Im losing it, I feel like im doing this right BUT cant figure out why this simple test fails
I got a feature file like so
Scenario: List all accounts in the tenant
Given that Keith has navigated to the tenant account list
When he views the accounts in the table that include name, name, name
Then he should also see 1,2,3 in the list
I got a definition file like so
this.When(/^(.*?) views the accounts in the table that include (.*)$/, (name: string, accountInformation: string) => {
return stage.theActorCalled(name).attemptsTo(
ViewAllAccountNames.inTheTableOf(listOf(accountInformation)),
);
});
I got a pageObject file like so
export class AccountTable {
// static displayingAll = Text.ofAll(AccountListUI.accountListView);
// static isDisplayingAllNames = Text.ofAll(Target.the('account names in the table').located(by.css('table tbody tr td:nth-child(2)')));
static AccountNames = Target.the('account names in the table').located(by.css('table tbody tr td:nth-child(2)'));
static AccountNumbers = Target.the('account numbers in the table').located(by.css('table tbody tr td:nth-child(1)'));
static isDisplayingAllNames = Text.ofAll(AccountTable.AccountNames);
static isDisplayingAllNumbers = Text.ofAll(AccountTable.AccountNumbers);
}
here is my class that does the work
constructor(private accName: string[]) {
}
static inTheTableOf(accName: string) {
return new ViewAllAccountNames(accName);
}
performAs(actor: PerformsTasks): PromiseLike<void> {
return actor.attemptsTo(
See.if(AccountTable.isDisplayingAllNames, items => expect(items).to.eventually.contain(this.accName))
);
}
}
when i debug through webstorm inside class ViewAllAccountNames i get
static inTheTableOf(accName: string) { accName: Array(3)
return new ViewAllAccountNames(accName); accName: Array(3)
}
then when i get to my See.if function I get
performAs(actor: PerformsTasks): PromiseLike<void> {
return actor.attemptsTo(
See.if(AccountTable.isDisplayingAllNames, items => expect(items).to.eventually.contain(this.accName)) AccountTable.isDisplayingAllNames: undefined
);
}
so my dilemma is this:
and I think it stems to my See.if function isnt setup in the correct way?
See.if(AccountTable.isDisplayingAllNames, items => expect(items).to.eventually.contain(this.accName))
Cucumber test run has failed.
1) Scenario: List all accounts in the tenant - e2e\features\get_account_list\get_all_accounts.feature:10
Step: When he views the accounts in the table that include name, name, name - e2e\features\get_account_list\get_all_accounts.feature:12
Step Definition: node_modules\serenity-js\src\serenity-cucumber\webdriver_synchroniser.ts:47
Message:
AssertionError: expected [ Array(5) ] to include [ 'name', 'name', 'name' ]
From: Task: <anonymous>
i am an idiot, I was using the wrong function, had to use the function
.to.eventually.contain.members
similar answer and description found here:
Answer
Related
Good Day guys,.. I need to download a excel template only show with headers,..
I have good and working function code in laravel-excel version 2 of my problem,. but in version 3.1 i dont know how to code it.
this is my code in version 2;
public function downloadCoursesTemplate()
{
$columns = array(
'Course Code',
'Course Description',
'Status'
);
return Excel::download('Courses', function ($excel) use ($columns) {
$excel->sheet('Courses', function ($sheet) use ($columns) {
$sheet->fromArray($columns);
});
})->export('xlsx');
}
this is the output:
I want that on laravel-excel version 3.1
There have documentation in new versions but i could not find it to solve my issue.
Is anyone can help me? thanks. sorry for my English grammar.
The documentation should be pretty clear, it even has a quick start guide here
But here is what you can do:
Generate the export class
php artisan make:export CoursesTemplateExport
Change the class to the following:
<?php
namespace App\Exports;
use Maatwebsite\Excel\Concerns\FromArray;
use Maatwebsite\Excel\Concerns\WithHeadings;
class CoursesTemplateExport implements FromArray, WithHeadings
{
/**
* #return array
*/
public function array(): array
{
return [];
}
/**
* #return array
*/
public function headings(): array
{
return [
'Course Code',
'Course Description',
'Status'
];
}
}
We can implement the FromArray interface so we can just return an empty array since we don't have any data, and we can implement the WithHeadings interface to declare the headings the export should have.
