I have a products.impex file with an attribute gender=MALE or FEMALE in the itemtype MyProduct(which extends Product) I have an attribute "choice" which depends on the values in the gender column so I initially wrote a PrepareInterceptor and checked for isNew condition.Now it works fine for the new rows but when the value is changed it does not work.Should I just remove the isNew condition or use InitDefaultsInterceptor?
if (ctx.isRemoved(productModel))
{
//TODO
}
else if (ctx.isNew(productModel) || ctx.isModified(productModel, ProductModel.GENDER))
{
//TODO
}
As far as interceptor concern, you can use PrepareInterceptor for preparing fields value as it called before ValidateInterceptor. If you just want to validate your fields then use ValidateInterceptor. The Init Defaults Interceptor is called when a model is filled with its default values.
Have a look at interceptor life cycle.
Related
I created a custom table with additional settings for customers. Next I added a field to the customer core table in which I'd like to store the id choice per customer. I extended with EntityExtensionInterface the customerDefinition :
public function extendFields(FieldCollection $collection): void
{
$collection->add(
(new OneToOneAssociationField(
'customerSetting',
'customer_setting',
'id',
WdtCustomerSettingsDefinition::class,
true
))->addFlags(new Inherited())
);
}
public function getDefinitionClass(): string
{
return CustomerDefinition::class;
}
When I manually manipulate the customer table, with an id from my custom table in the added field, I can retrieve and use the settings from my custom table in the storefront.
For the backend I created a single select to the entity custom_table,
<sw-entity-single-select entity="wdt_customer_settings" v-model="customer.extensions.customerSetting.id" >
</sw-entity-single-select>
and with the manually 'injected' id from the custom table, this choice indicates indeed 'selected' However, after changing to another choice and saving results in an error: Customer could not be saved.
What am I missing?
You should look always to the ajax responses. There is the explict error which is occured. Do you added some boilerplate code to check that your extensions is always available? Otherwise it would cause issues on new entities
I would like to use the "setter" function from the "filteredValue" property from the Data Table (PrimeFaces) to apply custom filtering logic... The problem is that the setter function always receives a null value and, if I use the value collection to filter, the filter operation isnt reflected in the datatable !.
publiv void setFilteredOrg(List filteredOrg) {
// filteredOrg always null
// I apply custom filtering against the value
return the filtered collection but the UI isnt filtered
}
Hope I make myself understood; I fear of pasting the code... But I can see if its confusing...
in your column use filterMatchMode='custom' and filterFunction='customFilter'
customFilter is a javascript function that you defined
function customFilter(itemLabel, filterValue) {
//return true to accept and false to reject
}
my cscockpit is displaying let says"125.00PHP" in price value.
Is there any config parameter or impex to change to "PHP125.00"?
You need to customize the widget corresponding to this layout.
For the same, you need to extend de.hybris.platform.cscockpit.widgets.renderers.impl.BasketTotalsWidgetRendererand override renderOrderDetail method of AbstractOrderTotalsWidgetRenderer
You need to change the below code block as per your requirement
NumberFormat currencyInstance = (NumberFormat) getSessionService()
.executeInLocalView(
new SessionExecutionBody(cartCurrencyModel) {
public Object execute() {
AbstractOrderTotalsWidgetRenderer.this
.getCommonI18NService()
.setCurrentCurrency(
this.val$cartCurrencyModel);
return AbstractOrderTotalsWidgetRenderer.this
.getFormatFactory()
.createCurrencyFormat();
}
});
We Have Contact Entities in contact Entitie one lookup filed company Name in that lookup having two values 1.Account and 2.Contact . When we are selecting contact show the address filed when we select account hide the address filed we needs to write the plugin to Execute that works. Kindly any one help me on the same.
Thanks!!
Rajesh Singh
First, if you need to make change on a form, you can't use plug-ins. Plug-ins are made for bussinees logics, like Update another record when the first one is created, make complex logic, etc...
What you need it is a javascript that executes on the OnLoad of the form and OnChange event in that OptionSet.
The lines you are looking for are:
function ShowField()
{
// The field is present on the form so we can access to its methods
var optionSet = Xrm.Page.getAttribute("custom_attribute");
if (optionSet == undefined)
{
return;
}
// The control is present on the form so we can access to its methods
var controlAddress = Xrm.Page.getControl("custom_address");
if (controlAddress == undefined)
{
return;
}
var valueOptionSet = optionSet.getValue(); // This is the value you set creating the OptionSet
switch (valueOptionSet)
{
case 0: // Your account value, show
controlAddress.setVisible(true);
case 1: // Your contact value, hide
controlAddress.setVisible(false);
default:
return;
}
}
You need to register a web resource and register the event, if you need more information about the code or why this stuff is here and why this not just tell me.
