I have 2 Objects that I have combined with the union/fusion control
The result is as expected, but now I would like to remove the remaining lines of the separate objects (at least in my view).
I understand the underlying principle of the stacking object tree and its good to have them still all available as single entities, but I would like to hide what would not be seen in reality also in my view.
Any takers?
Thanks
For anyone who's interested I found the solution. The view property dialog allows you to change the document window setting to "shaded" which hides the lines.
Related
Total newbi here. I have played with studio for a few h but can not get over the next hurdle.
I would like to draw wine growing areas on the map.
Managed to draw areas. Tick.
I would like to give these areas a unique name.
Managed to create labels.
But I don't understand how the text is associated with the area.
I then want to search for this label, so that the map zooms in on that area.
Just like when I search for "Coburg, Victoria, Australia".
I have managed to publish my maps including the areas in my WordPress website.
So my access token and my style does the right thing.
Need some hints how to get the labelling and searching happening.
Thank you for any help.
Regards
Romano
and welcome to using Mapbox.
I would like to give these areas a unique name. Managed to create labels. But I don't understand how the text is associated with the area.
Have you tried creating a Symbol layer, and setting the Text field to the appropriate field in your data source?
I then want to search for this label, so that the map zooms in on that area. Just like when I search for "Coburg, Victoria, Australia".
This goes beyond using Studio, and into building web maps with mapbox-gl-js. One starting point would be to use the Finder Impact Tool.
This might involve processing the data twice -- once for your base map, and another time in a spreadsheet to make available to the Finder template. It's possible to just do once, but would involve some modifying the Finder template.
https://labs.mapbox.com/education/impact-tools/finder-with-filters/
In an Excel 2010 Addin we programmatically populate a multi-level RibbonMenu with items from a database. However, it seems impossible to display a RibbonMenu having more than five levels. (Some) Clients get a runtime exception stating that a maximum of only 5 nest levels is supported (verbatim: "Maximal 5 geschachtelte Menüs sind zulässig."). After dismissing the dialog window, the menu shows and is functional, but any menu items deeper than five levels are missing and some items on levels <= 5 are disabled (e.g. RibbonMenus missing their level-5-RibbonButtons).
It doesn't matter whether the menu is created in code (using C#) or declaratively (XML).
Why is there a nesting limit? Is it documented somewhere?
Is there anything we can do to override this limit? The figure '5' in
the message looks suspicious, like there is some magic int value to
be set somewhere...
Are there any other controls that can be used to display a
multi-level nested menu inside an Excel ribbon?
Thanks and best regards,
Thomas
I don't profess any great knowledge on this, just an interest.
I have tried nesting menu controls on the Visual Ribbon Designer in VS2013 also and indeed you can only go to 5 levels deep. When run with some items added an error message (on each of the added items) is generated, with the maximum 5 nesting levels appears. So it does look like this is an absolute limit! Also looks like this error message IS the documentation! The error message relates to the XML CustomUI code so it is unlikely to be worked-around.
However, at the fourth level it looks like you can add a SplitButton and add items to this which may give you the added options that you need. There may also be scope in adding a Gallery control at this level, if this fits your application.
It is also interesting that the maximum number of SplitButtons you can nest in this way also appears to be 5.
May be time to consider a bit of UI re-design?
On a Custom Control I have defined a Navigation Rule xsp-success go to xpDemo.xsp. This works fine, but the Navigation rule is probably one of the only places that there is not the little blue diamond to allow for a computed result. What I want to do is something like this
(viewScope.get("vsSomething") == "Something) ? "/xpSomeWhere.xsp" : "/xpSomeWhereElse.xsp"
I could define a different xsp-??? for each possible success but that would be a blow-up waiting to happen.
In addition I want to re-use the CC in several different situations and the major difference is that where I want to navigate to. I could do a context.reDirectTo() but that then means that I have to repeat the code many times in several different places that might not be totally obvious thus creating a maintenance headache. The obvious place would seem to be the Navigation Rules. I can't believe that I'm the first person wanting to do this but my search has turned up nothing.
