If you have a table in excel all column headers are forced to be formatted as general text. I am trying to use a pivot table to reference the data in the table AND see the column headers as dates the only way to do this is to have a completely separate row somewhere else on the spreadsheet that's not part of the table but mirrors the columns with the exception of it being formatted as a date. Thus is my problem, I need to combine these two ranges to make a single range I can use as a value in the pivot table range.
OFFSET($B$11,0,0,ROWS(tblOther[#Data]),COLUMNS(tblOther[#Data]-2))
and
OFFSET(tblOther[#Data],0,0,ROWS(tblOther[#Data]),COLUMNS(tblOther[#Data]-2))
Thanks
Again, all I can do is point you to two great ways I suggested you can mash multiple tables together at your other thread at Combine Multiple Tables Rows Into Master Table
One using PowerQuery, as Ralph suggests
One using VBA.
Now I know at that other thread that you didn't want a PQ or VBA solution, but neither of them is that hard, and I've given you a link to a previous answer with step-by-step pictures that shows how easy PQ is, and a generic VBA routine that is pretty simple to implement.
If you want easy ways to mash tables together, then they are pretty much it. If there's some reason you can't use one or both of those, post back and let me know what the reason is and I'll see if I can help you overcome it.
Related
So basically, I have been trying to make excel scan one column and print out the row for cells which have specific letters.
For example I have the following data in my sheet.
What is required is to be have excel search for the values which contain T and I, and then print the new rows. Kind of like separate the two into two different tables, because then so that I can do further analysis on them.
So far I have been trying to use the VLOOKUP() function, but the problem with VLOOKUP() is that excel required a proper match and not just a letter in the cell. I had tried with both FALSE and TRUE. Then instead I tried to use the =INDEX($B$4:$K$9;MATCH($A$17;$A$5:$A$9;0);COLUMN(A4)) to make it work. But that also does not work, since it also requires a full match. Also another problem which I didn't realise before is that how can excel recognise each cell, because I will have different number after the letters everytime and then so how can one make excel not repeat the same row twice?
I have used another approach where I copy the data in a separated sheet and then I simply filter out the Ts and then copy/paste the Is into another sheet and vice versa. it is time consuming and so it would be much better if I can simply copy/paste my new data and it would generate the division on its own.
any suggestions or link would be really helpful.
UPDATE
I had a new idea on how to approach this problem. I was thinking that is it somehow possible to have VBA code running for filtering the data. Is there a way to specify in VBA code to filter the data by "Starts With" and Make the results be printed in another cell block?
Looks simple enough. First step is to make sure you have headers over your data and that it is in proper table format similar to my picture. Then select Data set and press CTRL+T. That should turn you data in to table object with stripes. Use the Formula =LEFT(C2,1) to take out the first letter which will be L or T.
Select the table and press ALT+D+P which will generate a pivot table based off original data set.
Drag the column with the formula I suggested over to the FILTERS area of the pivot table ID column to ROWS and all others to VALUES. Simply refresh and as new data is added you will get new pivot tables. Do not put the pivot tables on top of each other as I did that is only for the picture so you can see it. If you have too many filters to apply you can right click the helper column in the pivot table fields area to produce a slicer which is a button that helps you change the report quickly. Any other questions do ask.
So I got this excel file with a lot of data which is why I want to avoid doing all this manually. Basically what I want to do is find all values that is the same in one column and then combine all it's values to one row.
If I have this data in a worksheet.
I would like the output to be like this
I appreciate all the help I can get.
EDIT:
This is what I get from a Pivot Table
When I actually would want it to look like this.
You must use Pivot Table function from (i recommend it) MS Excel.
It lets you to set wich columns becomes rows, what type of values they will contain and much more.
Pivot Tables are what you want.
