I have a issue with the display_as.
I follow the example
$crud->display_as('lastName','Last Name');
$crud->display_as('firstName','First Name');
$crud->display_as('jobTitle','Job Title');
But the name does not change.
does this have something to do with the
application\libraries\Grocery_CRUD.php
where
protected $display_as = array();
Since it is protected and i have written my code in a public function?
I have been reading a lot but cant find anything about this.
grateful for any help
Thanks
public function employees_example()
{
$crud = new grocery_CRUD();
$crud->set_table('employees');
$crud->columns('lastName','firstName','email','jobTitle');
$crud->fields('lastName','firstName','extension','email','jobTitle');
$crud->display_as('lastName','Last Name');
$crud->display_as('firstName','First Name');
$crud->display_as('jobTitle','Job Title');
$output = $crud->render();
$this->_example_output($output);
}
but it does not change the display_as names
Well my friend, that protected variable declaration you saw in the code is the part of the code - the variable is protected, not the function. If you find in the code - the function is not protected.
It is hard to believe that the function ain't working unless you have done some personal alterations to the same. That is the base functionality that have existed for years and is working perfectly fine.
Only scenario where it might not work is .. in case you have specified your own set of fields / columns and that dose not include those fields and in that case it will not work.
For a proper answer - i will recommend you put up the code some place - the whole of the code for the method - and along with the table structure. That will help one identify as where and what is the issue and how can we reach to a proper solution.
Related
I'm trying to set up Two Factor Authentication on our app. Updated a user in AspNetUsers table and set it's TwoFactorEnabled value to 1 for testing.
While debugging, signInManager.PasswordSignInAsync return just "success", not "requires verification".
This is the line
signInStatus = await signInManager.PasswordSignInAsync(viewModel.Email, viewModel.Password, true, shouldLockout: false);
(Similar questions are generally answered as first value should be name instead of email but I don't think it's the issue. Login works correctly, for example if password is wrong it returns failure.)
I added the line below to Startup.Auth.cs too
app.UseTwoFactorSignInCookie(DefaultAuthenticationTypes.TwoFactorCookie, TimeSpan.FromMinutes(10));
I'm still able to work with what I have like this (though I don't want to)
if (signInStatus == SignInStatus.Success && user.TwoFactorEnabled == true)
{
//rest of code to be written
}
but this feels too makeshift of a solution and feels prone to many future errors. I'd prefer using Identity but I can't at the moment because of this problem.
It is obvious I'm doing something wrong or missing something but I don't know what. Thanks in advance.
I found my solution by copying the SignInManager code directly into mine and stepping through it, you can learn more about that here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/52357870/550975
SignInManager return RequiresVerification if :
dbo.ASpnetUsers has for user set to true TwoFactorEnabled and EmailConfirmed and user
email should be confirmed, email not be empty or null.
This is probably a stupid one but I have tried all the things I can think of. I am currently getting the below error on my client side script when I try and execute it.
Error: ReferenceError acvt_serialNumber_saveRecord is not defined
On the Script record in Netsuite I have set the saveRecord function as follows:
acvt_serialNumber_saveRecord
The code in the file is:
function acvt_serialNumber_saveRecord(){
/**do stuff */
}
I have reuploaded to code to make sure the right version was in NetSuite. I have added one character to both the script fn name and the fn name on the Script record (as a shot in the dark). I have seen in the Javascript console at runtime that the correct code is in there and I can see the exact function name (I did a ctrl+f for the "undefined" function in the code in the console to make sure spelling was all the same).
NOTHING has worked. I had this code working earlier, but the changes I made were not to this function at all.
Any help is appreciated
Another thing to check is the code that you recently changed. In particular, check for a hanging comma. IE:
var someObj = {
someProp:'somevalue',
};
The comma at the end of 'somevalue' will cause the script to fail, throwing 'undefined' errors.
Have you tried deleting the Script record in NetSuite and re-creating it?
Do you have any library included for that Client Script in netsuite ?
Provide a screen shot of your Netsuite script page
I encounter similar problem like this before, but it was because i called a function which is inside a library file
Thanks
I'd want to use a login page to access different firewalls, so I need to get information about the firewall I'm logging in.
In my controller I'd use
$this->container->get('security.context')->getToken()->getProviderKey()
but as an anonymous user I don't have access to getProviderKey method.
I could also parse
_security.xxx.target_path
to get xxx firewall but I'm looking for a more general solution if it exists at all.
Any idea?
