Problems rendering edge lines as SVG - three.js - svg
I'm trying to draw edge lines on 3D objects rendered in three.js, however the lines do not render correctly when using the SVGRenderer.
Apply edge lines:
var geo = new THREE.EdgesGeometry( mesh.geometry );
var mat = new THREE.LineBasicMaterial( { color: 0x000000, linewidth: 4 } );
var wireframe = new THREE.LineSegments( geo, mat );
mesh.add( wireframe );
(Edges code taken from this answer)
This works as expected with the WebGLRenderer:
https://jsfiddle.net/8p7jja9L/23/
But lines are obscured when using the SVGRenderer:
https://jsfiddle.net/8p7jja9L/24/
(NOTE: NEITHER version renders correctly in Chrome, due to this issue. Use Firefox to see an accurate representation of the WebGL version.)
What you are seeing is a limitation of SVGRenderer. There is no depth-testing as there is with WebGLRenderer.
The best you can do is set
wireframe.renderOrder = 1;
This will force the wireframe to render after the mesh. But the entire wireframe will be rendered, giving the appearance of a transparent mesh.
three.js r.88
Related
SVG getScreenCTM() on FireFox
GOAL
I am trying to build a signature pad in SVG. You can view
Sample project here.
Description
So far, it works in Chrome, Edge and Opera as desired but, in Firefox, getScreenCTM() doesn't account for the scale.
Research
I went through a bunch of documentation from bugzilla and a couple of posts here in SO such as SVG: GetScreenCTM() for nested SVG is different in Firefox but, still couldn't figure out how to fix my issue.
Problem
I've added a browse check to handle only Firefox (since all other browsers provides the desired result) which allows me to add extra code to fix the problem but, thus far, had no success. (SPSignature:416)
Reproduce the error
To reproduce the error, open the sample link in FireFox than, resize the box so it is at least 20% smaller as in fullscreen. You will see the mouseX/Y position change as scale changes.
I've tried to get the matrix transform from the group tag but, it returns similar result from the SVG. How do I calculate the CTM, so its result is similar/equal to Chrome?
Code
Source code here SPSignature:416
_getCursorPoint(event)
{
const svg = document.querySelector('.spsignature svg');
let pt = svg.createSVGPoint();
pt.x = event.clientX;
pt.y = event.clientY;
// firefox workaround:
if (this._checkBrowser() === 'Firefox') {
const matrix = this._decomposeMatrix(svg.getScreenCTM());
let cood = {
x: event.layerX,
y: event.layerY
};
if (matrix.scaleX < 0.9 || matrix.scaleY < 0.9) {
console.log('%c #todo: fix mouse position for FF on getScreenCTM().', 'background:#c00;color:#fff;padding:3px;');
}
return cood;
}
return pt.matrixTransform(svg.getScreenCTM().inverse());
}
To "fix" the mouse XY problem on FF, I've used the root scale value to allow for the calculation of the cursor XY position. The scale can be retrieved from the matrix based on https://gist.github.com/2052247. Also, in FF, I've used the event.layerX and event.layerY instead of event.clientX and event.clientY for the initial mouse coordinate values. So, instead of using matrixTransform(svg.getScreenCTM().inverse()) to return the calculated XY relative to the SVG, I've used the scale and layerXY to calculate the right XY position.
How to do svg scaling with Pixi
I've been trying to do SVG scaling with PIXI but the results are not really what I expected them to be. As you can see in the image, the debian logo, which is a SVG file, seems to be blurry and edgy. Am I writing my code wrong:
Refined from https://github.com/kevguy/D3-Svg-Comparison/blob/master/src/components/SvgCompare.vue:
// initialization
this.renderer = new PIXI.Application(800, 600, {backgroundColor: 0x1099bb})
document.getElementById('svg-canvas').appendChild(this.renderer.view)
this.container = new PIXI.Container()
this.stage = this.renderer.stage
this.stage.addChild(this.container)
// appending the svg file
const texture = PIXI.Texture.fromImage(this.chosenImage)
this.svg = new PIXI.Sprite(texture)
this.svg.anchor.x = 0.8
this.svg.anchor.y = 0.8
this.svg.position.x = 400
this.svg.position.y = 300
this.svg.scale.x = this.selectedScale
this.svg.scale.y = this.selectedScale
this.container.addChild(this.svg)
chosenImage is the svg file retrieved by using import * as choesnImage from 'the-file-path'
selectedScale is the selected scaling value which can be changed dynamically thanks to VueJS
You can check out my work here and its corresponding GitHub repo
The bunny logo is to verify when the scaling happens, it only applies to the SVG not the whole canvas.