In your Controller:
use App\Exports\CoursesTemplateExport;
public function downloadCoursesTemplate()
{
return Excel::download(new CoursesTemplateExport(), 'Courses.xlsx');
}
This will result in the following excel:
Problem statement
I've got problem with an object array I would like to get a sub object array from based on a object property. But via the Array.filter(lambda{}) all I get is an empty list.
The object is like:
export interface objectType1 {
someName: number;
someOtherName: string;
}
export interface ObjectType2 {
name: string;
other: string;
ObjectType1: [];
}
The method to get the subArray is:
private getSubArray(toDivied: ObjectType2[], propertyValue: string){
let list: ObjectType2[] = toDivied.filter((row:ObjectType2) => {
row.name === propertyValue
});
return list;
}
Analys
Namely two things been done ensure filter comparing works and that the data is "as expected".
Brekepoints in visual studio code
Via break points in the return and filter compareison I've inspected that the property value exists (by conditions on the break point) and that the "list" which is returned is empty.
I would like to point out that I use a Typescript linter which usally gives warning for the wrong types and undefined variable calls and such so I am quite sure it shouldn't be an syntax problem.
Tested via javascript if it works in chrome console
remove braces inside callback function
private getSubArray(toDivied: ObjectType2[], propertyValue: string){
let list: ObjectType2[] = toDivied.filter((row:ObjectType2) =>
row.name === propertyValue
);
return list;
}
There is a problem with my work. since Firebase's Web/JavaScript API always returns the full tree under the nodes that we request.
So in my case i retrieved all of existing fields from firebase including sensitive fields first and after that I want to export to excel selected fields only, not all of the fields that i got. the problem is, I always succeed exported all existing fields, including the sensitive fields.
Can I export selected field only and exclude the sensitive field? Below is my code:
I retrieve all of my fields include the data from firebase in my .ts file like this:
getData() {
this.dataLoading = true;
this.querySubscription = this._backendService.getDocs('report')
.subscribe(members => {
this.members = members;
this.dataSource = new MatTableDataSource(members);
this.dataSource.paginator = this.paginator;
this.dataSource.sort = this.sort;
},
(error) => {
this.error = true;
this.errorMessage = error.message;
this.dataLoading = false;
},
() => { this.error = false; this.dataLoading = false; });
}
//export func
exportAsXLSX():void{
this._backendService.exportAsExcelFile(this.members, 'sample');
}
My Backend service Code :
getDocs(coll:string,filters?:any){
this.itemsCollection=this.afs.collection<any>(this.getCollectionURL(coll));
return this.itemsCollection.valueChanges();
}
getCollectionURL(filter){
return "ReportApp/fajar/"+filter;
}
//export func
public exportAsExcelFile(json: any[], excelFileName: string): void {
const worksheet: XLSX.WorkSheet = XLSX.utils.json_to_sheet(json);
const workbook: XLSX.WorkBook = { Sheets: { 'data': worksheet }, SheetNames: ['data'] };
const excelBuffer: any = XLSX.write(workbook, { bookType: 'xlsx', type: 'array' });
this.saveAsExcelFile(excelBuffer, excelFileName);
}
private saveAsExcelFile(buffer: any, fileName: string): void {
const data: Blob = new Blob([buffer], {type: EXCEL_TYPE});
FileSaver.saveAs(data, fileName + '_export_' + new Date().getTime() + EXCEL_EXTENSION);
}
as for reference im using code from here to exporting to excel :https://medium.com/#madhavmahesh/exporting-an-excel-file-in-angular-927756ac9857
as u can see I put all of my data into this.member variable and export em, But the result is that I exported all of em, i want to export selected fields only.
You will need to "trim down" the array of member data before you send it to your exportAsExcelFile() method. Your problem is that you are passing ALL of the member data to that export function. So the solution is to remove any sensitive information before you call the export function.
exportAsXLSX():void {
// TRIM DOWN ARRAY HERE
this._backendService.exportAsExcelFile(this.members, 'sample');
}
Since you didn't provide your member database structure, or details of what you consider sensitive information, I'll provide a generic example. You have an array of members... Most likely, you've made each "member" in the array into an object... so we need to loop over that array and delete the "sensitive" property of each member object.
