How do I display the content of a JavaScript object in a string format like when we alert a variable?
The same formatted way I want to display an object.
Use native JSON.stringify method.
Works with nested objects and all major browsers support this method.
str = JSON.stringify(obj);
str = JSON.stringify(obj, null, 4); // (Optional) beautiful indented output.
console.log(str); // Logs output to dev tools console.
alert(str); // Displays output using window.alert()
Link to Mozilla API Reference and other examples.
obj = JSON.parse(str); // Reverses above operation (Just in case if needed.)
Use a custom JSON.stringify replacer if you
encounter this Javascript error
"Uncaught TypeError: Converting circular structure to JSON"
If you want to print the object for debugging purposes, use the code:
var obj = {
prop1: 'prop1Value',
prop2: 'prop2Value',
child: {
childProp1: 'childProp1Value',
},
}
console.log(obj)
will display:
Note: you must only log the object. For example, this won't work:
console.log('My object : ' + obj)
Note ': You can also use a comma in the log method, then the first line of the output will be the string and after that, the object will be rendered:
console.log('My object: ', obj);
var output = '';
for (var property in object) {
output += property + ': ' + object[property]+'; ';
}
alert(output);
console.dir(object):
Displays an interactive listing of the properties of a specified JavaScript object. This listing lets you use disclosure triangles to examine the contents of child objects.
Note that the console.dir() feature is non-standard. See MDN Web Docs
Try this:
console.log(JSON.stringify(obj))
This will print the stringify version of object. So instead of [object] as an output you will get the content of object.
Well, Firefox (thanks to #Bojangles for detailed information) has Object.toSource() method which prints objects as JSON and function(){}.
That's enough for most debugging purposes, I guess.
If you want to use alert, to print your object, you can do this:
alert("myObject is " + myObject.toSource());
It should print each property and its corresponding value in string format.
If you would like to see data in tabular format you can use:
console.table(obj);
Table can be sorted if you click on the table column.
You can also select what columns to show:
console.table(obj, ['firstName', 'lastName']);
You can find more information about console.table here
Function:
var print = function(o){
var str='';
for(var p in o){
if(typeof o[p] == 'string'){
str+= p + ': ' + o[p]+'; </br>';
}else{
str+= p + ': { </br>' + print(o[p]) + '}';
}
}
return str;
}
Usage:
var myObject = {
name: 'Wilson Page',
contact: {
email: 'wilson#hotmail.com',
tel: '123456789'
}
}
$('body').append( print(myObject) );
Example:
http://jsfiddle.net/WilsonPage/6eqMn/
In NodeJS you can print an object by using util.inspect(obj). Be sure to state the depth or you'll only have a shallow print of the object.
Simply use
JSON.stringify(obj)
Example
var args_string = JSON.stringify(obj);
console.log(args_string);
Or
alert(args_string);
Also, note in javascript functions are considered as objects.
As an extra note :
Actually you can assign new property like this and access it console.log or display it in alert
foo.moo = "stackoverflow";
console.log(foo.moo);
alert(foo.moo);
To print the full object with Node.js with colors as a bonus:
console.dir(object, {depth: null, colors: true})
Colors are of course optional, 'depth: null' will print the full object.
The options don't seem to be supported in browsers.
References:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Console/dir
https://nodejs.org/api/console.html#console_console_dir_obj_options
NB:
In these examples, yourObj defines the object you want to examine.
First off my least favorite yet most utilized way of displaying an object:
This is the defacto way of showing the contents of an object
console.log(yourObj)
will produce something like :
I think the best solution is to look through the Objects Keys, and then through the Objects Values if you really want to see what the object holds...
console.log(Object.keys(yourObj));
console.log(Object.values(yourObj));
It will output something like :
(pictured above: the keys/values stored in the object)
There is also this new option if you're using ECMAScript 2016 or newer:
Object.keys(yourObj).forEach(e => console.log(`key=${e} value=${yourObj[e]}`));
This will produce neat output :
The solution mentioned in a previous answer: console.log(yourObj) displays too many parameters and is not the most user friendly way to display the data you want. That is why I recommend logging keys and then values separately.
Next up :
console.table(yourObj)
Someone in an earlier comment suggested this one, however it never worked for me. If it does work for someone else on a different browser or something, then kudos! Ill still put the code here for reference!
