We have a ServiceStack host, in which we have modularised the services. In addition we have a custom authentication solution based on the Basic Authentication. But what we would like to do is have different authentication methods for different services, maybe based on routes? Is this possible?
Secondly, is it possible to assign a common route prefix based on the service? As I said we have modularised our services, and in the AppHost definition we enter the assemblies of the different services, but is it possible to change the route prefix, i.e. Service1 to localhost/api1/servicemethods, Service2 to localhost/api2/servicemethods etc.?
You can limit that a Service should only authenticate with a specific provider by specifying the provider name in the [Authenticate] attribute, e.g:
[Authenticate(AuthenticateService.ApiKeyProvider)]
public class ApiKeyAuthServices : Service
{
public object Any(ApiKeyOnly request) => ...;
}
[Authenticate(AuthenticateService.JwtProvider)]
public class JwtAuthServices : Service
{
public object Any(JwtOnly request) => ...;
}
Otherwise inside your Service you can inspect how the request was authenticated by looking at base.SessionAs<AuthUserSession>().AuthProvider.
For defining dynamic routes have a look at:
Auto Route Generation Strategies
Dynamically adding Route Attributes
Customizing Defined Routes
Although ServiceStack isn't designed to define different sets of Apps within the same AppHost so if that's what you're trying to do I'd recommend instead having different AppHosts and using the Service Gateway for any Service-to-Service communication.
Many thanks for your reply. I must be doing something fundamentally wrong, even though I have registered two custom authproviders, both based on the BasicAuthProvider, using AuthenticateService.GetAuthProviders() returns an empty array.
This is the code I use to register the AuthProviders, and they both allow me to login, so I know they are working.
Plugins.Add(new AuthFeature(() => new CustomUserSession(),
new IAuthProvider[] {
new RMCredentialsAuthProvider(),
new RMKOTAuthProvider()
}));
The code from one of the custom providers is
public class RMKOTAuthProvider : BasicAuthProvider
{
#region Public Constructors
public RMKOTAuthProvider() : base()
{
}
#endregion Public Constructors
#region Public Methods
public override Task<IHttpResult> OnAuthenticatedAsync(IServiceBase authService, IAuthSession session, IAuthTokens tokens, Dictionary<string, string> authInfo, CancellationToken token = default)
{
session.FirstName = session.UserAuthName;
session.Roles = new List<string>
{
"KOT"
};
authService.SaveSessionAsync(session, SessionExpiry);
return base.OnAuthenticatedAsync(authService, session, tokens, authInfo, token);
}
public override Task<bool> TryAuthenticateAsync(IServiceBase authService, string userName, string password, CancellationToken token = default)
{
try
{
if (userName.IsNullOrEmpty() || password.IsNullOrEmpty())
return Task.FromResult(false);
var result = VerifyUser(username, password);
return Task.FromResult(result);
}
catch (InvalidCastException)
{
return Task.FromResult(false);
}
}
#endregion Public Methods
}
Can you please explain what step I am missing such that GetAuthProviders() can list the providers, and I can use the metadata you described earlier.
Many thanks in advance for your help with this.
I have a Service Fabric asp.net core stateless service which implements custom middleware. In that middleware I need access to my service instance. How would I go about injecting this using asp.net core's built-in DI/IoC system?
public class MyMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate _next;
public MyMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
{
_next = next;
}
public Task Invoke(HttpContext httpContext)
{
// ** need access to service instance here **
return _next(httpContext);
}
}
Someone mentioned accomplishing this using TinyIoC in Web Api 2 in the Apr 20, 2017 Q&A #11 [45:30] with the Service Fabric team. As well that the current recommended method is to use asp.net core.
Any help or examples would be greatly appreciated!
In the asp.net core stateless service that creates the ServiceInstanceListener you can inject the context like this:
protected override IEnumerable<ServiceInstanceListener> CreateServiceInstanceListeners()
{
return new[]
{
new ServiceInstanceListener(serviceContext =>
new WebListenerCommunicationListener(serviceContext, "ServiceEndpoint", (url, listener) =>
{
logger.LogStatelessServiceStartedListening<WebApi>(url);
return new WebHostBuilder().UseWebListener()
.ConfigureServices(
services => services
.AddSingleton(serviceContext) // HERE IT GOES!
