Imported/Copied Opportunity shift one line - acumatica

Lines are shifting with custom fields in the Opportunity Products grid one row down at a customized site.
Background:
We have a customization which provides unit margins and % in the header. PXFormula is used on the DAC for any dependent on a calculation.
Opportunity Products has 4 added fields:
Last Cost = Last Cost from InventoryItem
Total Cost = Qty * Last Cost
Margin = ExtAmt - ExtCost
Manual Cost, a checkbox to allow manual override of Last Cost
Opportunity has 2 added fields:
Margin Total = Sum of Margins
Margin % = Margin Total/Sales Total
Problem:
There is an issue with a customization Opportunities where lines shift one line when a record is copied from an existing Opportunity or when an Excel file is imported.
Existing Record
After Copy/Paste or Import from Excel
Code:
My current code:
public PXSelect<INItemCost,
Where<INItemCost.inventoryID,
Equal<Current<CROpportunityProducts.inventoryID>>>> Cost;
protected void CROpportunityProducts_RowInserting(PXCache cache,
PXRowInsertingEventArgs e, PXRowInserting InvokeBaseHandler)
{
if(InvokeBaseHandler != null)
InvokeBaseHandler(cache, e);
var row = (CROpportunityProducts)e.Row;
if (row == null) return;
var rowExt = cache.GetExtension<CROpportunityProductsExt>(row);
if (rowExt == null) return;
var cost = Cost.SelectSingle();
if (cache.GetValue(row, "usrManCost") == null) return;
if (cost != null && (bool)cache.GetValue(row, "usrManCost") == false)
{
cache.SetValueExt<CROpportunityProductsExt.usrLastCost>(row, cost.LastCost);
}
}
What could be causing this? I have thoughts that the RowInserting event returns 0 for the first line since the PXSelect<> statement returns 0 because InventoryItem is not in cache until the next row.
One potential solution I came up with was using RowInserted. This resolves the issue when using Copy/Paste. However, it causes Import from Excel to miscalculate Total Margin.

Could be the Current<> on your view is not really the current you need?
What happens if you simply replace the var cost = Cost.SelectSingle() line with the following to use Required<> as pass in the Inventory ID...
INItemCost cost = PXSelect<INItemCost,
Where<INItemCost.inventoryID, Equal<Required<CROpportunityProducts.inventoryID>>>>
.Select(Base, row.inventoryID);

The answer is because events in this case must be done in the RowSelecting event handler, along with PXConnectionScope().
Brendan was on the right track moving the PXSelect into the handler. My code in the question becomes the below. Also, note use of Required<> versus Current<>.
public void CROpportunityProducts_RowSelecting(PXCache cache,
PXRowSelectingEventArgs e)
{
var row = (CROpportunityProducts)e.Row;
if (row == null) return;
using (new PXConnectionScope())
{
INItemCost cost = PXSelect<INItemCost,
Where<INItemCost.inventoryID,
Equal<Required<INItemCost.inventoryID>>>>.Select(Base, row.InventoryID);
if (cost != null && (bool)cache.GetValue(row, "usrManCost") == false)
{
//decimal dbLastCost = (decimal)cost.LastCost;
var lstCost = cache.GetValue(row, "usrLastCost");
if ((decimal)cost.LastCost == (decimal)0.00)
{
cache.SetValueExt<CROpportunityProductsExt.usrLastCost>(row,
cost.LastCost);
}
}
}
}

Related

CodedUI "FindMatchingControls()" works 10% of the time but usually returns about half of the controls

