There is an Excel add-in that allow users to make comments (not the traditional comments provided by Excel) for spreadsheet cells. The add-in memorizes all the cells that have comments in a workbook.
I am wondering where these information are actually stored. Are they stored in some hidden part of the workbook? Are they stored in the server of the add-in, then how are workbooks identified?
If you're referring to an add-in that somehow "remembers" a particular Range across document open/close sessions (e.g., how the Bing Maps add-in does it), it's using Bindings beneath the covers. Bindings -- which are conceptually a lot like the user-facing Named Ranges, but are invisible and are per add-in (so no name collision risk) -- are stored in the document, just like named ranges.
As Kim points out, this is often combined with Settings to create an add-in that both binds to some ranges (with a GUID-like name, for example), and stores some metadata keyed off of the binding name.
On a side note, if you want to reference ranges only for a specific duration of time while the add-in is running but you don't need these to persist in the document, you can instead use object-tracking. It is described in great detail in the book "Building Office Add-ins using Office.js", (disclaimer: I am author of said book), in a chapter called "Using objects outside the 'linear' Excel.run or Word.run flow (e.g., in a button-click callback,in a setInterval, etc.)".
Using the Office.js API, you can use the Settings object (Office.context.document.settings) to store name/value pairs in the host document. For details about how this works, see the documentation here: https://dev.office.com/reference/add-ins/shared/settings.
As the documentation indicates, the settings that you create/save using the Settings object are saved per add-in and per document, which matches the scenario that you've described. Regarding where settings data actually gets stored, check out the answer on this other Stack Overflow post -- which describes how/where settings data is persisted for a host document. (Note: I haven't personally verified that answer, so I'd suggest that you do some testing to verify/confirm its accuracy for your scenario.)
Related
With newly released Webi there's no way to manipulate reports with VBA like it was in DESKI era.
I'd like to know if there's a way for me to click a button with parameters in Excel sheet and get a report from the server?
I've been thinking of using the RESTful Web-services but it seems that there is a performance problem.
I also considered using a JAVA app in the middle using the SDK but it's not really satisfying as I add one layer.
Do you know if there's an other way to download a Webi report from and to Excel?
For this type of requirement, you'd normally use the OpenDocument feature. There is one thing that it won't do however, at least not for Webi documents, and that is deliver the output in Excel format (HTML and PDF are the two possible formats for Webi). In all fairness, the export to Excel option is only about two or three clicks away, but I can understand that this wouldn't be an ideal solution.
Another option is the Java SDK, which I would not recommend, as the ReBEAN SDK (the part of the Java SDK you need to interface with Webi documents) is deprecated and replaced by the REST SDK.
The REST SDK would be the way to go if the OpenDocument feature is not sufficient. Keep in mind that this would involve quite a few steps, each time sending a command to the WACS server and then decoding the answer. The steps would be:
Authenticate and get a logon token
Refresh the document (if necessary pass prompt values)
Export the document to Excel
Close the document
The REST interface is only supported on the WACS server, which should run on your BI4 server (unless you have a customised landscape). If it's slow, I would suggest looking into the root cause of this performance issue, instead of discarding the SDK altogether.
If you're going to use the REST interface, I would recommend opting for JSON to communicate through REST instead of XML. It's easier to read and parse.
A last option, which I wouldn't recommend, is LiveOffice. This is a separate product which allows you to embed contents from Webi documents into Office documents (most notably Excel). LiveOffice has always had its share of problems and has not received much love from SAP regarding much needed updates.
One final thought: the report will never appear in the same sheet, at least not without an additional amount of coding. Whatever SDK you end up choosing, you will always end up with an Excel file. If you want to show the results in the Excel file you started from, you'll need to code the steps to open the generated file, grab the contents and then copy those to your worksheet.
We have an application to track work orders (hundreds of thousands) built on an Oracle database. Data entry is cumbersome and report features non-existent. IT is inflexible. We do not get support from that end. Accordingly, users have created Excel "tools" to run queries and make sense of data using ADO or ODBC connections.
