I have a multi-layer taxonomy that I want to display in a Bootstrap 'row/column' layout. How do I stop Orchard from rendering it as an HTML list?
At present I am having to create alternates at quite a high level. So far:
1. Parts.TaxonomyPart-url-MyTaxonomy
2. TaxonomyItem-MyTaxonomy
3. TaxonomyItemLink-MyTaxonomy
The first is required to remove the main <ul> that is automatically added by Orchard.
The second removes the <ul> from any child terms
The third handles the display of the actual taxonomy term (my custom HTML).
It works, but I'm sure there's a less cluttered way of doing it that I can't see.
I would prefer to alter the rendering of the taxonomy this way rather than create a projection, as I find projections don't handle taxonomies with hierarchies very well / easily.
Any help / suggestions would be much appreciated! Comment if you need more info.
Related
I'm trying to make a two-lines menu with bootstrap 4, and I found some examples on the web:
https://www.codeply.com/go/DpHESPqZsx
https://www.codeply.com/go/cxXqBnGrPx
In the first example they use "div class='navbar'" to create the menus.
<div class="navbar">...</div>
In the second example they use "nav class='navbar'" to create the menus.
<nav class="navbar">...</nav>
Which is the correct way? Which one should be used?
I have another question. Why do they NOT use the bootstrap grid with the rows and columns? When should you use it?
Thank you very much
Div and nav are similar element, in terms of what they do. However, nav is better in this situation because you want to have semantic markup. It is because of SEO and more readable for developers.
And why they are not using grid is probably because they haven't implemented it yet and should be coming. Their grid system is done with flex currently, but should change. And CSS Grid does not work that great with IE11.
You should use Grid when you feel that it will be easier to structure your site. It's a great tool, and combine it with Flex is so easy and comfortable
The difference is that a div has no meaning and a nav Element has a semantic meaning (indicating that there is a navigation). You can remove every div and span from a website and have no difference about the semantic structure of a page, every other element has a meaning: For example, states that there is the main content, says here is the header-part of the site.
These parts tell for example search engines what's on a site. So if you have the text "Stackoverflow" in your Element somewhere, google (and other search engines) know that you have a stackoverflow link in your navigation. If you have it in your Tag, you probably have a text about stackoverflow.
Keep in mind: These are some simplified examples.
The html5 nav tag has semantic meaning.
Please follow the Bootstrap docs. The grid (row>col) should not be used in the Navbar as it's not a supported component. Using the grid inside the Navbar will through off alignment, spacing and the responsive behavior controlled by the navbar-expand-* classes. I'm the author of both Navbar examples from Codeply you posted.
I really hope I'm making sense with this one.
I'm trying to create a widget from a custom webpart that I created. It's nothing special at all as you can see:
<h3>Header</h3>
<p>Intro Copy</p>
<ul>
<li>List item one</li>
<li>List item two</li>
<li>List item three</li>
</ul>
I now want to be able to create a widget from this and create new fields that will be used to populate the above DOM. What do I need to do in order or do this.
In an example I saw for the demo site, they populated the bg image with:
style="background-image: url('{% ResolveUrl(PathToImage) %}');"
That was however done on the front facing part of the CMS and I'm trying to do it within the solution.
Any thoughts?
It's all in your layout or code behind. Your layout can have that code (but in ASCX format) and it will work just fine. OR you can add literal controls to the page based on the fields and what the user has entered.
Doing it in your layout is more restrictive and specific to that one application but allows you to use multiple new webpart layouts. Using the code approach allows you to be more dynamic but doesn't allow you to use the built-in layouts of the webpart/widget.
I would just use the Transformable Web Part in the Marketplace...it does exactly what you want it to do. Create a custom web part, and you use a Transformation to style the Web Part Properties into the DOM elements.
https://devnet.kentico.com/marketplace/web-parts/transformable-web-part
Reason why i built it!
I've done something similar in the past, using what I call generic web parts. I wrote a blog on it last year - it might help out with what I think you're trying to achieve:
http://www.mattnield.co.uk/Posts/Show/generic_web_parts_for_rapid_development
Why are you choosing to go with Widgets? If you want to access any field inside the transformation within the web part it's feasible by the same way as you define in inbuilt web parts.
If you want to perform any function like onload etc. then you need to use kentico API to access any data.
If you provide more insight on what is required, I can help further
I have been tasked with converting a design heavy, fairly advanced HTML template for a site into an Orchard theme and I am struggling with the best way to accomplish certain things. The theme is built on bootstrap and is a modern responsive HTML template like you might find on ThemeForest or something. The site will have a number of content types (staff members, portfolio items, partners, etc.) and will need a number of templates. The content types will have a large number of fields (upwards of a dozen) inside of custom content parts.