Will output something like this to the console :
Here's a way to do it:
console.log("%o", obj);
Use this:
console.log('print object: ' + JSON.stringify(session));
As it was said before best and most simply way i found was
var getPrintObject=function(object)
{
return JSON.stringify(object);
}
(This has been added to my library at GitHub)
Reinventing the wheel here! None of these solutions worked for my situation. So, I quickly doctored up wilsonpage's answer. This one is not for printing to screen (via console, or textfield or whatever). It does work fine in those situations and works just fine as the OP requested, for alert. Many answers here do not address using alert as the OP requested. Anyhow, It is, however, formatted for data transport. This version seems to return a very similar result as toSource(). I've not tested against JSON.stringify, but I assume this is about the same thing. This version is more like a poly-fil so that you can use it in any environment. The result of this function is a valid Javascript object declaration.
I wouldn't doubt if something like this was already on SO somewhere, but it was just shorter to make it than to spend a while searching past answers. And since this question was my top hit on google when I started searching about this; I figured putting it here might help others.
Anyhow, the result from this function will be a string representation of your object, even if your object has embedded objects and arrays, and even if those objects or arrays have even further embedded objects and arrays. (I heard you like to drink? So, I pimped your car with a cooler. And then, I pimped your cooler with a cooler. So, your cooler can drink, while your being cool.)
Arrays are stored with [] instead of {} and thus dont have key/value pairs, just values. Like regular arrays. Therefore, they get created like arrays do.
Also, all string (including key names) are quoted, this is not necessary unless those strings have special characters (like a space or a slash). But, I didn't feel like detecting this just to remove some quotes that would otherwise still work fine.
This resulting string can then be used with eval or just dumping it into a var thru string manipulation. Thus, re-creating your object again, from text.
function ObjToSource(o){
if (!o) return 'null';
var k="",na=typeof(o.length)=="undefined"?1:0,str="";
for(var p in o){
if (na) k = "'"+p+ "':";
if (typeof o[p] == "string") str += k + "'" + o[p]+"',";
else if (typeof o[p] == "object") str += k + ObjToSource(o[p])+",";
else str += k + o[p] + ",";
}
if (na) return "{"+str.slice(0,-1)+"}";
else return "["+str.slice(0,-1)+"]";
}
Let me know if I messed it all up, works fine in my testing. Also, the only way I could think of to detect type array was to check for the presence of length. Because Javascript really stores arrays as objects, I cant actually check for type array (there is no such type!). If anyone else knows a better way, I would love to hear it. Because, if your object also has a property named length then this function will mistakenly treat it as an array.
EDIT: Added check for null valued objects. Thanks Brock Adams
EDIT: Below is the fixed function to be able to print infinitely recursive objects. This does not print the same as toSource from FF because toSource will print the infinite recursion one time, where as, this function will kill it immediately. This function runs slower than the one above, so I'm adding it here instead of editing the above function, as its only needed if you plan to pass objects that link back to themselves, somewhere.
const ObjToSource=(o)=> {
if (!o) return null;
let str="",na=0,k,p;
if (typeof(o) == "object") {
if (!ObjToSource.check) ObjToSource.check = new Array();
for (k=ObjToSource.check.length;na<k;na++) if (ObjToSource.check[na]==o) return '{}';
ObjToSource.check.push(o);
}
k="",na=typeof(o.length)=="undefined"?1:0;
for(p in o){
if (na) k = "'"+p+"':";
if (typeof o[p] == "string") str += k+"'"+o[p]+"',";
else if (typeof o[p] == "object") str += k+ObjToSource(o[p])+",";
else str += k+o[p]+",";
}
if (typeof(o) == "object") ObjToSource.check.pop();
if (na) return "{"+str.slice(0,-1)+"}";
else return "["+str.slice(0,-1)+"]";
}
Test:
var test1 = new Object();
test1.foo = 1;
test1.bar = 2;
var testobject = new Object();
testobject.run = 1;
testobject.fast = null;
testobject.loop = testobject;
testobject.dup = test1;
console.log(ObjToSource(testobject));
console.log(testobject.toSource());
Result:
{'run':1,'fast':null,'loop':{},'dup':{'foo':1,'bar':2}}
({run:1, fast:null, loop:{run:1, fast:null, loop:{}, dup:{foo:1, bar:2}}, dup:{foo:1, bar:2}})
NOTE: Trying to print document.body is a terrible example. For one, FF just prints an empty object string when using toSource. And when using the function above, FF crashes on SecurityError: The operation is insecure.. And Chrome will crash on Uncaught RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded. Clearly, document.body was not meant to be converted to string. Because its either too large, or against security policy to access certain properties. Unless, I messed something up here, do tell!
If you would like to print the object of its full length, can use
console.log(require('util').inspect(obj, {showHidden: false, depth: null})
If you want to print the object by converting it to the string then
console.log(JSON.stringify(obj));
I needed a way to recursively print the object, which pagewil's answer provided (Thanks!). I updated it a little bit to include a way to print up to a certain level, and to add spacing so that it is properly indented based on the current level that we are in so that it is more readable.
