I have external App Service Environment (ASE) with three web apps (A,B,C) deployed inside.
Is it possible to limit the external access (from internet - I want to access them only when connected to the VNet with P2S/S2S VPN) to two of the web apps (A,B), while the other web app (C) is publicly accessible from internet through Azure WAF? If this is possible, how NSGs configuration may look like?
I understand that it is possible to deploy ILB ASE, but I want to minimize the number of deployed ASEs and If possible to achieve this segregation of access with one ASE.
Related
I have an Azure Web App and an Azure SQL Server, both in the same subscription. Both of them are connected to the same VNet Subnet as shown in the below snapshots. The SQL Server is configured not to Allow Azure Resources and Services to access the server, as it should only permit access from either the connected subnet or a set of IP rules.
Unfortunately, the SQL Server is actively refusing any connection from the web app stating that the web app IP is not allowed to access the server.
The interesting thing is that I have the exact same configuration working on another subscription.
What could I be missing?
Snapshots:
1- Here you can see the web application connected to the "webapps" subnet
2- And here you can see the SQL Server connected to the same subnet
3- And that's the error I get
TLDR
The configuration is correct, but an app service restart may be required.
VNET Integration
The configuration of using a virtual network to connect a web app to a SQL database is correct: if the web app is connected to the same subnet/vnet which is allowed in the database's ACLs, and the Microsoft.Sql service endpoint is enabled on the subnet, the web app is able to communicate to the database. This is the whole reason for service endpoints: you do not need to configure with IP allowances on the database.
As to why the configuration still resulted in an error, it could be the order in which the resources were configured. We were experiencing the exact same setup and issue (which is what let me to this question)!
We connected our web app to the subnet/vnet but had not enabled the service endpoint on the subnet. We then added/allowed the subnet/vnet as an ACL in the database, during which we were prompted to enable the Microsoft.Sql service endpoint (we did). However, even after waiting ~20 minutes, we were still seeing the same connection issue.
However, once we restarted the app service, the issue went away and the web app could connect to the SQL database.
I suspect the issue is due to enabling the subnet's service endpoint after the app service was connected to the subnet. The app service must need a restart to refresh the app service's vnet config/routing.
Configuration NOT needed
Contrary to other answers, you do not need to configure firewall IP allowances nor enable access to Azure services and resources. In fact, there are downsides to both approaches:
Enabling access to Azure services and resources allows any Azure-based resource to connect to your database, which includes resources not owned by you. From doc:
This option configures the firewall to allow all connections from Azure, including connections from the subscriptions of other customers.
Unless you're using an App Service Environment (which is significantly more expensive than normal App Service plans), your web app's outbound IP addresses are neither static nor specific to your application. From doc:
Azure App Service is a multi-tenant service, except for App Service Environments. Apps that are not in an App Service environment (not in the Isolated tier) share network infrastructure with other apps. As a result, the inbound and outbound IP addresses of an app can be different, and can even change in certain situations.
The second point is further elaborated upon in this Github issue:
IPs are indeed shared with other App Service plans (including other customer's plans) that are deployed into the same shared webspace. The network resources are shared among the plans in a workspace even if the computing instances are dedicated (e.g. in Standard tier). This is inherent to the App Service multi-tenant model. The only way to have a dedicated webspace (i.e. outbound IPs) is to deploy an App Service plan into an App Service Environment (ASE) (i.e. Isolated tier). ASE is the only thing that offers true single-tenency in App Service.
So neither of the above options will truly harden your SQL database if you want to isolate communication from only your web app. If you have resources in the same subnet, using vnet integration is the correct way to solve the problem.
If resources cannot be in the same subnet, the solution is to use Private Endpoints.
Virtual networking in Azure is quite different from how it would work on premises.
I had similar problems in production environment and digging deep, the working solution (meeting security standards and create a secure connection to the database) was to create a private endpoint for SQL access in the virtual network. Then all the calls to the SQL were performed internally (it did not go on the internet), and the databases were denying all public calls.
In your case now, you deactivated the Allow Azure apps to access so when your app is trying to access the SQL the server checks the ip to find out if it is white listed or not. So fast solutions would be one of the following:
Enable Azure Web apps to access SQL
Find all outbound IPs of your web app and register them in you SQL firewall/ security settings.
If you talk about a proper production environment with security regulations I would suggest you go down the more tedious path of private endpoints.
You have to configure the outbound IPs from the app service in the sql fw.
You can find them under properties of your app service. Documentation.
The reason why is that the VNET integration doesn't give your app service an outbound IP in the VNET you configured it in, so the FW you configured doesn't work.
I have working web apps which access storage accounts and KVs. These storage accounts and KVs accept traffic from a particular subnet and the web apps have been configured to integrate with those subnets. I did face an issue where even after integration apps were not able to access these resources. What worked for me was, I changed the App service SKU from Standard to Premium and restarted the app. As you can see, it warns that "Outgoing IPs of your app might change". This is not guaranteed solution but it worked for me.. several times! Not sure about SQL server though. Private endpoint does seem like the way to go but you can give this a try.
I have been messing around with Azure trying to get a web app up and running. My plan was to create a WAF and site the web app behind that, each in a seperate subnet and then to use the service endpoint tech to point the web app to a database.
I have been stopped in my tracks almost straight away with the revelation that if i want to use a WAF in front of the web app i have to configure the networking in the web app but when i choose a vnet it says that no gateway is configured for the selected VNET.