Problem: I am using FindMatchingControls() to create a Collection of rows in a WPF table. I have written a loop that will set the ComboBox in each row to a given value. The whole thing works sometimes but more often than not, FindMatchingControls() actually finds about half of the rows. How can I configure timeouts or change settings to make it find all 50 controls every time or perhaps to find the first 10 and then to find the next 10 etc?
Background: I am testing a WPF window and on it, there's a table, each row in the table has a drop down list. There are 50 rows and in future there could be more so it is not feasible for me to record the setting of each one, my recorded test would be out of date with each new version (every month or so).
I have therefore recorded the setting of 1 ComboBox and then I used FindMatchingControls() to create a Collection. I loop through the Collection setting each ComboBox in that collection to the desired selection. The first 23 rows are shown on my current screen resolution. The only problem is that FindMatchingControls() sometimes returns 23, sometimes 26 , sometimes 34 and sometimes it returns all 50 rows! My question is, how do I fix the code below so that it always return all 50 rows (and possibly more in future).
You can see from the code that I found the Parent control twice so pseudo code is below.
Psuedo Code:
1) Find Parent Container (table)
2) Define a row (that is a child of the parent table)
3) Use FindMatchingControls to get a Collection of Rows
4) Loop through the Collection, finding the ComboBox in each row and setting it's selection to a value passed into the method.
CODE:
public void PlaceAnOrderScreen_SelectItems_List(String item /*Value to set all 50 ComboBoxes to*/)
{
WpfControl rowOfOrderItems = new WpfControl(this.UIOptimalOrderSystemClientShWindow.UIItemCustom22.UIListViewAutoID37Table);
rowOfOrderItems.SearchProperties[WpfControl.PropertyNames.ControlType] = "DataItem";
rowOfOrderItems.SearchProperties[WpfControl.PropertyNames.ClassName] = "Uia.ListViewItem";
rowOfOrderItems.WindowTitles.Add("Order Management System");
rowOfOrderItems.Find();
rowOfOrderItems.DrawHighlight(); //Visible diagnostic
//should get a collection of 50 controls ...
//... but this is dodgy, it sometimes finds 23, 26, 34 or ocassionaly all 50 controls.
//There are 23 visible controls and the rest, you have to scroll down to see.
UITestControlCollection itemRows = rowOfOrderItems.FindMatchingControls();
int c = 0;
int i = 1;
string label = String.Empty;
foreach (var auditSelectionBox in itemRows)
{
//After the top 15 drop down selections have been made, strat scrolling down.
//This is because setting the Value for a list box that is off the screen
//causes it to complain the control is blocked...
if (c >= 15)
{
if (i >= 3) //The scroll wheel moves 3 rows at a time, so only scroll once for every 3 rows...
{
Mouse.MoveScrollWheel(-1);
i = 0;
}
}
i++;
c++;
WpfCell auditDDL1 = new WpfCell(auditSelectionBox);
auditDDL1.SearchProperties[WpfCell.PropertyNames.ColumnHeader] = "Total";
auditDDL1.WindowTitles.Add("OrderSystem 5");
//Works but takes 5 - 16 seconds per drop down list
auditDDL1.Value = item;
}
}
Instead of trying to find matching controls based on another row, you could use a method that takes the parent (in your case the table) and returns all it's children in a recursive way. It digs all the way down until all available children have been found. It shouldn't matter how much row's your table has, it will try and get all of them. It's usable for any UITestControl.
public ParentControl GetChildControls(UITestControl parentControl)
{
ParentControl parent = new ParentControl();
if (parentControl != null)
{
List<ParentControl> children = new List<ParentControl>();
foreach (UITestControl childControl in parentControl.GetChildren())
{
children.Add(GetChildControls(childControl));
}
parent.Children = new KeyValuePair<UITestControl, List<ParentControl>>(parentControl, children);
}
return parent;
}
The parent class
public class ParentControl
{
public KeyValuePair<UITestControl, List<ParentControl>> Children { get; set; }
public string Value
{
get
{
return Children.Key.Name;
}
}
}
I just added the Value property for easy access to the name of UITestControl.
PixelPlex (above) has provided the best answer. All I had to add to PixelPlex's code was an If statement to set the ComboBox to a value when it was found. The foreach is therefore as below in my case ...
foreach (UITestControl childControl in parentControl.GetChildren())
{
children.Add(GetChildControls(childControl));
//Added below If statement to set ComboBox selected item to "Carrots"...
if (childControl.ClassName == "Uia.ComboBox")
{
WpfComboBox cb = (WpfComboBox)childControl;
cb.SelectedItem = "Carrots";
}
}
This selects Carrots from my ComboBox... Everything that does not satisfy my If statement is not relevant so I don't do anything with it.