As a precaution, since we don't want to delete the properties from the ACTUAL array, since arrays are reference-types, and since you might need those details elsewhere... let's make a copy of the array - a deep copy to ensure even nested objects are copied.
var newMemberArray = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(this.members))
Then, we need to loop over that new array and delete our sensitive properties:
newMemberArray.forEach(function(m){
delete m.sensitivePropertyName1;
delete m.sensitivePropertyName2;
});
and pass that "sanitized" array to your export function... so putting all this together, something like:
exportAsXLSX():void {
var newMemberArray = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(this.members))
newMemberArray.forEach(function(m){ delete m.sensitivePropertyName });
this._backendService.exportAsExcelFile(newMemberArray, 'sample');
}
*Disclaimer: untested code, for explanation purposes only
I know this is a general question but I have exhausted google and tried many approaches.Any feedback is appreciated.
The HTTPClient is Angular 5+ so it returns an object created from the response JSON data. I get a massive JSON response from an endpoint I have no control over and I want to use about 20% of the response in my app and ignore the rest.
I am really trying hard to avoid using a series of templates or export objects or whatever and trying to force this massive untyped Observable into a typed object with hundreds of fields many being Arrays. All I need for the app is just a Array of very small objects with 3 fields per object. The 3 fields are all over within the JSON response and I want to map them to my object .map only seems to work when you are using the full response object and I can't find an example where .map does custom work besides in the case where you are mapping a few fields to 1 object and I am trying to map to an Array of my small objects.
UPDATED
Basically I want this service to return an object of Type DislayData to the module that subscribes to it but I get just an Object back. This is not what I ultimately need to do but if I can prove I can map the body of the response to my needed return type I can then start to break down the response body and return an Array of the Type I really need based on my silly DisplayData object. Thanks again!
export interface DislayData {
body: any;
}
...
export class DataService {
constructor(private http: HttpClient) { }
/** GET data from the black box */
getData(): Observable<DislayData> {
return this.http.get<HttpResponse<any>>(searchUrl, { observe: 'response' })
.pipe(
map(res => {
return res.body as DislayData;
}
tap(res => console.log(//do stuff with entire respoonse also)),
catchError(err => this.handleError(err)));
}
private handleError(error: HttpErrorResponse) {
...
Do you know the structure of the answering object?
If yes, you can do something like this:
item$ = new BehaviorSubject<any>({});
item = {
foo: 'a',
bar: 'b',
iton: [1, 2, 3],
boo: {
far: 'c'
}
};
logNewItem() {
this.item$
.pipe(
map(response => {
if (response.foo
&& response.iton
&& response.iton.length >= 3
&& response.boo
&& response.boo.far) {
let newItem = {
foo: response.foo,
iton2: response.iton[2],
far: response.boo.far
};
console.log(newItem); // output: Object { foo: "a", iton2: 3, far: "c" }
}
})
)
.subscribe();
this.item$.next(this.item);
}
Basically, you can simply make sure the properties exist, call them directly and map them to a better fitting object.
I heavily recommend creating an interface for the object you're receiving and an interface or class for the object you're mapping to. In that case you can also write the code more compact like this:
[...]
map(response: MyAPIResponse => {
let newItem = new NewItem(response);
console.log(newItem); // output: Object { foo: "a", iton2: 3, far: "c" }
}
})
[...]
class NewItem {
foo: string;
iton2: string;
far: string;
constructor(apiResponse: MyAPIResponse) {
//Validate parameter first
this.foo = apiResponse.foo;
this.iton2 = apiResponse.iton[2];
this.far = apiResponse.boo.far;
and make your code a lot more readable.
Context
In my case, I've some orders with "discount vouchers" (discount). A discount can be use on under different conditions. For instance, discounts have an expired date, can be used by a limited number of customers, can be dedicated to a user, ...
Each discount can be attached to several order.
In my backoffice, I want to add to order create form a field "Discount" with a list of discount available but only right discounts.