// Recursive print of object
var print = function( o, maxLevel, level ) {
if ( typeof level == "undefined" ) {
level = 0;
}
if ( typeof level == "undefined" ) {
maxLevel = 0;
}
var str = '';
// Remove this if you don't want the pre tag, but make sure to remove
// the close pre tag on the bottom as well
if ( level == 0 ) {
str = '<pre>';
}
var levelStr = '';
for ( var x = 0; x < level; x++ ) {
levelStr += ' ';
}
if ( maxLevel != 0 && level >= maxLevel ) {
str += levelStr + '...</br>';
return str;
}
for ( var p in o ) {
if ( typeof o[p] == 'string' ) {
str += levelStr +
p + ': ' + o[p] + ' </br>';
} else {
str += levelStr +
p + ': { </br>' + print( o[p], maxLevel, level + 1 ) + levelStr + '}</br>';
}
}
// Remove this if you don't want the pre tag, but make sure to remove
// the open pre tag on the top as well
if ( level == 0 ) {
str += '</pre>';
}
return str;
};
Usage:
var pagewilsObject = {
name: 'Wilson Page',
contact: {
email: 'wilson#hotmail.com',
tel: '123456789'
}
}
// Recursive of whole object
$('body').append( print(pagewilsObject) );
// Recursive of myObject up to 1 level, will only show name
// and that there is a contact object
$('body').append( print(pagewilsObject, 1) );
You can also use ES6 template literal concept to display the content of a JavaScript object in a string format.
alert(`${JSON.stringify(obj)}`);
const obj = {
"name" : "John Doe",
"habbits": "Nothing",
};
alert(`${JSON.stringify(obj)}`);
I always use console.log("object will be: ", obj, obj1).
this way I don't need to do the workaround with stringify with JSON.
All the properties of the object will be expanded nicely.
Another way of displaying objects within the console is with JSON.stringify. Checkout the below example:
var gandalf = {
"real name": "Gandalf",
"age (est)": 11000,
"race": "Maia",
"haveRetirementPlan": true,
"aliases": [
"Greyhame",
"Stormcrow",
"Mithrandir",
"Gandalf the Grey",
"Gandalf the White"
]
};
//to console log object, we cannot use console.log("Object gandalf: " + gandalf);
console.log("Object gandalf: ");
//this will show object gandalf ONLY in Google Chrome NOT in IE
console.log(gandalf);
//this will show object gandalf IN ALL BROWSERS!
console.log(JSON.stringify(gandalf));
//this will show object gandalf IN ALL BROWSERS! with beautiful indent
console.log(JSON.stringify(gandalf, null, 4));
Javascript Function
<script type="text/javascript">
function print_r(theObj){
if(theObj.constructor == Array || theObj.constructor == Object){
document.write("<ul>")
for(var p in theObj){
if(theObj[p].constructor == Array || theObj[p].constructor == Object){
document.write("<li>["+p+"] => "+typeof(theObj)+"</li>");
document.write("<ul>")
print_r(theObj[p]);
document.write("</ul>")
} else {
document.write("<li>["+p+"] => "+theObj[p]+"</li>");
}
}
document.write("</ul>")
}
}
</script>
Printing Object
<script type="text/javascript">
print_r(JAVACRIPT_ARRAY_OR_OBJECT);
</script>
via print_r in Javascript
var list = function(object) {
for(var key in object) {
console.log(key);
}
}
where object is your object
or you can use this in chrome dev tools, "console" tab:
console.log(object);
Assume object obj = {0:'John', 1:'Foo', 2:'Bar'}
Print object's content
for (var i in obj){
console.log(obj[i], i);
}
Console output (Chrome DevTools) :
John 0
Foo 1
Bar 2
Hope that helps!