.AddSingleton(logger)
.AddTransient<IServiceRemoting, ServiceRemoting>())
.UseContentRoot(Directory.GetCurrentDirectory())
.UseServiceFabricIntegration(listener, ServiceFabricIntegrationOptions.None)
.UseStartup<Startup>()
.UseUrls(url)
.Build();
}))
};
}
Your middleware than can use it like this:
public class MyMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate _next;
public MyMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
{
_next = next;
}
public Task Invoke(HttpContext httpContext, StatelessServiceContext serviceContext)
{
// ** need access to service instance here **
return _next(httpContext);
}
}
For a complete example take a look at this repository: https://github.com/DeHeerSoftware/Azure-Service-Fabric-Logging-And-Monitoring
Points of interest for you:
Setting up the DI: https://github.com/DeHeerSoftware/Azure-Service-Fabric-Logging-And-Monitoring/blob/master/src/WebApi/WebApi.cs
Using context in middleware: https://github.com/DeHeerSoftware/Azure-Service-Fabric-Logging-And-Monitoring/blob/master/src/ServiceFabric.Logging/Middleware/RequestTrackingMiddleware.cs
Dependency injection via constructor works for middleware classes as well as for others. Just add additional parameters to the middleware constructor
public MyMiddleware(RequestDelegate next, IMyService myService)
{
_next = next;
...
}
But also you can add dependency directly to the Invoke method
Documentation: Because middleware is constructed at app startup, not per-request, scoped lifetime services used by middleware constructors are not shared with other dependency-injected types during each request. If you must share a scoped service between your middleware and other types, add these services to the Invoke method's signature. The Invoke method can accept additional parameters that are populated by dependency injection.
public class MyMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate _next;
public MyMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
{
_next = next;
}
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext httpContext, IMyScopedService svc)
{
svc.MyProperty = 1000;
await _next(httpContext);
}
}
I'm currently building a library that contains several OWIN-middlewares. These middlewares should be executed in a certain order. In one of the first releases of OWIN, there was the IAppBuilder interface. However the IAppBuilder is not part of OWIN anymore, but part of Microsoft.Owin. I don't want to force my user(s) to have a dependency on Microsoft.Owin.
What is the preferred way of adding middlewares to the OWIN-pipeline without using Microsoft.Owin?
It took some time, but I think I figured it out.
First the definitions as specified by Owin:
public delegate Task AppFunc(IDictionary<string, object> environment);
public delegate AppFunc MidFunc(AppFunc next);
public delegate MidFunc MidFactory(IDictionary<string, object> startupProperties);
public delegate void BuildFunc(MidFactory midFactory);
I use delegate here to avoid the generics madness.
To go from IAppBuilder to BuildFunc:
public static BuildFunc UseOwin(this IAppBuilder builder)
{
return middleware => builder.Use(middleware(builder.Properties));
}
In order to build a pipeline using BuildFunc, you can create an extension on BuildFunc:
public static BuildFunc UseMyFramework(this BuildFunc buildFunc)
{
buildFunc(startupProperties => BuildPipeline(startupProperties));
return buildFunc;
}
It is a good practice to return the BuildFunc for chaining.
Building the pipeline is nothing more than linking the MidFuncs together and optionally end with the actual AppFunc:
public static MidFunc BuildPipeline(IDictionary<string, object> startupProperties)
{
return next => LogMiddleware(AuthenticateMiddleware(MyApplication));
// Or this if you don't supply your own AppFunc
return next => LogMiddleware(AuthenticateMiddleware(next));
}
public static AppFunc LogMiddleware(AppFunc next)
{
AppFunc middleware = async environment =>
{
// Log request
await next(environment);
};
return middleware;
}
public static AppFunc AuthenticateMiddleware(AppFunc next)
{
AppFunc middleware = async environment =>
{
// authenticate request
await next(environment);
};
return middleware;
}
public static async Task MyApplication(IDictionary<string, object> environment)
{
await Task.CompletedTask;
}
You still need to connect the Owin implementation to your framework. I use Microsoft.Owin for this:
app.UseOwin().UseMyFramework()
How can I pass along auditing information between clients and services in an easy way without having to add that information as arguments for all service methods? Can I use message headers to set this data for a call?