It saved my career at my previous job :)
Here you got some screenshot of example for making sums for all duplicates in first column:
original table:
My previous post seemed to have been unclear so I am posting this again and will try to explain the problem more clearly using screenshots.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4x8wktbdo7jc21m/excel-screenshot.jpg?dl=0
Now, let me explain the screenshots.
Let's take just one of the raw materials in the table, say Rosin (Column B).
Whenever we buy more rosin, I mention the quanity bought and the date(Column A)
and I have the total quantity of rosin bought at the bottom using the formula "=sum(b80:b91)".
You will also notice that the number of rows at present is 11 i.e. 80 to 91.
But we will still be buying more rosin, even when I have entered the data in these rows. i.e. when I enter the dates and the quantity bought.
The problem is that I'll have to keep inserting more rows in there after every few days.
And if I keep doing that then the column for Rosin(as well as for the other raw materials) will become so long that I'll be scrolling forever.
So, is there a way that I could just enter the amount of rosin bought and the date without having to insert more rows.
Here's a link to the excel sheet that I created - https://www.dropbox.com/s/iod5y7jae6grmyz/brc%20goods%20received%20STOCK11.xlsx?dl=0
If you think MS Excel is not the right tool for this, then please recommend the correct tool for this.
I was learning some python and know some programming basics - just for your information.
P.S. Hope I have been able to explain the problem clearly this time.
I admit that the excel sheet looks very confusing and haphazardly done, but I wanted to start doing the calculations and improve the looks of the sheet later on.
basically, you need to use pivot tables to organize and sum your data.
here is an example sheet done for you to illustrate how it is done in your case.
therefore, you need to put each distinct data type in different sheets. In my example, I have put all of the incoming chemicals into one sheet and created a pivot table for it in another sheet. you need to repeat this for chemicals used in a separate sheet, and create a pivot table in the same/separaate sheet. And finally, in another sheet, you can make a table of total chemicals at present, simply by refering to the data in your pivots tables.
Every time you update your data sheets, come back to its pivot table and click refresh to get the latest and update your data across the table.
you can look up some help across tutorial sites on how to create a pivot table, here is one from microsoft
the best solution here would be not to keep multiple tables which you plan to extend on the same sheet, i looked at your file and it is way too confusing and clogged up, separate all the datasets you have into separate sheets, give good descriptive names to these sheets. I noticed you use total rows below each dataset, what you can do(as long as you are in Excel 2007+), create the dataset and then format it as a table from the menu, which makes your data a lot easier to read and handle, it also gives you the option of total row, more to read up on these tables you can here: Format an Excel table
I am finding inserting rows in table structures or in normal cells - manually or otherwise - very very slow. Like it takes more than 10 mins to insert 7 rows in a table (containing literal strings only) or in adjacent cells, in a sheet with no conditional formatting.
The workbook has 45 worksheets and 20 tables, with the bigger tables having XML files of about 10KB. There are 33MB worth of spreadsheet XMLs with most being around 300KB with 5 more than 1MB and one being 15MB. Its fairly complex but not massive. All of the calculations flow nicely from left to right up to down, right sheet to left sheet and I've mostly managed to avoid array formulas. All of the tables have regular structures, with the calculated columns having one only formula. Most of the table columns are calculated, with only a couple of smaller ones containing literal data.
I do have a lot of conditional formatting on a couple of sheets but I've been very careful to keep it rational and stopped it from fragmenting: I have about 45 rules for the whole sheet and these are generalised to cover all columns. The main processing for the formating decisions are moved into the tables as helper columns and as I said, very regular in structure.
It seems that these type of edits are not thread safe so only one processor is loading up and there is very light disc activity. I can't understand what excel is doing all that time.
Of course I set calculation to manual...
I've seen comments attributing this type of thing to the increased row and column limits, but I don't understand why this should be a factor. If I look at the XML files of the spreadsheets, there is only code for rows and columns that are occupied with values or formulas. So why are the unoccupied cells in play?