Adding an image to only one node within a Tree View

I'm currently working on modifying a Tree View control (Telerik MVC Extensions) for a customer request. Their request is a simple one: if an item within the tree has an Attachment, add a paperclip beside the node to identify it.
I have so far been able to do so but, found a small hiccup with this. I can add the image to certain nodes that have an Attachment, however, all nodes that don't should have no image (by that, I mean they should appear normal within the tree). Instead though, I find that the tree places a blank the size of the paperclip image.
Is there a way to dynamically turn off this blank (aka not add an Image Url if unnecessary)? Below is my code where I'm executing this process (is done on the expansion method of the tree due that only the bottom level shows the Attachments).
Navigation Controller
[AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)]
public ActionResult GetNextTreeViewLevel(TreeViewItem node)
{
...
//If bottom layer, then execute the following
var data = _TreeRepo.GetProcessesByParcel(int.Parse(values[1]), cntTreeList);
nodes = from item in data
select new TreeViewItem
{
Text = item.strProcess,
Value = "PR" + "," + item.cntProcess.ToString(),
LoadOnDemand = false,
Enabled = true,
Selected = SelectedSearchResult.ToString().Length > 0
&& SelectedSearchResult.ToString().Split('~').Length > 3
&& decimal.Parse(SelectedSearchResult.ToString()
.Split('~')
.Last()
.Substring(2)) == item.cntProcess
ImageUrl = item.ysnHasAttachment.HasValue && item.ysnHasAttachment.Value == 1
? #"/Content/NewImages/attachment.png"
: string.Empty
};
return new JsonResult { Data = nodes };
}
Screen shots of what it looks like without/with code for Image Url:
I at long last came up with a solution to this issue. The problem was how I was getting my data added to the nodes. The original logic was doing a Linq query after fetching the data to get an IEnumerable object.
Because of that, every node was trying to add an image (even if there was none). Hence the weird looking space. Below is how I reworked this logic to correctly get my data.
var processNodes = new List<TreeViewItem>();
var data = _TreeRepo.GetProcessesByParcel(int.Parse(values[1]), cntTreeList);
foreach (var item in data)
{
#region Process has at least one Attachment
if (item.ysnHasAttachment.HasValue && item.ysnHasAttachment.Value == 1)
processNodes.Add(new TreeViewItem
{
Text = item.strProcess,
Value = "PR" + "," + item.cntProcess.ToString(),
LoadOnDemand = false,
Enabled = true,
Selected = SelectedSearchResult.ToString().Length > 0
&& SelectedSearchResult.ToString().Split('~').Length > 3
&& decimal.Parse(SelectedSearchResult.ToString()
.Split('~')
.Last()
.Substring(2)) == item.cntProcess,
ImageUrl = "/Content/NewImages/smallAttachment.png"
});
#endregion
#region Process has no Attachments
else
processNodes.Add(new TreeViewItem
{
Text = item.strProcess,
Value = "PR" + "," + item.cntProcess.ToString(),
LoadOnDemand = false,
Enabled = true,
Selected = SelectedSearchResult.ToString().Length > 0
&& SelectedSearchResult.ToString().Split('~').Length > 3
&& decimal.Parse(SelectedSearchResult.ToString()
.Split('~')
.Last()
.Substring(2)) == item.cntProcess
}
#endregion
}
nodes = processNodes;
At this point, you can now return the nodes. Those that should have had an Attachment icon will, and those that shouldn't won't. Funny how 4 months later, you can come up with something off the cuff.

Conditional Formatting for items created in the last 5 minutes in SharePoint 2010