As of symfony 3.2, you can now get the current firewall configuration using the following:
public function indexAction(Request $request)
{
$firewall = $this->container
->get('security.firewall.map')
->getFirewallConfig($request)
->getName();
}
Ref: http://symfony.com/blog/new-in-symfony-3-2-firewall-config-class-and-profiler
For Symfony 3.4 I wrote this to avoid referencing the non-public "security.firewall.map" service:
$firewallName = null;
if (($firewallContext = trim($request->attributes->get("_firewall_context", null))) && (false !== ($firewallContextNameSplit = strrpos($firewallContext, ".")))) {
$firewallName = substr($firewallContext, $firewallContextNameSplit + 1);
}
(Referencing "security.firewall.map" on 3.4 will throw an exception.)
Edit: This will not work in a custom exception controller function.
I was doing a little research on this myself recently so that I could send this information in an XACML request as part of the environment.
As far as I can tell from GitHub issues like this one:
https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/14435
There is currently no way to reliably get the information out of Symfony except the dirty compiler pass hack suggested on the linked issue. It does appear from the conversation on these issues, they are working on making this available, however, the status is still open, so we will have to be patient and wait for it to be provided.
#Adambean's answer is pretty elegant, but I'd write it as a one-liner:
$firewallName = array_slice(explode('.', trim($request->attributes->get('_firewall_context'))), -1)[0];
The difference is that $firewallName will always be a string (which may be empty).
Also, please note that this answer (like #Adambean's) doesn't work for a firewall with a dot in its name.
In Yii, is there a best way to make sure a user can only see and access their own data in Yii?
I thought an Admin should be able to see anything, but for now, I'll cross that bridge later.
Thanks
Look into scopes. Default scopes will be your friend:
http://www.yiiframework.com/doc/guide/1.1/en/database.ar#named-scopes
Because the defaultScopes array is inside of a function, you can also do conditional default scopes:
public function defaultScope()
{
$t=$this->getTableAlias(false,false);
if(Yii::app()->user->notAdmin()) {
return array(
'condition'=>"$t.<column_name> = :<columnName>",
'params'=>array(':<columnName>'=>Yii::app()->user->notAdmin),
);
}
else return array();
}
Edit: Note that this can get you in trouble down the road if you aren't careful. See this issue on the Yii site for more info.
There is no way Yii will do this for you, you'll do it on your own, but it's fairly straight forward.
You can consider scopes, or look into Relations and base them all on current user. For example, to get all posts by a user, you can do:
$posts = Post::model()->findAll(); //WRONG
$posts = Yii::app()->user->posts(); //RIGHT (Should define the relation in the User model)
Check out a solution which I wrote:
http://www.yiiframework.com/forum/index.php/topic/42735-restrict-users-to-only-editingdeleting-their-own-entries/page_gopid_237608#entry237608
I'm writing this in the forlorn hope that someone has already done something similar. I would have posted on drupal.org - but that site is about as user-friendly as a kick in the tomatoes.
I don't know about you, but when I develop I leave all my Drupal paths with open access, and then think about locking them down with access permissions at the end.
What would be be really useful is a module which parses all the paths available (by basically deconstructing the contents of the menu_router table) and then trying them (curl?) in turn whilst logged-in as a given user with a given set of roles.
The output would be a simple html page saying which paths are accessible and which are not.
I'm almost resigned to doing this myself, but if anyone knows of anything vaguely similar I'd be more than grateful to hear about it.
Cheers
UPDATE
Following a great idea from Yorirou, I knocked together a simple module to provide the output I was looking for.
You can get the code here: http://github.com/hymanroth/Path-Lockdown
My first attempt would be a function like this:
function check_paths($uid) {
global $user;
$origuser = $user;
$user = user_load($uid);
$paths = array();
foreach(array_keys(module_invoke_all('menu')) as $path) {
$result = menu_execute_active_handler($path);
if($result != MENU_ACCESS_DENIED && $result != MENU_NOT_FOUND) {
$paths[$path] = TRUE;
}
else {
$paths[$path] = FALSE;
}
}
$user = $origuser;
return $paths;
}
This is good for a first time, but it can't handle wildcard paths (% in the menu path). Loading all possible values can be an option, but it doesn't work in all cases. For instance, if you have %node for example, then you can use node_load, but if you have just %, then you have no idea what to load. Also, it is a common practice to omit the last argument, which is a variable, in order to correctly handle if no argument is given (eg. display all elements).
Also, it might be a good idea to integrate this solution with the Drupal's testing system.
I did a bit of research and wasn't able to find anything. Though I'm inclined to think there is a way to check path access through Drupal API as opposed to CURL - but please keep me updated on your progress / let me know if you would like help developing. This would a great addition to the Drupal modules.