on save" plugin, but I can't actually with Kate.
Is there a better workflow with Linux and Kate (or similar) editors?
Thanks you
In my experience with this setup, the fastest way to work will be to have Konsole (or preferred shell application) open with an SSH connection to the sandbox. Git must be installed on the sandbox for this to work.
Alternatively, you can mount to the filesystem and manage the repository directly from your operating system, but I've found this to be unacceptably slow relative to the size of the repository. Moreover, there's something magical about the way Dolphin mounts to remote filesystems using virtual folders that I could never figure out how to navigate to in a shell. I ended up going back to gvfs so that I had a clear path.
Lastly, Kate is not an IDE - it's just an editor. Not knocking it, it's actually my editor of choice in which I spend half of my life looking at, so you've got a friend in me :) Nevertheless, I'm not aware of a git plug-in for it, but depending on personal preference, I'd bet you're never going to beat the git core console app.
Currently in our repository, there is a conf/ folder that I have svn ignored so as to avoid committing local configuration data. However, now I need to add a new configuration option to this file. From my research, the only answer that seems applicable is to change the project structure and have 'config.conf.default' files that everyone can add new options to, and they must copy that file to 'config.conf' and edit it with their local options and svn ignore it. As this is not my project I am working on I would prefer to find a more 'local' solution if their is one.
Changesets don't seem to be helpful in this situation, and constantly manually backing up, reverting, remaking changes I want sync'd, committing and then restoring each config file doesn't sound fun at all.
I read some posts that TortoiseSVN 1.8+ can do this sort of thing, I'm hoping there's a Linux equivalent.
Looking forward to any advice -- thank you
I do not know for certain, but I will be very surprised to hear that TortoiseSVN can do this. What you are asking for runs counter to everything that SVN (and, I might add, any other version control I'm aware of) works.
A file can be either tracked, in which case any change to it is an interesting change, or untracked, in which case none are. Allowing partially tracked files means the version control cannot know whether the change you just made should or should not be tracked. Allowing this is just asking for trouble.
While, technically, TortoiseSVN might have such a feature as an overlay above SVN, in my experience, that's simply not how Tortoise is built. Their design is very nice in that they are simply an SVN client, honoring the same configurations and semantics as the command line tool (for both Windows and Linux). In fact, the fact that Tortoise, the command line tool and the VisualStudio clients all share the same mode of operation is one of the strong points of the tool set, making the experience of working on Windows just a tiny bit more bearable. I really hope Tortoise have not decided to deviate from that.
I have a owncloud server and the owncloud desktop client.What I want to do is to be able to delete things server wise and have it automatically delete from the pc. The problem is that the owncloud client displays a warning message of "Remove All Files"? with the choices of Remove all files or to keep files when the files are deleted from the server. Is there a way to not have the prompt come up and automatically remove all files?
In the version 2.2.3 (maybe earlier), you can change the configuration file to disable the prompt.
See the code where the prompt is invoked and the code showing the configuration file property.
If you edit (on Windows): c:\Users\myuser\AppData\Owncloud\owncloud.cfg and add the following, under the [General] section, you will no longer get the prompt.
promptDeleteAllFiles=false
The short answer: You cannot change this currently.
The long answer: The dialog was added as a safe-guard because there were cases where you could lose all your files unintentionally, e.g. if your admin re-created your account and left it empty. The client would assume the files had gone and would replicate this (it could not know better), so it would replicate the data removal locally. The code is still there today just to be safe.
If you are fearless, you can patch Folder::slotAboutToRemoveAllFiles(). Alternatively, you could open a bug report so we can solve this for everyone. What is your motivation to be able to do this without a prompt?
PS: The sources can be found on GitHub. URL and build instructions at http://doc.owncloud.org/desktop/1.5/building.html.
I have a script that processes the files that someone drops into ownCloud and it will then move them to the final storage place. However, this prompt stops the client from syncing until I manually log in to acknowledge it... I guess I will learn how to patch this.. Dropbox doesn't do this. Google Drive doesn't do this. But since I can't use cloud services (compliance issues), I have to use this solution until I can build a new secure upload means.
On some of the devices that I am working on, the \Windows directory is not on permanent storage. That is, once the device is rebooted, whatever was written to \Windows is lost. This is particularly problematic for uninstalling programs since wceload.exe (the Windows CE CAB installer program) generates a .unload file and places it in \Windows. The application can be uninstalled before the device is rebooted, but afterward it can't (the "Remove Programs" tool in the control panel comes back with an error about not being able to open the unload file). So how can I get the .unload file to persist across reboots? Is there any way to control where the uninstaller (I believe it is called unload.exe) looks for the .unload file?
I haven't been able to find any good info on this still. It looks like the path to the unload file is hardcoded so the best I can do is make a backup of the unload file. If the user wishes to uninstall they will have to manually copy the file to the \windows directory and then use the uninstall tool in the control panel. Here is more info:
http://www.generation-nt.com/us/answer/wince5-force-wceload-install-unload-into-nonvolatile-memory-help-87676002.html
You can probably keep the .unload file across reboots by copying it to a persistent directory after installing. This directory may vary per device, e.g. \Hard Disk\ramroot\Windows or \Backup\Windows. It will then automatically be copied to the \Windows on reboot. (Although I am not sure whether such a directory and behavior exist for every device.)
To copy this file you need to execute a copy-statement from a custom setup-dll after the install completes. This codeproject-site has a very comprehensive explanation, with screenshots and code.
Simply re-Install application and then un-install from remove programs in control panel.