This is having a massive effect on my productivity - although I'm learning a lot by reading in sites like this in my new-found spare time. I really need to figure out what the problem is so that I can avoid or work around this issue if possible.
Can anybody help me on that?
Just in case people are wondering about this, the answer is to use power query and power view in excel. I find medium (500k lines) datasets and complex structures and transformations all work without a hitch. I never use formulae in tables anymore. The other thing is that this naturally leads you to power bi which is great. That's my tip.
Long insertion times may be due to INDEX (or other functions) that reference a whole column, or a whole row.
I had a very similar problem: not too complex worksheet (about 2500 rows, with 15 columns of data (results from a query), and about 10 columns of formulas to extract data from the query results. when I inserted a column, the first columns might insert within 4 seconds or so, but the second insert would take over a minute. Yikes! I searched the internet and found this site http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2755145.
My experience:
I was using a formula like =INDEX(11:11,1,MATCH(AC$5,$10:$10,0)), about 25000 times in my worksheet. You can see that each formula references an entire row twice. Apparently, when I added a column, since each row is affected, and therefore each of my formulas was affected, Excel would dutifully go to work trying to figure out what to do about that.
Based on what I learned form the microsoft website, I changed the formula to =INDEX(QueryResults,ROW()-ROW(QueryHeaders),MATCH(AC$5,QueryHeaders,0)), where the QueryResults and QueryHeaders are simple named ranges.
After I made this change throughout the sheet, inserting a column became almost instantaneous - less than a second.
This sounds like the problem described here http://fastexcel.wordpress.com/2012/01/30/excel-2010-tableslistobject-slow-update-and-how-to-bypass/
If so you have to break one of the conditions to bypass it:
For this slowdown to occur each of the following conditions must be true:
A cell within the Table must be selected
The sheet containing the Table must be the Active Sheet
The cell being updated must be on the same sheet as the table, but does not have to be within the table
There must be a reasonable number of formulas in the workbook.
Maybe you could do the update indirectly via VBA with another sheet active. Or Maybe moveing all the formulas to a separate workbook would bypass it. Or convert your Tables back to normal ranges (& use dynamic range names if neccessary)
Try removing conditional formatting and then reapplying it with vba after main code is through. Worked for me.
I am attempting to make some reports in Excel using a pivot table of a Sql server view. One of the customer requirements is to be able to filter the reports based on a date range they select, which seems reasonable. The end user process needs to be fairly simple, so my preference is to have a cell for begin date and one for end date and allow the user to
enter these and refresh the table.
There are two problems which I haven't been able to get past:
Selecting a date filter doesn't appear to provide any way for me to reference a cell as a source for the value. I have to put it in at the time.
It seems as if it is only possible to define a date range if I am grouping on the date field. For some of the reports, this violates the specification. The Report Filter section of a pivot table only seems to allow me to filter by individual values rather than a range. This gets unmanageable on real data which might have hundreds of dates to go through.
One thing I have tried is to create an intermediate table without any aggregates columns in a separate sheet in the same workbook, and then filter that. This hid the columns correctly in that intermediate table, but had no effect on the pivot table which derived from it.
Does anyone have ideas for how I can make this work? It seems like a fairly obvious use case - is there something I am missing about how pivot tables are supposed to be used?
The easies thing you can do is changing your pivot table query on the fly.
When the source cell is changed (Worksheet_Changed event), append " AND WhateverDate > '1/1/1111'" to Me.PivotTables("Your pivot").PivotCache.CommandText and refresh the pivot.
I remember I solved a similar requirement some years ago by making the SQL query dynamic (i. e. putting it together as a string in VBA, and using the cells with the range values in the where condition). ant the VBA macor was then called with a button labeled "refresh".
But I am sorry do not have this code available any more, I just remember the general idea.
This has been dead for a while, but I thought I would post a different method. add a formula to the source table that returns a '1' for thing you want, and a '0' for things you don't, and then add a filter in the pivot table that filters only the '1'.