According to this issue you need to load svg like this to generate scaled svg texture. PIXI.Texture.fromImage(this.chosenImage, undefined, undefined, newVal) And need to clean texture cache then create new texture for every new scale change. PIXI.utils.clearTextureCache() Modified SvgCompare.vue on gist
three.js color of object, not texture
So to explain the weird title first, I am trying to make a 3D avatar for a little project I am working on, however when I try to change the color of the arm on the avatar, it doesn't actually change the color with the texture on it, it changes the color of the white part (not transparent) of the texture, but where it is transparent on the texture it shows white with, as it seems, no lighting.
Before coloring:
After coloring:
The actual texture I am using can be found here: http://imgur.com/SlnOxEw
This is how I am rendering the texture:
var AvatarTexture = new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial( { map: THREE.ImageUtils.loadTexture('./images/Shirt/vest.png'), shininess: 80, shading: THREE.SmoothShading, alphaMap: 0x000000} );
and the coloring:
object.children[0].material.color.setHex(0xffcc66);
object.children[2].material.color.setHex(0xffcc66);
object.children[4].material.color.setHex(0xffcc66);
the object itself is a UV mapped .obj exported from blender. This happens even if the texture does not have transparency.
First, in three.js, the final color is the product of material.color and material.map, component-wise. So if you change material.color, the final texture color will be tinted. Second, if two meshes share the same material, and you change the material color, then both meshes will change color. To prevent that, you need to have a separate material instance for each mesh. material2 = material1.clone(); three.js r.77
If you want to change color of part, it is not important an object, but a material var reference. //your solution as i understand question var material1 = new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial( .. ); var mesh1.material = material1; var mesh2.material = material1; material1.color= red; // both meshes change color. //solution: var mesh1.material = new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial( .. ); var mesh2.material = new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial( .. ); //or var material1 = new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial( .. ); var material2 = new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial( .. ); var mesh1.material = material1; var mesh2.material = material2;
Extruding multiple polygons with multiple holes and texturing the combined shape
This question is related to this question. The answer shows very nice way to extrude polygons that have holes (see the excellent live example). The main learning of the answer was that paths in three.js (r58) cannot have more than one moveTo command and it have to be in the start of the path, which means that path have to be broken by moveTos, so that moveTo start always a new path.
Extruding in three.js means that 2D paths are converted to 3D shapes using possible beveling. It is suitable for extruding texts to make 3D letters and words, but can be used also to extrude custom paths.
Now there arises two questions:
how is it possible to handle polygons that have multiple hole-polygons and multiple non-hole-polygons?
how is it possible to add a texture to generated shape as a whole?
I made an example of this as SVG in http://jsbin.com/oqomuj/1/edit:
The image is produced using this path:
<path d="
M57.11,271.77 L57.11,218.33 L41.99,218.63 L105.49,165.77 L138.41,193.18 L138.41,172.2 L152.53,172.2 L152.53,204.93 L168.99,218.63 L153.21,218.63 L153.21,271.77Z
M74.14,264.13 L105.49,264.13 L105.49,232.8 L74.14,232.8Z
