gcc-7 isn't working when I am trying to build a linux kernel.
The command which I am using:
make export CROSS_COMPILE=/usr/bin/arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-7
Output:
make: /usr/bin/arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-7gcc: Command not found
It has added gcc automatically after gnueabi- but not gcc-7 how do I stop it adding gcc automatically?
The CROSS_COMPILE variable contains only the prefix needed for cross-compilation, apparently.
Most likely you can reset the CC variable to choose a different named compiler. It's been a very long time since I tried to build the Linux kernel so I'm not sure, but something like this may work:
make export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- CC=gcc-7
Related
I am trying to compile GCC from source. After make finishes, I could not find the GCC binary executable. Here is the configure command I used:
../gcc-svn/configure --prefix=/home/user/Documents/mygcc
Here are my questions specifically:
What should I expect make install does?
Is make install going to do more compilation or just moves some files to ~/Documents/mygcc? If it is the latter where the GCC executable resides?
Any other directory in my system also get affected by make install?
Thank you in advance.
I'm trying to cross-compile libSDL version 1.2 for a custom made, debian based Linux system. The toolchain I'm using is already configured properly so that I just run gcc/g++ on my the desired code and the resulting output is compatible with the target machine.
When I run ./configure --help in the libSDL source directory, I see that I can basically just set some environment variables to point to my cross-compiler.
However, I also see the following options:
System types:
--build=BUILD configure for building on BUILD [guessed]
--host=HOST cross-compile to build programs to run on HOST [BUILD]
I looked into the configure.in, build-scripts/config.sub, and build-scripts/config.guess files but couldn't really figure out how it works.
Are these options required? If not, is it a good idea to use them?
With autotools, --build is what you are building on and --host is what you want it to run on (there's also --target, but that's only important if what you're compiling is itself a compiler). Autotools will generally figure out --build on their own, so don't specify it if you don't have to (but look in /usr/lib/gcc to see what your compiler probably thinks --build should be)
So, eg, if you're building for i686 on x86_64, do
./configure --host=i686-linux-gnu
(And use the -m32 options in CFLAGS, etc., but it sounds like you already have that ready.)
Whereas if you're building for x86_64 on i686, do
./configure --host=x86_64-linux-gnu
(You can build for all kinds of crazy hosts: rs6000-ibm-aix, sparc-sun-solaris, mips-idt-ecoff, etc..., assuming you have the appropriate gcc cross-compilers installed...)
GNU's page on it is here:
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Cross_002dCompilation.html
My gcc compiler is at a custom location /my/path/hpgcc
I've downloaded the boost sources. Executed bootstrap.sh, but it fails because it runs with the default gcc.
Looking into it, I see that it fails at the first thing it does: building the Boost.Build engine:
gcc -o bootstrap/jam0 command.c compile.c debug.c expand.c glob.c hash.c hdrmacro.c headers.c jam.c jambase.c jamgram.c lists.c make.c make1.c newstr.c option.c output.c parse.c pathunix.c pathvms.c regexp.c rules.c scan.c search.c subst.c timestamp.c variable.c modules.c strings.c filesys.c builtins.c pwd.c class.c native.c md5.c w32_getreg.c modules/set.c modules/path.c modules/regex.c modules/property-set.c modules/sequence.c modules/order.c execunix.c fileunix.c
(fails because executed with the default gcc, and not my gcc version).
I've tried to change the gcc path in the user-config.jam file, but it doesn't help. Probably because the Boost.Build's build script boost_1_47_0/tools/build/v2/engine/build.sh doesn't use user-config.jam, and just uses the default locations.
Any solution?
Add the line:
using gcc : : /my/path/hpgcc ;
to user-config.jam. user-config.jam will usually be in /path/to/boost/tools/build/v2/, but you can put a custom user-config.jam or site-config.jam in any of the places listed here.
/my/path/hpgcc should be the full path to the g++ executable.
EDIT (Igor Oks) : What eventually solved the problem is that I edited boost_1_47_0/tools/build/v2/engine/build.sh to make it use my custom gcc.
We do this in our build environment by simply defining the PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variables to pickup our desired GCC first.
I have never done any major programing outside of VS08.
I am trying to compile a program called LAMMPS with either of the two relevant make files. One calls g++ and the other calls icc (Intel's compiler).
icc produces this error:
icc -O -DLAMMPS_GZIP -DMPICH_SKIP_MPICXX -DFFT_FFTW -M write_restart.cpp > write_restart.d
write_restart.cpp(15): catastrophic error: cannot open source file "mpi.h"
#include "mpi.h"
and g++ throws this error
g++ -g -O -DLAMMPS_GZIP -DMPICH_SKIP_MPICXX -DFFT_FFTW -M verlet.cpp > verlet.d
pointers.h:25: fatal error: mpi.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
The mpi.h file is located in /usr/lib/openmpi/include
It is my understanding that I need to set that $PATH variable which reads
bash: /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/opt/intel/bin:/usr/lib/openmpi/include:
and $LD_LIBRARY_PATH which currently reads
/usr/lib/openmpi/lib:
SO, how does one include the mpi.h file? So that either icc or g++ find it?
mpi.h is a header for MPI library. That would be included if you use mpic++ MPI compiler wrapper instead of g++ in your makefile. mpic++ will call the appropriate compiler. From what you describe you have openmpi package installed on your ubuntu machine.
For more info, you need to consult the manual, e.g.
http://lammps.sandia.gov/doc/Section_start.html#2_2 (for LAMMPS)
and perhaps you need to see openmpi manual as to how to set up additional compiler. Not sure if this can be done after openmpi itself has been built. By default I think in Ubuntu openmpi compiler wrappers would only call g++. CMIIW.
Okay, so I got it to work with g++ when setting up cc as "mpic++.mpich2" instead of "mpic++"
you can try compile using openmpi make file in /src/MAKE
make openmpi
in my case, this option was successful
I've got a proprietary program that I'm trying to use on a 64 bit system.
When I launch the setup it works ok, but after it tries to update itself and compile some modules and it fails to load them.
I'm suspecting it's because it's using gcc and gcc tries to compile them for a 64 bit system and therefore this program cannot use these modules.
Is there any way (some environmental variables or something like that) to force gcc to do everything for a 32 bit platform. Would a 32 bit chroot work?
You need to make GCC use the -m32 flag.
You could try writing a simple shell script to your $PATH and call it gcc (make sure you don't overwrite the original gcc, and make sure the new script comes earlier in $PATH, and that it uses the full path to GCC.
I think the code you need is just something like /bin/gcc -m32 $* depending on your shell (the $* is there to include all arguments, although it might be something else – very important!)
You may get a 32-bit binary by applying Alan Pearce's method, but you may also get errors as follows:
fatal error: bits/predefs.h: No such file or directory
If this is the case and if you have apt-get, just install gcc-multilib
sudo apt-get install gcc-multilib
For any code that you compile directly using gcc/g++, you will need to add -m32 option to the compilation command line, simply edit your CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and LDFLAGS variables in your Makefile.
For any 3rd party code you might be using you must make sure when you build it to configure it for cross compilation. Run ./configure --help and see which option are available. In most cases you can provide your CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and LDFLAGS variables to the configure script. You also might need to add --build and --host to the configure script so you end up with something like
./configure CFLAGS=-m32 CXXFLAGS=-m32 LDFLAGS=-m32 --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu
If compilation fails this probably means that you need to install some 32 bit development packages on your 64 bit machine