I prefer using console.table for getting clear object format, so imagine you have this object:
const obj = {name: 'Alireza', family: 'Dezfoolian', gender: 'male', netWorth: "$0"};
And you will you see a neat and readable table like this below:
Circular references solution
To make string without redundant information from object which contains duplicate references (references to same object in many places) including circular references, use JSON.stringify with replacer (presented in snippet) as follows
let s = JSON.stringify(obj, refReplacer(), 4);
function refReplacer() {
let m = new Map(), v= new Map(), init = null;
return function(field, value) {
let p= m.get(this) + (Array.isArray(this) ? `[${field}]` : '.' + field);
let isComplex= value===Object(value)
if (isComplex) m.set(value, p);
let pp = v.get(value)||'';
let path = p.replace(/undefined\.\.?/,'');
let val = pp ? `#REF:${pp[0]=='[' ? '$':'$.'}${pp}` : value;
!init ? (init=value) : (val===init ? val="#REF:$" : 0);
if(!pp && isComplex) v.set(value, path);
return val;
}
}
// ---------------
// TEST
// ---------------
// gen obj with duplicate references
let a = { a1: 1, a2: 2 };
let b = { b1: 3, b2: "4" };
let obj = { o1: { o2: a }, b, a }; // duplicate reference
a.a3 = [1,2,b]; // circular reference
b.b3 = a; // circular reference
let s = JSON.stringify(obj, refReplacer(), 4);
console.log(s);
alert(s);
This solution based on this (more info there) create JSONPath like path for each object value and if same object occurs twice (or more) it uses reference with this path to reference that object e.g. #REF:$.bar.arr[3].foo (where $ means main object) instead 'render' whole object (which is less redundant)
BONUS: inversion
function parseRefJSON(json) {
let objToPath = new Map();
let pathToObj = new Map();
let o = JSON.parse(json);
let traverse = (parent, field) => {
let obj = parent;
let path = '#REF:$';
if (field !== undefined) {
obj = parent[field];
path = objToPath.get(parent) + (Array.isArray(parent) ? `[${field}]` : `${field?'.'+field:''}`);
}
objToPath.set(obj, path);
pathToObj.set(path, obj);
let ref = pathToObj.get(obj);
if (ref) parent[field] = ref;
for (let f in obj) if (obj === Object(obj)) traverse(obj, f);
}
traverse(o);
return o;
}
// ------------
// TEST
// ------------
let s = `{
"o1": {
"o2": {
"a1": 1,
"a2": 2,
"a3": [
1,
2,
{
"b1": 3,
"b2": "4",
"b3": "#REF:$.o1.o2"
}
]
}
},
"b": "#REF:$.o1.o2.a3[2]",
"a": "#REF:$.o1.o2"
}`;
console.log('Open Chrome console to see nested fields');
let obj = parseRefJSON(s);
console.log(obj);
A little helper function I always use in my projects for simple, speedy debugging via the console.
Inspiration taken from Laravel.
/**
* #param variable mixed The var to log to the console
* #param varName string Optional, will appear as a label before the var
*/
function dd(variable, varName) {
var varNameOutput;
varName = varName || '';
varNameOutput = varName ? varName + ':' : '';
console.warn(varNameOutput, variable, ' (' + (typeof variable) + ')');
}
Usage
dd(123.55); outputs:
var obj = {field1: 'xyz', field2: 2016};
dd(obj, 'My Cool Obj');
The console.log() does a great job of debugging objects, but if you are looking to print the object to the page content, here's the simplest way that I've come up with to mimic the functionality of PHP's print_r(). A lot these other answers want to reinvent the wheel, but between JavaScript's JSON.stringify() and HTML's <pre> tag, you get exactly what you are looking for.
var obj = { name: 'The Name', contact: { email: 'thename#gmail.com', tel: '123456789' }};
$('body').append('<pre>'+JSON.stringify(obj, null, 4)+'</pre>');
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
i used pagewil's print method, and it worked very nicely.
here is my slightly extended version with (sloppy) indents and distinct prop/ob delimiters:
var print = function(obj, delp, delo, ind){
delp = delp!=null ? delp : "\t"; // property delimeter
delo = delo!=null ? delo : "\n"; // object delimeter
ind = ind!=null ? ind : " "; // indent; ind+ind geometric addition not great for deep objects
var str='';
for(var prop in obj){
if(typeof obj[prop] == 'string' || typeof obj[prop] == 'number'){
var q = typeof obj[prop] == 'string' ? "" : ""; // make this "'" to quote strings
str += ind + prop + ': ' + q + obj[prop] + q + '; ' + delp;
}else{
str += ind + prop + ': {'+ delp + print(obj[prop],delp,delo,ind+ind) + ind + '}' + delo;
}
}
return str;
};
Related
I came across a youtube video showing how to count each letters' occurrence using Javascript, eg when the input is "hello", the function will return
{h:1 e:1 l:2 o:1}
Like this:
const obj = {};
for (let i = 0; i < wordInput.length; i++) {
const char = wordInput[i];
if (!obj[char]) {
obj[char] = 0;
}
obj[char]++;
}
Why do we need the if statement? He said something like "some of these are undefined", but I'm not really sure what that means, can you explain why we need the if (!obj[char])?
In the first run of the loop
i = 0
-----------
char = 'h'
obj = {}
obj[char] ==> obj['h'] ==> undefined
So if you try to do
obj[char]++ ==> obj['h']++ , it will throw error as the value is undefined. Instead initialize it to 0 first, using the if statement, then increment it.