What we also need is a way to record comments on specific work order (WO) records and have those comments travel with those records somehow. There are multiple users using their own spreadsheets, all querying the same database.
I'm envisioning a junction-table approach, perhaps using Access, where some VBA could take a users comment from the row in the worksheet, capture the WO number, user id, date, and comment text and store it in an Access table. Those fields could then be retrieved by some more code. This would allow any user to see all comments by any other user related to a specific WO.
I'd greatly appreciate feedback ... on the practicality, preferable constructive, but brutally honest is ok too.
Much thanks,
Kevin
Apart from this being a horrible mess you could:
use SQL Server instead of access - you can get a free copy that will probably cater for your needs. Access will also work, but it is bodge. SQL server is more professional!
I would avoid doing data entry in excel. You could build a front end (possibly in Access with SQL Server backend) that allows data entry. You could add pretty simple code to all your workbooks, which will probably reference code that will be in an excel addin. The addin has code to simply open an access database, open a form and find the WO that the user was viewing in excel.
2a. Or you could use an excel addin with a data entry form, to do data entry, but beware managing the locking, refreshing and update of displayed data.
Creating excel addins is easy, (re-)distributing them is easy, access (or whatever front end you use) is designed to do record management (ie lock and update or lock and cancel or just view) etc.... Plus you want to avoid addinghte same or similar code to all your workbooks.
Each users workbook would have very simple code. Just to tell the addin what WO you want to operate on.
Do you have sharepoint? If so Access 2013 can deliver forms as webpages - very easily, so you might not even have to manage a front end access file.
Happier now?
For those that may stumble on this post, what we ended up doing was use VBA to store comments in a separate SQL database. Users double click the cell with the WO number to get an input form prompting for comments with options to add new, append or remove existing. Entries are passed to the SQL db and also to columns in the worksheet so users can see all the entries. Time stamp/Network ID provides when/who provided comment. Existing comments are fetched when users re-open file. Works great.
I'm trying to wrap my head around it. I've checked other questions and nothing seems to be too similar.
The Office 2013 development centre contains extensive DAO examples and states it is one of the easiest ways to work with an Access file (does not require an Access window) but DAO is a deprecated technology. (https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/ff834801.aspx)
I'm trying to write an Excel Add-in (eventual end point) that will grade Access assignments in .accdb format.
I'm can't just use ADODB to perform SQL queries to extract data, unless SQL can also do the following:
check a specified report has a specified title
check that specified tables, queries, forms, and reports exist
check specific fields in a table exist
check that specific fields have been set as the Primary Key
I also need to check that certain values exist in a table, but those I can solve with SQL.
So should I be using DAO or stick with ADODB? Remember, I'm using Excel, not programming in Access VBA.
The simplest way to work with excel tables is to link them in Access either manually or via the TransferSpreadsheet function in VBA. If you use a generic naming standard for the file names and tab names in Excel, you will not have to relink, rather you can replace the Excel file and the Access link will read the new file unless the layout has changed.
Once linked you can use the query-by-example tool to write your queries which also can be written into code (i.e. either embedded in the VBA [old school and not a best practice] or saved in an Access table then looked up and assigned to a variable for use with the CurrentDb.Execute strSQL, dbFailOnError command.
I suggest manually linking the first go round so you can manually define the individual column types vs. letting Access mess it up.
If you cannot use generic names and have to pick the file via a browse dialog, you can get a file browse function via Google to allow you to programatically link the file. (or you can rename it to a generic name which works even better)
So DAO vs. ADODB is moot from an Access perspective. I supported 50 databases with 70,000+ lines of code and dozens of Excel source files the past 4 years and never had to ponder the question.
Microsoft originally deprecated DAO in favor of ADO, but recently renamed DAO to Microsoft Access Engine (ACE) and is now pushing it as the preferred data access technology for Automation-supported environments (VBA, WSH etc.)