All,
I've been looking all day and have tried numerous solutions, but just can't get it to work. Our team projects a list that is constantly updated and we want to highlight only newly created items for 5 minutes. After 5 minutes, the row would return to normal. (FYI- the list is projected on a display and updated using AJAX asynchronous update every 15 seconds)
Basically, I want to set conditional formatting on list items created in the last 5 minutes. If the item was created in the last 5 minutes, the row will be highlighted. After the 5 minutes are up, the row would return to normal.
I tried SharePoint Designer conditional formatting by creating a calculated column in Date/Time format called "Created + 5" and tried to set an expression where the formatting is applied (row is highlighted) when "Created + 5" is greater than or equal to current date. So after 5 minutes, the row will no longer be highlighted (because the current date/time will exceed the "Created + 5" value)
Here is the expression from the SPD Advanced Condition Builder:
ddwrt:DateTimeTick(ddwrt:GenDisplayName(string($thisNode/#Created_x0020__x002b__x0020_5_x))) >=
ddwrt:DateTimeTick(ddwrt:GenDisplayName(string($Today)))
I think the problem is that the [Current Date] option ($Today in the expression builder) only accounts for date and not time. It looks like it just ends up highlighting everything that was created today, which is not very useful.
Any thoughts or help!? I have never messed with the advanced conditions because usually the basic stuff works fine for me! If anyone has any other ideas too like JavaScript or anything else that would work, I am open to that too as long as it will continuously update!
Thanks all!!!!
[Today] actually doesn't work properly in 2010, there are some workarounds though, e.g. https://abstractspaces.wordpress.com/2008/05/19/use-today-and-me-in-calculated-column/.
You can also use the approach with calculated column: https://blog.splibrarian.com/2012/06/06/using-calculated-columns-to-add-color-coding-to-your-sharepoint-lists/
Since you want this to update automatically without requiring someone to manually refresh the page, JavaScript is your best bet. You can have a function run repeatedly on a specified interval, checking the current date against the values in a date column.
Something like the following code would work, though you may need to tweak the CSS selectors specified in the calls to document.querySelector and querySelectorAll to match your particular HTML.
<script>
formatCell();
function formatCell(){
var frequencyToCheck = 2 /* num seconds between updates */
var minutes = 5; /* num minutes back to highlight */
var targetColumn = "Display name of the column you want to check";
var formatting = "background-color:darkred;color:red;font-weight:bold;";
var comparisonDate = new Date();
comparisonDate.setHours(comparisonDate.getHours() - minutes);
var tables = document.querySelectorAll("table.ms-listviewtable"); /* should get all list view web parts on the page */
var t_i = 0;
while(t_i < tables.length){
var headings = tables[t_i].rows[0].cells;
var columnIndex = null;
var h_i = 0;
while(h_i < headings.length){
var heading = headings[h_i].querySelector("div:first-child");
if(heading != null){
var displayName = heading.DisplayName ? heading.DisplayName : (heading.innerText ? heading.innerText : heading.textContent);
displayName = displayName.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/g,''); /* removes leading and trailing whitespace */
if(displayName === targetColumn){
columnIndex = h_i;
break;
}
}
h_i += 1;
}
if(columnIndex != null){ /* we found a matching heading */
var rows = tables[t_i].rows;
for(var i = (rows.length > 0 ? 1 : 0); i < rows.length; i++){
var cells = rows[i].children;
if(cells.length <= columnIndex){continue;}
var valueToEval = cells[columnIndex].innerText ? cells[columnIndex].innerText : cells[columnIndex].textContent;
if(typeof valueToEval == "undefined"){valueToEval = "";}
valueToEval = new Date(valueToEval);
if(valueToEval > comparisonDate){
cells[columnIndex].setAttribute("style",formatting);
}else{
cells[columnIndex].setAttribute("style","");
}
}
}
t_i +=1;
}
setTimeout(formatCell,frequencyToCheck * 1000);
}
</script>
One potential pitfall is that while this approach will "age" records appropriately based on their displayed values (causing them to stop being highlighted as they grow stale), it won't automatically pick up new changes to the list; you'd need to refresh the page (or at least refresh the view in the web part) whenever you want to see updated information.

Selecting DataGridViewRow at a selected Index

I am having problems selecting a row out of the DataGridView on a search. The data source is a DataTable from a database. I am using a search box that checks the DataGridView for a product matching the product key, and i want to select it if found.
Here is what i have:
private void search_btn_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
foreach (DataGridViewRow row in products_dgv.Rows)
{
string tempCode = row.Cells[0].Value.ToString(); //Code comparing
if (tempCode == code_tb.Text) //Checks if code matchs the search code
{
//I would like to do a products_dgv.selectedIndex = row.Index but it
//doesnt work
break;
}
}
}
Any help is much appreciated. Thank You!
You can use the CurrentCell property of the DataGridView to set the selection. If you are using FullRowSelect as selection mode, just use any cells in the row that you would like to select.
For example:
...
if (tempCode == code_tb.Text) //Checks if code matchs the search code
{
products_dgv.CurrentCell = row.Cells[0];
break;
}
...

