I understand how to use each method: VLOOKUP (or HLOOKUP) vs. INDEX/MATCH.
I'm looking for differences between them not in terms of personal preference, but primarily in the following areas:
Is there something that one method can do that the other cannot?
Which one is more efficient in general (or does it depend on the situation)?
Any other advantages/disadvantages to using one method vs. the other
NOTE: I am answering my own question here but looking to see if anyone else has other insights I hadn't thought of.
I prefer to use INDEX/MATCH in practically every situation because it is far more flexible and has the potential to be much more efficient depending on how large the lookup table is.
The only time when I can really justify using VLOOKUP is for very straight-forward tables where the column index number is dynamic, although even in this case, INDEX/MATCH is equally viable.
I'll give a few specific examples below to demonstrate the detailed differences between the two methods.
INDEX/MATCH can lookup to the left (or anywhere else you want)
This is probably the most obvious advantages to INDEX/MATCH as well as one of the biggest downfalls of VLOOKUP. VLOOKUP can only lookup to the right, INDEX/MATCH can lookup from any range, including different sheets if necessary.
The example below cannot be accomplished with VLOOKUP.
INDEX/MATCH has the potential to use smaller cell ranges (thus increasing efficiency)
Consider the example below. It can be accomplished with either method.
Both of these formulas work fine. However, since the VLOOKUP formula contains a larger range than the INDEX/MATCH formula, it is unnecessarily volatile.
If any cell in the range B1:G4 changes, the VLOOKUP formula must recalculate (because B1:G4 is within the range A1:H4) even though changing any cell in B1:G4 will not affect the outcome of the formula. This is not an issue for INDEX/MATCH because its formula does not contain the range B1:G4.
Using VLOOKUP with fixed col_index_number is dangerous
The main issue I see with having a fixed column index number is that it will not update as it should if full columns are inserted. Consider the following example:
This formula works fine unless a column is inserted within the lookup table. In that case, the formula will lookup the value to the left of where it should. See below, result after a column has been inserted.
This can actually be alleviated by using the following VLOOKUP formula instead:
= VLOOKUP("s",A1:H4,COLUMN(H1)-COLUMN(A1)+1,FALSE)
Now H1 will automatically update to I1 if a column is inserted, thus preserving the reference to the same column. However, this is entirely unnecessary because INDEX/MATCH can accomplish this without this problem with the formula below.
= INDEX(H1:H4,MATCH("s",A1:A4,0))
I realize this is an unlikely scenario, but it always bothered me that VLOOKUP by default looks up based on a fixed column index that does not automatically update if columns are inserted. To me, it just seems to make the VLOOKUP function more fragile.
INDEX/MATCH can handle variable column indexes just as well, but longer formula
If the column index number itself is dynamic, this is really the only case when I think VLOOKUP simplifies things a bit, but again the INDEX/MATCH alternative is just as good, just slightly more confusing. See below examples.
INDEX/MATCH is more efficient for multiple lookups
(thanks to #jeffreyweir)
If multiple lookup values are needed for a single match value, it is much more efficient to have a helper cell with the match value. This way, the match only has to be computed once, instead of one for each lookup formula. See example below.
This match value can then be used to return the appropriate lookup values. See example below, (formula has been dragged to the right).
This manual "splitting" of the match value and index values is not an option with VLOOKUP since the match value is an "internal" variable in VLOOKUP and cannot be accessed.
INDEX/MATCH can look up a range, allowing another operation
Let's say for example you want to find a max value in a column based on the column name.
You can first use MATCH to find the appropriate column, then INDEX to return the range of that entire column, then use MAX to find the max of that range.
See example below, the formula in H4 looks up the max value of the column name specified in cell G4. This cannot be accomplished using VLOOKUP alone.
MATCH doesn't have to match an exact value
Usually MATCH is used with the third argument as 0, meaning "find an exact match". But depending on the situation, using -1 or 1 as the third argument of MATCH can be very useful.
For example, the following formula returns the row number of the last row in column A that contains a number:
= MATCH(-1E+300,A:A,-1)
This is because this formula starts from the bottom of the A column and works its way toward the top, and returns the first row number in the A column where the value is greater than or equal to -1E+300 (which is basically any number).
Then INDEX can be used in combination with this to return the value in that cell. See example below.
In Summary
VLOOKUP is, at best, as good as INDEX/MATCH and admittedly slightly less confusing in some situations. And at worst, VLOOKUP is much more unsafe and volatile than INDEX/MATCH.
Also worth noting that if you want to look up a range instead of a single value, INDEX/MATCH must be used. VLOOKUP cannot be used to look up a range.
For these reasons, I generally prefer INDEX/MATCH in practically all situations.