M115.35,250.7 L135.96,250.7 L135.96,232.61 L115.35,232.61Z
M56.11,145.77 L56.11,92.33 L40.99,92.63 L104.49,39.77 L137.41,67.18 L137.41,46.2 L151.53,46.2 L151.53,78.93 L152.53,79.76 L155.55,77.23 L159.5,74.52 L168.65,69.81 L176.46,66.93 L188.04,64.16 L200.63,62.7 L213.65,62.7 L226.05,64.09 L234.83,66.06 L245.65,69.73 L252.87,73.27 L259.12,77.34 L262.63,80.33 L265.6,83.47 L268.01,86.76 L269.83,90.17 L271.08,93.68 L271.76,99.08 L271.04,104.64 L269.75,108.2 L267.87,111.63 L265.42,114.91 L262.44,118.01 L258.95,120.92 L255.02,123.63 L245.86,128.34 L238.06,131.22 L226.48,133.99 L213.88,135.44 L200.63,135.44 L188.04,133.99 L176.46,131.22 L168.65,128.34 L159.5,123.63 L155.55,120.92 L152.21,118.12 L152.21,145.77Z
M73.14,138.13 L104.49,138.13 L104.49,106.8 L73.14,106.8Z
M114.35,124.7 L134.96,124.7 L134.96,106.61 L114.35,106.61Z
M207.26,117.33 L210.57,117.26 L216.87,116.53 L222.66,115.15 L227.8,113.18 L233.11,110 L236.34,106.99 L238.51,103.64 L239.42,100.48 L239.42,97.67 L238.51,94.51 L236.34,91.16 L233.11,88.15 L227.8,84.97 L222.66,83 L216.87,81.62 L210.57,80.89 L203.94,80.89 L197.65,81.62 L191.86,83 L186.71,84.97 L181.41,88.15 L178.18,91.16 L176.01,94.51 L175.1,97.67 L175.1,100.48 L176.01,103.64 L178.18,106.99 L181.41,110 L186.71,113.18 L191.86,115.15 L197.65,116.53 L203.94,117.26Z
"></path>
and this path converted to individual arrays of vertices:
var lower_house_material = [{x:57.11,y:271.77},{x:57.11,y:218.33},{x:41.99,y:218.63},{x:105.49,y:165.77},{x:138.42,y:193.18},{x:138.42,y:172.2},{x:152.53,y:172.2},{x:152.53,y:204.93},{x:168.99,y:218.63},{x:153.21,y:218.63},{x:153.21,y:271.77}];
var lower_house_hole_1 = [{x:74.14,y:264.13},{x:105.49,y:264.13},{x:105.49,y:232.8},{x:74.14,y:232.8}];
var lower_house_hole_2 = [{x:115.35,y:250.7},{x:135.96,y:250.7},{x:135.96,y:232.61},{x:115.35,y:232.61}];
var upper_house_material = [{x:56.11,y:145.77},{x:56.11,y:92.33},{x:40.99,y:92.63},{x:104.49,y:39.77},{x:137.42,y:67.18},{x:137.42,y:46.2},{x:151.53,y:46.2},{x:151.53,y:78.93},{x:152.53,y:79.76},{x:155.55,y:77.23},{x:159.5,y:74.52},{x:168.65,y:69.81},{x:176.46,y:66.93},{x:188.04,y:64.16},{x:200.63,y:62.7},{x:213.65,y:62.7},{x:226.05,y:64.1},{x:234.83,y:66.06},{x:245.65,y:69.73},{x:252.87,y:73.27},{x:259.12,y:77.35},{x:262.63,y:80.33},{x:265.6,y:83.47},{x:268.01,y:86.76},{x:269.84,y:90.17},{x:271.08,y:93.68},{x:271.76,y:99.08},{x:271.04,y:104.64},{x:269.75,y:108.2},{x:267.87,y:111.63},{x:265.42,y:114.91},{x:262.44,y:118.01},{x:258.96,y:120.92},{x:255.02,y:123.63},{x:245.86,y:128.34},{x:238.06,y:131.22},{x:226.48,y:133.99},{x:213.88,y:135.45},{x:200.63,y:135.45},{x:188.04,y:133.99},{x:176.46,y:131.22},{x:168.65,y:128.34},{x:159.5,y:123.63},{x:155.55,y:120.92},{x:152.21,y:118.12},{x:152.21,y:145.77}];
var upper_house_hole_1 = [{x:73.14,y:138.13},{x:104.49,y:138.13},{x:104.49,y:106.8},{x:73.14,y:106.8}];
var upper_house_hole_2 = [{x:114.35,y:124.7},{x:134.96,y:124.7},{x:134.96,y:106.61},{x:114.35,y:106.61}];
var upper_house_hole_3 = [{x:207.26,y:117.33},{x:210.57,y:117.26},{x:216.87,y:116.53},{x:222.66,y:115.15},{x:227.8,y:113.18},{x:233.11,y:110},{x:236.34,y:106.99},{x:238.51,y:103.64},{x:239.42,y:100.48},{x:239.42,y:97.67},{x:238.51,y:94.51},{x:236.34,y:91.16},{x:233.11,y:88.15},{x:227.8,y:84.97},{x:222.66,y:83},{x:216.87,y:81.62},{x:210.57,y:80.89},{x:203.94,y:80.89},{x:197.65,y:81.62},{x:191.86,y:83},{x:186.71,y:84.97},{x:181.41,y:88.15},{x:178.18,y:91.16},{x:176.01,y:94.51},{x:175.1,y:97.67},{x:175.1,y:100.48},{x:176.01,y:103.64},{x:178.18,y:106.99},{x:181.41,y:110},{x:186.71,y:113.18},{x:191.86,y:115.15},{x:197.65,y:116.53},{x:203.94,y:117.26}];
The question is, how this like structure can be converted to 3D object in three.js so that it can be extruded using THREE.ExtrudeGeometry( shape, extrusionSettings ) and after that textured as a whole?