How do I read data from a spreadsheet using the OpenXML Format SDK?

I need to read data from a single worksheet in an Excel 2007 workbook using the Open XML SDK 2.0. I have spent a lot of time searching for basic guidelines to doing this, but I have only found help on creating spreadsheets.
How do I iterate rows in a worksheet and then iterate the cells in each row, using this SDK?
The other answer seemed more like a meta-answer. I have been struggling with this since using LINQ does work with separated document parts. The following code includes a wrapper function to get the value from a Cell, resolving any possible string lookups.
public void ExcelDocTest()
{
Debug.WriteLine("Running through sheet.");
int rowsComplete = 0;
using (SpreadsheetDocument spreadsheetDocument =
SpreadsheetDocument.Open(#"path\to\Spreadsheet.xlsx", false))
{
WorkbookPart workBookPart = spreadsheetDocument.WorkbookPart;
foreach (Sheet s in workBookPart.Workbook.Descendants<Sheet>())
{
WorksheetPart wsPart = workBookPart.GetPartById(s.Id) as WorksheetPart;
Debug.WriteLine("Worksheet {1}:{2} - id({0}) {3}", s.Id, s.SheetId, s.Name,
wsPart == null ? "NOT FOUND!" : "found.");
if (wsPart == null)
{
continue;
}
Row[] rows = wsPart.Worksheet.Descendants<Row>().ToArray();
//assumes the first row contains column names
foreach (Row row in wsPart.Worksheet.Descendants<Row>())
{
rowsComplete++;
bool emptyRow = true;
List<object> rowData = new List<object>();
string value;
foreach (Cell c in row.Elements<Cell>())
{
value = GetCellValue(c);
emptyRow = emptyRow && string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(value);
rowData.Add(value);
}
Debug.WriteLine("Row {0}: {1}", row,
emptyRow ? "EMPTY!" : string.Join(", ", rowData));
}
}
}
Debug.WriteLine("Done, processed {0} rows.", rowsComplete);
}
public static string GetCellValue(Cell cell)
{
if (cell == null)
return null;
if (cell.DataType == null)
return cell.InnerText;
string value = cell.InnerText;
switch (cell.DataType.Value)
{
case CellValues.SharedString:
// For shared strings, look up the value in the shared strings table.
// Get worksheet from cell
OpenXmlElement parent = cell.Parent;
while (parent.Parent != null && parent.Parent != parent
&& string.Compare(parent.LocalName, "worksheet", true) != 0)
{
parent = parent.Parent;
}
if (string.Compare(parent.LocalName, "worksheet", true) != 0)
{
throw new Exception("Unable to find parent worksheet.");
}
Worksheet ws = parent as Worksheet;
SpreadsheetDocument ssDoc = ws.WorksheetPart.OpenXmlPackage as SpreadsheetDocument;
SharedStringTablePart sstPart = ssDoc.WorkbookPart.GetPartsOfType<SharedStringTablePart>().FirstOrDefault();
// lookup value in shared string table
if (sstPart != null && sstPart.SharedStringTable != null)
{
value = sstPart.SharedStringTable.ElementAt(int.Parse(value)).InnerText;
}
break;
//this case within a case is copied from msdn.
case CellValues.Boolean:
switch (value)
{
case "0":
value = "FALSE";
break;
default:
value = "TRUE";
break;
}
break;
}
return value;
}
Edit: Thanks #Nitin-Jadhav for the correction to GetCellValue().
The way I do this is with Linq. There are lots of sample around on this subject from using the SDK to just going with pure Open XML (no SDK). Take a look at:
Office Open XML Formats: Retrieving
Excel 2007 Cell Values (uses pure
OpenXML, not SDK, but the concepts
are really close)
Using LINQ to Query Tables in Excel
2007 (uses Open XML SDK, assumes
ListObject)
Reading Data from SpreadsheetML
(probably best "overall introduction"
article)

Resources