Related
Taking sum of HP. But my formula is providing me wrong amount despite of criteria not being fulfilled!
I think it's worth posting an explanation as to why your original formula does not work, as it highlights an interesting feature of the function SUMIF.
As stated in one of my commments, you are passing a range parameter to that function of CN_2021[[#All],[HP]:[Sum of ORDER_AMT]], which is a reference to the entire table (including headers). Hence, you are effectively searching for the entry from P14 in all three columns, not just the first.
However, you are also using a sum_range parameter of CN_2021[[#All],[Sum of ORDER_QTY]], which is only one column. One might think that the construction should flat out error, since your range and sum_range parameters are not of an equal dimension (the former comprises 3 columns, the latter only 1).
The reason it does not error is due to the fact that, in such cases, Excel redimensions the sum_range so as to be of an equal dimension to the range.
So, if we replace the Table references with their equivalent worksheet references (assuming that table begins in A3) for the sake of simplification, we have that
=SUMIF(CN_2021[[#All],[HP]:[Sum of ORDER_AMT]],P14,CN_2021[[#All],[Sum of ORDER_QTY]])
which is equivalent to
=SUMIF(A3:C19,P14,B3:B19)
should error, though the single-column range
B3:B19
is redimensioned to a three-column range in line with the range, i.e.
B3:D19
which means that you are effectively performing
=SUMIF(A3:C19,P14,B3:D19)
This could have potential consequences were column D also populated: for example, place a 3 in cell C14 and 1000 in cell D14. The formula will now pick up this extra 1000 in the sum.
Strangely, unlike SUMIF, SUMIFS does not appear to be so lenient with respect to this redimensioning:
=SUMIFS(B3:B19,A3:C19,P14)
errors.
I'm trying to use VLOOKUP with HLOOKUP to extract a value from table but it always give me wrong cell - offset the cell value by one -
The equation is
=VLOOKUP(G22,A5:Z18,HLOOKUP(H22,B3:Z4,1,FALSE),FALSE)
the cell in red rec. is the right answer, but it always return value in green circle
What is wrong with my code?
INDEX/MATCH Over VLOOKUP or HLOOKUP
As a rule of thumb, using HLOOKUP only makes sense if you have more rows and you want to return a value from any but the first row. Similarly using VLOOKUP only makes sense if you have more columns and you want to return a value from any but the first column.
A more flexible handling of lookups is achieved by using INDEX with MATCH.
=INDEX(A3:Z18,MATCH(G22,A3:A18,0),MATCH(H22,A3:Z3,0))
If someone enters 3 in G22, an error will be displayed. A simple way of error handling is using the IFERROR function.
=IFERROR(INDEX(A3:Z18,MATCH(G22,A3:A18,0),MATCH(H22,A3:Z3,0)),"")
Study the image closely. When it comes to finding exact matches, I never use VLOOKUP or HLOOKUP because INDEX with MATCH covers it all and more. That doesn't mean that you should abandon using them because they are good tools to get familiar with indexes, offsets, and whatnot.
If you have Excel 365, you can use Xlookup as described in Example 5 of This reference. Note that Xlookup can return a whole column from a 2d array:
=XLOOKUP(G22,A5:A18,XLOOKUP(H22,B3:K3,B5:K18))
or if the data is in fact a table where the Phi is the first column and the mm are the headers, this would be:
=XLOOKUP(G22,Table1[φ],XLOOKUP(H22,Table1[#Headers],Table1))
Note If the mm are in the headers, they are formatted as text so H22 has to be formatted to reflect this or use
=XLOOKUP(G22,A5:A18,XLOOKUP(TEXT(H22,"general"),B3:K3,B5:K18))
and
=XLOOKUP(G22,Table1[φ],XLOOKUP(TEXT(H22,"general"),Table1[#Headers],Table1))
I have a table of fruits in Excel 2013.
I'd like to fill the "Category" column by searching from the current row to the top until the first occurrence of "::", which is the keyword for a category in the table.
If there was some way to reverse a range, I could do something like "=Match("::*"; $A6:$A$2)" to find the row. However, this is not possible.
Does anyone know how this might be accomplished using formulas?
Using your provided sample data, and assuming your data is already organized as shown in your sample, you can take advantage of that organization and use this formula in cell C2 and copy down:
=IF(LEFT(A2,2)="::","",IF(LEFT(A1,2)="::",MID(A1,4,LEN(A1)),C1))
Assuming your table is in A1, put this in C3:
=INDEX(A:A, AGGREGATE (14,6,ROW($A$1:A2)/(LEFT($A$1:A2,2)="::"),1))
And copy down.
Here's a kinda different approach. I'm just basically responding to this part of your post to prove this is possible:
If there was some way to reverse a range, I could do something like "=Match("::*"; $A6:$A$2)" to find the row. However, this is not possible.
