How do you check the position values of two of the same object in a room? I have two of the same object in my room and need to find the x and y positioning of each.
with (objName) {
// now x is each objName.x, and y is each objName.x, while to access object from which you called you need to use other.xxx (except VAR defined variables)
}
for example, to get all X positions:
var xpos = [], _a = 0;
with (objName) {
xpos[a++] = x;
}
// xpos[0] is x of first object, xpos[1] of second etc.
Related
Is there a base function in Rcpp that:
Fills entirely by a single value if size of a vector is 1.
Fills the other vector completely if same length.
Fills with an NA value if neither Vector are the same length nor a vector is of size 1.
I've written the above criteria as a function below using a NumericVector as an example. If there isn't a base function in Rcpp that performs said operations there should be a way to template the function so that given any type of vector (e.g. numeric, character and so on) the above logic would be able to be executed.
// [[Rcpp::export]]
NumericVector cppvectorize(NumericVector x,NumericVector y) {
NumericVector y_out(y.size());
if(x.size() == 1) {
for(int i = 0; i < y_out.size(); i++) {
y_out[i] = x[0];
}
} else if(x.size() == y_out.size()) {
for(int i = 0; i < y_out.size(); i++) {
y_out[i] = x[i];
}
} else {
for(int i = 0; i < y_out.size(); i++) {
y_out[i] = NA_REAL;
}
}
return y_out;
}
Unfortunately, the closest you will come to such a function is one of the rep variants that Rcpp supports. However, none of the variants match the desired output. Therefore, the only option is to really implement a templated version of your desired function.
To create the templated function, we will first create a routing function that handles the dispatch of SEXP objects. The rationale behind the routing function is SEXP objects are able to be retrieved from and surfaced into R using Rcpp Attributes whereas a templated version is not. As a result, we need to specify the SEXTYPE (used as RTYPE) dispatches that are possible. The TYPEOF() macro retrieves the coded number. Using a switch statement, we can dispatch this number into the appropriate cases.
After dispatching, we arrive at the templated function. The templated function makes use of the base Vector class of Rcpp to simplify the data flow. From here, the notable novelty will be the use of ::traits::get_na<RTYPE>() to dynamically retrieve the appropriate NA value and fill it.
With the plan in place, let's look at the code:
#include <Rcpp.h>
using namespace Rcpp;
// ---- Templated Function
template <int RTYPE>
Vector<RTYPE> vec_helper(const Vector<RTYPE>& x, const Vector<RTYPE>& y) {
Vector<RTYPE> y_out(y.size());
if(x.size() == 1){
y_out.fill(x[0]);
} else if (x.size() == y.size()) {
y_out = x;
} else {
y_out.fill(::traits::get_na<RTYPE>());
}
return y_out;
}
// ---- Dispatch function
// [[Rcpp::export]]
SEXP cppvectorize(SEXP x, SEXP y) {
switch (TYPEOF(x)) {
case INTSXP: return vec_helper<INTSXP>(x, y);
case REALSXP: return vec_helper<REALSXP>(x, y);
case STRSXP: return vec_helper<STRSXP>(x, y);
default: Rcpp::stop("SEXP Type Not Supported.");
}
// Need to return a value even though this will never be triggered
// to quiet the compiler.
return R_NilValue;
}
Sample Tests
Here we conduct a few sample tests on each of the supported data
# Case 1: x == 1
x = 1:5
y = 2
cppvectorize(x, y)
## [1] NA
# Case 2: x == y
x = letters[1:5]
y = letters[6:10]
cppvectorize(x, y)
## [1] "a" "b" "c" "d" "e"
# Case 3: x != y && x > 1
x = 1.5
y = 2.5:6.5
cppvectorize(x, y)
## [1] 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
I'm making an air dictionary and I have a(nother) problem. The main app is ready to go and works perfectly but when I tested it I noticed that it could be better. A bit of context: the language (ancient egyptian) I'm translating from does not use punctuation so a phrase canlooklikethis. Add to that the sheer complexity of the glyph system (6000+ glyphs).
Right know my app works like this :
user choose the glyphs composing his/r word.
app transforms those glyphs to alphanumerical values (A1 - D36 - X1A, etc).
the code compares the code (say : A5AD36) to a list of xml values.
if the word is found (A5AD36 = priestess of Bast), the user gets the translation. if not, s/he gets all the possible words corresponding to the two glyphs (A5A & D36).