The obj object starts out empty. Trying to access any property of it will return undefined, and if you try to use ++ on undefined, you'll get NaN (Not a Number), which is not what you want:
const obj = {};
obj.foo++;
console.log(obj.foo);
To fix that, before incrementing, check to see if the property exists first, and if it doesn't, set it to 0. 0 is incrementable; undefined is not.
const obj = {};
if (!obj.foo) {
obj.foo = 0;
}
obj.foo++;
console.log(obj.foo);
The code in your question does the same sort of thing, except it iterates over chars (characters of the wordInput string). If the character hasn't been put as a property of the object yet, it must be set before incrementing, otherwise the resulting object will contain useless NaN values:
const wordInput = 'foo bar';
const obj = {};
for (let i = 0; i < wordInput.length; i++) {
const char = wordInput[i];
obj[char]++;
}
console.log(obj);
The if statement is for the first entry of a character. Before 'a' comes, there's no property in obj called 'a'. So obj[char] defines a property and sets its value to 0. Before that, there's no property, so it's undefined. You can't apply operator to undefined.
This is how obj looks like when the first letter comes in 'hello'
before the if statement:
obj = {};
so obj['h'] = undefined;
It enters the if statement, then:
obj = { 'h' : 0 }
Take this object:
x = {
"key1": "xxx",
"key2": function(){return this.key1}
}
If I do this:
y = JSON.parse( JSON.stringify(x) );
Then y will return { "key1": "xxx" }. Is there anything one could do to transfer functions via stringify? Creating an object with attached functions is possible with the "ye goode olde eval()", but whats with packing it?
json-stringify-function is a similar post to this one.
A snippet discovered via that post may be useful to anyone stumbling across this answer. It works by making use of the replacer parameter in JSON.stringify and the reviver parameter in JSON.parse.
More specifically, when a value happens to be of type function, .toString() is called on it via the replacer. When it comes time to parse, eval() is performed via the reviver when a function is present in string form.
var JSONfn;
if (!JSONfn) {
JSONfn = {};
}
(function () {
JSONfn.stringify = function(obj) {
return JSON.stringify(obj,function(key, value){
return (typeof value === 'function' ) ? value.toString() : value;
});
}
JSONfn.parse = function(str) {
return JSON.parse(str,function(key, value){
if(typeof value != 'string') return value;
return ( value.substring(0,8) == 'function') ? eval('('+value+')') : value;
});
}
}());
Code Snippet taken from Vadim Kiryukhin's JSONfn.js or see documentation at Home Page
I've had a similar requirement lately. To be clear, the output looks like JSON but in fact is just javascript.
JSON.stringify works well in most cases, but "fails" with functions.
I got it working with a few tricks:
make use of replacer (2nd parameter of JSON.stringify())
use func.toString() to get the JS code for a function
remember which functions have been stringified and replace them directly in the result
And here's how it looks like:
// our source data
const source = {
"aaa": 123,
"bbb": function (c) {
// do something
return c + 1;
}
};
// keep a list of serialized functions
const functions = [];
// json replacer - returns a placeholder for functions
const jsonReplacer = function (key, val) {
if (typeof val === 'function') {
functions.push(val.toString());
return "{func_" + (functions.length - 1) + "}";
}
return val;
};
// regex replacer - replaces placeholders with functions
const funcReplacer = function (match, id) {
return functions[id];
};
const result = JSON
.stringify(source, jsonReplacer) // generate json with placeholders
.replace(/"\{func_(\d+)\}"/g, funcReplacer); // replace placeholders with functions
// show the result
document.body.innerText = result;
body { white-space: pre-wrap; font-family: monospace; }
Important: Be careful about the placeholder format - make sure it's not too generic. If you change it, also change the regex as applicable.
Technically this is not JSON, I can also hardly imagine why would you want to do this, but try the following hack:
x.key2 = x.key2.toString();
JSON.stringify(x) //"{"key1":"xxx","key2":"function (){return this.key1}"}"
Of course the first line can be automated by iterating recursively over the object. Reverse operation is harder - function is only a string, eval will work, but you have to guess whether a given key contains a stringified function code or not.
You can't pack functions since the data they close over is not visible to any serializer.
Even Mozilla's uneval cannot pack closures properly.
Your best bet, is to use a reviver and a replacer.
https://yuilibrary.com/yui/docs/json/json-freeze-thaw.html
The reviver function passed to JSON.parse is applied to all key:value pairs in the raw parsed object from the deepest keys to the highest level. In our case, this means that the name and discovered properties will be passed through the reviver, and then the object containing those keys will be passed through.