Is there a way to allow service to pass that along downstream also, i.e., if ServiceA calls ServiceB that calls ServiceC, could the same auditing information be send to first A, then in A's call to B and then in B's call to C?
There is actually a concept of headers that are passed between client and service if you are using fabric transport for remoting. If you are using Http transport then you have headers there just as you would with any http request.
Note, below proposal is not the easiest solution, but it solves the issue once it is in place and it is easy to use then, but if you are looking for easy in the overall code base this might not be the way to go. If that is the case then I suggest you simply add some common audit info parameter to all your service methods. The big caveat there is of course when some developer forgets to add it or it is not set properly when calling down stream services. It's all about trade-offs, as alway in code :).
Down the rabbit hole
In fabric transport there are two classes that are involved in the communication: an instance of a IServiceRemotingClient on the client side, and an instance of IServiceRemotingListener on the service side. In each request from the client the messgae body and ServiceRemotingMessageHeaders are sent. Out of the box these headers include information of which interface (i.e. which service) and which method are being called (and that's also how the underlying receiver knows how to unpack that byte array that is the body). For calls to Actors, which goes through the ActorService, additional Actor information is also included in those headers.
The tricky part is hooking into that exchange and actually setting and then reading additional headers. Please bear with me here, it's a number of classes involved in this behind the curtains that we need to understand.
The service side
When you setup the IServiceRemotingListener for your service (example for a Stateless service) you usually use a convenience extension method, like so:
protected override IEnumerable<ServiceInstanceListener> CreateServiceInstanceListeners()
{
yield return new ServiceInstanceListener(context =>
this.CreateServiceRemotingListener(this.Context));
}
(Another way to do it would be to implement your own listener, but that's not really what we wan't to do here, we just wan't to add things on top of the existing infrastructure. See below for that approach.)
This is where we can provide our own listener instead, similar to what that extention method does behind the curtains. Let's first look at what that extention method does. It goes looking for a specific attribute on assembly level on your service project: ServiceRemotingProviderAttribute. That one is abstract, but the one that you can use, and which you will get a default instance of, if none is provided, is FabricTransportServiceRemotingProviderAttribute. Set it in AssemblyInfo.cs (or any other file, it's an assembly attribute):
[assembly: FabricTransportServiceRemotingProvider()]
This attribute has two interesting overridable methods:
public override IServiceRemotingListener CreateServiceRemotingListener(
ServiceContext serviceContext, IService serviceImplementation)
public override IServiceRemotingClientFactory CreateServiceRemotingClientFactory(
IServiceRemotingCallbackClient callbackClient)
These two methods are responsible for creating the the listener and the client factory. That means that it is also inspected by the client side of the transaction. That is why it is an attribute on assembly level for the service assembly, the client side can also pick it up together with the IService derived interface for the client we want to communicate with.
The CreateServiceRemotingListener ends up creating an instance FabricTransportServiceRemotingListener, however in this implementation we cannot set our own specific IServiceRemotingMessageHandler. If you create your own sub class of FabricTransportServiceRemotingProviderAttribute and override that then you can actually make it create an instance of FabricTransportServiceRemotingListener that takes in a dispatcher in the constructor:
public class AuditableFabricTransportServiceRemotingProviderAttribute :
FabricTransportServiceRemotingProviderAttribute
{
public override IServiceRemotingListener CreateServiceRemotingListener(
ServiceContext serviceContext, IService serviceImplementation)
{
var messageHandler = new AuditableServiceRemotingDispatcher(
serviceContext, serviceImplementation);
return (IServiceRemotingListener)new FabricTransportServiceRemotingListener(
serviceContext: serviceContext,
messageHandler: messageHandler);
}
}
The AuditableServiceRemotingDispatcher is where the magic happens. It is our own ServiceRemotingDispatcher subclass. Override the RequestResponseAsync (ignore HandleOneWay, it is not supported by service remoting, it throws an NotImplementedException if called), like this:
public class AuditableServiceRemotingDispatcher : ServiceRemotingDispatcher
{
public AuditableServiceRemotingDispatcher(ServiceContext serviceContext, IService service) :
base(serviceContext, service) { }
public override async Task<byte[]> RequestResponseAsync(
IServiceRemotingRequestContext requestContext,
ServiceRemotingMessageHeaders messageHeaders,
byte[] requestBodyBytes)
{
byte[] userHeader = null;
if (messageHeaders.TryGetHeaderValue("user-header", out auditHeader))
{
// Deserialize from byte[] and handle the header
}
else
{
// Throw exception?