If the user knows the string is a word, no problem. But if s/he enters a few words, s/he'll have a few more choices than hoped (exemple : query = A1A5AD36 gets A1 - A5A - D36 - A5AD36).
What I would like to do is this:
query = A1A5AD36 //word/phrase to be translated;
varArray = [A1, A5A, D36] //variables containing the value of the glyphs.
Corresponding possible words from the xml : A1, A5A, D36, A5AD36.
Possible phrases: A1 A5A D36 / A1 A5AD36 / A1A5A D36 / A1A5AD36.
Possible phrases with only legal words: A1 A5A D36 / A1 A5AD36.
I'm not I really clear but to things simple, I'd like to get all the possible phrases containing only legal words and filter out the other ones.
(example with english : TOBREAKFAST. Legal = to break fast / to breakfast. Illegal = tobreak fast.
I've managed to get all the possible words, but not the rest. Right now, when I run my app, I have an array containing A1 - A5A - D36 - A5AD36. But I'm stuck going forward.
Does anyone have an idea ? Thank you :)
function fnSearch(e: Event): void {
var val: int = sp.length; //sp is an array filled with variables containing the code for each used glyph.
for (var i: int = 0; i < val; i++) { //repeat for every glyph use.
var X: String = ""; //variable created to compare with xml dictionary
for (var i2: int = 0; i2 < val; i2++) { // if it's the first time, use the first glyph-code, else the one after last used.
if (X == "") {
X = sp[i];
} else {
X = X + sp[i2 + i];
}
xmlresult = myXML.mot.cd; //xmlresult = alphanumerical codes corresponding to words from XMLList already imported
trad = myXML.mot.td; //same with traductions.
for (var i3: int = 0; i3 < xmlresult.length(); i3++) { //check if element X is in dictionary
var codeElement: XML = xmlresult[i3]; //variable to compare with X
var tradElement: XML = trad[i3]; //variable corresponding to codeElement
if (X == codeElement.toString()) { //if codeElement[i3] is legal, add it to array of legal words.
checkArray.push(codeElement); //checkArray is an array filled with legal words.
}
}
}
}
var iT2: int = 500 //iT2 set to unreachable value for next lines.
for (var iT: int = 0; iT < checkArray.length; iT++) { //check if the word searched by user is in the results.
if (checkArray[iT] == query) {
iT2 = iT
}
}
if (iT2 != 500) { //if complete query is found, put it on top of the array so it appears on top of the results.
var oldFirst: String = checkArray[0];
checkArray[0] = checkArray[iT2];
checkArray[iT2] = oldFirst;
}
results.visible = true; //make result list visible
loadingResults.visible = false; //loading screen
fnPossibleResults(null); //update result list.
}
I end up with an array of variables containing the glyph-codes (sp) and another with all the possible legal words (checkArray). What I don't know how to do is mix those two to make legal phrases that way :
If there was only three glyphs, I could probably find a way, but user can enter 60 glyphs max.
With D3.js I want to transform the x of a group many times (eg. by clicking a button a causing a transform for every click), starting from the current position of the group. Problem is I can't retrieve the x of the group and, even if I find it, I can't find any built-in function that lets me change the x of a group starting from its current x. Am I missing something important? It's very strange I can't get the x of an element added to an SVG "stage".
My code is the following (edited for Lars): I created the nodes the way you suggested me yesterday (cloning them).
var m=[5,10,15,20,25,30];
var count=0;
d3.select('svg').on("mouseup", function(d, i){
count+=0.5;
var n = d3.selectAll(".myGroup");
n.each(function(d,i) {
if(i!=0){
// here I need to know the current x of the current n element but I
// can't get it
// this causes error "Uncaught TypeError: undefined is not a function"
// var currentx = d3.transform(this.attr("transform")).translate[0];
this.setAttribute("transform", "translate("+((100/m[i])*count)+",10)");
}
});
});
Getting and changing the position of a g element is relatively straightforward. For example like this:
var g = d3.select("#myG");
// get x position
var currentx = d3.transform(g.attr("transform")).translate[0];
// set x position
g.attr("transform", "translate(" + (currentx + 100) + ",0)");
Edit:
If you have a raw DOM element, select it with D3 first:
var currentx = d3.transform(d3.select(this).attr("transform")).translate[0];
I'm a newbie in kinect programming, i am working on a ball tracking using kinect and opencv..we all know that kinect provides Depth data, and with the code below:
DepthImagePoint righthandDepthPoint =
sensor.CoordinateMapper.MapSkeletonPointToDepthPoint
(
me.Joints[JointType.HandRight].Position,
DepthImageFormat.Resolution640x480Fps30
);
double rightdepthmeters = (righthandDepthPoint.Depth);
using this, I am able to get the depth of a right hand, using the function MapSkeletonPointToDepthPoint() by specifing the jointtype..