This is what I did https://gist.github.com/Lepozepo/3275d686bc56e4fb5d11d27ef330a8ed
function stringifyWithFunctions(object) {
return JSON.stringify(object, (key, val) => {
if (typeof val === 'function') {
return `(${val})`; // make it a string, surround it by parenthesis to ensure we can revive it as an anonymous function
}
return val;
});
};
function parseWithFunctions(obj) {
return JSON.parse(obj, (k, v) => {
if (typeof v === 'string' && v.indexOf('function') >= 0) {
return eval(v);
}
return v;
});
};
The naughty but effective way would be to simply:
Function.prototype.toJSON = function() { return this.toString(); }
Though your real problem (aside from modifying the prototype of Function) would be deserialization without the use of eval.
I have come up with this solution which will take care of conversion of functions (no eval). All you have to do is put this code before you use JSON methods. Usage is exactly the same but right now it takes only one param value to convert to a JSON string, so if you pass remaning replacer and space params, they will be ignored.
void function () {
window.JSON = Object.create(JSON)
JSON.stringify = function (obj) {
return JSON.__proto__.stringify(obj, function (key, value) {
if (typeof value === 'function') {
return value.toString()
}
return value
})
}
JSON.parse = function (obj) {
return JSON.__proto__.parse(obj, function (key, value) {
if (typeof value === 'string' && value.slice(0, 8) == 'function') {
return Function('return ' + value)()
}
return value
})
}
}()
// YOUR CODE GOES BELOW HERE
x = {
"key1": "xxx",
"key2": function(){return this.key1}
}
const y = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(x))
console.log(y.key2())
It is entirely possible to create functions from string without eval()
var obj = {a:function(a,b){
return a+b;
}};
var serialized = JSON.stringify(obj, function(k,v){
//special treatment for function types
if(typeof v === "function")
return v.toString();//we save the function as string
return v;
});
/*output:
"{"a":"function (a,b){\n return a+b;\n }"}"
*/
now some magic to turn string into function with this function
var compileFunction = function(str){
//find parameters
var pstart = str.indexOf('('), pend = str.indexOf(')');
var params = str.substring(pstart+1, pend);
params = params.trim();
//find function body
var bstart = str.indexOf('{'), bend = str.lastIndexOf('}');
var str = str.substring(bstart+1, bend);
return Function(params, str);
}
now use JSON.parse with reviver
var revivedObj = JSON.parse(serialized, function(k,v){
// there is probably a better way to determ if a value is a function string
if(typeof v === "string" && v.indexOf("function") !== -1)
return compileFunction(v);
return v;
});
//output:
revivedObj.a
function anonymous(a,b
/**/) {
return a+b;
}
revivedObj.a(1,2)
3
To my knowledge, there are no serialization libraries that persist functions - in any language. Serialization is what one does to preserve data. Compilation is what one does to preserve functions.
It seems that people landing here are dealing with structures that would be valid JSON if not for the fact that they contain functions. So how do we handle stringifying these structures?
I ran into the problem while writing a script to modify RequireJS configurations. This is how I did it. First, there's a bit of code earlier that makes sure that the placeholder used internally (">>>F<<<") does not show up as a value in the RequireJS configuration. Very unlikely to happen but better safe than sorry. The input configuration is read as a JavaScript Object, which may contain arrays, atomic values, other Objects and functions. It would be straightforwardly stringifiable as JSON if functions were not present. This configuration is the config object in the code that follows:
// Holds functions we encounter.
var functions = [];
var placeholder = ">>>F<<<";
// This handler just records a function object in `functions` and returns the
// placeholder as the value to insert into the JSON structure.
function handler(key, value) {
if (value instanceof Function) {
functions.push(value);
return placeholder;
}
return value;
}
// We stringify, using our custom handler.
var pre = JSON.stringify(config, handler, 4);
// Then we replace the placeholders in order they were encountered, with
// the functions we've recorded.
var post = pre.replace(new RegExp('"' + placeholder + '"', 'g'),
functions.shift.bind(functions));
The post variable contains the final value. This code relies on the fact that the order in which handler is called is the same as the order of the various pieces of data in the final JSON. I've checked the ECMAScript 5th edition, which defines the stringification algorithm and cannot find a case where there would be an ordering problem. If this algorithm were to change in a future edition the fix would be to use unique placholders for function and use these to refer back to the functions which would be stored in an associative array mapping unique placeholders to functions.
I need a dynamic variable in nodejs .
