I'm using mermaid js to produce a gantt chart. In the documentation it shows how to set tasks relative to the completion of the prior task using "after x", for example:
section A section
Completed task :done, des1, 2014-01-06,2014-01-08
Active task :active, des2, 2014-01-09, 3d
Future task : des3, after des2, 5d
Future task2 : des4, after des3, 5d
Is there any equivalent for setting a task to before a subsequent deadline? I tried replacing "after" with "before" but that didn't work
Right, mermaid syntax does not support the "before" qualifier, only the "after" qualifier.
Some options to consider are depicted in the "Gantt chart" section on the mermaid-diagrams page of diagrams.net.
title Example Gantt diagram
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
section Team 1
Research & requirements :done, a1, 2020-03-08, 2020-04-10
Review & documentation : after a1, 20d
section Team 2
Implementation :crit, active, 2020-03-25 , 20d
Testing :crit, 20d
Use an end date value - like 2020-04-10 for "Research & requirements" task
Use a fixed time duration - like 20d for "Review & documentation" task
Mark the task with ":crit" - like "Implementation" to indicate a "critical path" task
You can also apply the "after" qualifier on the tasks that follow the earlier task that is to be completed before those other tasks.
Related
I have modified some VB sample code to get most of what I need done using the QuickBooks SDK in an app launched from Excel using VBA. I am able to produce both a Time by Job Summary report and a Job Estimates vs. Actuals report, but for the latter I need to produce filtered copies of it for each customer:job reference number, and I'm not sure what the proper syntax is for this even after looking over the specific query in the API Reference for QB Desktop.
I'm fairly sure that this needs to be done during the request phase. Also, I'm using QBFC, so I have tried various combinations that seem logical, but still haven't received the desired output. If it helps, an example of what is needed for the filter would be like: 20-5050 Dan Barton Trucks. Below is my code for the request:
Set jobRQ = requestSet.AppendJobReportQueryRq
customerRef = "20-5050 Dan Barton Trucks"
With jobRQ
.JobReportType.SetValue ENJobReportType.jrtJobEstimatesVsActualsSummary
.ReportEntityFilter.ORReportEntityFilter.EntityTypeFilter.SetValue etfCustomer
' .ReportEntityFilter.ORReportEntityFilter.FullNameList.Add (customerRefID)
.ORReportPeriod.ReportPeriod.FromReportDate.SetValue dateFrom
.ORReportPeriod.ReportPeriod.ToReportDate.SetValue dateTo
.SummarizeColumnsBy.SetValue scbTotalOnly
.IncludeSubcolumns.SetValue True
.DisplayReport.SetValue True
End With
I have commented out the line that doesn't work.
I am needing to check that our Master Schedule is reflecting all physical work that falls into our SOW(Statement of Work).
I have a sheet that does this fairly simply, but I want to make it a simple cut and paste from our Schedule export, and that way it reflects that it is looking at current data vs data from several months ago.
I can handle the date part, but I can't seem to get the logic in my head right for how I should reference the data to double-check compliance.
Each SOW Paragraph has a number assigned to it, and that is what each task would refer to.
Activity Type
Activity ID
CAM
WBS
OBS
% Complete
SOW
ASAP
49.3.4.2.3.2.030
Pam
77.4.1.2
C.11.1
20%
1.0
ASAP
C2_4.20.010.011
Shaun
77.3.1
C.5.4.2
15%
3.6.1.2
ASAP
C2_4.20.010.012
Shaun
77.3.1
C.5.4.2
0%
3.6.1.2
ASAP
69.HP.5.1.2.15.30
Mark
77.1.1
C.11.1
50%
3.2
ASAP
C2_6.1.5.15
Brett
77.2.1
C.3.2.1
100%
5.0
ASAP
C2_2.10.55
Susan
77.2.1
C.5.4.1
60%
6.0
ASAP
29.3.2.11.1.20
Eric
77.4.1
C.11.1
20%
1.0
ASAP
1Z.DIL.0025
Adam
77.1.1
C.1.1
10%
1.1.2
Say this image is an export from our schedule.