In general, in your scenario I don't think it makes much of a difference which one you use. I suggest you read through this.
I don't think it's possible to read table/query/field information via SQL. However, this can be done either with the DAO.TableDefs and DAO.QueryDefs collection, or the ADO.OpenSchema method.
RE: forms/reports - I don't know if it's possible to read form/report information via DAO or ADO even without SQL, as it is actually part of the UI objects, and not the data; unless we're talking about reading/parsing the system tables. You may have to open the database in a hidden Access instance and read the forms/reports that way.
I am new to VBA and this area. I would like to capture the document proporties like (document title, subject, author, team, manager,company etc...) while create or saving the document. This properties capture is must and i would like to implement to all the Word, Excel, Powerpoint users in my company.
How this can be possible. If I wrote a macro, is it possible to deploy all the MS-Office users. or a VB program will do?.
All i need is to make mandatory to input document properties for all the documents. these properties can also be fetched from a template file from the user machine.
Is this possible in VBA or any other easy ways to do it.
To force users to fill in all the properties before saving the document, you can create add-ins (one for each of Excel, Word and PowerPoint) that intercept the "before save" event and check the document properties. If the add-in detects some properties that have not been filled in, it can prompt the user and cancel the save.
The means by which you can create an add-in is similar (but not identical) across the 3 applications. You would of course also have to ensure that the add-ins were installed on all your users machines.
If you just want to be able to read (or modify) the properties, you can use the Office Document Property Reader to read and write properties of Office documents, without even needing Office installed. That works across all Office applications.
One of our customers has a problem that we cannot reproduce. We programmatically copy a document's properties to a destination file using SPFile.Properties. However, for some reason the file's properties do not match the meta data specified on the list the file is stored in.
Now, we can probably solve this by copying SPFile.Item.Properties (not tested yet), but I am just wondering under what circumstances SPFile.Properties is unequal to SPFile.Item.Properties.
Update: We have just received an update from our customer. Using SPFile.Item.Properties always returns the up to date information. However, we still would like to understand the original question.
There is a slight difference between SPFile.Properties and SPFile.Item fields and the first one is much, much slower to call.
You have most probably seen Microsoft Office document's "properties" window (this one - http://dradisframework.org/images/tutorial/custom_document_properties.png). These are the properties that are read when you access SPFile.Properties. Reading them is slow since there is some code infrastructure that parses the binary DOC file and finds the properties. (takes up to 30 or something milliseconds for every property access) See more here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.sharepoint.spfile.properties.aspx
In SharePoint, every item is an SPListItem and its field values (and I don't use the word "properties" on purpose here) are stored in Sharepoint's content database. So, when you access SPFile.Item.Properties, you actually look at the SPListItem to which the file is attached and look at its properties from SharePoint's content database.
What happens behind the scene, when you upload a file having some "Office properties" set, is that SharePoint copies them to same-named fields in SPListItem. (Some information about it here: http://weblogs.asp.net/bsimser/archive/2004/11/22/267846.aspx)
This is why these properties typically have the same value, BUT it only happens if SharePoint knows how to read metadata from your file and write them back. So, in case you put a .txt file in your SharePoint store, you will not get any SPFile.Properties back.
The user will always see the ListItem Properties and not the SPFile properties in a document library. So using the ListItem properties in the copy is the way to go.
I believe this issue is related to the Sharepoint property promotion/demotion feature which enables document properties to be embedded in the physical MSOffice file and travel with it to the client etc. This however is only supported currently for Office file types (to my knowledge).
Jonathan
Trying to find the "official documented" anything for sharepoint is pretty much undoable. :-D. The online docs suck, you are better of using blog entries etc.
P.S. I agree with Alex here. Although an SPFile never exists in a list without an accompanying SPListItem, the connection between the 2 can get corrupted (i.e. being able to edit the list item but the file is not openable). This to me indicates information about the 2 is stored in different locations in the content db. I have had this happen before.