I use the allocine-api, and she return, a different object when I use it . For example :
allocine.api(type, {code: code}, function(error, result) {
if(error){
console.log('Error : '+ error);
return;
}
socket.emit("allocine_"+type ,result);
});
if type is "movie", result contain a movie object, but if type is "tvseries", result contain a tvseries object. So I need to take the variable "originalTitle" in "tvseries" or "movie" object, so I need to make this :
result.<type>.originalTitle
But, how to use the contain of "type" for this ?
I have try with the javascript method, and the use of "window['type']", but it's don't work in nodeJs .
as javascript objects elements can be accessed as an associative array ( cf mozilla js doc )
using myobject.myproperties is strictly equal to use myobject["myproperties"]
so if a var hold the properties name to read var myvar = "myproperties"; you could also use myobject[myvar]
so, concretely :
var o = {
tvseries : {
originalTitle : "hello world"
}
}, type = "tvseries";
console.log( o[type].originalTitle );
jsfiddle
also, if the result object get only one sub object, named by the type, you can get type name directly from it
var type = Object.keys( myobject )[0];
jsfiddle
or more simply :
var theTitle = myobject[ Object.keys( myobject )[0] ].originalTitle;
jsfiddle
var results = {};
results.a = {originalTitle: "One"};
var results2 = {b:{originalTitle: "Two"}};
console.log(results['a'].originalTitle); //now one
console.log(results2['b'].originalTitle); //now Two
With two ways of creating the object.
Try the fiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/rmoskal/6rf0juq6/
I'm relatively new to js and now have to implement a handsontable into our project.
This worked well so far, but I am hitting a roadblock with globalization.
Basically, we use comma as a decimal seperator, but when I try and copy something like "100,2" into a cell designated as 'numeric,' it will show as 1002.
If the same value is entered in a cell designated as 'text' and the type is changed to numeric afterwards, the value will be shown correctly.
For this I already had to add 'de' culture to the table sourcecode.(basically copying 'en' and changing the values currently relevant to me.)
numeral.language('de', {
delimiters: {
thousands: '.',
decimal: ','
},//other non-relevant stuff here
When I copy the values directly from the table and insert them to np++ they show as 100.2 etc. However, when inserting them into handsontable the arguments-array looks as follows:
[Array[1], "paste", undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined]
0: Array[4]
0: 1 //row
1: 1 //column
2: "100.2" //previous value
3: 1002 //new value
Here's what I have tried currently:
hot.addHook("beforeChange", function () {
if (arguments[1] === "paste") {
hot.updateSettings({
cells: function (row, col, prop) {
var cellProperties = {
type: 'numeric',
language: 'en'
};
return cellProperties;
}
});
//hot.updateSettings({
// cells: function (row, col, prop) {
// var cellProperties = {
// type: 'text',
// };
// return cellProperties;
// }
//});
}
}, hot);
hot.addHook("afterChange", function () {
if (arguments[1] === "paste") {
ChangeMatrixSettings(); //reset cell properties of whole table
}
}, hot);
I hope I've made my problem clear enough, not sure if I missed something.
Are there any other ways to get the correct values back into the table? Is this currently not possible?
Thanks in advance.
You asked more than one thing, but let me see if I can help you.
As explained in handsontable numeric documentation, you can define a format of the cell. If you want '100,2' to be shown you would format as follows
format: '0.,'
You can change that to what you really need, like if you are looking for money value you could do something like
format: '0,0.00 $'
The other thing you asked about is not on the latest release, but you can check it out how it would work here
I have since implemented my own validation of input, due to other requirements we have for the table mainly in regards to showing invalid input to user.
function validateInputForNumeric(parameter) {
var value = parameter[3];
var row = parameter[0];
var col = parameter[1];
if (decimalSeperator === '') {
var tmpculture = getCurrCulture();
}
if (value !== null && value !== "") {
if (!value.match('([a-zA-Z])')) {
if (value.indexOf(thousandSeperator) !== -1) {
value = removeAndReplaceLast(value, thousandSeperator, ''); //Thousandseperators will be ignored
}
if (value.indexOf('.') !== -1 && decimalSeperator !== '.') {
//Since numeric variables are handled as '12.3' this will customize the variables to fit with the current culture
value = removeAndReplaceLast(value, '.', decimalSeperator);
}
//Add decimalseperator if string does not contain one
if (numDecimalPlaces > 0 && value.indexOf(decimalSeperator) === -1) {
value += decimalSeperator;
}
var index = value.indexOf(decimalSeperator)
var zerosToAdd = numDecimalPlaces - (value.length - index - 1);
for (var j = 0; j < zerosToAdd; j++) {
//Add zeros until numberOfDecimalPlaces is matched for uniformity in display values
value += '0';
}
if (index !== -1) {
if (numDecimalPlaces === 0) {
//Remove decimalseperator when there are no decimal places
value = value.substring(0, index)
} else {
//Cut values that have to many decimalplaces
value = value.substring(0, index + 1 + numDecimalPlaces);
}
}
if (ErrorsInTable.indexOf([row, col]) !== -1) {
RemoveCellFromErrorList(row, col);
}
} else {
AddCellToErrorList(row, col);
}
}
//console.log("r:" + row + " c:" + col + " v:" + value);
return value;
}
The inputParameter is an array, due to handsontable hooks using arrays for edit-events. parameter[2] is the old value, should this be needed at any point.