My question being is do i have to use point to site VPN to get this setup working? i thought that it would work like
INTERNET ---> VNET ----> subnet ----> WAF -----> subnet -----> web app ----> service endpoint ------> DB
but that doesnt seem to be the case. I am not keen on the idea of having to install a client certificate on every machine in our network that might want to access this website (it is currently internal). I suppose i am looking for the best of both worlds. Accessible from the internet but having the added comfort of having something like a WAF sat in front of it to make up for any security inadequacies which might exist somewhere in said app.
Thanks
As far as I know, you could not deploy a web app in a VNet unless you are using the App Service Environment(Isolated). App VNet integration could not do it. It allows you to securely access resources in a VNet. For example, you have a database on an Azure VM in a private VNet. You could not access it from Azure web app to this database if this database is not available publicly, but you could reach it via app VNet integration.
VNet service endpoints is another different service. Endpoints allow you to secure your critical Azure service resources to only your virtual networks. If you enable such service endpoint like Azure SQL database( which differs from the database on Azure VMs) in a VNet, this means only the resource in these authorized VNets could access your SQL database unless you add an exclusion like the public IP address in the firewall of the database.
In this case, you could put a Public facing Azure app gateway at the high level of the web app service, then add the Azure app gateway public IP in the IP restriction of the web app.This will restrict to access to web app via Azure web app gateway over the Internet. Also, you could control the network inbound and outbound in Azure app gateway subnet NSG. See Network security groups on the Application Gateway subnet if you want to add an NSG to the app gateway subnet level. I think these are enough if you just want to create a WAF and site the web app behind that.
Furthermore, if you want to let web app privately access the Azure SQL database. You could deploy a web app in an ASE, then enable the VNet service endpoint for Azure SQL database. App VNet integration does not need to use it with the service endpoint.
If you want to use Azure WAF with Azure App Service (multi-tenant) you can, you just need to ensure you are supplying the host header with your request.
If you want you Azure Web App on a VNet, you will need to run your Azure Web App on an App Service Environment (Isolated). This version of Azure Web App is more expensive but allows you to apply NSG's to the VNet to fully control access to your web app. Personally I think WAF w/ Azure App Service (multi-tenant) should meet your needs.
We have it all documented here:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-gateway/application-gateway-web-app-overview
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-gateway/configure-web-app-portal
I have a web app that is currently deployed in an App Service Environment. One of the advantages of this is the security offered by the VNet within which the ASE resides.
Unfortunately this is a very expensive option for a low traffic solution (currently costing approx. £1500 a month). Is there an alternative solution that offers the same level of security as the ASE solution, e.g. is it possible to deploy a standard Web App to a VNet?
Yes and no.
A way to do that would be to use VNet integration of a WebApp. Unfortunately, it doesn't isolate the WebApp from the internet (that can be done via the webconfig). The other problem is that it only allows the webapp to access resources inside the VNet, not vice-versa. For that you would have to allow resources to access WebApp from the internet.
No other way currently.
It is not possible to deploy an Azure web app to a VNET (allowing for 2-way communication) without using App Service Environment (ASE). If you want your web app to only be available to internal systems, you'd have to rely on IIS ipSecurity config (https://www.iis.net/configreference/system.webserver/security/ipsecurity).
Essentially, whitelist all allowed public IPs (from the systems accessing the website). This might get difficult to maintain, so you might want to investigate a reverse proxy type solution either deployed in IaaS, or use AppGateway, or use a 3rd party such as incapsula/silverline.
As it has already been mentioned, Azure Web App cannot be added to your VNET. There is a VNET integration option which allows it to act as a P2S client, however it may not be acceptable in all scenarios. Here are the alternate options:
Azure Cloud Services (PaaS)
Azure Virtual Machines (IaaS)
App Service Environment (Expensive)
I think the best option would be cloud services as it can sit inside a VNET and provide some benefits of being a PaaS based service. Refer here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-in/azure/cloud-services/
I have a .NET Web Api project with several REST endpoints that I only want accessed by resources from within an Azure virtual network I have created. Resources such as Azure Functions and Azure Web Roles will access these endpoints only. In other words, I do not want the endpoints publicly available.
So, I configured the Web Api application with my virtual network but apparently I also need to add the Web Api application to an Application Service Environment (which are quite costly from what I have read). To quote the Azure documentation:
VNET Integration gives your web app access to resources in your virtual network but does not grant private access to your web app from the virtual network.
Do I indeed need to use an Application Service Environment and just deal with the costs or is there another way I can achieve what I want?
I do not want the endpoints publicly available.
Until now, Azure web app only supports for using an internal load balancer with the app service environment feature. If you want to make your Web API can only be accessed internally. An app service environment is required.
If you don't want to move your Web API to app service environment and your Azure function and web role have fixed ip addresses, you could configure the IP whitelist using ipSecurity configuration in your web API. For more information of ipSecurity, link below is for your reference.
IP and Domain Restrictions for Windows Azure Web Sites
We are having multiple web apps running on Azure using PaaS offering.
The requirement is, though all the hosted applications(web apps) are accessible all over the internet, still only a specific number of users (say IPs) will only be allowed to do FTP on the Azure cloud environment.
I need some advise on how to achieve that.
Azure offers NSG for complete isolation and full control over managing inbound / outbound traffic to the Web apps but we believe to implement NSG, we need to implement Virtual Network and ASE before that.
but then, if all the web apps resides under the VNET, then whoever will access the applications will be needing to have VNET client in their local machines.
Kindly guide me on this.