They can indeed be computed, just not using the "Navigation" section of the properties pane. If you go instead to the XSP source or to the "navigationRules" element of the "All Properties" section, you can modify the "viewId" property to include a computed value as normal.
I need to produce facet block from two vocabularies in my site. I am using Views and a patched version of Views infinite Scroll to generate the search page, using my search index, and I have tweaked everything I could in the facet display settings to see if I could produce the requested results, to no avail.
I do not need keyword searches. I need to show all taxonomy terms in each facets at all times and to be able to select a single criteria at a time from each vocabulary. So, never more thane one selection at a time from each facet block.
Why are you using Solr to store data and generate your search page, if you do not need keyword search and are trying to go against the native working of solr Facets, I hear you say? For performance reasons, it is the reason why I am using Solr to store & serve the results, I have even gone as far as pushing renedered node to the index with the help of the somwhat obscure search_api_solr_view_modes module.
I could take two separate routes
Create a custom block, load all the taxonomy terms, alter the output of the term link to point to the view and provide the TID for the View. The active filter data could be obtained from the view arguments. I know how to do that but feel it is the wrong way to go about it, if I am working with Solr, I should be using a facet, not a custom block.
Build a custom Facet block that has this exact behaviour. After reading a lot of documentation, I git kind of dicouraged with the possibility of doing this simply without having to develop a Facet plugin, which is kind of out of my league.
Any advice is appreciated.
Here is a screenshot of the interface I have to produce.
http://imageshack.com/a/img834/9836/kr0i.png
Each taxonomy term has to be persistent, i.e., produce a link event if there are no nodes indexed under this term.
Selecting a term in one of the vocabularies will deselect previously selected terms
Clicking on the x next to a term will remove it form the active search criterias.
Have a look at this. https://drupal.org/project/ajax_facets This might get you to where you need to be. Sans you infinite scroll. There is a youtube video that goes with it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBj3OkXLyWs
I'd appreciate it if it works as I haven't tried it my self.
Here is my scenario...
Using Orchard CMS 1.7.1 I have created a custom Content Type named 'VistaImage' using the Orchard UI. This Content Type defines one field based on a Media Library Picker Field, this field is also named 'VistaImage'.
A Projection of groups of Vista Images are placed in the 'Featured' Zone as a Widget reference and works well.
Using the Shape Tracer on the resulting page(s), the shape hierarchy looks as follows:
Zone [Featured]
Widget
List
Content Alt: Content-VistaImage
Fields_MediaLibraryPicker Alt: Fields.MediaLibraryPicker-VistaImage
Media
Parts_Image_Summary
What I want to do is to provide alternative shapes from the Content shape downwards. This is easy enough for Content itself and for Fields_MediaLibraryPicker (as the Shape Tracer automatically provides applicable alternatives (as indicated above)).
My problem comes in providing alternatives for the Media and Parts_Image_Summary parts.
Looking at the documentation for Alternates on the Orchard web site, I thought that if I created a new shape in my Theme at at /Views/Parts/Image.Summary-VistaImage.cshtml this would get referenced, but it does not (though if I remove the '-VistaImage' the shape does get used, but this would, I believe change this shape for every Content Type, which is not what I want to do).
Any advice/direction on how I should approach this requirement would be apprciated.
Thanks.
From personal experience, when you get that low level in the shapes, alternatives don't work very well, if at all. The only way I best deal with those scenarios is to choose the next applicable shape above it, and do an if statement to determine if its the content you want, in which case to remove the default shape display and implement your own hard-coded layout.
eg if the shape simplay says #display(Model.whatever) and you know that displays is garbage for you, look into the model.
For example, I had trouble creating a 4 leveled menu for bootstrap as it only typically deals with 2 levels, so i manipulated the lowest level shape. I.e:
if{Model.Items.Any()}{
//code to generate another submenu for that menuItem
}
This may not even be the most correct way to address this, just the solution I found has worked.
So in your case I'd use VS debug and breakpoint where the mediafield picker is rendered, and find out if the model holds any information letting you know it's your VistaImage content.