Get app service name in azure programmatically - azure

Simple question, hopefully a simple answer :)
How to I get the app service name, displayed as "test-webapp" in the picture below, from code (C#)? (any other identifier of a specific app service also works).
I have multiple app services, running same code. So I want to be able to express
if(appServiceName == "test-webapp")
{
//take a specific value from web.config and run with it
}

You can get it from the WEBSITE_SITE_NAME environment variable.
To get the variable, use something like:
string siteName = System.Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("WEBSITE_SITE_NAME")
You can see a list of environment variables available here: https://github.com/projectkudu/kudu/wiki/Azure-runtime-environment.

Related

How to use node package dotenv to access local development environment variables in Red Hat OpenShift application?

I'm revisiting a project which hasn't been updated for a while.
In production/online environment, it uses environment variables defined at:
openshift online console > applications > deployments > my node app > environment
In development/offline environment, it uses environment variables defined at:
./src/js/my_modules/local_settings (this file is ignored by .gitignore)
The code looks something like:
// check which environment we are in
if (process.env.MONGODB_USER) {
var online_status = "online";
}
else {
var online_status = "offline";
}
// if online, use environment variables defined in red hat openshift
if (online_status === 'online') {
var site_title = process.env.SITE_TITLE;
var site_description = process.env.SITE_DESCRIPTION;
//etc
}
// if offline, get settings from a local file
else if (online_status === 'offline') {
var local_settings = require('./src/js/my_modules/local_settings');
var site_title = local_settings.SITE_TITLE;
var site_description = local_settings.SITE_DESCRIPTION;
// etc
}
I would like to install the dotenv package in my local project repo via:
npm install dotenv
So that I can:
Have my local settings in a .env file in the root of my project (ignored in .gitignore)
Be able to use process.env.SOME_VARIABLE rather than local_settings.SOME_VARIABLE
Get rid of some if/else blocks as both scenarios would point to process.env.SOME_VARIABLE
I'm a bit confused as to how this would effect the online environment.
Seeing as both production/online and development/offline environments would use:
var some_variable = process.env.SOME_VARIABLE_HERE
would the application automatically know to:
Look at the local .env file when in development?
Look at the Red Hat environment variables when in production?
And would adding the required instantiation at the beginning of the server-side file:
require('dotenv').config()
somehow make Red Hat OpenShift freak out (as it seems to already have its own 'things' in place to resolve references to process.env.SOME_VARIABLE_HERE to the relevant values defined in the OpenShift console)?
To have a file by any environment (.dev .staging .prod) into the source code repository or manually in the server (it those are in .gitignore) worked for long time, but now it goes against to the devops.
The clean way is to use environment variables but managed remotely and obtained at the start of your application.
How it works?
Basically your apps don't read or need a file (.env .properties, etc) with variables anymore. It loads them from a remote http service.
Not intrusive
In this approach, you don't need specific languages variables (nodejs in your case). You just need to prepare your app to use environment variables. Your application don't care where the variables come from, just needs to be available at operative system level.
To achieve that, you just need to download the variables using a simple shell code or a very basic algorithm (http invocation) in your favorite language.
After that, after the start of your app, variables are ready to use at the most basic level.
var site_title = process.env.SITE_TITLE;
This approach is not intrusive because your app don't need something complex like library or algorithm in some programing language. Just needs the environment variables.
Intrusive
Same as previous alternative but instead to read the variables direct from environment system, you should use or create a class/module in your language. This offer your the variables you need:
var site_title = VariablesManager.getProperty("SITE_TITLE");
VariablesManager at the startup must have consumed the variables from a remote service (http) and the store them to offer them to whoever needs it through getProperty method.
Also this VariablesManager usually has a feature called hot-reload which at intervals, update the variables consuming the remote variables manager. With this, if your application is running in production with real users and some variable needs to be updated, you just need to change it in the variables manager. Automatically your app will load the new values, without restart or touching your app
This approach is intrusive because you need to load advanced libraries in some programing language or create it.
Devops
Your application just needs a few properties or settings related to the consume of remote variables. For example: variables of acme-web-staging:
remote_variables_manager = https://variables.com/api
application_id = acme-web-staging
secure_key = *****
You could hide the secure key and parametrize the application_id using environment variables (created in the platform console)
remote_variables_manager = https://variables.com/api
application_id = ${application_id}
secure_key = ${remote_variables_manager_key}
Or if you want one variable manager by each environment
staging
remote_variables_manager = https://variables-staging.com/api
application_id = acme-web
secure_key = *****
production
remote_variables_manager = https://variables-staging.com/api
application_id = acme-web
secure_key = *****
Variables manager
This concept was introduced many years ago. I used with java. It consist in a web application with features like:
secure login
create applications
create variables of an application
crypt sensitive values
publish http endpoints to download or query the variables by application
Here a list of some ready to use alternatives:
Configurator
Nodejs & mysql solution. I developed this and I use it in various projects.
Doppler
zookeeper
http://www.therore.net/java/2015/05/03/distributed-configuration-with-zookeeper-curator-and-spring-cloud-config.html
Spring Cloud
https://www.baeldung.com/spring-cloud-configuration
This is a java spring framework functionality in which you can create properties file with configurations and configure your applications to read them.
Consul
Consul is a service mesh solution providing a full featured control plane with service discovery, configuration, and segmentation functionality.
doozerd, etcd
In your specific case
Don't use dot-env
Use pure process.env.foo
Deploy a remote variables manager in your openshift infraestructure
Create just one variable in your openshift web console: APP_ENVIRONMENT
In your code at the start, do something like this:
if (process.env.APP_ENVIRONMENT === "PROD")
//get variables from remote service using
//some http client like axios, request, etc
//then inject them to your process.env
process.env.site_url = remoteVariables.site_url
else
//we are in local developer workspace
//so, nothing complex is required
//developer should inject manually
//before the startup: npm run start or dev
//export site_url = "acme.com"
If you can configure an execution of a shell script before the start of your openshift app, you could load and expose the variables at that stage and the previous snippet would not be necessary because the variables will be ready to be retrieved using process.env directly in your app

