Albeit I have no problem advertising and promoting ServiceStack in general. I have a project that requires that I remove ServiceStack mentions from my APIs' Response Headers:
And also from myservice/types:
Like I said my team all has licenses to develop with ServiceStack...
You can remove it from your AppHost’s HostConfig:
Config.GlobalResponseHeaders.Remove(“X-Powered-By”);
Related
We were required to lower .NET trust level for our WEB application using ServiceStack.
However when .NET trust level is set to anything lower than "Full", ServiceStack fails to recognize the license. Here is the stack I got:
LicenseException: This license is invalid. Please see servicestack.net or contact team#servicestack.net for more details. The id for this license is '2771']
ServiceStack.LicenseUtils.RegisterLicense(String licenseKeyText) +781
ServiceStack.Licensing.RegisterLicense(String licenseKeyText) +5
Is there a way to overcome this?
ServiceStack isn't supported in non-Full trust environments which is also deprecated in ASP.NET.
After reading a lot about ServiceStack, I think it's such a beautiful work of art and I decided to use it for our upcoming Xamarin iOS App.
The problem currently is that after installing the ServiceStack.Client for Xamarin.iOS, I can't find the Request/Response DTOs (i.e POCOs) that are used for registration or authentication given that I have enabled the Authentication and Registration Plugins in the service host.
After digging into the source code, I found those Request/Response DTOs to reside in ServiceStack assembly which is a huge dependency and I don't think I can include it in our iOS App.
is there a way around that ? shouldn't these DTOs be shipped as well with the ServiceStack clients themselves under maybe ServiceStack.Client.Auth ?
Thanks
Sorry, I guess I found them already available inside ServiceStack.Client .. what confused me is that I took some sample code from the C# client wiki and the DTOs were named differently and not available .. Thanks –
I need a Micro-ORM which has a commercial license. Our corporate policy currently does not allow open source.
I have looked at these options, which would all work, but they are all open source:
Dapper (Apache 2.0)
PetaPoco (Apache 2.0)
Massive (BSD-2).
We are using SQLite and .NET 4.0.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. We would be willing to purchase a commercial license if it were available.
Perhaps you can buy support and have a commercial license from some companies for the open source options you are considering.
It seems that avoiding open source software is more and more difficult (and I am happy of that).
Telerik has an ORM which looks good.
But I am still a big fan of Dapper ORM. I am working with my legal department to get approval to use it.
http://www.mindscapehq.com/products/lightspeed
lightspeed is that easy compared to Entity framework that I would count it as semi-orm lite ;-)
What is the issue tracking system used by Google Code to track projects like GWT http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/list Chromium http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/list etc?
I'd like to know if this bug tracking software is an open source project available for download.
When you create a new project on code.google.com, the issue tracker comes with it. As far as I know, this is a custom issue tracker built for Google Project Hosting, and according to Wikipedia, the code for Google's issue tracker isn't open source. They do have an API for building client applications that interact with the Issue Tracker, though. An open source client library has been written in C#, but I haven't used it, so I can't speak to its functionality or flexibility.
The issue tracking software that was used on Google Code was never open-sourced, as it depended upon many Google-internal systems (eg. BigTable). The site was developed in Python from about August 2005 through to the launch of Google Code in July 2006, by a team of four engineers (including myself).
I think it's worth mentioning that the Chromium team did a rewrite of the issue tracker, which is a nearly identical drop-in replacement. It's an open-source App Engine application called Monorail and it's being used at bugs.chromium.org.
https://chromium.googlesource.com/infra/infra/+/master/appengine/monorail
I was wondering if anyone has built or know of a decent forum package for Umbraco 4.03??
I've had a little play with this but its a bit basic
http://our.umbraco.org/projects/umbraco-forum-package
and
http://our.umbraco.org/projects/uforum-basics
I've found this article on how to integrate YAF forum but would rather have one which fits a bit better..
http://dawoe.blogspot.com/2009/02/intergrate-yet-another-forum-193rc2.html
Of course I know one answer, write or extend one of the above :) Any help would be gratefully received.
uForum is used to power the Our Umbraco community - so that's the current recommended forum package.
YAF is a fully-featured forum/bulletin-board web-application, which can be integrated with Umbraco (using an ASP.NET Membership Provider). Aside from that YAF is standalone.
Update: There is a new package called nForum.
I guess it depends on your requirements.
What features are lacking, clearly you know what you want so any guidance on what the forum should include will help.
Pretty much any asp.net based forum software would work with Umbraco. I guess the main thing would be the integration with the Membership provider in Umbraco. In this case Any forum software that could use a custom ASP.NET membership provider would integrate pretty much seamlessly.
There are plenty of opensource and commercial forum packages available for ASP.NET, just find one that matches your requirements and look at integrating it or running it alongside Umbraco.