I modified the existing activation function and using it in the Convolutional layer of the Neural Network. I would like to know how does it perform compared to the existing activation function.Is there any method/function to plot in a graph the results(matrix values) after each Neural network layer,so that I could customise my activation function according to the values for better results?
model = Sequential()
e = Embedding(vocab_size, 100, weights=[embedding_matrix], input_length=max_length, trainable=False)
model.add(e)
model.add(Conv1D(64,kernel_size,padding='valid',activation=newactivation,strides=1))
model.add(MaxPooling1D(pool_size=pool_size))
model.add(Conv1D(256,kernel_size,padding='valid',activation=newactivation,strides=1))
model.add(MaxPooling1D(pool_size=pool_size))
model.add(Bidirectional(GRU(gru_output_size, dropout=0.2, recurrent_dropout=0.2)))
model.add(Bidirectional(LSTM(lstm_output_size)))
model.add(Dense(nclass, activation='softmax'))
model.compile(optimizer='rmsprop', loss='binary_crossentropy', metrics=['accuracy'])
print(model.summary())
model.fit(padded_docs,y_train, epochs=epoch_size, verbose=0)
loss, accuracy = model.evaluate(tpadded_docs, y_test, verbose=0)
I cannot comment yet so I post this as an answer:
Refer to the Keras FAQ: "How can I obtain the output of an intermediate layer?"
It shows you how you can access the output of each layer. If you are using the version that uses the keras function, you can even access the output of the model in the learning phase (if your model contains layer that behave differently in training vs. testing).
Related
I an trying implement both classification problem and the regression problem with Keras tuner. here is my code for the regression problem:
def build_model(hp):
model = keras.Sequential()
for i in range(hp.Int('num_layers', 2, 20)):
model.add(layers.Dense(units=hp.Int('units_' + str(i),
min_value=32,
max_value=512,
step=32),
activation='relu'))
if hp.Boolean("dropout"):
model.add(layers.Dropout(rate=0.5))
# Tune whether to use dropout.
model.add(layers.Dense(1, activation='linear'))
model.compile(
optimizer=keras.optimizers.Adam(
hp.Choice('learning_rate', [1e-4, 1e-3, 1e-5])),
loss='mean_absolute_error',
metrics=['mean_absolute_error'])
return model
tuner = RandomSearch(
build_model,
objective='val_mean_absolute_error',
max_trials=5,
executions_per_trial=2,
# overwrite=True,
directory='projects',
project_name='Air Quality Index')
In order to apply this code for a classification problem, which parameters(loss, objective, metrices etc.) have to be changed?
To use this code for a classification problem, you will have to change the loss function, the objective function and the activation function of your output layer. Depending on the number of classes, you will use different functions:
Number of classes
Two
More than two
Loss
binary_crossentropy
categorical_crossentropy
Tuner objective
val_binary_crossentropy
val_categorical_crossentropy
Last layer activation
sigmoid
softmax
I am new to Keras and trying to write my first code. I want to understand what 'model.predict' should return. Consider a simple model below.
model = keras.Sequential()
model.add(keras.layers.Dense(12, input_dim=232, activation='relu'))
model.add(keras.layers.Dense(232, activation='relu'))
model.add(keras.layers.Dense(1, activation='sigmoid'))
# compile the keras model
model.compile(loss='binary_crossentropy', optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy'])
# fit the keras model on the dataset
model.fit(vSignal, vLabels, epochs=15, batch_size=100 )
# evaluate the keras model
_, accuracy = model.evaluate(vSignal, vLabels)
print('Accuracy: %.2f' % (accuracy*100))
pred=model.predict(vSignalT)
Consider we train the "model" with "vSignal" and "vLabels" as shown above. Now consider that the accuracy of the model as given by model.evaluate is 100%. Now if we give same data 'vSignal' to 'model.predict' should we get the 'vLabels' return?
pred=model.predict(vSignalT) returns a numpy arrays of predictions.
each row consists of one of the vlabels that the model predicted.
for more information refer to here
save return value of fit function:
hist = model.fit(vSignal, vLabels, epochs=15, batch_size=100 );
then check the
hist.history["accuracy"]
I was trying to train a model using IMDB data. I am getting expected train accuracy about 96%+ but I am not satisfied with the test accuracy.Now my expectation is to get 90%+ test accuracy on test data. I tried by using several classifier but each time I am getting 84% to 89% accuracy on test data. Here I am going to include some classifiers I already tried. Most of the cases I tried some parameter tuning by increasing epoch or changing the optimizer. Now my concern is how can I increase the test accuracy to 90%+ .