ConnectionString is null when deploying Azure Function

I've been working with functions with Azure, I've built a very simple Http Function locally by following the example linked here, the only difference is I've defined a User table instead of a Todo table
Everything works as expected locally, I'm able to post and get.
However, when deploying the function and trying to make a POST request I see the following within the logs:
Executed 'User' (Failed, Id=5df9dffe-eedf-4b11-aa10-54fda00992b0, Duration=1ms)System.ArgumentNullException : Value cannot be null. (Parameter 'connectionString')
I've checked the SQL Server to ensure it's accessible by other Azure Services just encase that was causing a problem, but I can confirm it's set to allow.
I have found this question, I've gone through the steps and checked against mine and I can confirm my Function App configuration does have the AzureWebJobsStorage connection string.
I'm not 100% sure why this would be happening due to my lack of knowledge of functions at the moment, have anyone else experience this? if so how did you resolve it?
Update
After further testing, it seems the error is coming from my Startup class,
class Startup : FunctionsStartup
{
public override void Configure(IFunctionsHostBuilder builder)
{
string connectionString = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("SqlConnectionString");
builder.Services.AddDbContext<ApplicationDbContext>(
options => SqlServerDbContextOptionsExtensions.UseSqlServer(options, connectionString));
}
}
Upon deployment, connectionString variable is null.... not sure why though.
Yes, you can not get it because you didn't set it in the configuration settings.
If you want to use the Connection Strings section.
Add the "ConnectionStrings":{} section to your local.settings.json file then add your connection string
{
...
"ConnectionStrings": {
"MyConnectionString": ""
}
}
Then you need to set the connection string in the Settings section of the Function App in the Azure Portal.
The scroll down to the Connection Section
And add a new connection string. Make sure it has the same name as you connection in the local.settings.json file.
Your question isn't 100% clear if this is happening locally (as you refer to local.settings.json) or when deploying. If this occurs when deploying, changing your local.settings.json file will not help, unfortunately.
You will need to add the Application Setting within the Azure Portal (located under Settings -> Configuration -> Application Settings -> New application setting).
You will need to save the application setting, and then restart the Azure Function instance for the changes to reflect.
Check out https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-how-to-use-azure-function-app-settings?tabs=portal

AzureWebJobsScriptRoot variable is not defined on Azure Functions, but returns correct value locally

AzureWebJobsScriptRoot variable is not defined on Azure Functions. The code below returns no value.
System.Environment.GetEnvironmentVariables(EnvironmentVariableTarget.Process)["AzureWebJobsScriptRoot"];
However, %HOME%\site\wwwroot will be returned based on below:
AzureWebJobsScriptRoot
AzureWebJobsScriptRoot
The path to the root directory where the host.json file and function folders are located. In a function app, the default is %HOME%\site\wwwroot.
Key Sample value
AzureWebJobsScriptRoot %HOME%\site\wwwroot
It returns correct value locally, not %HOME%\site\wwwroot
Update
Is this a bug with Azure Functions?
If so, what is an alternative solution?
Before the issue is fixed by Microsoft, can this variable, AzureWebJobsScriptRoot, be defined myself to "%HOME%\site\wwwroot" on Azure?
https://github.com/Azure/Azure-Functions/issues/1146
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/26761
I test in my site and get the same problem with you. As the article said, when running in Azure, will default to %HOME%\site\wwwroot and it set the function folder under home\site\wwwroot.
However, when I set AzureWebJobsScriptRoot in Azure funtion Application Settings, it will show in the output like below:
If you configure a function app with a different value for AzureWebJobsScriptRoot, then the functions host should honor that new value. For example, if you set AzureWebJobsScriptRoot = D:\home\site\wwwroot\foo then the functions host would look for a host.json file and function directories in the D:\home\site\wwwroot\foo location.
By default, this environment variable is not set. So it is expected that if you did not set it yourself, then System.Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("AzureWebJobsScriptRoot") will return null.
Be aware that if you modify this setting, other components like the portal, visual studio, visual studio code, etc will not be aware of setting and will deploy your code to the normal default location. If you want to customize this setting, its up to you to make sure the application code is deployed to the right location.
Please refer the full details here

