Related
This question already has answers here:
Find files with a certain extension that exceeds a certain file size
(3 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
I have the following linux command I use to determine if a directory is larger than 1GB in size:
du -sh * | sort -hr | awk '$1 ~ /[GT]/
How would I modify this to instead search for any file that has a certain file type, such as .log filetype?
Better use find :
find . -type f -name '*.log' -size +1G
sudo find /www-data -name "*.log" -type f -size +1000000k -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{ print $9 ": " $5 }' | sort
This question already has answers here:
How to find the largest file in a directory and its subdirectories?
(17 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
1.How to view the largest file in the directory using linux commands.
2.As i followed the following command ls -lh.
3.Is any other way to use the linux commands to view the largest file inside the directory with its size in human readable format.
Try:
$ find . -maxdepth 1 -printf '%s %p\n'|sort -nr|head
It will give you the top 10 in your directory. And if you just want the largest one:
$ find . -type f | xargs ls -1S | head -n 1
With its "parameters/attributes" (size, permissions, creation date & time):
$ find . -type f | xargs ls -lS | head -n 1
And if youy want to use ls without find try:
$ ls -S . | head -1
ls -Slh | tail +2 | head -1
which uses ls to list your files in size order, long format with human readable sizes. tail +2 removes the first line of your output which is a total size and head gives you the largest file.
I solved the question using this command:
ls -Slh | head -2
This lists by size and selects the first two results.
while I was trying to practice my linux skills, but I could not solve this question.
So its basically saying "Write a bash script that takes a name of
directory as a command argument and printf the name of subdirectories
that has more than 5 files in it."
I thought we will use the find command but ı still could not figure it out. My code is:
find directory -type d -mindepth5
but it's not working.
You can use find twice:
First you can use find and wc to count the number of files in a given directory:
nb=$(find directory -maxdepth 1 -type f -printf "x\n" | wc -l)
This just asks find to output an x on a line for each file in the directory directory, proceeding non-recursively, then wc -l counts the number of lines, so, really, nb is the number of files in directory.
If you want to know whether a directory contains more than 5 files, it's a good idea to stop find as soon as 6 files are found:
nb=$(find directory -maxdepth 1 -type f -printf "x\n" | head -6 | wc -l)
Here nb has an upper threshold of 6.
Now if for each subdirectory of a directory directory you want to output the number of files (threshold at 6), you can do this:
find directory -type d -exec bash -c 'nb=$(find "$0" -maxdepth 1 -type f -printf "x\n" | head -6 | wc -l); echo "$nb"' {} \;
where the $0 that appears is the 0-th argument, namely {} that find will replaced by the subdirectory of directory.
Finally, you only want to display the subdirectory name if the number of files is more than 5:
find . -type d -exec bash -c 'nb=$(find "$0" -maxdepth 1 -type f -printf "x\n" | head -6 | wc -l); ((nb>5))' {} \; -print
The final test ((nb>5)) returns success or failure whether nb is greater than 5 or not, and in case of success, find will -print the subdirectory name.
This should do the trick:
find directory/ -type f | sed 's/\(.*\)\/.*/\1/g' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | awk '{if($1>5) print($2)}'
Using mindpeth is useless here since it only lists directories at at least depth 5. You say you need subdirectories with more then 5 files in it.
find directory -type f prints all files in subdirectories
sed 's/\(.*\)\/.*/\1/g' removes names of files leaving only list of subdirecotries without filenames
sort sorts that list so we can use uniq
uniq -c merges duplicate lines and writes how many times it occured
sort -n sorts it by number of occurences (so you end up with a list:(how many times, subdirectory))
awk '{if($1>5) print($2)}' prints only those with first comlun 1 > 5 (and it only prints the second column)
So you end up with a list of subdirectories with at least 5 files inside.
EDIT:
A fix for paths with spaces was proposed:
Instead of awk '{if($1>5) print($2)}' there should be awk '{if($1>5){ $1=""; print(substr($0,2)) }}' which sets first part of line to "" and then prints whole line without a leading space (which was delimiter). So put together we get this:
find directory/ -type f | sed 's/\(.*\)\/.*/\1/g' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | awk '{if($1>5){ $1=""; print(substr($0,2)) }}'
I am able to list all the directories by
find ./ -type d
I attempted to list the contents of each directory and count the number of files in each directory by using the following command
find ./ -type d | xargs ls -l | wc -l
But this summed the total number of lines returned by
find ./ -type d | xargs ls -l
Is there a way I can count the number of files in each directory?