Classifiers I tried so far:
First:
model = Sequential()
model.add(Embedding(vocab_size, 32, input_length = max_words))
model.add(Bidirectional(LSTM(32, return_sequences = True)))
model.add(GlobalMaxPool1D())
model.add(Dense(20, activation="relu"))
model.add(Dropout(0.05))
model.add(Dense(1, activation="sigmoid"))
model.compile(loss='binary_crossentropy', optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy'])
model.fit(x_train,y_train,validation_data=(x_test, y_test),epochs=10,batch_size=100)
Second:
model = Sequential([
Embedding(vocab_size, 32, input_length=max_words),
Dropout(0.2),
ZeroPadding1D(padding=1),
Convolution1D(64, 5, activation='relu'),
Dropout(0.2),
MaxPooling1D(),
Flatten(),
Dense(100, activation='relu'),
Dropout(0.2),
Dense(1, activation='sigmoid')
])
model.compile(loss='binary_crossentropy', optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy'])
model.fit(x_train,y_train,validation_data=(x_test, y_test),epochs=10,batch_size=100)
By checking on State-of-the-art analysis on IMDB dataset, I don't think you can get to ^90% with simple models like those you are using. However, you may try using pretrained embedding like glove instead of training your own embedding. Also, I found this repo have BERT implementation in keras, providing demo of IMBD classification, it is able to get ~99% acc.
I have trained a keras LSTM model. But after training, all i get is the final parameters of the models after training with 10 epochs and batch size=120. How can i get intermediate parameter after a batch keras.
Example: after 120 sample in each batch i can get the intermediate parameter of this step.
I have tried callback method and backend in keras, but i do not know how to get the
'''python
model = Sequential()
model.add(Embedding(max_features, 32))
#model.add(LSTM(32, return_sequences=True, input_shape=(1,texts.shape[0])))
model.add(LSTM(32))
model.add(Dense(1, activation='sigmoid'))
model.compile(optimizer='adam', loss='binary_crossentropy', metrics=['acc'])
history_ltsm = model.fit(texts_train, y_train, epochs=10, batch_size=120, validation_split=0.2)
'''
I expected the model run step by step based on each batch to show the intermediate parameters, but not the all epochs.
Thank you very much!
I'm using mobilenet v2 to train a model on my images. I've frozen all but a few layers and then added additional layers for training. I'd like to be able to train from an intermediate layer rather than from the beginning. My questions:
Is it possible to provide the output of the last frozen layer as the
input for training (it would be a tensor of (?, 7,7,1280))?
How does one specify training to start from that first trainable
(non-frozen) layer? In this case, mbnetv2_conv.layer[153].
What is y_train in this case? I don't quite understand how y_train
is being used during the training process- in general, when does the
CNN refer back to y_train?
Load mobilenet v2
image_size = 224
mbnetv2_conv = MobileNetV2(weights='imagenet', include_top=False, input_shape=(image_size, image_size, 3))
# Freeze all layers except the last 3 layers
for layer in mbnetv2_conv.layers[:-3]:
layer.trainable = False
# Create the model
model = models.Sequential()
model.add(mbnetv2_conv)
model.add(layers.Flatten())
model.add(layers.Dense(16, activation='relu'))
model.add(layers.Dropout(0.5))
model.add(layers.Dense(3, activation='softmax'))
model.summary()
# Build an array (?,224,224,3) from images
x_train = np.array(all_images)
# Get layer output
from keras import backend as K
get_last_frozen_layer_output = K.function([mbnetv2_conv.layers[0].input],
[mbnetv2_conv.layers[152].output])
last_frozen_layer_output = get_last_frozen_layer_output([x_train])[0]
# Compile the model
from keras.optimizers import SGD
sgd = SGD(lr=0.01, decay=1e-6, momentum=0.9, nesterov=True)
model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer=sgd, metrics=['acc'])
# how to train from a specific layer and what should y_train be?
model.fit(last_frozen_layer_output, y_train, batch_size=2, epochs=10)
Yes, you can. Two different ways.
First, the hard way makes you build two new models, one with all your frozen layers, one with all your trainable layers. Add a Flatten() layer to the frozen-layers-only model. And you will copy the weights from mobilenet v2 layer by layer to populate the weights of the frozen-layers-only model. Then you will run your input images through the frozen-layers-only model, saving the output to disk in CSV or pickle form. This is now the input for your trainable-layers model, which you train with the model.fit() command as you did above. Save the weights when you're done training. Then you will have to build the original model with both sets of layers, and load the weights into each layer, and save the whole thing. You're done!
However, the easier way is to save the weights of your model separately from the architecture with:
model.save_weights(filename)
then modify the layer.trainable property of the layers in MobileNetV2 before you add it into a new empty model:
mbnetv2_conv = MobileNetV2(weights='imagenet', include_top=False, input_shape=(image_size, image_size, 3))
for layer in mbnetv2_conv.layers[:153]:
layer.trainable = False
model = models.Sequential()
model.add(mbnetv2_conv)
then reload the weights with
newmodel.load_weights(filename)
This lets you adjust which layers in your mbnetv2_conv model you will be training on the fly, and then just call model.fit() to continue training.