I am planning to use Azure Traffic manager to do a failover of my app running on one Azure zone to Azure zone.
I need some suggestion, if that is the correct approach to do a failover ? We have seen issue with Azure that, most of the services in one region goes down for few hours. Although I understand that Azure traffic manager is not associated with the region. But is it possible that Azure traffic manager goes down or that traffic manager endpoint is not reachable although my backend webapp is reachable?
If I am planning to use Azure traffic manager, what are other problems I should be worried about ?
I've been working with TM for some time now, so here are a few issues I haven't seen mentioned before:
Keep-Alive
If your service allows Keep-Alive, then your DNS entry will be ignored as long as the connection remains open. I've seen some exceptionally odd behavior result from this, including users being stuck on a fallback page since they kept using the connection, causing it to remain open indefinitely. If you have access to IIS Manager, you can force Keep-Alive to be false.
Browser DNS Caching
Most browsers have their own DNS cache, and very few honor DNS Time To Live. In my experience Chrome is pretty responsive, with IE and Edge having significant delays if you need them to rollover quickly. I've heard that Opera is particularly bad.
Other DNS Caching
Even if you're not accessing your service through a browser, other components can have DNS caches, and some of them will allow you to manage the cache yourself. This can in theory even depend on ISP's DNS caching, though reports on the magnitude of this vary significantly.
Traffic Manager works at the DNS level, which itself is replicated. However, even then, you should still build in redundancy into your solution.
Take a look at the Azure Architecture Center under "Make all things redundant" and you will see a recommendation for Traffic Manager:
consider adding another traffic management solution as a failback. If
the Azure Traffic Manager service fails, change your CNAME records in
DNS to point to the other traffic management service.
The Traffic Manager internal architecture is resilient to the failure of any single Azure region. So, even if a region fails, Traffic Manager should stay up. That applies to all Traffic Manager components: control plane, endpoint monitoring, and DNS name servers.
Since Traffic Manager works at the DNS level, it doesn't have an 'endpoint' that proxies your traffic--it uses DNS to direct clients to the appropriate endpoint, and clients then connect to those endpoints directly. Thus, an unreachable endpoint is an application problem, not a Traffic Manager problem.
That said, if the Traffic Manager DNS name servers are down, you have a serious problem. You DNS resolution path will fail and your customers will be impacted. The only solution is to either accept the risk (small, but can never be zero) or have a plan in place to use another DNS system, either in parallel or failover. This is not a limitation of Traffic Manager; you could say the same about any DNS-based traffic management system.
The earlier answer from DornaDigital is very good (other than the first point which suggests DNS caching will protect you through a name server outage--it won't). It covers some important points. In short, DNS-based failover works well for new sessions. Existing clients may have to refresh or even close their browser and reconnect.
I also agree with the details provided dornadigital.
There are considerations for front end applications as well. The browsers all have different thresholds for how long they maintain persistent connections. Chromium, for example, currently maintains a connection unless there is inactivity for 300 seconds.
In our web applications, we are detecting the failover by the presence of a certain number of failed requests to the endpoint. After requests begin failing, we pause requests for 301 seconds to allow the connection to reset. This allows the DNS change from the traffic manager to be applied to subsequent requests. We pop up a snackbar to indicate to the user that we are having an issue and display the count down when requests will resume. Similar to Gmail when it has an issue connecting to their servers.
I hope that gives you one idea on how to build some redundancy into your web apps.
I disagree with Jonathan as his understanding of the resiliency of the Traffic Manager service is in disagreement with Microsoft's own documentation on the subject.
When you provision Azure Traffic Manager, you select a region in which to deploy the service. I (correctly) inferred this to assert if said region were to fail, the Traffic Manager service could also be impacted and in turn, your application solution would not properly fail over to the secondary region.
According to Microsoft's Azure Application Architecture Guide, under "Make all things redundant", a customer should deploy Traffic Manager into more than one region:
Include redundancy for Traffic Manager. Traffic Manager is a possible failure point. Review the Traffic Manager SLA, and determine whether using Traffic Manager alone meets your business requirements for high availability. If not, consider adding another traffic management solution as a failback. If the Azure Traffic Manager service fails, change your CNAME records in DNS to point to the other traffic management service.
Azure Application Architecture Guide - Make all things redundant
My thought and intention is to not deploy Traffic Manager within the primary service region, but instead to deploy it into the secondary (failover region) and a tertiary (3rd) region as a backup.
Related
I am trying to find a powershell command which helps find out a way that there is no open connections or any traffic is flowing to endpoint1 or confirm traffic is moving smoothly to endpoint2 after disabling endpoint1:
$e[0].EndpointStatus = "Disabled"
Set-AzureRmTrafficManagerEndpoint -TrafficManagerEndpoint $e
Is there a command to do this? I am not able to find anything in google or should I use some wait command to wait for like a minute to flush out all open connections?
*Basically looking for a way to make sure all in-flight connections are drained from one endpoint before disabling it.