Im using subsonic 2.2
I tried asking this question another way but didnt get the answer i was looking for.
Basically i ususally include validation at page level or in my code behind for my user controls or aspx pages. However i haev seen some small bits of info advising this can be done within partial classes generated from subsonic.
So my question is, where do i put these, are there particular events i add my validation / business logic into such as inserting, or updating. - If so, and validation isnt met, how do i stop the insert or update. And if anyone has a code example of how this looks it would be great to start me off.
Any info greatly appreciated.
First you should create a partial class for you DAL object you want to use.
In my project I have a folder Generated where the generated classes live in and I have another folder Extended.
Let's say you have a Subsonic generated class Product. Create a new file Product.cs in your Extended (or whatever) folder an create a partial class Product and ensure that the namespace matches the subsonic generated classes namespace.
namespace Your.Namespace.DAL
{
public partial class Product
{
}
}
Now you have the ability to extend the product class. The interesting part ist that subsonic offers some methods to override.
namespace Your.Namespace.DAL
{
public partial class Product
{
public override bool Validate()
{
ValidateColumnSettings();
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(this.ProductName))
this.Errors.Add("ProductName cannot be empty");
return Errors.Count == 0;
}
// another way
protected override void BeforeValidate()
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(this.ProductName))
throw new Exception("ProductName cannot be empty");
}
protected override void BeforeInsert()
{
this.ProductUUID = Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
}
protected override void BeforeUpdate()
{
this.Total = this.Net + this.Tax;
}
protected override void AfterCommit()
{
DB.Update<ProductSales>()
.Set(ProductSales.ProductName).EqualTo(this.ProductName)
.Where(ProductSales.ProductId).IsEqualTo(this.ProductId)
.Execute();
}
}
}
In response to Dan's question:
First, have a look here: http://github.com/subsonic/SubSonic-2.0/blob/master/SubSonic/ActiveRecord/ActiveRecord.cs
In this file lives the whole logic I showed in my other post.
Validate: Is called during Save(), if Validate() returns false an exception is thrown.
Get's only called if the Property ValidateWhenSaving (which is a constant so you have to recompile SubSonic to change it) is true (default)
BeforeValidate: Is called during Save() when ValidateWhenSaving is true. Does nothing by default
BeforeInsert: Is called during Save() if the record is new. Does nothing by default.
BeforeUpdate: Is called during Save() if the record is new. Does nothing by default.
AfterCommit: Is called after sucessfully inserting/updating a record. Does nothing by default.
In my Validate() example, I first let the default ValidatColumnSettings() method run, which will add errors like "Maximum String lenght exceeded for column ProductName" if product name is longer than the value defined in the database. Then I add another errorstring if ProductName is empty and return false if the overall error count is bigger than zero.
This will throw an exception during Save() so you can't store the record in the DB.
I would suggest you call Validate() yourself and if it returns false you display the elements of this.Errors at the bottom of the page (the easy way) or (more elegant) you create a Dictionary<string, string> where the key is the columnname and the value is the reason.
private Dictionary<string, string> CustomErrors = new Dictionary<string, string>
protected override bool Validate()
{
this.CustomErrors.Clear();
ValidateColumnSettings();
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(this.ProductName))
this.CustomErrors.Add(this.Columns.ProductName, "cannot be empty");
if (this.UnitPrice < 0)
this.CustomErrors.Add(this.Columns.UnitPrice, "has to be 0 or bigger");
return this.CustomErrors.Count == 0 && Errors.Count == 0;
}
Then if Validate() returns false you can add the reason directly besides/below the right field in your webpage.
If Validate() returns true you can safely call Save() but keep in mind that Save() could throw other errors during persistance like "Dublicate Key ...";
Thanks for the response, but can you confirm this for me as im alittle confused, if your validating the column (ProductName) value within validate() or the beforevalidate() is string empty or NULL, doesnt this mean that the insert / update has already been actioned, as otherwise it wouldnt know that youve tried to insert or update a null value from the UI / aspx fields within the page to the column??
Also, within asp.net insert or updating events we use e.cancel = true to stop the insert update, if beforevalidate failes does it automatically stop the action to insert or update?
If this is the case, isnt it eaiser to add page level validation to stop the insert or update being fired in the first place.
I guess im alittle confused at the lifecyle for these methods and when they come into play