Based on what I have read the proper way to do theming in Orchard is using placement.info in combination with alternates, wrappers, etc. This gracefully handles if parts or properties are added/removed. However, this technique is quickly becoming overwhelming, since I have to declare the name and order of every field/part in the placement.info for every content type, and every display type of that content type. Each field of each content type then needs to be wrapped in very specific html. This creates an issue because a single page can be split out into potentially a couple dozen views, with HTML tags opening in one view and closing in another.
The best work around for this I have found is to basically ignore the placement.info file and build templates just by traversing the object model. So basically, for a portfolio page, I would copy in the template HTML I have and then replace the text values with values from the model. This might look something like:
<li class="#Display(Model.ContentItem.PortfolioPart.PortfolioCore.Value.ToLower())">
<a href="#Url.ItemDisplayUrl(contentItem)" >
#foreach (var media in Model.ContentItem.PortfolioPart.PortfolioImage.MediaParts)
{
<img src="#Display(media.MediaUrl)" />
}
<span class="type">#Display(Model.ContentItem.PortfolioPart.PortfolioCoreArea.Value)</span>
<span class="portfolio-item-content">
<span class="header">#Display(Model.ContentItem.TitlePart.Title)</span>
<span class="body">
<p>
#Display(Model.ContentItem.PortfolioPart.PortfolioTagline.Value)
</p>
</span>
</span>
</a>
</li>
The benefit with this method is that I can apply all of the values in a couple of views and it's more readable. Obviously the problem with this is that if any properties or parts are removed, the template breaks.
Is there a way in Orchard to have the best of both worlds? I can't have a wrapper or template for every field - this would end up potentially hundreds of fields by the end. I also might need to display content types in multiple places with different views - each field would then require a whole new set of wrappers or alternates for every projection.
Please let me know if I'm missing anything or if there is a better way to do this besides manually traversing to the properties I need. I need a way to be able to easily plug in properties into very specific html.
My final thought was to use very specific templates for custom content types using the object model but still provide good general templates/placement.info file so that general Orchard content is flexible but the custom content types have to stay how they are.
Side thought - I guess another option would be to wrap any code that accesses a property directly in a try catch block or some kind of error handler helper, but that doesn't seem like a "best practice".
I think the techniques in this article are what you're looking for: http://weblogs.asp.net/bleroy/archive/2013/02/13/easy-content-templates-for-orchard-take-2.aspx
I am using orchard cms with the bootstrap theme.
I have created a content type: House
it contains FIELDS
image (media picker field)
Property Type (taxonomy field)
Location (taxonomy field)
It has PARTS
common
body
publish later
Title
Autoroute
I want queries of houses and be able to choose the view/ layout for them
e.g. layout called HouseList (for sidebars mainly) which will render: title, image and link to house, possible location and type but with out the links as defaulted. And then a fullDetails layout and a image only layout (so i can show a jquery image reel a widget say in a quadzone) How can i do all this please, i have tried in view Content-House.cshtml etc but i cant access the details model.content to choose what to display.
Im sure when i get the idea of how to do 1 i should be able to sort the rest. I have read documentation etc but there are so many different ways, ie placement file, change the parts, contents, create classes to handle display etc. sureley i am missing something simple like create a view for each list i want eg. houue-list, house-details, house-imageONly and then manipulate content.
Please help i have been trying different things for getting this site running for weeks and not getting very far. Examples would be fantastic but i have searched google for hours and found similar but nothing with enough details for a meer beginer.
Thanks
The standard way of doing that is placement to move things around and alternate templates for the different parts and fields. You can specialize placement and alternates with the display type, which is Summary when rendering in a list such as what a projection returns, and Detail for the detail view. More info on placement can be found here: http://docs.orchardproject.net/Documentation/Understanding-placement-info and on alternates here: http://docs.orchardproject.net/Documentation/Alternates
Now if you prefer to completely take over the rendering and do without placement, here are a few posts that may help:
http://weblogs.asp.net/bleroy/archive/2011/07/31/so-you-don-t-want-to-use-placement-info.aspx
http://weblogs.asp.net/bleroy/archive/2011/03/27/taking-over-list-rendering-in-orchard.aspx
I've just started developing in express and am new to Jade as well.
I'm having trouble deciding when it's appropriate to use layouts and when not to. I'm also having trouble deciding when it's appropriate to use something like blocks vs. partials.
Any help regarding this is truly appreciated. I'm a little lost.
It's mostly a matter of preference. If you are used to something like Wordpress where you have a concept of a header and footer that you include into pages than you might not like layouts. I personally only use layouts with content blocks because the non-layout way tends to cause more repetition.
As for partials vs blocks. You use a partial for items that you want to reuse on different pages. While a block is a chunk of html that will be replaced by child templates.
An example of a partial can be the html for a product. So you have a thumbnail, the title and a description of a product. You might use this partial while listing the products in a category. But you might also use this partial for rendering a list of search results.
An example of a partial can be a main layout that contains you header and your navigation and a content area. If you want to reuse this main layout on multiple pages you will extend this it and overwrite the block in the child templates.