}
byte[] result = null;
result = await base.RequestResponseAsync(requestContext, messageHeaders, requestBodyBytes);
return result;
}
}
Another, easier, but less flexible way, would be to directly create an instance of FabricTransportServiceRemotingListener with an instance of our custom dispatcher directly in the service:
protected override IEnumerable<ServiceInstanceListener> CreateServiceInstanceListeners()
{
yield return new ServiceInstanceListener(context =>
new FabricTransportServiceRemotingListener(this.Context, new AuditableServiceRemotingDispatcher(context, this)));
}
Why is this less flexible? Well, because using the attribute supports the client side as well, as we see below
The client side
Ok, so now we can read custom headers when receiving messages, how about setting those? Let's look at the other method of that attribute:
public override IServiceRemotingClientFactory CreateServiceRemotingClientFactory(IServiceRemotingCallbackClient callbackClient)
{
return (IServiceRemotingClientFactory)new FabricTransportServiceRemotingClientFactory(
callbackClient: callbackClient,
servicePartitionResolver: (IServicePartitionResolver)null,
traceId: (string)null);
}
Here we cannot just inject a specific handler or similar as for the service, we have to supply our own custom factory. In order not to have to reimplement the particulars of FabricTransportServiceRemotingClientFactory I simply encapsulate it in my own implementation of IServiceRemotingClientFactory:
public class AuditedFabricTransportServiceRemotingClientFactory : IServiceRemotingClientFactory, ICommunicationClientFactory<IServiceRemotingClient>
{
private readonly ICommunicationClientFactory<IServiceRemotingClient> _innerClientFactory;
public AuditedFabricTransportServiceRemotingClientFactory(ICommunicationClientFactory<IServiceRemotingClient> innerClientFactory)
{
_innerClientFactory = innerClientFactory;
_innerClientFactory.ClientConnected += OnClientConnected;
_innerClientFactory.ClientDisconnected += OnClientDisconnected;
}
private void OnClientConnected(object sender, CommunicationClientEventArgs<IServiceRemotingClient> e)
{
EventHandler<CommunicationClientEventArgs<IServiceRemotingClient>> clientConnected = this.ClientConnected;
if (clientConnected == null) return;
clientConnected((object)this, new CommunicationClientEventArgs<IServiceRemotingClient>()
{
Client = e.Client
});
}
private void OnClientDisconnected(object sender, CommunicationClientEventArgs<IServiceRemotingClient> e)
{
EventHandler<CommunicationClientEventArgs<IServiceRemotingClient>> clientDisconnected = this.ClientDisconnected;
if (clientDisconnected == null) return;
clientDisconnected((object)this, new CommunicationClientEventArgs<IServiceRemotingClient>()
{
Client = e.Client
});
}
public async Task<IServiceRemotingClient> GetClientAsync(
Uri serviceUri,
ServicePartitionKey partitionKey,
TargetReplicaSelector targetReplicaSelector,
string listenerName,
OperationRetrySettings retrySettings,
CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
var client = await _innerClientFactory.GetClientAsync(
serviceUri,
partitionKey,
targetReplicaSelector,
listenerName,
retrySettings,
cancellationToken);
return new AuditedFabricTransportServiceRemotingClient(client);
}
public async Task<IServiceRemotingClient> GetClientAsync(
ResolvedServicePartition previousRsp,
TargetReplicaSelector targetReplicaSelector,
string listenerName,
OperationRetrySettings retrySettings,
CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
var client = await _innerClientFactory.GetClientAsync(
previousRsp,
targetReplicaSelector,
listenerName,
retrySettings,
cancellationToken);
return new AuditedFabricTransportServiceRemotingClient(client);
}
public Task<OperationRetryControl> ReportOperationExceptionAsync(
IServiceRemotingClient client,
ExceptionInformation exceptionInformation,
OperationRetrySettings retrySettings,
CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
return _innerClientFactory.ReportOperationExceptionAsync(
client,
exceptionInformation,
retrySettings,
cancellationToken);
}
public event EventHandler<CommunicationClientEventArgs<IServiceRemotingClient>> ClientConnected;
public event EventHandler<CommunicationClientEventArgs<IServiceRemotingClient>> ClientDisconnected;
}
This implementation simply passes along anything heavy lifting to the underlying factory, while returning it's own auditable client that similarily encapsulates a IServiceRemotingClient:
public class AuditedFabricTransportServiceRemotingClient : IServiceRemotingClient, ICommunicationClient
{