Traffic does not flow through your Traffic Manager instance. Therefore, the functionality you are asking for from Traffic Manager does not exist. Traffic Manager simply resolves DNS queries to an IP address of one of your endpoints using the routing method (priority, weighted, performance, etc) you configured it for.
After disabling an endpoint, you could still see traffic going to the disabled endpoint for a period of time measured by your Traffic Manager profile DNS TTL setting. For example, if you disable an endpoint at 3:01:00 and your DNS TTL setting is 90 seconds, then you could see traffic until 3:02:30 because that's how long it could take for any client's DNS cache to expire. One way to monitor this is through the Queries by Endpoint Returned metric described here. This should work in most cases. However, it's not 100%. Just because you disabled an endpoint in Traffic Manager won't stop a client that know's the IP address of your endpoint from calling it. You can decide whether or not this scenario is likely for your application and clients. So, to be absolutely certain there are no active clients using the endpoint, you will need some monitoring in place at the endpoint.
Finally, if you gracefully stop your web app, virtual machine, or other service hosting the endpoint you want disabled, then any active requests to your application will complete before the service shuts down, assuming your application completes requests in a reasonable time (a few seconds).
Documentation on how to test and verify your Traffic Manager settings is available here.
I have an Azure website (website.mycompany.com) that uses a WCF service for some data. The WCF Service sits behind an Azure Traffic Manager (service.mycompany.com) running in "priority mode", with 2 instances of the service for failover handling. With priority mode, the primary always serves up the data first, unless it's unavailable. If unavailable, the 2nd instance will reply.. and so on down the line.
We've had a few instances recently where the primary endpoint for service.mycompany.com was offline. For "partnerships" who point to service.mycompany.com, they detected the switch and all was fine. Lately however, our own site (website.mycompany.com) does NOT detect the traffic manager switch, and the website has errors since the service fails to reply.
Our failover endpoint in these instances is up, and in the past the Azure website detected the switch, it's only recently we've encountered this issue. Has anyone experienced similar issues? Are there perhaps any DNS changes that we need to tweak in our Azure Website to help it detect TTL's?
Has anyone experienced similar issues?
Do you mean the traffic manager can't switch to another endpoint immediately?
Traffic manager works at the DNS level, here are the reasons why traffic manager can't switch immediately:
The duration of the cache is determined by the 'time-to-live' (TTL) property of each DNS record. Shorter values result in faster cache expiry and thus more round-trips to the Traffic Manager name servers. Longer values mean that it can take longer to direct traffic away from a failed endpoint.
The traffic manager endpoint monitor effects the response time. More information about how azure traffic manager works, please refer to the link.
The following timeline is a detailed description of the monitoring process.
Also we can check traffic manager profile using nslookup and ipconfig in windows. About how to vertify traffic Manager settings, please refer to the link.
By the way, because traffic manager works at the DNS level, it cannot influence existing connections to any endpoint. When it directs traffic between endpoints (either by changed profile settings, or during failover or failback), Traffic Manager directs new connections to available endpoints. However, other endpoints might continue to receive traffic via existing connections until those sessions are terminated. To enable traffic to drain from existing connections, applications should limit the session duration used with each endpoint.
I'm going to refer you to my answer here because while the situation isn't exactly the same, it seems like it could have the same solution. To summarize, I find it likely that you have a connection left open to the down service that isn't being properly closed. This connection is independent of TTL, which only deals with DNS caching, and as such bypasses Traffic Manager completely.
I've created an Azure Traffic Manager profile which uses failover as the load balancing method. The primary endpoint is an on-premises website test.company.com. The other endpoint is an Azure Website App which has a custom domain name xxx.mysite.com. When I added the endpoint to Traffic Manager it points to mysite.azurewebsites.net.
I've created a CNAME record at the ISP to point xxx.mysite.com to mycompany.trafficmanager.net.
When I stop the primary website to simulate a failover to the second website I get Error 404 - Web App Not Found. If I go directly to mycompany.trafficmanager.net it works as expected and displays the xxx.mysite.com website.
What am I missing in the configuration so that when I failover it displays the xxx.mysite.com website?
Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS routing system, not a load-balancer. Using DNS will always have latency with changes. By default, Traffic Manager uses a TTL of 300 which is 5 minutes (300 seconds).
This means any clients (like web browsers) will only check for a new address every 5 minutes, and that's if they actually follow the TTL value and don't cache the DNS entry even longer. There are also lots of DNS proxies and caches (like in your ISP) that can still cache the old DNS entry. Any updates will take minutes at least before clients go to the failover site.
You can lower the TTL although this will increase number of queries (and resulting cost) and might decrease performance. If you absolutely can't have any downtime then you'll have to look into running an actual load-balancer that will handle the traffic directly and send it to the right place.
As of 2020, Azure now has the Front Door service which is a global load balancer that will handle the requests and failover seamlessly. Try that instead. More info here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/frontdoor/
Can you check and see if the custom domain is also added to the web app? e.g. something.mysite.com is registered as a custom hostname with mysite.azurewebsites.net.
If that step isn't done, then when the request is routed to the azurewebsites app, it will fail because there is nothing configuration wise to indicate that something.mysite.com is really mysite.azurewebsites.net.