This code works reasonably fast even when copying 2k records from Excel (2s-4s).
One of my main hindrances regarding execution speed was me using the handsontable .getDataAtCell and .setDataAtCell methods to check. These don't seem to handle large tables very well ( not a critique, just an observation ). This was fixed by iterating through the data via .getData method.
When I query my database with a function passed in the "$where" clause in nodejs, it always return me all documents in the db.
For example, if I do
var stream = timetables.find({$where: function() { return false; }}).stream();
it return me all the documents.
Instead, if I do
var stream = timetables.find({$where: 'function() { return false; }'}).stream();
the function is really executed, and this code doesn't return any document.
The problem is that if I convert in string my function the context's bindinds are removed, and I need them for more complex query. For example:
var n = 1;
var f = function() { return this.number == n; }
var stream = timetables.find({$where: f.toString()}).stream();
// error: n is not defined
Is this a normal behaviour? How can I solve my problem?
Please excuse me for my poor english!
First off, keep in mind that the $where operator should almost never be used for the reasons explained here (credit goes to #WiredPrairie).
Back to your issue, the approach you'd like to take won't work even in the mongodb shell (which explicitly allows naked js functions with the $where operator). The javascript code provided to the $where operator is executed on the mongo server and won't have access to the enclosing environment (the "context bindings").
> db.test.insert({a: 42})
> db.test.find({a: 42})
{ "_id" : ObjectId("5150433c73f604984a7dff91"), "a" : 42 }
> db.test.find({$where: function() { return this.a == 42 }}) // works
{ "_id" : ObjectId("5150433c73f604984a7dff91"), "a" : 42 }
> var local_var = 42
> db.test.find({$where: function() { return this.a == local_var }})
error: {
"$err" : "error on invocation of $where function:\nJS Error: ReferenceError: local_var is not defined nofile_b:1",
"code" : 10071
}
Moreover it looks like that the node.js native mongo driver behaves differently from the shell in that it doesn't automatically serialize a js function you provide in the query object and instead it likely drops the clause altogether. This will leave you with the equivalent of timetables.find({}) which will return all the documents in the collection.
This one is works for me , Just try to store a query as a string in one variable then concat your variable in query string,
var local_var = 42
var query = "{$where: function() { return this.a == "+local_var+"}}"
db.test.find(query)
Store your query into a varibale and use that variable at your find query. It works..... :D
The context will always be that of the mongo database, since the function is executed there. There is no way to share the context between the two instances. You have to rethink the way you query and come up with a different strategy.
You can use a wrapper to pass basic JSON objects, ie. (pardon coffee-script):
# That's the main wrapper.
wrap = (f, args...) ->
"function() { return (#{f}).apply(this, #{JSON.stringify(args)}) }"
# Example 1
where1 = (flag) ->
#myattr == 'foo' or flag
# Example 2 with different arguments
where2 = (foo, options = {}) ->
if foo == options.bar or #_id % 2 == 0
true
else
false
db.collection('coll1').count $where: wrap(where1, true), (err, count) ->
console.log err, count
db.collection('coll1').count $where: wrap(where2, true, bar: true), (err, count) ->
console.log err, count
Your functions are going to be passed as something like:
function () {
return (function (flag) {
return this.myattr === 'foo' || flag;
}).apply(this, [true])
}
...and example 2:
function () {
return (
function (foo, options) {
if (options == null) {
options = {};
}
if (foo === options.bar || this._id % 2 === 0) {
return true;
} else {
return false;
}
}
).apply(this, [ true, { "bar": true } ])
}
This is how it is supposed to be. The drivers don't translate the client code into the mongo function javascript code.
I'm assuming you are using Mongoose to query your database.
If you take a look at the actual Query object implementation, you'll find that only strings are valid arguments for the where prototype.
When using the where clause, you should use it along with the standard operators such as gt, lt that operates on in the path created by the where function.
Remember that Mongoose querying, as in Mongo, is by example, you may want to reconsider your query specification in a more descriptive fashion.