Reversing a range is possible, it's just tricky.
As you pointed out: $A6:$A$2 won't work since this is equivalent to $A$2:$A6.
However, without getting into the nitty-gritty details, this array formula will reverse this range:
= INDEX($A$2:$A6,N(IF({1},MAX(ROW($A$2:$A6))-ROW($A$2:$A6)+1)))
Note this is an array formula, so you must press Ctrl+Shift+Enter instead of just Enter after typing this formula into a cell.
You could use this in combination with your MATCH formula to get the desired result (which tells you how many rows up the :: row is):
= MATCH("::*",INDEX($A$2:$A6,N(IF({1},MAX(ROW($A$2:$A6))-ROW($A$2:$A6)+1))),0)
(Also haha this is kinda cool: Usually you see MATCH used within INDEX to effectively get a VLOOKUP type of functionality. This is the first time I have ever seen it the opposite way of having INDEX within MATCH.)
Note that I'm not saying this is necessarily the best approach for this specific problem, just proving a point that arrays can be reversed.
What I'm wanting to do is have a formula in one cell that counts the values in a range that conform to a lookup of that range cell's value compared to another cell.
OMG, now that I look at it, that is totally confusing. Let me try to clarify a lot here.
Say we have Cell1, which will hold the counting formula. I have a list of values in a two-column table, Table1. The range, Range1 that Cell1 will be counting from is a range of cells that have List Validation in them. Table1 holds references to all values that can result from those Lists, in column 1. I have another cell, Cell2, which holds a number value. Column 2 of Table1 holds values that reference Cell2. I need to count the number of values from Range1 whose row matches in Table12 match the value in Cell2. Is there a way I can do this with COUNTIF without referencing each cell individually? Is there some shorthand (like Range.currentValue) that I can use to get the value of the cell currently being checked? The range is 11 rows long, and I need to do a second range that has 12 rows counted.
Man, I really don't know how to clarify that any more... I'll post this for now, in case anyone can understand what I'm saying and knows the answer, while I work on a sample spreadsheet I can upload.
I did my best to visually represent what I'm trying to accomplish:
http://gyazo.com/b83295baf3b156683a5c39b40c806504
Extended explanation: http://gyazo.com/4048802050e3dcfca7aee238acc2f7dd
Use a helper column, say, between the brown and the first blue or at the right of the setup. Use a vlookup like
=vlookup(brownvalue,BluetableRange,2,false)
Then do a countif on the helper column
=countif(HelperColumn,"<="&GreenCellAddress)
You can hide the column with the helper if it upsets your spreadsheet design.
You can (and probably should) use a helper column as Teylyn suggests. But, for when that may be inconvenient, you can also use an array formula:
=SUM(COUNTIFS(listlookupcolumn,rangeoflists,numbervaluecolumn,"<="&numbertomatch))
To enter it as an array formula, type "ctrl-shift-enter" after editing the formula, rather than just "enter"
Rough explanation: since rangeoflists is in a place where a single value is expected, the countifs is calculated once for each value, and the array of results is passed to sum. Use the "evaluate formula" feature to see the intermediate result array.
Afterthought: It occurs to me now that this does rely on listlookupcolumn containing unique values. (Almost certainly true in this example.) You can modify the formula a bit to get around this:
=SUM(SIGN(COUNTIFS(listlookupcolumn,rangeoflists,numbervaluecolumn,"<="&numbertomatch)))
The SIGN function will keep you from double counting.
Again, you must use "ctrl-shift-enter" for this to work. (Yes, as I'm sure others are ready to point out, you can also use the sumproduct hack in this instance.)
I want to Vlookup using two criteria:
the value in Column D;
The amount in Column A and Column G which can be approximately matched.
The normal Vlookup only returns the value of the first row, so one solution I think about is to match both the Invoice Number and Approximately Match the amount.
I am not sure if it is the best solution, please advise a better one, not necessarily in VBA, it can also use INDEX or MATCH functions, etc.
Thanks a lot in advance!
Below is the formula I've been trying, it is like something If true, then this value, if false then Lookup the next one.... But I am still thinking about how to navigate though the Vlookup to search next value, do I need to use VBA to solve this?! Vlookup based on Multiple Criteria2
The following formula should work:
=INDEX(G3:G5,SUMPRODUCT(MAX((D3:D5=B3)*ROW(D3:D5)))-3,1)
That's just a fancier version of Index(Match) that is used as a common replacement for vlookup. In this case, instead of Match we use Sumproduct to get the max row with the criteria we are looking for.
ADDED: Added a -3 to the second paramater of INDEX in order to adjust the Row() returned to the actual range that is being Indexed.