Fast question is it possible to have Azure Traffic Manager
I would like to rent dedicated servers in 3rd party suppler and to load balancer from Azure
Question 1:
Can I setup this scenario? and use the load balancer from Azure?
Question 2:
Will I pay Outgoing bandwidth
Question 3:
Will you share for website with 10 000 000 page views per month how much you pay for DNS look ups as average.
Question 4 please suggest same service competitors... Google, Amazon, Rackspace I already know
The link you provided to the article already answers #1 and #3. Yes you can set this up. Billing is done by DNS lookup at $0.75 per million lookup, so your 10m page views will cost at most $7.50, but this isn't taking into consideration DNS caching which will drastically lower this (already very low) cost.
Question 2 is not an Azure Traffic Manager related question. No bandwidth goes through ATM so there is no charge. I am sure you will pay bandwidth charges with whatever 3rd party datacenter provider you are going to use.
I don't understand question 4. What do you want suggestions for? A cloud provider? There are lots of good ones but it depends on your scenario.
Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS routing system. It is similar to the routing features of AWS Route 53 (although Route 53 is a more full-featured DNS system).
Azure Traffic Manager uses DNS to point incoming traffic to different endpoints, which can be either within Azure or external urls. Because it uses DNS, it doesn't actually see any of the data itself, it just translates something like myapp.trafficmanager.net to 'webserver1.example.comorwebserver2.example.com` based on your rules and setup.
You can use round-robin, weighted or performance (which directs to the geographically closest address you have setup). You can further use Azure's DNS or another DNS system to use your own (sub)domain to CNAME to the trafficmanager.net domain name.
Load balancers like Azure Load Balancers and Amazon's Elastic Load Balancers are used to actually spread the traffic itself to different machines or services. Each work only with services hosted with the cloud provider so Azure Load Balancers can be used to load balance Azure VM's but not some servers you have hosted elsewhere.
Load balancers have bandwidth charges because they actually pass through the traffic. Azure Traffic Manager just has DNS query charges because that's all it does.
In your case, yes you can use Azure Traffic Manager to point to several external endpoints for your dedicated servers. You can also nest Traffic Manager profiles so that you can first use geo-location then round-robin. Azure Traffic Manager does support basic http/https monitoring to make sure the endpoint is still active.
Because it is based on DNS, there will always be a lag between changes with the TTL value and how clients cache DNS addresses. This is inherent with all DNS routing. To be extra safe, you can use Azure Traffic Manager to route to your datacenter and then run your own load balancing software locally to spread the load among servers.
I am starting to develop a webservice that will be hosted in the cloud but needs higher availability than typical cloud SLAs provide.
Typical SLAs, e.g. Windows Azure, promise an availability of 99.9%, i.e. up to 43min downtime per month. I am looking for an order of magnitude better availability (<5min down time per month). While I can configure several load balanced database back-ends to resolve that part of the issue I see a bottleneck at the webserver. If the webserver fails, the whole service is unavailable to the customer. What are the options of reducing that risk without introducing another possible single point of failure? I see the following solutions and drawbacks to each:
SRV-record:
I duplicate the whole infrastructure (and take care that the databases are in sync) and add additional SRV records for the domain so that the user tying to access www.example.com will automatically get forwarded to example.cloud1.com or if that one is offline to example.cloud2.com. Googling around it seems that SRV records are not supported by any major browser, is that true?
second A-record:
Add an additional A-record as alternatives. Drawbacks:
a) at my hosting provider I do not see any possibility to add a second A-record but just one... is that normal?
b)if one server of two servers are down I am not sure if the user gets automatically re-directed to the other one or 50% of all users get a 404 or some other error
Any clues for a best-practice would be appreciated
Cheers,
Sebastian
The availability of the instance i.e. SLA when specified by the Cloud Provider means the "Instance's Health is server running in the context of Hypervisor or Fabric Controller". With that said, you need to take an effort and ensure the instance is not failing because of your app / OS / or pretty much anything running inside the instance. There are few things which devops tend to miss and that kind of hit back hard like for instance - forgetting to configure the OS Updates and Patches.
The fundamental axiom with the availability is the redundancy. More redundant your application / infrastructure is more availabile is your app.
I recommend your to look into the Azure Traffic Manager and then re-work on your architecture. You need not worry about the SRV record or A-Record. Just a CNAME for the traffic manager would do the trick.
The idea of traffic manager is simple, you can tell the traffic
manager to stand after the domain name ( domain name resolution of the
app ) then the traffic manager decides where to send the request on
considerations of factors like Round-Robin, Disaster Management etc.
With the combination of the Traffic Manager and multi-region infrastructure setup; you will march towards the high availability goal.
Links
Azure Traffic Manager Overview
Cloud Power: How to scale Azure Websites globally with Traffic Manager
Maybe You should configure a corosync cluster with DRBD ?
DRBD will ensure You that the data on both nodes are replicated (for example website files and db files).
Apache as web server will be available under a virtual IP to which domain is pointed. In case of one server is down corosync will move all services to second server within few seconds.