I need to make sure that those SOW numbers are lined up with the full SOW for just the ID numbers with a C2. Below would be the example result.
SOW Number
In Master Schedule?
1.0
No
1.1
No
1.1.1
Yes
1.1.2
No
1.1.3
No
3.0
No
3.2
No
3.3
No
3.5
No
3.6
No
3.6.1
No
3.6.1.2
Yes
4.0
No
5.0
Yes
5.1
No
5.2
No
6.0
Yes
The logic I'm trying to figure out with the formulas is:
If A# is in MS_Tab $G:$G, does the ID number start with a C2? If Yes, list "Yes" under "In MS?", else list "No"
I tried to do a VLOOKUP first and of course, that is incorrect since it only looks for the first instance of the search. Then I thought of doing a VLOOKUPpaired with an HLOOKUP, but that still falls into the same problem. I read I could do Index and Match, but I haven't been able to get the logic to work for me.
Note: I cannot change the ID's to make my life easier, this is using an excel export from our master schedule.
I am using taskwarrior together with conky and to make the format look nicer, I want to modify, what information is actually given by taskwarrior.
In particular, I do not want it to display the "Age" column of a task.
Right now it looks like this:
ID Age Due Description Urg
1 33min 1d Do Stuff 8.33
but I want it to look more like this:
ID Due Description Urg
1 1d Do Stuff 8.33
Is there an easy way of doing this?
Thanks in advance!
Add the following lines to the file ~/.taskrc:
report.report1.description=Report without age attribute
report.report1.columns=id,due,description,urgency
Then you can run task report1 to view the report.
I prefer to edit the default reports. With this command:
task show report
You will get the configuration of all the reports. The default report of task command is report.next, so you can put this in your .taskrc without entry.age:
report.next.columns=id,start.age,depends,priority,project,tags,recur,scheduled.countdown,due.relative,until.remaining,description,urgency
report.next.labels=ID,Active,Deps,P,Project,Tag,Recur,S,Due,Until,Description,Urg
Now the task command will show the next report without the Age.
I would like to set the deadline for a task to be end of day tomorrow. The following was my first attempt:
task add 'Ask question about tw on StackOverflow' due:tomorrow eod
That fails, resulting in eod being appended to the description:
21 4s 14h Ask question about tw on StackOverflow eod 8.52
Is there a concise way of doing that? From the docs it seems hardcoding the date/time may be the only way: https://taskwarrior.org/docs/dates.html
You can do it like this:
task add 'Ask question about tw on StackOverflow' due:tomorrow+24h
Note that you can also abbreviate tomorrow with tom which would make the command
task add 'Ask question about tw on StackOverflow' due:tom+24h
See calc command documentation for more examples of the uses of arithmetic operators in Taskwarrior.
When creating different task lists in Markdown for Gitlabs templates, Gitlabs consider all the tasks from checklist as an individual count and shows count as total number of tasklist.
Like for below template -
## PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [X] The commit message follows our guidelines:
- [X] Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
- [ ] Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
## PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
- [X] Bugfix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Code style update (formatting, local variables)
- [X] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
- [ ] Build related changes
- [ ] CI related changes
- [ ] Documentation content changes
- [ ] angular.io application / infrastructure changes
- [ ] Other... Please describe:
## Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
It shows 5 of the 14 tasks completed. Ideally, I only want first three task lists to be considered as a task by Gitlabs and it should show 2 of the 3 tasks completed. Please let me know if there is something in the markdown or Gitlabs by which I can achieve the desired output.
Do not use task list syntax for things for non-tasks.
See the vendor documentation for task lists.
You can use labels to categorize issues with regard to feature vs bug fix, or breaking versus non-breaking change.
As already pointed out, the docs on task lists specify that a "task" will always add to the task counter.
If you want to keep a similar formatting to encourage users to mark which items apply, then you can use parentheses like so:
- ( ) task
The formatting is not as pretty, but it'll work.