This prints the file count per directory for the current directory level:
du -a | cut -d/ -f2 | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
Assuming you have GNU find, let it find the directories and let bash do the rest:
find . -type d -print0 | while read -d '' -r dir; do
files=("$dir"/*)
printf "%5d files in directory %s\n" "${#files[#]}" "$dir"
done
find . -type f | cut -d/ -f2 | sort | uniq -c
find . -type f to find all items of the type file, in current folder and subfolders
cut -d/ -f2 to cut out their specific folder
sort to sort the list of foldernames
uniq -c to return the number of times each foldername has been counted
You could arrange to find all the files, remove the file names, leaving you a line containing just the directory name for each file, and then count the number of times each directory appears:
find . -type f |
sed 's%/[^/]*$%%' |
sort |
uniq -c
The only gotcha in this is if you have any file names or directory names containing a newline character, which is fairly unlikely. If you really have to worry about newlines in file names or directory names, I suggest you find them, and fix them so they don't contain newlines (and quietly persuade the guilty party of the error of their ways).
If you're interested in the count of the files in each sub-directory of the current directory, counting any files in any sub-directories along with the files in the immediate sub-directory, then I'd adapt the sed command to print only the top-level directory:
find . -type f |
sed -e 's%^\(\./[^/]*/\).*$%\1%' -e 's%^\.\/[^/]*$%./%' |
sort |
uniq -c
The first pattern captures the start of the name, the dot, the slash, the name up to the next slash and the slash, and replaces the line with just the first part, so:
./dir1/dir2/file1
is replaced by
./dir1/
The second replace captures the files directly in the current directory; they don't have a slash at the end, and those are replace by ./. The sort and count then works on just the number of names.
Here's one way to do it, but probably not the most efficient.
find -type d -print0 | xargs -0 -n1 bash -c 'echo -n "$1:"; ls -1 "$1" | wc -l' --
Gives output like this, with directory name followed by count of entries in that directory. Note that the output count will also include directory entries which may not be what you want.
./c/fa/l:0
./a:4
./a/c:0
./a/a:1
./a/a/b:0
Slightly modified version of Sebastian's answer using find instead of du (to exclude file-size-related overhead that du has to perform and that is never used):
find ./ -mindepth 2 -type f | cut -d/ -f2 | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
-mindepth 2 parameter is used to exclude files in current directory. If you remove it, you'll see a bunch of lines like the following:
234 dir1
123 dir2
1 file1
1 file2
1 file3
...
1 fileN
(much like the du-based variant does)
If you do need to count the files in current directory as well, use this enhanced version:
{ find ./ -mindepth 2 -type f | cut -d/ -f2 | sort && find ./ -maxdepth 1 -type f | cut -d/ -f1; } | uniq -c | sort -nr
The output will be like the following:
234 dir1
123 dir2
42 .
Everyone else's solution has one drawback or another.
find -type d -readable -exec sh -c 'printf "%s " "$1"; ls -1UA "$1" | wc -l' sh {} ';'
Explanation:
-type d: we're interested in directories.
-readable: We only want them if it's possible to list the files in them. Note that find will still emit an error when it tries to search for more directories in them, but this prevents calling -exec for them.
-exec sh -c BLAH sh {} ';': for each directory, run this script fragment, with $0 set to sh and $1 set to the filename.
printf "%s " "$1": portably and minimally print the directory name, followed by only a space, not a newline.
ls -1UA: list the files, one per line, in directory order (to avoid stalling the pipe), excluding only the special directories . and ..
wc -l: count the lines
This can also be done with looping over ls instead of find
for f in */; do echo "$f -> $(ls $f | wc -l)"; done
Explanation:
for f in */; - loop over all directories
do echo "$f -> - print out each directory name
$(ls $f | wc -l) - call ls for this directory and count lines
This should return the directory name followed by the number of files in the directory.
findfiles() {
echo "$1" $(find "$1" -maxdepth 1 -type f | wc -l)
}
export -f findfiles
find ./ -type d -exec bash -c 'findfiles "$0"' {} \;
Example output:
./ 6
./foo 1
./foo/bar 2
./foo/bar/bazzz 0
./foo/bar/baz 4
./src 4
The export -f is required because the -exec argument of find does not allow executing a bash function unless you invoke bash explicitly, and you need to export the function defined in the current scope to the new shell explicitly.
My answer is a little different, due to the options of find, you can actually be much more flexible. Just try:
find . -type f -printf "%h\n" | sort | uniq -c
With the "%h" option to "-printf", find prints only the directory of the files it found. Then sort and count with "uniq -c". This prints the number of search result entries with the same directory, per directory.
Using further options on find, you can be much more flexible. For example, to get an overview how many files in which directory have been modified at a certain date, use:
find . -newermt "2022-01-01 00:00:00" -type f -printf "%TY-%Tm-%Td %h\n" | sort | uniq -c
This finds all files that have been modified since 1. January 2022, prints (with "-printf") the modification date and the directory, then sorts and counts them. In this example, each line in the result has the number of files, the date of modification (without time), and the directory.