What I made
An entity "order" with a field manyToMany
/**
* #ORM\ManyToMany(targetEntity="PATH\MyBundle\Entity\Discount", inversedBy="orders")
* #ORM\JoinTable(name="shop_discounts_orders",
* joinColumns={#ORM\JoinColumn(name="order_id", referencedColumnName="id")},
* inverseJoinColumns={#ORM\JoinColumn(name="discount_id", referencedColumnName="id")}
* )
*/
private $discounts;
An entity "discounts" with a field manyToMany
/**
* #ORM\ManyToMany(targetEntity="PATH\MyBundle\Entity\Order", mappedBy="discounts")
*/
private $orders;
A form OrderType with a field discounts
$builder->add('discounts', 'entity',
array( 'label' => 'Discount vouchers',
'required' => false,
'expanded' => true,
'class' => 'PATH\MyBundle\Entity\Discount',
'property' => 'title',
'multiple' => true,
'query_builder' => function(EntityRepository $er) use ($params) {
return $er->getQuerySelectType($params);
},
));
With this solution, I can return specific discount defined by my request in my entity repository. It's good for expired date condition for instance.
What I would like
I'd like to filter results in the checkbox list. In fact, I want limit usage of the discount to a dedicated user, limit to a list of products, or limit the number of usage... And these condition cannot be done by a simple sql request.
I try to create special Type. My idea is to have an array of entities Discount and load a choice list... After that, I create a dataTransformer but It doesn't work !
Thank's for your ideas !
You could use the $options from public function buildForm(FormBuilderInterface $builder, array $options) to pass your user and product for instance. With those 2 informations you could refine your list of discount (in your query)
if you do so you need to add them in the setDefaultValue
public function setDefaultOptions(OptionsResolverInterface $resolver)
{
$resolver->setDefaults(array(
'user_discount' => null,
'product_discount' => null,
));
}
and in your controller:
$form = $this->formFactory->create(new YourFormType(), $entity, array(
'user_discount' => $this->getUser(),
'product_discount' => $product,
));
I found a solution and explain it if someone have the same issue as me.
Create a custom Type
My custom type is inspired by Symfony\Bridge\Doctrine\Form\Type\DoctrineType
class DiscountOrderType extends AbstractType
{
// overide choiceList callback
public function setDefaultOptions(OptionsResolverInterface $resolver)
{
$choiceListCache =& $this->choiceListCache;
$type = $this;
$choiceList = function (Options $options) use (&$choiceListCache, &$time, $container) {
[[ Copy paste same as Doctrine type ]]
// Create your own choiceList class (EntityChoiceList)
if (!isset($choiceListCache[$hash])) {
$choiceListCache[$hash] = new DiscountChoiceList(
$options['em'],
$options['class'],
$options['property'],
$options['loader'],
$options['choices'],
$options['group_by']
);
// If you want add container
$choiceListCache[$hash]->setContainer($container);
}
return $choiceListCache[$hash];
};
$resolver->setDefaults(array(
'choice_list' => $choiceList,
));
}
Create a custom EntityChoiceList
My custom type is inspired by Symfony\Bridge\Doctrine\Form\ChoiceList\EntityChoiceList
class EntityChoiceList extends ObjectChoiceList
{
protected function load()
{
if ($this->entityLoader) {
$entities = $this->entityLoader->getEntities();
} else {
$entities = $this->em->getRepository($this->class)->findAll();
}
// You have access to the entities in the choice list
// Add your custom code here to manipulate the choice list
// you can do some check not properly possible with sql request (http requests on each result, ...) before add it in choice list
// you can add some custom cache rules, ...
// if you use gedmon and want apply a "join" with translate table, you can add $query->setHint(\Doctrine\ORM\Query::HINT_CUSTOM_OUTPUT_WALKER, 'Gedmo\\Translatable\\Query\\TreeWalker\\TranslationWalker'); before playing request...
// Possibilities are infinite
// FOR INSTANCE : you already want unset first entity of the result
if (isset($entities[0])) {
unset($entities[0]);
}
// END OF CUSTOM CODE
try {
// The second parameter $labels is ignored by ObjectChoiceList
// The third parameter $preferredChoices is currently not supported
parent::initialize($entities, array(), array());
} catch (StringCastException $e) {
throw new StringCastException(str_replace('argument $labelPath', 'option "property"', $e->getMessage()), null, $e);
}
$this->loaded = true;
}
Of course you can try to extend symfony class for beautyfull code ;).
Thank's to #maxwell2022 for your help !