Substitute Service Fabric application parameters during deployment

I'm setting up my production environment and would like to secure my environment-related variables.
For the moment, every environment has its own application parameters file, which works well, but I don't want every dev in my team knowing the production connection strings and other sensitive stuffs that could appear in there.
So I'm looking for every possibility available.
I've seen that in Azure DevOps, which I'm using at the moment for my CI/CD, there is some possible variable substitution (xml transformation). Is it usable in a SF project?
I've seen in another project something similar through Octopus.
Are there any other tools that would help me manage my variables by environment safely (and easily)?
Can I do that with my KeyVault eventually?
Any recommendations?
Thanks
EDIT: an example of how I'd like to manage those values; this is a screenshot from octopus :
so something similar to this that separates and injects the values is what I'm looking for.
You can do XML transformation to the ApplicationParameter file to update the values in there before you deploy it.
The other option is use Powershell to update the application and pass the parameters as argument to the script.
The Start-ServiceFabricApplicationUpgrade command accept as parameter a hashtable with the parameters, technically, the builtin task in VSTS\DevOps transform the application parameters in a hashtable, the script would be something like this:
#Get the existing parameters
$app = Get-ServiceFabricApplication -ApplicationName "fabric:/AzureFilesVolumePlugin"
#Create a temp hashtable and populate with existing values
$parameters = #{ }
$app.ApplicationParameters | ForEach-Object { $parameters.Add($_.Name, $_.Value) }
#Replace the desired parameters
$parameters["test"] = "123test" #Here you would replace with your variable, like $env:username
#Upgrade the application
Start-ServiceFabricApplicationUpgrade -ApplicationName "fabric:/AzureFilesVolumePlugin" -ApplicationParameter $parameters -ApplicationTypeVersion "6.4.617.9590" -UnmonitoredAuto
Keep in mind that the existing VSTS Task also has other operations, like copy the package to SF and register the application version in the image store, you will need to replicate it. You can copy the full script from Deploy-FabricApplication.ps1 file in the service fabric project and replace it with your changes. The other approach is get the source for the VSTS Task here and add your changes.
If you are planning to use KeyVault, I would recommend the application access the values direct on KeyVault instead of passing it to SF, this way, you can change the values in KeyVault without redeploying the application. In the deployment, you would only pass the KeyVault credentials\configuration.

Azure Web App - Cannot GET (particular path)

I have been trying out the AADv2 sample from BotAuth to no avail.
The error that I keep getting after I select the button on the action card is that either a HTTP 500 internal server error, or Cannot GET /botauth/aadv2. When I check if the root web page or the messaging endpoint is working or not, I get the same error - either Cannot GET / or Cannot GET \api\messages. The root page I have been trying to get to is https://(botname).azurewebsites.net
May I know what steps I can take to resolve this issue? I have tried to Google the error, but to no avail. Please let me know if you need more information!
Since you are test the sample directly on Azure Web Apps, there should be a few of questions we should pay attention on.
1, const MICROSOFT_APP_ID = envx("MICROSOFT_APP_ID");
const MICROSOFT_APP_PASSWORD = envx("MICROSOFT_APP_PASSWORD");
we declare the environment valiable as MicrosoftAppId and MicrosoftAppPassword. Please modify this sentence as
//bot application identity
const MICROSOFT_APP_ID = envx("MicrosoftAppId");
const MICROSOFT_APP_PASSWORD = envx("MicrosoftAppPassword");
2, And you also need to check the environment variables are set correctly in Application settings of Azure Web App, which is shown at https://github.com/MicrosoftDX/botauth/tree/master/Node/examples/aadv2#3-setup-environment-variables
3, You can leverage online code editor to develop, debug, and manage your project on Azure Web Apps.
And in the output column, you can see the detailed errors throwm by the application. You can leverage these info to narrow down your issue.
Tips, after you changing the application settings, it's better to restart your Azure Web App.

Resources