Note that "-printf" may not be available in all versions of find I think.
I combined #glenn jackman's answer and #pcarvalho's answer(in comment list, there is something wrong with pcarvalho's answer because the extra style control function of character '`'(backtick)).
My script can accept path as an augument and sort the directory list as ls -l, also it can handles the problem of "space in file name".
#!/bin/bash
OLD_IFS="$IFS"
IFS=$'\n'
for dir in $(find $1 -maxdepth 1 -type d | sort);
do
files=("$dir"/*)
printf "%5d,%s\n" "${#files[#]}" "$dir"
done
FS="$OLD_IFS"
My first answer in stackoverflow, and I hope it can help someone ^_^
THis could be another way to browse through the directory structures and provide depth results.
find . -type d | awk '{print "echo -n \""$0" \";ls -l "$0" | grep -v total | wc -l" }' | sh
find . -type f -printf '%h\n' | sort | uniq -c
gives for example:
5 .
4 ./aln
5 ./aln/iq
4 ./bs
4 ./ft
6 ./hot
I tried with some of the others here but ended up with subfolders included in the file count when I only wanted the files. This prints ./folder/path<tab>nnn with the number of files, not including subfolders, for each subfolder in the current folder.
for d in `find . -type d -print`
do
echo -e "$d\t$(find $d -maxdepth 1 -type f -print | wc -l)"
done
This will give the overall count.
for file in */; do echo "$file -> $(ls $file | wc -l)"; done | cut -d ' ' -f 3| py --ji -l 'numpy.sum(l)'
A super fast miracle command, which recursively traverses files to count the number of images in a directory and organize the output by image extension:
find . -type f | sed -e 's/.*\.//' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | grep -Ei '(tiff|bmp|jpeg|jpg|png|gif)$'
Credits: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/386135/354980
I edited the script in order to exclude all node_modules directories inside the analyzed one.
This can be used to check if the project number of files is exceeding the maximum number that the file watcher can handle.
find . -type d ! -path "*node_modules*" -print0 | while read -d '' -r dir; do
files=("$dir"/*)
printf "%5d files in directory %s\n" "${#files[#]}" "$dir"
done
To check the maximum files that your system can watch:
cat /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches
node_modules folder should be added to your IDE/editor excluded paths in slow systems, and the other files count shouldn't ideally exceed the maximum (which can be changed though).
Easy Method:
find ./|grep "Search_file.txt" |cut -d"/" -f2|sort |uniq -c
In my case I needed the count at subfolder level, so I did:
du -a | cut -d/ -f3 | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
Easy way to recursively find files of a given type. In this case, .jpg files for all folders in current directory:
find . -name *.jpg -print | wc -l
omg why the complex commands. just use something like
find whatever_folder | wc -l
On a Linux machine I would like to traverse a folder hierarchy and get a list of all of the distinct file extensions within it.
What would be the best way to achieve this from a shell?
Try this (not sure if it's the best way, but it works):
find . -type f | perl -ne 'print $1 if m/\.([^.\/]+)$/' | sort -u
It work as following:
Find all files from current folder
Prints extension of files if any
Make a unique sorted list
No need for the pipe to sort, awk can do it all:
find . -type f | awk -F. '!a[$NF]++{print $NF}'
Recursive version:
find . -type f | sed -e 's/.*\.//' | sed -e 's/.*\///' | sort -u
If you want totals (how may times the extension was seen):
find . -type f | sed -e 's/.*\.//' | sed -e 's/.*\///' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
Non-recursive (single folder):
for f in *.*; do printf "%s\n" "${f##*.}"; done | sort -u
I've based this upon this forum post, credit should go there.
My awk-less, sed-less, Perl-less, Python-less POSIX-compliant alternative:
find . -type f | rev | cut -d. -f1 | rev | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | sort | uniq --count | sort -rn
The trick is that it reverses the line and cuts the extension at the beginning.
It also converts the extensions to lower case.
Example output:
3689 jpg
1036 png
610 mp4
90 webm
90 mkv
57 mov
12 avi
10 txt
3 zip
2 ogv
1 xcf
1 trashinfo
1 sh
1 m4v
1 jpeg
1 ini
1 gqv
1 gcs
1 dv
Powershell:
dir -recurse | select-object extension -unique
Thanks to http://kevin-berridge.blogspot.com/2007/11/windows-powershell.html
Adding my own variation to the mix. I think it's the simplest of the lot and can be useful when efficiency is not a big concern.
find . -type f | grep -oE '\.(\w+)$' | sort -u
Find everythin with a dot and show only the suffix.
find . -type f -name "*.*" | awk -F. '{print $NF}' | sort -u
if you know all suffix have 3 characters then
find . -type f -name "*.???" | awk -F. '{print $NF}' | sort -u
or with sed shows all suffixes with one to four characters. Change {1,4} to the range of characters you are expecting in the suffix.
find . -type f | sed -n 's/.*\.\(.\{1,4\}\)$/\1/p'| sort -u
I tried a bunch of the answers here, even the "best" answer. They all came up short of what I specifically was after. So besides the past 12 hours of sitting in regex code for multiple programs and reading and testing these answers this is what I came up with which works EXACTLY like I want.
find . -type f -name "*.*" | grep -o -E "\.[^\.]+$" | grep -o -E "[[:alpha:]]{2,16}" | awk '{print tolower($0)}' | sort -u
Finds all files which may have an extension.