I can examine the path data to know what hole belongs to what polygon and handle all as separate shapes, but because I want to use one texture image across all the shapes, I think the preferred way is to handle all material-polygons as one shape, and hole-polygons as other shape and use something like:
var shape = [lower_house_material, upper_house_material];
shape.holes = [lower_house_hole_1, lower_house_hole_2, upper_house_hole_1, upper_house_hole_2, upper_house_hole_3];
var 3d_geometry = THREE.ExtrudeGeometry( shape, extrusionSettings );
So the 3d_geometry should be at the end one mesh to which I can append a texture this way:
var textureFront = new THREE.ImageUtils.loadTexture( 'textureFront.png');
var textureSide = new THREE.ImageUtils.loadTexture( 'textureSide.png');
var materialFront = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: textureFront } );
var materialSide = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: textureSide } );
var materialArray = [ materialFront, materialSide ];
var faceMaterial = new THREE.MeshFaceMaterial(materialArray);
var final_mesh = new THREE.Mesh(3d_geometry, faceMaterial );
And one of the textures could be something like this (256x256px):
And texture applied:
And because the mesh is extruded, there is also 3D thickness on the above, but you got the idea of texturing.
I know that y-coordinates have to be flipped but it is a trivial task and not the point of my question, but if three.js has ready-made function for clipping y, it would be helpful.
I have spent hours to examine the three.js source code, examples and documentation, but because the most frequent word there is "todo", it cannot help much. And I'm very newbie to three.js, I would think that this may be trivial task for some experienced three.js user.
UPDATE: And just to make sure, the hole polygons are always well-behaved, which means that hole polygons are always fully inside material-polygons and there are no duplicate vertices or self-intersections either in material-polygons or hole-polygons and all material-polygons have CW winding order and holes CCW.
UPDATE: Merging geometries was not a solution for texturing the whole extruded polygon set by one texture: http://jsfiddle.net/C5dga. The texture is repeated on all individual shapes, so merging geometries in this case has no real meaning. The solution could be possibly found on merging shapes before they are extruded, but not found solution for this yet.
You can merge geometries as in the following snippet, resulting in just a single mesh. From your prior questions, you already know how to texture a single geometry. var geometry1 = new THREE.ExtrudeGeometry( shape1, extrusionSettings ); var geometry2 = new THREE.ExtrudeGeometry( shape2, extrusionSettings ); geometry1.merge( geometry2 ); . . . var mesh = new THREE.Mesh( geometry1, material ); scene.add( mesh ); Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/pHn2B/88/ Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/C5dga/13/ (with texture) EDIT: As an alternative to creating separate geometries and using the merge utility, you can create a single geometry using the following pattern, instead: var geometry1 = new THREE.ExtrudeGeometry( [ shape1, shape2 ], extrusionSettings ); EDIT: updated to three.js r.70
How to create a `pixelized' SVG image from a bitmap?
I have a 16x16 bitmap and want to create an SVG that contains 16x16 squares with the colors of the pixels of the image. Is there an easy way to achieve this? My current thoughts go into the direction of using Python and PIL to read the bitmap image and dynamically create an SVG image file with the corresponding objects. But this feels a little clumsy and like reinventing the wheel. Is there a better way to do this?
If you don't need the output to be SVG, I would suggest using an HTML5 Canvas where you can sample the pixels of the image client-side (using getImageData() on the context) and then draw your own up-scaled image. Or, if you need SVG, you could still use Canvas for the image sampling and then use procedurally-created <rect/> elements in SVG for each pixel.
I've written an example using just HTML Canvas so you can see how to do this. In short:
function drawPixelated(img,context,zoom,x,y){
if (!zoom) zoom=4; if (!x) x=0; if (!y) y=0;
if (!img.id) img.id = "__img"+(drawPixelated.lastImageId++);
var idata = drawPixelated.idataById[img.id];
if (!idata){
var ctx = document.createElement('canvas').getContext('2d');
ctx.width = img.width;
ctx.height = img.height;
ctx.drawImage(img,0,0);
idata = drawPixelated.idataById[img.id] = ctx.getImageData(0,0,img.width,img.height).data;
}
for (var x2=0;x2<img.width;++x2){
for (var y2=0;y2<img.height;++y2){
var i=(y2*img.width+x2)*4;
var r=idata[i ];
var g=idata[i+1];
var b=idata[i+2];
var a=idata[i+3];
context.fillStyle = "rgba("+r+","+g+","+b+","+(a/255)+")";
context.fillRect(x+x2*zoom, y+y2*zoom, zoom, zoom);
}
}
};
drawPixelated.idataById={};
drawPixelated.lastImageId=0;
If you really need SVG involved, I'd be happy to write an example that dynamically generated that.
Edit: OK, I've created an SVG version just for fun and practice. :)
As an aside (from an initial misreading of your question) this demo file from ASVG3 their old SVG Examples Page shows how to use some complex compositing of many different effects to create pixelation on arbitrary vector data. Unfortunately the demo does not load in Chrome, having been hardwired to require the (now-discontinued) Adobe SVG Viewer.