private readonly IServiceRemotingClient _innerClient;
public AuditedFabricTransportServiceRemotingClient(IServiceRemotingClient innerClient)
{
_innerClient = innerClient;
}
~AuditedFabricTransportServiceRemotingClient()
{
if (this._innerClient == null) return;
var disposable = this._innerClient as IDisposable;
disposable?.Dispose();
}
Task<byte[]> IServiceRemotingClient.RequestResponseAsync(ServiceRemotingMessageHeaders messageHeaders, byte[] requestBody)
{
messageHeaders.SetUser(ServiceRequestContext.Current.User);
messageHeaders.SetCorrelationId(ServiceRequestContext.Current.CorrelationId);
return this._innerClient.RequestResponseAsync(messageHeaders, requestBody);
}
void IServiceRemotingClient.SendOneWay(ServiceRemotingMessageHeaders messageHeaders, byte[] requestBody)
{
messageHeaders.SetUser(ServiceRequestContext.Current.User);
messageHeaders.SetCorrelationId(ServiceRequestContext.Current.CorrelationId);
this._innerClient.SendOneWay(messageHeaders, requestBody);
}
public ResolvedServicePartition ResolvedServicePartition
{
get { return this._innerClient.ResolvedServicePartition; }
set { this._innerClient.ResolvedServicePartition = value; }
}
public string ListenerName
{
get { return this._innerClient.ListenerName; }
set { this._innerClient.ListenerName = value; }
}
public ResolvedServiceEndpoint Endpoint
{
get { return this._innerClient.Endpoint; }
set { this._innerClient.Endpoint = value; }
}
}
Now, in here is where we actually (and finally) set the audit name that we want to pass along to the service.
Call chains and service request context
One final piece of the puzzle, the ServiceRequestContext, which is a custom class that allows us to handle an ambient context for a service request call. This is relevant because it gives us an easy way to propagate that context information, like the user or a correlation id (or any other header information we want to pass between client and service), in a chain of calls. The implementation ServiceRequestContext looks like:
public sealed class ServiceRequestContext
{
private static readonly string ContextKey = Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
public ServiceRequestContext(Guid correlationId, string user)
{
this.CorrelationId = correlationId;
this.User = user;
}
public Guid CorrelationId { get; private set; }
public string User { get; private set; }
public static ServiceRequestContext Current
{
get { return (ServiceRequestContext)CallContext.LogicalGetData(ContextKey); }
internal set
{
if (value == null)
{
CallContext.FreeNamedDataSlot(ContextKey);
}
else
{
CallContext.LogicalSetData(ContextKey, value);
}
}
}
public static Task RunInRequestContext(Func<Task> action, Guid correlationId, string user)
{
Task<Task> task = null;
task = new Task<Task>(async () =>
{
Debug.Assert(ServiceRequestContext.Current == null);
ServiceRequestContext.Current = new ServiceRequestContext(correlationId, user);
try
{
await action();
}
finally
{
ServiceRequestContext.Current = null;
}
});
task.Start();
return task.Unwrap();
}
public static Task<TResult> RunInRequestContext<TResult>(Func<Task<TResult>> action, Guid correlationId, string user)
{
Task<Task<TResult>> task = null;
task = new Task<Task<TResult>>(async () =>
{
Debug.Assert(ServiceRequestContext.Current == null);
ServiceRequestContext.Current = new ServiceRequestContext(correlationId, user);
try
{
return await action();
}
finally
{
ServiceRequestContext.Current = null;
}
});
task.Start();
return task.Unwrap<TResult>();
}
}
This last part was much influenced by the SO answer by Stephen Cleary. It gives us an easy way to handle the ambient information down a hierarcy of calls, weather they are synchronous or asyncronous over Tasks. Now, with this we have a way of setting that information also in the Dispatcher on the service side:
public override Task<byte[]> RequestResponseAsync(
IServiceRemotingRequestContext requestContext,
ServiceRemotingMessageHeaders messageHeaders,
byte[] requestBody)
{
var user = messageHeaders.GetUser();
var correlationId = messageHeaders.GetCorrelationId();
return ServiceRequestContext.RunInRequestContext(async () =>
await base.RequestResponseAsync(
requestContext,
messageHeaders,
requestBody),
correlationId, user);
}
(GetUser() and GetCorrelationId() are just helper methods that gets and unpacks the headers set by the client)
Having this in place means that any new client created by the service for any aditional call will also have the sam headers set, so in the scenario ServiceA -> ServiceB -> ServiceC we will still have the same user set in the call from ServiceB to ServiceC.