Greps only the extension
Greps for file extensions between 2 and 16 characters (just adjust the numbers if they don't fit your need). This helps avoid cache files and system files (system file bit is to search jail).
Awk to print the extensions in lower case.
Sort and bring in only unique values. Originally I had attempted to try the awk answer but it would double print items that varied in case sensitivity.
If you need a count of the file extensions then use the below code
find . -type f -name "*.*" | grep -o -E "\.[^\.]+$" | grep -o -E "[[:alpha:]]{2,16}" | awk '{print tolower($0)}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
While these methods will take some time to complete and probably aren't the best ways to go about the problem, they work.
Update:
Per #alpha_989 long file extensions will cause an issue. That's due to the original regex "[[:alpha:]]{3,6}". I have updated the answer to include the regex "[[:alpha:]]{2,16}". However anyone using this code should be aware that those numbers are the min and max of how long the extension is allowed for the final output. Anything outside that range will be split into multiple lines in the output.
Note: Original post did read "- Greps for file extensions between 3 and 6 characters (just adjust the numbers if they don't fit your need). This helps avoid cache files and system files (system file bit is to search jail)."
Idea: Could be used to find file extensions over a specific length via:
find . -type f -name "*.*" | grep -o -E "\.[^\.]+$" | grep -o -E "[[:alpha:]]{4,}" | awk '{print tolower($0)}' | sort -u
Where 4 is the file extensions length to include and then find also any extensions beyond that length.
In Python using generators for very large directories, including blank extensions, and getting the number of times each extension shows up:
import json
import collections
import itertools
import os
root = '/home/andres'
files = itertools.chain.from_iterable((
files for _,_,files in os.walk(root)
))
counter = collections.Counter(
(os.path.splitext(file_)[1] for file_ in files)
)
print json.dumps(counter, indent=2)
Since there's already another solution which uses Perl:
If you have Python installed you could also do (from the shell):
python -c "import os;e=set();[[e.add(os.path.splitext(f)[-1]) for f in fn]for _,_,fn in os.walk('/home')];print '\n'.join(e)"
Another way:
find . -type f -name "*.*" -printf "%f\n" | while IFS= read -r; do echo "${REPLY##*.}"; done | sort -u
You can drop the -name "*.*" but this ensures we are dealing only with files that do have an extension of some sort.
The -printf is find's print, not bash. -printf "%f\n" prints only the filename, stripping the path (and adds a newline).
Then we use string substitution to remove up to the last dot using ${REPLY##*.}.
Note that $REPLY is simply read's inbuilt variable. We could just as use our own in the form: while IFS= read -r file, and here $file would be the variable.
None of the replies so far deal with filenames with newlines properly (except for ChristopheD's, which just came in as I was typing this). The following is not a shell one-liner, but works, and is reasonably fast.
import os, sys
def names(roots):
for root in roots:
for a, b, basenames in os.walk(root):
for basename in basenames:
yield basename
sufs = set(os.path.splitext(x)[1] for x in names(sys.argv[1:]))
for suf in sufs:
if suf:
print suf
I think the most simple & straightforward way is
for f in *.*; do echo "${f##*.}"; done | sort -u
It's modified on ChristopheD's 3rd way.
I don't think this one was mentioned yet:
find . -type f -exec sh -c 'echo "${0##*.}"' {} \; | sort | uniq -c
The accepted answer uses REGEX and you cannot create an alias command with REGEX, you have to put it into a shell script, I'm using Amazon Linux 2 and did the following:
I put the accepted answer code into a file using :
sudo vim find.sh
add this code:
find ./ -type f | perl -ne 'print $1 if m/\.([^.\/]+)$/' | sort -u
save the file by typing: :wq!
sudo vim ~/.bash_profile
alias getext=". /path/to/your/find.sh"
:wq!
. ~/.bash_profile
you could also do this
find . -type f -name "*.php" -exec PATHTOAPP {} +
I've found it simple and fast...
# find . -type f -exec basename {} \; | awk -F"." '{print $NF}' > /tmp/outfile.txt
# cat /tmp/outfile.txt | sort | uniq -c| sort -n > tmp/outfile_sorted.txt