Is it possible to get the depth of other objects by specifying in the image where?
given the coordinate..I want to get the depth of the object in that coordinate?
Pulling depth data from the Kinect SDK can be extracted from the DepthImagePixel structure.
The example code below loops through the entire DepthImageFrame to examine each of the pixels. If you have a specific coordinate you wish to look at, remove the for loop and set the x and y to a specific value.
// global variables
private const DepthImageFormat DepthFormat = DepthImageFormat.Resolution320x240Fps30;
private const ColorImageFormat ColorFormat = ColorImageFormat.RgbResolution640x480Fps30;
private DepthImagePixel[] depthPixels;
// defined in an initialization function
this.depthWidth = this.sensor.DepthStream.FrameWidth;
this.depthHeight = this.sensor.DepthStream.FrameHeight;
this.depthPixels = new DepthImagePixel[this.sensor.DepthStream.FramePixelDataLength];
private void SensorAllFramesReady(object sender, AllFramesReadyEventArgs e)
{
if (null == this.sensor)
return;
bool depthReceived = false;
using (DepthImageFrame depthFrame = e.OpenDepthImageFrame())
{
if (null != depthFrame)
{
// Copy the pixel data from the image to a temporary array
depthFrame.CopyDepthImagePixelDataTo(this.depthPixels);
depthReceived = true;
}
}
if (true == depthReceived)
{
// loop over each row and column of the depth
for (int y = 0; y < this.depthHeight; ++y)
{
for (int x = 0; x < this.depthWidth; ++x)
{
// calculate index into depth array
int depthIndex = x + (y * this.depthWidth);
// extract the given index
DepthImagePixel depthPixel = this.depthPixels[depthIndex];
Debug.WriteLine("Depth at [" + x + ", " + y + "] is: " + depthPixel.Depth);
}
}
}
}
I have a CouchDB database with a view whose values are paired numbers of the form [x,y]. For documents with the same key, I need (simultaneously) to compute the minimum of x and the maximum of y. The database I am working with contains about 50000 documents. Building the view takes several hours, which seems somewhat excessive. (The keys are themselves length-three arrays.) I show the map and reduce functions below, but the basic question is: how can I speed up this process?
Note that the builtin functions won't work because the values have to be numbers, not length-two arrays. It is possible that I could make two different views (one for min(x) and one for max(y)), but it is unclear to me how to combine them to get both results simultaneously.
My current map function looks basically like
function(doc) {
emit ([doc.a, doc.b, doc.c], [doc.x, doc.y])
}
and my reduce function looks like
function(keys, values) {
var x = null;
var y = null;
for (i = 0; i < values.length; i++) {
if (values[i][0] == null) break;
if (values[i][1] == null) break;
if (x == null) x = values[i][0];
if (y == null) y = values[i][1];
if (values[i][0] < x) x = values[i][0];
if (values[i][1] > y) y = values[i][1];
}
emit([x, y]);
}
Just two more notes. Using Math.max() and Math.min() should be a little faster.
function(keys, values) {
var x = -Infinity,
y = Infinity;
for (var i = 0, v; v = values[i]; i++) {
x = Math.max(x, v[0]);
y = Math.min(y, v[1]);
}
return [x, y];
}
And if CouchDB is treating the values as strings, it is because you are storing them as strings in the document.
Hope it helps.
This turned out to be a combination of two factors. One is obvious in the code posted above, where uses "emit" when it should use "return".
The other factor is less obvious and was only found by making a smaller version of the database and logging the steps in the reduce function. Although the entries in "values" were meant to be integers, they were being treated by CouchDB as character strings. Using the parseInt function corrected that problem.
After those two fixes, the entire build of the reduced view took about five minutes, so the speed problem evaporated.
Please check http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/archives/4583 . This may be extended to your application.