what? that easy? yes ;)
From inside a service, for instance a Stateless OWIN web api, where you first capture the user information, you create an instance of ServiceProxyFactoryand wrap that call in a ServiceRequestContext:
var task = ServiceRequestContext.RunInRequestContext(async () =>
{
var serviceA = ServiceProxyFactory.CreateServiceProxy<IServiceA>(new Uri($"{FabricRuntime.GetActivationContext().ApplicationName}/ServiceA"));
await serviceA.DoStuffAsync(CancellationToken.None);
}, Guid.NewGuid(), user);
Ok, so to sum it up - you can hook into the service remoting to set your own headers. As we see above there is some work that needs to be done to get a mechanism for that in place, mainly creating your own subclasses of the underlying infrastructure. The upside is that once you have this in place, then you have a very easy way for auditing your service calls.
I know that the services get wired-up by instantiating the BasicAppHost, and the IoC by using the ConfigureContainer property, but where is the right place to add the filters? The test in question never fire the global filter:
[TestFixture]
public class IntegrationTests
{
private readonly ServiceStackHost _appHost;
public IntegrationTests()
{
_appHost = new BasicAppHost(typeof(MyServices).Assembly)
{
ConfigureContainer = container =>
{
//
}
};
_appHost.Plugins.Add(new ValidationFeature());
_appHost.Config = new HostConfig { DebugMode = true };
_appHost.GlobalRequestFilters.Add(ITenantRequestFilter);
_appHost.Init();
}
private void ITenantRequestFilter(IRequest req, IResponse res, object dto)
{
var forTennant = dto as IForTenant;
if (forTennant != null)
RequestContext.Instance.Items.Add("TenantId", forTennant.TenantId);
}
[TestFixtureTearDown]
public void TestFixtureTearDown()
{
_appHost.Dispose();
}
[Test]
public void CanInvokeHelloServiceRequest()
{
var service = _appHost.Container.Resolve<MyServices>();
var response = (HelloResponse)service.Any(new Hello { Name = "World" });
Assert.That(response.Result, Is.EqualTo("Hello, World!"));
}
[Test]
public void CanInvokeFooServiceRequest()
{
var service = _appHost.Container.Resolve<MyServices>();
var lead = new Lead
{
TenantId = "200"
};
var response = service.Post(lead); //Does not fire filter.
}
}
ServiceStack is set at 4.0.40
Updated
After perusing the ServiceStack tests (which I highly recommend BTW) I came across a few example of the AppHost being used AND tested. It looks like the "ConfigureAppHost" property is the right place to configure the filters, e.g.
ConfigureAppHost = host =>
{
host.Plugins.Add(new ValidationFeature());
host.GlobalRequestFilters.Add(ITenantRequestFilter);
},
ConfigureContainer = container =>
{
}
Updated1
And they still don't fire.
Updated2
After a bit of trial and error I think it's safe to say that NO, the filters are not hooked up while using the BasicAppHost. What I have done to solve my problem was to switch these tests to use a class that inherits from AppSelfHostBase, and use the c# servicestack clients to invoke the methods on my service. THIS does cause the global filters to be executed.
Thank you,
Stephen
No the Request and Response filters only fire for Integration Tests where the HTTP Request is executed through the HTTP Request Pipeline. If you need to test the full request pipeline you'd need to use a Self-Hosting Integration test.
Calling a method on a Service just does that, i.e. it's literally just making a C# method call on a autowired Service - there's no intermediate proxy magic intercepting the call in between.